Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2018

01-05-2018 | Classics in Abdominal Imaging

Bridging vessel sign

Authors: Venkatraman Indiran, J. Kokilavani

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

The appearance of multiple vascular channels connecting the uterus to an adjacent pelvic mass, as seen on imaging studies, is known as the “bridging vessel” or “bridging vascular” sign (Fig. 1). This is similar to the Howrah bridge which connects the cities of Howrah and Kolkata in India (Fig. 2). The “bridging vessel” sign was originally described on ultrasound with use of color Doppler imaging, but it may also be appreciated on CT or MR imaging [1, 2]. The sign helps in differentiating a mass of uterine origin, typically a subserosal fibroid, from other pelvic masses [2]. The demonstration of the feeding (bridging) vessels is best seen when the subserosal fibroid is larger than 3 cm in diameter [3]. The feeding arteries located at the interface between uterus and exophytic uterine mass may be either intervening vessels (vessels running parallel to the interface), crossing vessels (vessels running across the interface), or a mixture of types depending on their course [1, 3]. The sensitivity and specificity of ‘bridging vessel sign’ in identifying subserosal fibroids range from 90% to almost 100% [2, 4]. It should be noted that ovarian masses invading the uterus may rarely produce a falsely positive bridging vessel sign [4].
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kim JC, Kim SS, Park JY (2000) “Bridging vascular sign” in the MR diagnosis of exophytic uterine leiomyoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24(1):57–60CrossRefPubMed Kim JC, Kim SS, Park JY (2000) “Bridging vascular sign” in the MR diagnosis of exophytic uterine leiomyoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24(1):57–60CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lee JH, Lee JH, Sohn CH, Woo Seung K, Kim JS (2002) Significance of ‘Bridging vessel sign’ on color Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of uterine subserosal leiomyoma. J Korean Soc Med Ultrasound 21(2):1113–1119 Lee JH, Lee JH, Sohn CH, Woo Seung K, Kim JS (2002) Significance of ‘Bridging vessel sign’ on color Doppler ultrasound in diagnosis of uterine subserosal leiomyoma. J Korean Soc Med Ultrasound 21(2):1113–1119
3.
go back to reference Torashima M, Yamashita Y, Matsuno Y, et al. (1998) The value of detection of flow voids between the uterus and the leiomyoma with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 8(2):427–431CrossRefPubMed Torashima M, Yamashita Y, Matsuno Y, et al. (1998) The value of detection of flow voids between the uterus and the leiomyoma with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 8(2):427–431CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Kim SH, Sim JS, Seong CK (2001) Interface vessels on color/power Doppler US and MRI: a clue to differentiate subserosal uterine myomas from extrauterine tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25(1):36–42CrossRefPubMed Kim SH, Sim JS, Seong CK (2001) Interface vessels on color/power Doppler US and MRI: a clue to differentiate subserosal uterine myomas from extrauterine tumors. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25(1):36–42CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Bridging vessel sign
Authors
Venkatraman Indiran
J. Kokilavani
Publication date
01-05-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1260-y

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Abdominal Radiology 5/2018 Go to the issue