Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2018

01-03-2018

Variable refocusing flip angle single-shot fast spin echo imaging of liver lesions: increased speed and lesion contrast

Authors: Robert M. Hicks, Andreas M. Loening, Michael A. Ohliger, Shreyas S. Vasanawala, Thomas A. Hope

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate acquisition time and clinical image quality of a variable refocusing flip angle (vrf) single-shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) sequence in comparison with a conventional SSFSE sequence for imaging of liver lesions in patients undergoing whole-body PET/MRI for oncologic staging.

Methods

A vrfSSFSE sequence was acquired in 43 patients with known pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors undergoing 68Ga-DOTA-TOC PET on a simultaneous time-of-flight 3.0T PET/MRI. Liver lesions ≥1.5 cm with radionucleotide uptake were analyzed. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were measured, and four blinded radiologists assessed overall image quality. Differences in repetition time and CNR were assessed using a paired Student’s t test with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Inter-reader variability was assessed with Fleiss’ kappa statistic.

Results

53 eligible lesions in 27 patients were included for analysis. vrfSSFSE demonstrated higher mean lesion CNR compared to SSFSE (9.9 ± 4.1 vs. 6.7 ± 4.1, p < 0.001). Mean repetition time (TR) was 679 ± 97 ms for the vrfSSFSE sequence compared to 1139 ± 106 ms for SSFSE (p < 0.0001), corresponding to a 1.7-fold decrease in acquisition time. Overall quality of liver lesion and common bile duct images with the vrfSSFSE sequence was graded as superior than or equivalent to the SSFSE sequence for 59% and 67% of patients, respectively.

Conclusions

Compared to conventional SSFSE, vrfSSFSE resulted in improved lesion contrast on simultaneous PET/MRI in patients with liver metastases. Due to decreased SAR demands, vrfSSFSE significantly decreased TR, allowing coverage of the entire liver in a single twenty-second breath hold. This may have important clinical implications in the setting of PET/MRI, where scan time is limited by the necessity of whole-body image acquisition in addition to bed specific imaging.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hicks RM, Yee J, Ohliger MA, et al. (2016) Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and T2-weighted single shot fast spin-echo: implications for LI-RADS characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Magn Reson Imaging 34(7):915–921CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hicks RM, Yee J, Ohliger MA, et al. (2016) Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and T2-weighted single shot fast spin-echo: implications for LI-RADS characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Magn Reson Imaging 34(7):915–921CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Reiner CS, Stolzmann P, Husmann L, et al. (2014) Protocol requirements and diagnostic value of PET/MR imaging for liver metastasis detection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41(4):649–658CrossRefPubMed Reiner CS, Stolzmann P, Husmann L, et al. (2014) Protocol requirements and diagnostic value of PET/MR imaging for liver metastasis detection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 41(4):649–658CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Vitellas KM, Keogan MT, Spritzer CE, Nelson RC. (2000) MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Radiographics 20(4):939–957; quiz 1107–1108, 12. Vitellas KM, Keogan MT, Spritzer CE, Nelson RC. (2000) MR cholangiopancreatography of bile and pancreatic duct abnormalities with emphasis on the single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Radiographics 20(4):939–957; quiz 1107–1108, 12.
4.
go back to reference Merkle EM, Dale BM (2006) Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1524–1532CrossRefPubMed Merkle EM, Dale BM (2006) Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186(6):1524–1532CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Yang RK, Roth CG, Ward RJ, et al. (2010) Optimizing abdominal MR imaging: approaches to common problems. Radiographics 30(1):185–199CrossRefPubMed Yang RK, Roth CG, Ward RJ, et al. (2010) Optimizing abdominal MR imaging: approaches to common problems. Radiographics 30(1):185–199CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Bhosale P, Ma J, Choi H (2009) Utility of the FIESTA pulse sequence in body oncologic imaging: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(6 Suppl):S83–93 (Quiz S4–7). Bhosale P, Ma J, Choi H (2009) Utility of the FIESTA pulse sequence in body oncologic imaging: review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(6 Suppl):S83–93 (Quiz S4–7).
7.
go back to reference Semelka RC, Kelekis NL, Thomasson D, et al. (1996) HASTE MR imaging: description of technique and preliminary results in the abdomen. J Magn Reson Imaging 6(4):698–699CrossRefPubMed Semelka RC, Kelekis NL, Thomasson D, et al. (1996) HASTE MR imaging: description of technique and preliminary results in the abdomen. J Magn Reson Imaging 6(4):698–699CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Fowler KJ, McConathy J, Narra VR (2014) Whole-body simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET)-MR: optimization and adaptation of MRI sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 39(2):259–268CrossRefPubMed Fowler KJ, McConathy J, Narra VR (2014) Whole-body simultaneous positron emission tomography (PET)-MR: optimization and adaptation of MRI sequences. J Magn Reson Imaging 39(2):259–268CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sotoudeh H, Sharma A, Fowler KJ, et al. (2016) Clinical application of PET/MRI in oncology. J Magn Reson Imaging 44(2):265–276CrossRefPubMed Sotoudeh H, Sharma A, Fowler KJ, et al. (2016) Clinical application of PET/MRI in oncology. J Magn Reson Imaging 44(2):265–276CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference von Schulthess GK, Veit-Haibach P (2014) Workflow considerations in PET/MR imaging. J Nucl Med 55(Supplement 2):19S–24SCrossRef von Schulthess GK, Veit-Haibach P (2014) Workflow considerations in PET/MR imaging. J Nucl Med 55(Supplement 2):19S–24SCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Busse RF, Brau AC, Vu A, et al. (2008) Effects of refocusing flip angle modulation and view ordering in 3D fast spin echo. Magn Reson Med 60(3):640–649CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Busse RF, Brau AC, Vu A, et al. (2008) Effects of refocusing flip angle modulation and view ordering in 3D fast spin echo. Magn Reson Med 60(3):640–649CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Hennig J, Weigel M, Scheffler K (2003) Multiecho sequences with variable refocusing flip angles: optimization of signal behavior using smooth transitions between pseudo steady states (TRAPS). Magn Reson Med 49(3):527–535CrossRefPubMed Hennig J, Weigel M, Scheffler K (2003) Multiecho sequences with variable refocusing flip angles: optimization of signal behavior using smooth transitions between pseudo steady states (TRAPS). Magn Reson Med 49(3):527–535CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Loening AM, Litwiller DV, Saranathan M, Vasanawala SS (2017) Increased speed and image quality for pelvic single-shot fast spin-echo imaging with variable refocusing flip angles and full-fourier acquisition. Radiology 282(2):561–568CrossRefPubMed Loening AM, Litwiller DV, Saranathan M, Vasanawala SS (2017) Increased speed and image quality for pelvic single-shot fast spin-echo imaging with variable refocusing flip angles and full-fourier acquisition. Radiology 282(2):561–568CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Loening AM, Saranathan M, Ruangwattanapaisarn N, et al. (2015) Increased speed and image quality in single-shot fast spin echo imaging via variable refocusing flip angles. J Magn Reson Imaging 42(6):1747–1758CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Loening AM, Saranathan M, Ruangwattanapaisarn N, et al. (2015) Increased speed and image quality in single-shot fast spin echo imaging via variable refocusing flip angles. J Magn Reson Imaging 42(6):1747–1758CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Levin CS, Maramraju SH, Khalighi MM, et al. (2016) Design features and mutual compatibility studies of the time-of-flight PET capable GE SIGNA PET/MR system. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(8):1907–1914CrossRefPubMed Levin CS, Maramraju SH, Khalighi MM, et al. (2016) Design features and mutual compatibility studies of the time-of-flight PET capable GE SIGNA PET/MR system. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35(8):1907–1914CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hope TA, Pampaloni MH, Nakakura E, et al. (2015) Simultaneous (68)Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/MRI with gadoxetate disodium in patients with neuroendocrine tumor. Abdom Imaging. 40(6):1432–1440CrossRefPubMed Hope TA, Pampaloni MH, Nakakura E, et al. (2015) Simultaneous (68)Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/MRI with gadoxetate disodium in patients with neuroendocrine tumor. Abdom Imaging. 40(6):1432–1440CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Hope TA, Verdin EF, Bergsland EK, et al. (2015) Correcting for respiratory motion in liver PET/MRI: preliminary evaluation of the utility of bellows and navigated hepatobiliary phase imaging. EJNMMI Phys 2(1):21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hope TA, Verdin EF, Bergsland EK, et al. (2015) Correcting for respiratory motion in liver PET/MRI: preliminary evaluation of the utility of bellows and navigated hepatobiliary phase imaging. EJNMMI Phys 2(1):21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Busse RF, Hariharan H, Vu A, Brittain JH (2006) Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast. Magn Reson Med 55(5):1030–1037CrossRefPubMed Busse RF, Hariharan H, Vu A, Brittain JH (2006) Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast. Magn Reson Med 55(5):1030–1037CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Coenegrachts K, Delanote J, Ter Beek L, et al. (2007) Improved focal liver lesion detection: comparison of single-shot diffusion-weighted echoplanar and single-shot T2 weighted turbo spin echo techniques. Br J Radiol 80(955):524–531CrossRefPubMed Coenegrachts K, Delanote J, Ter Beek L, et al. (2007) Improved focal liver lesion detection: comparison of single-shot diffusion-weighted echoplanar and single-shot T2 weighted turbo spin echo techniques. Br J Radiol 80(955):524–531CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hussain SM, De Becker J, Hop WC, et al. (2005) Can a single-shot black-blood T2-weighted spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence with sensitivity encoding replace the respiratory-triggered turbo spin-echo sequence for the liver? An optimization and feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 21(3):219–229CrossRefPubMed Hussain SM, De Becker J, Hop WC, et al. (2005) Can a single-shot black-blood T2-weighted spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence with sensitivity encoding replace the respiratory-triggered turbo spin-echo sequence for the liver? An optimization and feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 21(3):219–229CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Phelps AS, Naeger DM, Courtier JL, et al. (2015) Pairwise comparison versus Likert scale for biomedical image assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204(1):8–14CrossRefPubMed Phelps AS, Naeger DM, Courtier JL, et al. (2015) Pairwise comparison versus Likert scale for biomedical image assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204(1):8–14CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Goshima S, et al. (2006) Imaging liver metastases: review and update. Eur J Radiol 58(2):217–228CrossRefPubMed Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Goshima S, et al. (2006) Imaging liver metastases: review and update. Eur J Radiol 58(2):217–228CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Ruangwattanapaisarn N, Loening AM, Saranathan M, et al. (2015) Faster pediatric 3-T abdominal magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between conventional and variable refocusing flip-angle single-shot fast spin-echo sequences. Pediatr Radiol 45(6):847–854CrossRefPubMed Ruangwattanapaisarn N, Loening AM, Saranathan M, et al. (2015) Faster pediatric 3-T abdominal magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between conventional and variable refocusing flip-angle single-shot fast spin-echo sequences. Pediatr Radiol 45(6):847–854CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Adamic P, Babiy V, Janicki R, et al. (2009) Pairwise comparisons and visual perceptions of equal area polygons. Percept Mot Skills 108(1):37–42CrossRefPubMed Adamic P, Babiy V, Janicki R, et al. (2009) Pairwise comparisons and visual perceptions of equal area polygons. Percept Mot Skills 108(1):37–42CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Good WF, Gur D, Feist JH, et al. (1994) Subjective and objective assessment of image quality–a comparison. J Digit Imaging 7(2):77–78CrossRefPubMed Good WF, Gur D, Feist JH, et al. (1994) Subjective and objective assessment of image quality–a comparison. J Digit Imaging 7(2):77–78CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Gur D, Rubin DA, Kart BH, et al. (1997) Forced choice and ordinal discrete rating assessment of image quality: a comparison. J Digit Imaging 10(3):103–107CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gur D, Rubin DA, Kart BH, et al. (1997) Forced choice and ordinal discrete rating assessment of image quality: a comparison. J Digit Imaging 10(3):103–107CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Albaum G (1997) The Likert scale revisited: an alternate version. J Mark Res Soc 39(2):331–348 Albaum G (1997) The Likert scale revisited: an alternate version. J Mark Res Soc 39(2):331–348
29.
30.
go back to reference Clegg F (1998) Simple statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Clegg F (1998) Simple statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
32.
go back to reference Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB, et al. (2008) Influence of multichannel combination, parallel imaging and other reconstruction techniques on MRI noise characteristics. Magn Reson Imaging 26(6):754–762CrossRefPubMed Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB, et al. (2008) Influence of multichannel combination, parallel imaging and other reconstruction techniques on MRI noise characteristics. Magn Reson Imaging 26(6):754–762CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Variable refocusing flip angle single-shot fast spin echo imaging of liver lesions: increased speed and lesion contrast
Authors
Robert M. Hicks
Andreas M. Loening
Michael A. Ohliger
Shreyas S. Vasanawala
Thomas A. Hope
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1252-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Abdominal Radiology 3/2018 Go to the issue