Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 1/2017

01-01-2017

Prostate cancer bone metastases on staging prostate MRI: prevalence and clinical features associated with their diagnosis

Authors: Hebert Alberto Vargas, Rachel Schor-Bardach, Niamh Long, Anna N. Kirzner, Jane D. Cunningham, Debra A. Goldman, Chaya S. Moskowitz, Ramon E. Sosa, Evis Sala, David M. Panicek, Hedvig Hricak

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Bone lesions on prostate MRI often raise concern about metastases. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of bone metastases on staging prostate MRI and evaluate associations between their MRI features and clinical/pathologic characteristics.

Methods

Retrospective, IRB-approved study of 3765 patients undergoing prostate MRI for newly diagnosed PCa between 2000 and 2014. The reference standard to calculate the prevalence of bone metastases was bone biopsy and/or ≥1-year follow-up after MRI. In a subsample of 228 patients, the MRI characteristics of bone lesions were recorded by two radiologists independently. Associations between MRI and clinical/pathologic findings, including National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk categories, were calculated.

Results

57/3765 patients (1.5%, 95% CI 1.2–2.0%) had bone metastases. No patient with NCCN low-risk PCa (Gleason < 7, PSA < 10 ng/mL, cT1-2a) had bone metastases. In the subsample, ≥1 bone lesion was present on MRI in 74% (95% CI 0.67–0.79) and 72% (95% CI 0.66–0.78) of patients (R1 and R2). Larger lesion diameter (OR 1.33/1.19; p < 0.001 for both readers) and the absence of intralesional fat (OR 0.07/0.11; p = 0.004/0.002 for R1/R2) were significantly associated with bone metastases.

Conclusion

Bone lesions are common in prostate MRI, but only rarely represent metastases. MRI should be interpreted in the context of clinical features that influence the likelihood of metastatic disease.
Literature
1.
go back to reference DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, et al. (2014) Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 64(4):252–271CrossRefPubMed DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, et al. (2014) Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 64(4):252–271CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, et al. (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol. 65(1):124–137CrossRefPubMed Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, et al. (2014) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. Eur Urol. 65(1):124–137CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Gondo T, Hricak H, Sala E, et al. (2014) Multiparametric 3T MRI for the prediction of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-proven Gleason score 3 + 4 prostate cancer. Eur Radiol. 24(12):3161–3170CrossRefPubMed Gondo T, Hricak H, Sala E, et al. (2014) Multiparametric 3T MRI for the prediction of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy-proven Gleason score 3 + 4 prostate cancer. Eur Radiol. 24(12):3161–3170CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fascelli M, George AK, Frye T, et al. (2015) The role of MRI in active surveillance for prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep. 16(6):507CrossRef Fascelli M, George AK, Frye T, et al. (2015) The role of MRI in active surveillance for prostate cancer. Curr Urol Rep. 16(6):507CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Eberhardt SC, Carter S, Casalino DD, et al. (2013) ACR appropriateness criteria prostate cancer–pretreatment detection, staging, and surveillance. J Am Coll Radiol. 10(2):83–92CrossRefPubMed Eberhardt SC, Carter S, Casalino DD, et al. (2013) ACR appropriateness criteria prostate cancer–pretreatment detection, staging, and surveillance. J Am Coll Radiol. 10(2):83–92CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Wang L, Mullerad M, Chen HN, et al. (2004) Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension. Radiology. 232(1):133–139CrossRefPubMed Wang L, Mullerad M, Chen HN, et al. (2004) Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension. Radiology. 232(1):133–139CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Donati OF, Afaq A, Vargas HA, et al. (2014) Prostate MRI: evaluating tumor volume and apparent diffusion coefficient as surrogate biomarkers for predicting tumor Gleason score. Clin Cancer Res. 20(14):3705–3711CrossRefPubMed Donati OF, Afaq A, Vargas HA, et al. (2014) Prostate MRI: evaluating tumor volume and apparent diffusion coefficient as surrogate biomarkers for predicting tumor Gleason score. Clin Cancer Res. 20(14):3705–3711CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Sartor AO, Hricak H, Wheeler TM, et al. (2008) Evaluating localized prostate cancer and identifying candidates for focal therapy. Urology. 72(6 Suppl):S12–S24CrossRefPubMed Sartor AO, Hricak H, Wheeler TM, et al. (2008) Evaluating localized prostate cancer and identifying candidates for focal therapy. Urology. 72(6 Suppl):S12–S24CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Vargas HA, Akin O, Afaq A, et al. (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of clinically low risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 188(5):1732–1738CrossRefPubMed Vargas HA, Akin O, Afaq A, et al. (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging for predicting prostate biopsy findings in patients considered for active surveillance of clinically low risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 188(5):1732–1738CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sciarra A, Barentsz J, Bjartell A, et al. (2011) Advances in magnetic resonance imaging: how they are changing the management of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 59(6):962–977CrossRefPubMed Sciarra A, Barentsz J, Bjartell A, et al. (2011) Advances in magnetic resonance imaging: how they are changing the management of prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 59(6):962–977CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Turkbey B, Brown AM, Sankineni S, et al. (2016) Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 66(4):326–336CrossRefPubMed Turkbey B, Brown AM, Sankineni S, et al. (2016) Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 66(4):326–336CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Thompson JE, van Leeuwen PJ, Moses D, et al. (2016) The diagnostic performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect significant prostate cancer. J Urol. 195(5):1428–1435CrossRefPubMed Thompson JE, van Leeuwen PJ, Moses D, et al. (2016) The diagnostic performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect significant prostate cancer. J Urol. 195(5):1428–1435CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging - reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69(1):16–40CrossRefPubMed Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. (2016) PI-RADS prostate imaging - reporting and data system: 2015, version 2. Eur Urol 69(1):16–40CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Vargas HA, Hotker AM, Goldman DA, et al. (2016) Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference. Eur Radiol. 26(6):1606–1612CrossRefPubMed Vargas HA, Hotker AM, Goldman DA, et al. (2016) Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference. Eur Radiol. 26(6):1606–1612CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind Ch (2009) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. UICC International Union Against Cancer, 7th edn. Berlin: Springer Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind Ch (2009) TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. UICC International Union Against Cancer, 7th edn. Berlin: Springer
17.
go back to reference Ryan CJ, Elkin EP, Small EJ, Duchane J, Carroll P (2006) Reduced incidence of bony metastasis at initial prostate cancer diagnosis: data from CaPSURE. Urol Oncol 24(5):396–402CrossRefPubMed Ryan CJ, Elkin EP, Small EJ, Duchane J, Carroll P (2006) Reduced incidence of bony metastasis at initial prostate cancer diagnosis: data from CaPSURE. Urol Oncol 24(5):396–402CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Jacobson AF (2000) Association of prostate-specific antigen levels and patterns of benign and malignant uptake detected. on bone scintigraphy in patients with newly diagnosed prostate carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 21(7):617–622CrossRefPubMed Jacobson AF (2000) Association of prostate-specific antigen levels and patterns of benign and malignant uptake detected. on bone scintigraphy in patients with newly diagnosed prostate carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 21(7):617–622CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Wang Y, Wan F, Xu L, et al. (2015) Is it safe to omit baseline bone scan for newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients? Urol Int 94(3):342–346CrossRefPubMed Wang Y, Wan F, Xu L, et al. (2015) Is it safe to omit baseline bone scan for newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients? Urol Int 94(3):342–346CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Simpfendorfer CS, Ilaslan H, Davies AM, et al. (2008) Does the presence of focal normal marrow fat signal within a tumor on MRI exclude malignancy? An analysis of 184 histologically proven tumors of the pelvic and appendicular skeleton. Skelet Radiol. 37(9):797–804CrossRef Simpfendorfer CS, Ilaslan H, Davies AM, et al. (2008) Does the presence of focal normal marrow fat signal within a tumor on MRI exclude malignancy? An analysis of 184 histologically proven tumors of the pelvic and appendicular skeleton. Skelet Radiol. 37(9):797–804CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Zacho HD, Barsi T, Mortensen JC, et al. (2014) Prospective multicenter study of bone scintigraphy in consecutive patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 39(1):26–31CrossRefPubMed Zacho HD, Barsi T, Mortensen JC, et al. (2014) Prospective multicenter study of bone scintigraphy in consecutive patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Clin Nucl Med. 39(1):26–31CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ozgur BC, Gultekin S, Ekici M, Yilmazer D, Alper M (2015) A narrowing range of bone scan in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study. Urol Ann. 7(2):193–198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ozgur BC, Gultekin S, Ekici M, Yilmazer D, Alper M (2015) A narrowing range of bone scan in newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients: a retrospective comparative study. Urol Ann. 7(2):193–198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Lavery HJ, Brajtbord JS, Levinson AW, et al. (2011) Unnecessary imaging for the staging of low-risk prostate cancer is common. Urology. 77(2):274–278CrossRefPubMed Lavery HJ, Brajtbord JS, Levinson AW, et al. (2011) Unnecessary imaging for the staging of low-risk prostate cancer is common. Urology. 77(2):274–278CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prostate cancer bone metastases on staging prostate MRI: prevalence and clinical features associated with their diagnosis
Authors
Hebert Alberto Vargas
Rachel Schor-Bardach
Niamh Long
Anna N. Kirzner
Jane D. Cunningham
Debra A. Goldman
Chaya S. Moskowitz
Ramon E. Sosa
Evis Sala
David M. Panicek
Hedvig Hricak
Publication date
01-01-2017
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 1/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0851-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Abdominal Radiology 1/2017 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The “starry sky” liver

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

Turtleback liver

Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.