Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 10/2017

01-10-2017

Thirty-day emergency room visits and hospital admissions after outpatient non-vascular image-guided procedures

Authors: Quang Nguyen, Sahil V. Mehta, Jieming Fang, Robert Sheiman, Robert Kane, Muneeb Ahmed, Ammar Sarwar, Bettina Siewert, Olga R. Brook

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the rate of post-procedure emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions following outpatient non-vascular image-guided interventions performed under moderate sedation and to identify common and preventable causes of emergency department visits and hospital admissions.

Materials and methods

Institutional review board approval was acquired for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study with waiver of informed consent. 1426 consecutive patients undergoing 1512 outpatient image-guided procedures under moderate sedation from November 2012 to August 2014 were included. The average patient age was 57.2 ± 15.2 years, and 602 (42%) patients were women. Major procedure categories included ultrasound-guided liver biopsies, ultrasound-guided kidney biopsies, and CT-guided lung biopsies/fiducial placement. Procedure details and medical follow-up within and after 30 days of the procedure were analyzed.

Results

A total of 168 (11.8%) patients were admitted to the hospital within 30 days of the procedure, with 29 of the admissions (17.3% of total admissions and 1.9% of total procedures) being procedure related. The most common procedure-related complication that required admission was hemorrhage (10/29, 34.5% of procedure-related admissions, 6.0% of total admissions, and 0.7% of total procedures), followed by pneumothorax (9/29, 31%, 5.4%, 0.6%), infection (4/29, 13.8%, 2.4%, 0.3%), and pain (3/29, 10.3%, 1.8%, 0.2%). Eighteen (62.1%) procedure-related admissions were immediately indicated. Thirty patients visited the ED and were subsequently discharged without admission with eight of the visits being procedure related (8/1512, 0.5%). All the procedure-related ED visits were due to pain. There were two deaths (2/1512, 0.1%) related to procedures, one from a thromboembolic event and another from post-biopsy hemorrhage.

Conclusion

Outpatient non-vascular image-guided procedures result in a 30-day 1.9% hospital admission, 30-day 0.5% emergency room visit, and 30-day 0.1% mortality rate.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA (2009) Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. New Engl J Med 360(14):1418–1428CrossRefPubMed Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA (2009) Rehospitalizations among patients in the Medicare fee-for-service program. New Engl J Med 360(14):1418–1428CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Vaduganathan M, Bonow RO, Gheorghiade M (2013) Thirty-day readmissions: the clock is ticking. JAMA 309(4):345–346CrossRefPubMed Vaduganathan M, Bonow RO, Gheorghiade M (2013) Thirty-day readmissions: the clock is ticking. JAMA 309(4):345–346CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Berenson RA, Paulua RA, Kalman NS (2012) Medicare’s readmissions-reduction program—a positive alternative. N Engl. J Med 366(15):1364–1366CrossRefPubMed Berenson RA, Paulua RA, Kalman NS (2012) Medicare’s readmissions-reduction program—a positive alternative. N Engl. J Med 366(15):1364–1366CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Brown JR, Sox HC, Goodman DC (2014) Financial incentives to improve quality: skating to the puck or avoiding the penalty box? JAMA 311(10):1009–1010CrossRefPubMed Brown JR, Sox HC, Goodman DC (2014) Financial incentives to improve quality: skating to the puck or avoiding the penalty box? JAMA 311(10):1009–1010CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Prahbhakar AM, Harvey HB, Oklu R (2013) Thirty-day hospital re-admissions: a metric that matters. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 24(10):1509–1511CrossRef Prahbhakar AM, Harvey HB, Oklu R (2013) Thirty-day hospital re-admissions: a metric that matters. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 24(10):1509–1511CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ashton CM, Del Junco DJ, Souchek J, et al. (1997) The association between the quality of inpatient care and early readmission: a meta-analysis of the evidence. Med Care 35:1044–1059CrossRefPubMed Ashton CM, Del Junco DJ, Souchek J, et al. (1997) The association between the quality of inpatient care and early readmission: a meta-analysis of the evidence. Med Care 35:1044–1059CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Kothary N, Heit JJ, Louie JD, et al. (2009) Safety and efficacy of percutaneous fiducial marker implantation for image-guided radiation therapy. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 20(2):235–239CrossRef Kothary N, Heit JJ, Louie JD, et al. (2009) Safety and efficacy of percutaneous fiducial marker implantation for image-guided radiation therapy. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 20(2):235–239CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bhagat N, Fidelman N, Durack JC, et al. (2010) Complications associated with the percutaneous insertion of fiducial markers in the thorax. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33(6):1186–1191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bhagat N, Fidelman N, Durack JC, et al. (2010) Complications associated with the percutaneous insertion of fiducial markers in the thorax. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33(6):1186–1191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Nolsoe C, Nielsen L, Torp-Pedersen S, Holm HH (1990) Major complications and deaths due to interventional ultrasonography: a review of 8000 cases. J Clin Ultrasound 18(3):179–184CrossRefPubMed Nolsoe C, Nielsen L, Torp-Pedersen S, Holm HH (1990) Major complications and deaths due to interventional ultrasonography: a review of 8000 cases. J Clin Ultrasound 18(3):179–184CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Geraghty PR, Kee ST, McFarlane G, et al. (2003) CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of pulmonary nodules: needle size and pneumothorax rate. Radiology 229(2):475–481CrossRefPubMed Geraghty PR, Kee ST, McFarlane G, et al. (2003) CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of pulmonary nodules: needle size and pneumothorax rate. Radiology 229(2):475–481CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Volpe A, Kachura JR, Geddie WR, et al. (2007) Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy. J Urol 178(2):379–386CrossRefPubMed Volpe A, Kachura JR, Geddie WR, et al. (2007) Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy. J Urol 178(2):379–386CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Welch TJ, Sheedy PF 2nd, Johnson CD, Johnson CM, Stephens DH (1989) CT-guided biopsy: prospective analysis of 1000 procedures. Radiology 171(2):493–496CrossRefPubMed Welch TJ, Sheedy PF 2nd, Johnson CD, Johnson CM, Stephens DH (1989) CT-guided biopsy: prospective analysis of 1000 procedures. Radiology 171(2):493–496CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Olsen JW, Barger RL Jr, Doshi SK (2013) Moderate sedation: what radiologists need to know. AJR 201(5):941–946CrossRefPubMed Olsen JW, Barger RL Jr, Doshi SK (2013) Moderate sedation: what radiologists need to know. AJR 201(5):941–946CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Patatas K, Koukkoulli A (2009) The use of sedation in the radiology department. Clin Radiol 64(7):655–663CrossRefPubMed Patatas K, Koukkoulli A (2009) The use of sedation in the radiology department. Clin Radiol 64(7):655–663CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Martin ML, Lennox PH (2003) Sedation and analgesia in the interventional radiology department. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 14(9):1119–1128CrossRef Martin ML, Lennox PH (2003) Sedation and analgesia in the interventional radiology department. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 14(9):1119–1128CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Eichhord B, Henzler D, Murphy MF (2010) Standardizing care and monitoring for anesthesia or procedural sedation delivered outside the operating room. Cur Opin Anesthesiol 23(4):494–499CrossRef Eichhord B, Henzler D, Murphy MF (2010) Standardizing care and monitoring for anesthesia or procedural sedation delivered outside the operating room. Cur Opin Anesthesiol 23(4):494–499CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF, Kundu S, et al. (2010) Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 21(7):969–975CrossRef Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF, Kundu S, et al. (2010) Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 21(7):969–975CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B, et al. (2012) Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 23(6):727–736CrossRef Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B, et al. (2012) Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 23(6):727–736CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cardella JF, Bakal CW, Bertino RE, et al. (2003) Quality improvement guidelines for image-guided percutaneous biopsy in adults. JVIR 14(9):S227–S230PubMed Cardella JF, Bakal CW, Bertino RE, et al. (2003) Quality improvement guidelines for image-guided percutaneous biopsy in adults. JVIR 14(9):S227–S230PubMed
20.
21.
go back to reference Charalel RA, Mcginty G, Brant-Zawadzki M, et al. (2015) Interventional radiology delivers high-value health care and is an Imaging 3.0 vanguard. JACR 12(5):501–506PubMed Charalel RA, Mcginty G, Brant-Zawadzki M, et al. (2015) Interventional radiology delivers high-value health care and is an Imaging 3.0 vanguard. JACR 12(5):501–506PubMed
22.
23.
go back to reference Norbash A, Bluth E, Lee CI, et al. (2014) Radiologist manpower considerations and imaging 3.0: effort planning for value-based imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 11(10):953–958CrossRefPubMed Norbash A, Bluth E, Lee CI, et al. (2014) Radiologist manpower considerations and imaging 3.0: effort planning for value-based imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 11(10):953–958CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Baerlocher MO, Myers A, Asch M (2011) Managing anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy before interventional radiology procedures. Can Med Assoc J 183(2):223CrossRef Baerlocher MO, Myers A, Asch M (2011) Managing anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy before interventional radiology procedures. Can Med Assoc J 183(2):223CrossRef
25.
26.
go back to reference DiPasco PJ, Misra S, Koniaris LG, Moffat FL (2012) The thrombophilic state in cancer part II: cancer outcomes, occult malignancy, and cancer suppression. J Surg Oncol 106(4):517–523CrossRefPubMed DiPasco PJ, Misra S, Koniaris LG, Moffat FL (2012) The thrombophilic state in cancer part II: cancer outcomes, occult malignancy, and cancer suppression. J Surg Oncol 106(4):517–523CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Atwall TD, Smith RL, Hesley GK, et al. (2010) Incidence of bleeding after 15,181 percutaneous biopsies and the role of aspirin. AJR 194:784–789CrossRef Atwall TD, Smith RL, Hesley GK, et al. (2010) Incidence of bleeding after 15,181 percutaneous biopsies and the role of aspirin. AJR 194:784–789CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Thorson CM, Van Haren RM, Ryan ML, et al. (2014) Pre-existing hypercoagulability in patients undergoing potentially curative cancer resection. Surgery 155(1):134–144CrossRefPubMed Thorson CM, Van Haren RM, Ryan ML, et al. (2014) Pre-existing hypercoagulability in patients undergoing potentially curative cancer resection. Surgery 155(1):134–144CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Cordell WH, Keene KK, Giles BK, et al. (2002) The high prevalence of pain in emergency medical care. AJEM 20(3):165–169CrossRef Cordell WH, Keene KK, Giles BK, et al. (2002) The high prevalence of pain in emergency medical care. AJEM 20(3):165–169CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Guru V, Dublinksy I (2000) The patient vs. caregiver perception of acute pain in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 18(1):7–12CrossRefPubMed Guru V, Dublinksy I (2000) The patient vs. caregiver perception of acute pain in the emergency department. J Emerg Med 18(1):7–12CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Nasir K, Lin Z, Bueno H, et al. (2010) Is same-hospital readmission rate a good surrogate for all-hospital readmission rate? Med Care 48(5):477–481CrossRefPubMed Nasir K, Lin Z, Bueno H, et al. (2010) Is same-hospital readmission rate a good surrogate for all-hospital readmission rate? Med Care 48(5):477–481CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Thirty-day emergency room visits and hospital admissions after outpatient non-vascular image-guided procedures
Authors
Quang Nguyen
Sahil V. Mehta
Jieming Fang
Robert Sheiman
Robert Kane
Muneeb Ahmed
Ammar Sarwar
Bettina Siewert
Olga R. Brook
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1153-0

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

Abdominal Radiology 10/2017 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

Rigler sign