Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 11/2016

01-11-2016

Incidences of acute kidney injury, dialysis, and graft loss following intravenous administration of low-osmolality iodinated contrast in patients with kidney transplants

Authors: Ghaneh Fananapazir, Christoph Troppmann, Michael T. Corwin, Arian M. Nikpour, Sima Naderi, Ramit Lamba

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 11/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), need for emergent dialysis, and renal graft loss in patients with kidney transplants, who underwent CT examinations with low-osmolality iodine-based contrast material (IBCM).

Materials and methods

Our institutional review board approved this retrospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant study. From January 2005 to April 2015, a total of 224 CT examinations were performed using low-osmolality IBCM in patients with kidney transplants. Six patients who had septic or cardiogenic shock and 30 patients with documented, failed transplants were excluded from our analysis, yielding a total of 188 examinations. Of these, pre- and post-CT serum creatinine (SCr) values were available for 104 examinations, to allow evaluation of AKI. The mean baseline SCr and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in this subgroup were 1.37 mg/dL (median 1.18, range 0.5–6.05) and 65.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively (median 65, range 9–114). AKI was defined as a rise in SCr of either (a) ≥0.3 mg/dL or (b) ≥0.5 mg/dL in the 24- to 72-h period following IBCM administration. For all patients undergoing the 188 examinations, need for dialysis and graft loss 30 days after contrast administration were evaluated.

Results

In patients with pre- and post-CT SCr values, the incidence of AKI was 7% (7/104) based on a rise of ≥0.3 mg/dL and 3% (3/104) based on a rise of ≥0.5 mg/dL. All three patients with the more strict definition (≥0.5 mg/dL) had a pre-CT eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. No patient required dialysis or had renal graft loss 30 days after contrast administration.

Conclusion

The incidence of AKI after administration of low-osmolality IBCM administration in renal transplant recipients is low, with no instances of emergent dialysis or graft loss at 30 days post contrast.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nash K, Hafeez A, Hou S (2002) Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 39(5):930–936CrossRefPubMed Nash K, Hafeez A, Hou S (2002) Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 39(5):930–936CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Mehran R, Nikolsky E (2006) Contrast-induced nephropathy: definition, epidemiology, and patients at risk. Kidney Int 69:S11–S15CrossRef Mehran R, Nikolsky E (2006) Contrast-induced nephropathy: definition, epidemiology, and patients at risk. Kidney Int 69:S11–S15CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ho Y-F, Hsieh K-L, Kung F-L, et al. (2015) Nephrotoxic polypharmacy and risk of contrast medium-induced nephropathy in hospitalized patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT. Am J Roentgenol 205(4):703–708CrossRef Ho Y-F, Hsieh K-L, Kung F-L, et al. (2015) Nephrotoxic polypharmacy and risk of contrast medium-induced nephropathy in hospitalized patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT. Am J Roentgenol 205(4):703–708CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Karthikeyan V, Karpinski J, Nair RC, Knoll G (2004) The burden of chronic kidney disease in renal transplant recipients. Am J Transpl 4(2):262–269CrossRef Karthikeyan V, Karpinski J, Nair RC, Knoll G (2004) The burden of chronic kidney disease in renal transplant recipients. Am J Transpl 4(2):262–269CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ekberg H, Tedesco-Silva H, Demirbas A, et al. (2007) Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 357(25):2562–2575CrossRefPubMed Ekberg H, Tedesco-Silva H, Demirbas A, et al. (2007) Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 357(25):2562–2575CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference ACR Manual on Contrast Media Version 10.1 (2015). ACR Manual on Contrast Media Version 10.1 (2015).
7.
go back to reference Haider M, Yessayan L, Venkat K, Goggins M, Patel A, Karthikeyan V (2015) Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients. In: Transplantation proceedings, vol 2. Elsevier, pp 379–383 Haider M, Yessayan L, Venkat K, Goggins M, Patel A, Karthikeyan V (2015) Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in kidney transplant recipients. In: Transplantation proceedings, vol 2. Elsevier, pp 379–383
8.
go back to reference Ahuja T, Niaz N, Agraharkar M (2000) Contrast-induced nephrotoxicity in renal allograft recipients. Clin Nephrol 54(1):11–14PubMed Ahuja T, Niaz N, Agraharkar M (2000) Contrast-induced nephrotoxicity in renal allograft recipients. Clin Nephrol 54(1):11–14PubMed
9.
go back to reference Light JA, Perloff LJ, Etheredge EE, Hill G, Spees EK (1975) Adverse effects of meglumine diatrizoate on renal function in the early post-transplant period. Transplantation 20(5):404–409CrossRefPubMed Light JA, Perloff LJ, Etheredge EE, Hill G, Spees EK (1975) Adverse effects of meglumine diatrizoate on renal function in the early post-transplant period. Transplantation 20(5):404–409CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Peters C, Delmonico F, Cosimi A, et al. (1983) Risks versus benefits of contrast medium exposure in renal allograft recipients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 156(4):467PubMed Peters C, Delmonico F, Cosimi A, et al. (1983) Risks versus benefits of contrast medium exposure in renal allograft recipients. Surg Gynecol Obstet 156(4):467PubMed
11.
go back to reference McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Newhouse JH, Davenport MS (2015) Controversies in contrast material–induced acute kidney injury: closing in on the truth? Radiology 277(3):627–632CrossRefPubMed McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Newhouse JH, Davenport MS (2015) Controversies in contrast material–induced acute kidney injury: closing in on the truth? Radiology 277(3):627–632CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Davenport MS, Cohan RH, Khalatbari S, Ellis JH (2014) The challenges in assessing contrast-induced nephropathy: where are we now? Am J Roentgenol 202(4):784–789CrossRef Davenport MS, Cohan RH, Khalatbari S, Ellis JH (2014) The challenges in assessing contrast-induced nephropathy: where are we now? Am J Roentgenol 202(4):784–789CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Rao QA, Newhouse JH (2006) Risk of nephropathy after intravenous administration of contrast material: a critical literature analysis 1. Radiology 239(2):392–397CrossRefPubMed Rao QA, Newhouse JH (2006) Risk of nephropathy after intravenous administration of contrast material: a critical literature analysis 1. Radiology 239(2):392–397CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Stratta P, Bozzola C, Quaglia M (2012) Pitfall in nephrology: contrast nephropathy has to be differentiated from renal damage due to atheroembolic disease. J Nephrol 25(3):282CrossRefPubMed Stratta P, Bozzola C, Quaglia M (2012) Pitfall in nephrology: contrast nephropathy has to be differentiated from renal damage due to atheroembolic disease. J Nephrol 25(3):282CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Katzberg RW, Newhouse JH (2010) Intravenous contrast medium–induced nephrotoxicity: is the medical risk really as great as we have come to believe? 1. Radiology 256(1):21–28CrossRefPubMed Katzberg RW, Newhouse JH (2010) Intravenous contrast medium–induced nephrotoxicity: is the medical risk really as great as we have come to believe? 1. Radiology 256(1):21–28CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Newhouse JH, Kho D, Rao QA, Starren J (2008) Frequency of serum creatinine changes in the absence of iodinated contrast material: implications for studies of contrast nephrotoxicity. Am J Roentgenol 191(2):376–382CrossRef Newhouse JH, Kho D, Rao QA, Starren J (2008) Frequency of serum creatinine changes in the absence of iodinated contrast material: implications for studies of contrast nephrotoxicity. Am J Roentgenol 191(2):376–382CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bruce RJ, Djamali A, Shinki K, et al. (2009) Background fluctuation of kidney function versus contrast-induced nephrotoxicity. Am J Roentgenol 192(3):711–718CrossRef Bruce RJ, Djamali A, Shinki K, et al. (2009) Background fluctuation of kidney function versus contrast-induced nephrotoxicity. Am J Roentgenol 192(3):711–718CrossRef
18.
go back to reference McDonald JS, McDonald RJ, Comin J, et al. (2013) Frequency of acute kidney injury following intravenous contrast medium administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 267(1):119–128CrossRefPubMed McDonald JS, McDonald RJ, Comin J, et al. (2013) Frequency of acute kidney injury following intravenous contrast medium administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 267(1):119–128CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Davenport MS, Khalatbari S, Cohan RH, et al. (2013) Contrast material–induced nephrotoxicity and intravenous low-osmolality iodinated contrast material: risk stratification by using estimated glomerular filtration rate. Radiology 268(3):719–728CrossRefPubMed Davenport MS, Khalatbari S, Cohan RH, et al. (2013) Contrast material–induced nephrotoxicity and intravenous low-osmolality iodinated contrast material: risk stratification by using estimated glomerular filtration rate. Radiology 268(3):719–728CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Bida JP, et al. (2013) Intravenous contrast material–induced nephropathy: causal or coincident phenomenon? Radiology 267(1):106–118CrossRefPubMed McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Bida JP, et al. (2013) Intravenous contrast material–induced nephropathy: causal or coincident phenomenon? Radiology 267(1):106–118CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference McDonald JS, McDonald RJ, Carter RE, et al. (2014) Risk of intravenous contrast material–mediated acute kidney injury: a propensity score–matched study stratified by baseline-estimated glomerular filtration rate. Radiology 271(1):65–73CrossRefPubMed McDonald JS, McDonald RJ, Carter RE, et al. (2014) Risk of intravenous contrast material–mediated acute kidney injury: a propensity score–matched study stratified by baseline-estimated glomerular filtration rate. Radiology 271(1):65–73CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Carter RE, et al. (2014) Intravenous contrast material exposure is not an independent risk factor for dialysis or mortality. Radiology 273(3):714–725CrossRefPubMed McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Carter RE, et al. (2014) Intravenous contrast material exposure is not an independent risk factor for dialysis or mortality. Radiology 273(3):714–725CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Fananapazir G, Troppmann C, Corwin MT, et al. (2016) Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy after renal graft catheter arteriography using iodine-based contrast medium. Am J Roentgenol 206(4):783–786CrossRef Fananapazir G, Troppmann C, Corwin MT, et al. (2016) Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy after renal graft catheter arteriography using iodine-based contrast medium. Am J Roentgenol 206(4):783–786CrossRef
24.
go back to reference McDonald JS, Katzberg RW, McDonald RJ, Williamson EE, Kallmes DF (2015) Is the presence of a solitary kidney an independent risk factor for acute kidney injury after contrast-enhanced CT? Radiology:142676 McDonald JS, Katzberg RW, McDonald RJ, Williamson EE, Kallmes DF (2015) Is the presence of a solitary kidney an independent risk factor for acute kidney injury after contrast-enhanced CT? Radiology:142676
Metadata
Title
Incidences of acute kidney injury, dialysis, and graft loss following intravenous administration of low-osmolality iodinated contrast in patients with kidney transplants
Authors
Ghaneh Fananapazir
Christoph Troppmann
Michael T. Corwin
Arian M. Nikpour
Sima Naderi
Ramit Lamba
Publication date
01-11-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 11/2016
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0827-3

Other articles of this Issue 11/2016

Abdominal Radiology 11/2016 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

Central dot sign

Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.