Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 10/2017

01-10-2017

MDCT of the liver in obese patients: evaluation of a different method to optimize iodine dose

Authors: Marco Rengo, Davide Bellini, Rita Businaro, Damiano Caruso, Gabriella Azzara, Domenico De Santis, Simona Picchia, Tommaso Biondi, Marwen Eid, Dario Boschiero, Andrea Laghi

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To prospectively compare two different approaches for estimating the amount of intravenous contrast media (CM) needed for multiphasic MDCT of the liver in obese patients.

Materials and methods

This single-center, HIPAA-compliant prospective study was approved by our Institutional Review Board. Ninety-six patients (55 men, 41 women), with a total of 42 hypovascular liver lesions, underwent MDCT of the liver. The amount of contrast medium injected was computed according to the patient’s lean body weight which was estimated using either a bioimpedance device (Group A) or the James formula (Group B). The following variables were compared between the two groups: the amount of contrast medium injected (in grams of Iodine, gI), the contrast enhancement index (CEI) and the lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio.

Results

Protocols A and B yielded significant differences in the amount of CM injected (mean values 41.9 ± 4.41 gI in Group A vs. 35.9 ± 5.75 gI in Group B; P = 0.021). The mean CEI value and lesion-to-liver contrast-to-noise ratio measured on the portal phase were significantly higher with protocol A than with protocol B (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Our study shows that the adoption of a bioimpedance device in obese patients improves liver parenchymal enhancement and lesion conspicuity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference van Kessel CS, Buckens CF, van den Bosch MA, et al. (2012) Preoperative imaging of colorectal liver metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19(9):2805–2813CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Kessel CS, Buckens CF, van den Bosch MA, et al. (2012) Preoperative imaging of colorectal liver metastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19(9):2805–2813CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Goshima S, et al. (2006) Imaging liver metastases: review and update. Eur J Radiol 58(2):217–228CrossRefPubMed Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Goshima S, et al. (2006) Imaging liver metastases: review and update. Eur J Radiol 58(2):217–228CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bae KT (2010) Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology 256(1):32–61CrossRefPubMed Bae KT (2010) Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches. Radiology 256(1):32–61CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Awai K, Takada K, Onishi H, et al. (2002) Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 224(3):757–763CrossRefPubMed Awai K, Takada K, Onishi H, et al. (2002) Aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast: analysis of the effect of different concentrations of contrast material at multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 224(3):757–763CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL et al. (1995) Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. Radiology 195(2):353–357CrossRefPubMed Heiken JP, Brink JA, McClennan BL et al. (1995) Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. Radiology 195(2):353–357CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Yamashita Y, Komohara Y, Takahashi M, et al. (2000) Abdominal helical CT: evaluation of optimal doses of intravenous contrast material–a prospective randomized study. Radiology 216(3):718–723CrossRefPubMed Yamashita Y, Komohara Y, Takahashi M, et al. (2000) Abdominal helical CT: evaluation of optimal doses of intravenous contrast material–a prospective randomized study. Radiology 216(3):718–723CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ho LM, Nelson RC, Delong DM (2007) Determining contrast medium dose and rate on basis of lean body weight: does this strategy improve patient-to-patient uniformity of hepatic enhancement during multi-detector row CT? Radiology 243(2):431–437CrossRefPubMed Ho LM, Nelson RC, Delong DM (2007) Determining contrast medium dose and rate on basis of lean body weight: does this strategy improve patient-to-patient uniformity of hepatic enhancement during multi-detector row CT? Radiology 243(2):431–437CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rengo M, Bellini D, De Cecco CN, et al. (2011) The optimal contrast media policy in CT of the liver. Part I: Technical notes. Acta Radiol 52(5):467–472CrossRefPubMed Rengo M, Bellini D, De Cecco CN, et al. (2011) The optimal contrast media policy in CT of the liver. Part I: Technical notes. Acta Radiol 52(5):467–472CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, et al. (2011) Aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector CT: evaluation of optimal iodine dose determined by lean body weight. Eur J Radiol 80(3):e273–e277CrossRefPubMed Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, et al. (2011) Aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector CT: evaluation of optimal iodine dose determined by lean body weight. Eur J Radiol 80(3):e273–e277CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Awai K, Kanematsu M, Kim T, et al. (2016) The optimal body size index with which to determine iodine dose for hepatic dynamic CT: a prospective multicenter study. Radiology 278(3):773–781CrossRefPubMed Awai K, Kanematsu M, Kim T, et al. (2016) The optimal body size index with which to determine iodine dose for hepatic dynamic CT: a prospective multicenter study. Radiology 278(3):773–781CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Boer P (1984) Estimated lean body mass as an index for normalization of body fluid volumes in humans. Am J Physiol 247(4 Pt 2):F632–F636PubMed Boer P (1984) Estimated lean body mass as an index for normalization of body fluid volumes in humans. Am J Physiol 247(4 Pt 2):F632–F636PubMed
12.
go back to reference Nyman U (2016) James Lean body weight formula is not appropriate for determining ct contrast media dose in patients with high body mass index. Radiology 278(3):956–957CrossRefPubMed Nyman U (2016) James Lean body weight formula is not appropriate for determining ct contrast media dose in patients with high body mass index. Radiology 278(3):956–957CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA (1998) Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate–pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Radiology 206(2):455–464CrossRefPubMed Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA (1998) Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate–pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model. Radiology 206(2):455–464CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rivosecchi F, Caruso D, Rengo, M, et al. (2017) Evaluation of different methods to optimise contrast media amount in abdominal CT of obese patients. Insights Imaging 8(Suppl 1):S335 Rivosecchi F, Caruso D, Rengo, M, et al. (2017) Evaluation of different methods to optimise contrast media amount in abdominal CT of obese patients. Insights Imaging 8(Suppl 1):S335
15.
go back to reference Buffa R, Mereu E, Comandini O, et al. (2014) Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) for the assessment of two-compartment body composition. Eur J Clin Nutr 68(11):1234–1240CrossRefPubMed Buffa R, Mereu E, Comandini O, et al. (2014) Bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA) for the assessment of two-compartment body composition. Eur J Clin Nutr 68(11):1234–1240CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Segal KR, Van Loan M, Fitzgerald PI, et al. (1988) Lean body mass estimation by bioelectrical impedance analysis: a four-site cross-validation study. Am J Clin Nutr 47(1):7–14PubMed Segal KR, Van Loan M, Fitzgerald PI, et al. (1988) Lean body mass estimation by bioelectrical impedance analysis: a four-site cross-validation study. Am J Clin Nutr 47(1):7–14PubMed
17.
go back to reference James WPT (1976) Research on obesity. A Report of the DHSSIMRC Group. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. James WPT (1976) Research on obesity. A Report of the DHSSIMRC Group. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
18.
go back to reference Furuta A, Ito K, Fujita T, et al. (2004) Hepatic enhancement in multiphasic contrast-enhanced MDCT: comparison of high- and low-iodine-concentration contrast medium in same patients with chronic liver disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(1):157–162CrossRefPubMed Furuta A, Ito K, Fujita T, et al. (2004) Hepatic enhancement in multiphasic contrast-enhanced MDCT: comparison of high- and low-iodine-concentration contrast medium in same patients with chronic liver disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(1):157–162CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Bae KT, Shah AJ, Shang SS, et al. (2008) Aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement with abdominal 64-MDCT in pediatric patients: effect of body weight and iodine dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(5):1589–1594CrossRefPubMed Bae KT, Shah AJ, Shang SS, et al. (2008) Aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement with abdominal 64-MDCT in pediatric patients: effect of body weight and iodine dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191(5):1589–1594CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
MDCT of the liver in obese patients: evaluation of a different method to optimize iodine dose
Authors
Marco Rengo
Davide Bellini
Rita Businaro
Damiano Caruso
Gabriella Azzara
Domenico De Santis
Simona Picchia
Tommaso Biondi
Marwen Eid
Dario Boschiero
Andrea Laghi
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1156-x

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Abdominal Radiology 10/2017 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

‘Frosted liver’ appearance