Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2016

01-03-2016

Quality assurance methodology and applications to abdominal imaging PQI

Authors: David M. Paushter, Stephen Thomas

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Quality assurance has increasingly become an integral part of medicine, with tandem goals of increasing patient safety and procedural quality, improving efficiency, lowering cost, and ultimately improving patient outcomes. This article reviews quality assurance methodology, ranging from the PDSA cycle to the application of lean techniques, aimed at operational efficiency, to continually evaluate and revise the health care environment. Alignment of goals for practices, hospitals, and healthcare organizations is critical, requiring clear objectives, adequate resources, and transparent reporting. In addition, there is a significant role played by regulatory bodies and oversight organizations in determining external benchmarks of quality, practice, and individual certification and reimbursement. Finally, practical application of quality principles to practice improvement projects in abdominal imaging will be presented.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. www.IHI.org. Published March 2001. Accessed February 22, 2015 Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. www.​IHI.​org. Published March 2001. Accessed February 22, 2015
4.
go back to reference Cromwell J, Trisolini MG, Pope GE, Mitchell J, Greenwald LM (2011) Pay for performance in health care: methods and approaches. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTICrossRef Cromwell J, Trisolini MG, Pope GE, Mitchell J, Greenwald LM (2011) Pay for performance in health care: methods and approaches. Research Triangle Park, NC: RTICrossRef
5.
go back to reference Henkel RJ, Maryland PA (2015) The risks and rewards of value-based reimbursement. Front Health Serv Manag Winter 32:3–16 Henkel RJ, Maryland PA (2015) The risks and rewards of value-based reimbursement. Front Health Serv Manag Winter 32:3–16
11.
go back to reference Deming WE (2000) For The New Economics Industry, Government, and Education. Cambridge, MA: MIT Deming WE (2000) For The New Economics Industry, Government, and Education. Cambridge, MA: MIT
12.
go back to reference Tsutstui W, Edwards W (1996) Deming and the origins of quality control in Japan. J Jpn Stud 22:295–325CrossRef Tsutstui W, Edwards W (1996) Deming and the origins of quality control in Japan. J Jpn Stud 22:295–325CrossRef
13.
go back to reference The breakthrough series: IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. IHI Innovation Series white paper. Boston: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2003. www.IHI.org The breakthrough series: IHI’s collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. IHI Innovation Series white paper. Boston: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2003. www.​IHI.​org
14.
go back to reference Keller PA (2009) Six sigma demystified. McGraw-Hill professional, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill Keller PA (2009) Six sigma demystified. McGraw-Hill professional, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill
15.
go back to reference Pyzdek T, Keller PA (2009) The six sigma handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill Pyzdek T, Keller PA (2009) The six sigma handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill
16.
go back to reference Found P, Harrison R (2012) Understanding the lean voice of the customer. Int J Lean Six Sigma 3:251–267CrossRef Found P, Harrison R (2012) Understanding the lean voice of the customer. Int J Lean Six Sigma 3:251–267CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lee E, Grooms R, Mamidala S, Nagy P (2014) Six easy steps on how to create a lean sigma value stream map for a multidisciplinary clinical operation. J Am Coll Radiol 11:1144–1149CrossRefPubMed Lee E, Grooms R, Mamidala S, Nagy P (2014) Six easy steps on how to create a lean sigma value stream map for a multidisciplinary clinical operation. J Am Coll Radiol 11:1144–1149CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Young TP, McClean SI (2008) A critical look at lean thinking in healthcare. Quality Saf Health Care 17(5):382–386CrossRef Young TP, McClean SI (2008) A critical look at lean thinking in healthcare. Quality Saf Health Care 17(5):382–386CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Graban M (2012) Lean hospitals: improving quality, patient safety, and employee engagement. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Graban M (2012) Lean hospitals: improving quality, patient safety, and employee engagement. Boca Raton, FL: CRC
22.
go back to reference Knechtges P, Decker MC (2014) Application of Kaizen methodology to Foster departmental engagement in quality improvement. J Am Coll Radiol 11:1126–1130CrossRefPubMed Knechtges P, Decker MC (2014) Application of Kaizen methodology to Foster departmental engagement in quality improvement. J Am Coll Radiol 11:1126–1130CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Rubin DL (2011) Informatics in radiology: measuring and improving quality in radiology: meeting the challenge with informatics. RadioGraphics 31(6):1511–1527CrossRefPubMed Rubin DL (2011) Informatics in radiology: measuring and improving quality in radiology: meeting the challenge with informatics. RadioGraphics 31(6):1511–1527CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Morgan MB, Meenan CD, Nabile M, Nagy P, Flanders AE (2014) Informatics leaders in radiology: who they are and why you need them? J Am Coll Radiol 11:1241–1250CrossRefPubMed Morgan MB, Meenan CD, Nabile M, Nagy P, Flanders AE (2014) Informatics leaders in radiology: who they are and why you need them? J Am Coll Radiol 11:1241–1250CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Cook TS, Nagy P (2014) Business intelligence for the radiologist: making you. J Am Coll Radiol 11:1238–1240CrossRefPubMed Cook TS, Nagy P (2014) Business intelligence for the radiologist: making you. J Am Coll Radiol 11:1238–1240CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Thrall JH (2013) Data mining, knowledge creation, and work process enhancement in the second generation of radiology’s digital age. J Am Coll Radiol 10:161–162CrossRefPubMed Thrall JH (2013) Data mining, knowledge creation, and work process enhancement in the second generation of radiology’s digital age. J Am Coll Radiol 10:161–162CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Boland GW, Thrall JH, Duszak R Jr (2015) Business intelligence, data mining, and future trends. J Am Coll Radiol 12:9–11CrossRefPubMed Boland GW, Thrall JH, Duszak R Jr (2015) Business intelligence, data mining, and future trends. J Am Coll Radiol 12:9–11CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Mansoori B, Novak RD, Sivit CJ, Ros PR (2013) Utilization of Dashboard technology in academic radiology departments: results of a national survey. J Am Coll Radiol 10:283–288CrossRefPubMed Mansoori B, Novak RD, Sivit CJ, Ros PR (2013) Utilization of Dashboard technology in academic radiology departments: results of a national survey. J Am Coll Radiol 10:283–288CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Kelly AM, Cronin P (2015) Practical approaches to quality improvement for radiologists. RadioGraphics 35:1630–1642CrossRefPubMed Kelly AM, Cronin P (2015) Practical approaches to quality improvement for radiologists. RadioGraphics 35:1630–1642CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Bruno J Advanced (2014) Practice quality improvement: beyond the radiology department. Am Coll Radiol 11:1150–1154CrossRef Bruno J Advanced (2014) Practice quality improvement: beyond the radiology department. Am Coll Radiol 11:1150–1154CrossRef
31.
go back to reference You-Ling Shyu J, Burleson J, Tallant C, Seidenwurm DJ, Rybicki FJ (2014) Performance measures in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 11:456–463CrossRefPubMed You-Ling Shyu J, Burleson J, Tallant C, Seidenwurm DJ, Rybicki FJ (2014) Performance measures in radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 11:456–463CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Rosenkrantz J, Lawson K, Ally R, et al. (2015) Focused process improvement events: sustainability of impact on process and performance in an academic radiology department. J Am Coll Radiol 12:75–81CrossRefPubMed Rosenkrantz J, Lawson K, Ally R, et al. (2015) Focused process improvement events: sustainability of impact on process and performance in an academic radiology department. J Am Coll Radiol 12:75–81CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Masselli G, Gualdi G (2013) CT and MR enterography in evaluating small bowel diseases: when to use which modality? Abdom Imaging 38:249–259CrossRefPubMed Masselli G, Gualdi G (2013) CT and MR enterography in evaluating small bowel diseases: when to use which modality? Abdom Imaging 38:249–259CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Cipriano LE, Levesque BG, Zaric GS, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ (2012) Cost-effectiveness of imaging strategies to reduce radiation-induced cancer risk in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 18:1240–1248CrossRefPubMed Cipriano LE, Levesque BG, Zaric GS, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ (2012) Cost-effectiveness of imaging strategies to reduce radiation-induced cancer risk in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 18:1240–1248CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Dambha F, Tanner J, Carroll N (2014) Diagnostic imaging in Crohn’s disease: what is the new gold standard? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 28:421–436CrossRefPubMed Dambha F, Tanner J, Carroll N (2014) Diagnostic imaging in Crohn’s disease: what is the new gold standard? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 28:421–436CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Sinha R, Rawat S (2013) MRI enterography with divided dose oral preparation: effect on bowel distension and diagnostic quality. Indian J Radiol Imaging 23:86–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sinha R, Rawat S (2013) MRI enterography with divided dose oral preparation: effect on bowel distension and diagnostic quality. Indian J Radiol Imaging 23:86–91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Cima R, Kollengode A, Garnatz J, et al. (2007) Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg 12:80–87 Cima R, Kollengode A, Garnatz J, et al. (2007) Incidence and characteristics of potential and actual retained foreign object events in surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg 12:80–87
39.
go back to reference Preventing unintended retained foreign objects. The Joint Commission Sentinel Event Alert 2013: 51 Preventing unintended retained foreign objects. The Joint Commission Sentinel Event Alert 2013: 51
40.
go back to reference Guidance for Performing Root Cause Analysis (RCA) with Performance Improvement Projects. QAPI. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/provider-enrollment-and-certification/qapi/downloads/guidanceforrca.pdf. Accessed November 12, 2015 Guidance for Performing Root Cause Analysis (RCA) with Performance Improvement Projects. QAPI. https://​www.​cms.​gov/​medicare/​provider-enrollment-and-certification/​qapi/​downloads/​guidanceforrca.​pdf.​ Accessed November 12, 2015
41.
go back to reference Anderson B, Fagerhaug T, Beltz M (2010) Root cause analysis and improvement in the healthcare sector. Milwaukee: ASO Quality Anderson B, Fagerhaug T, Beltz M (2010) Root cause analysis and improvement in the healthcare sector. Milwaukee: ASO Quality
42.
go back to reference RCA2 Improving Root Cause Analyses and Actions to Prevent Harm, Version 2. 2016. The National Patient Safety Foundation. www.npsf.oreg. Accessed January 22, 2016 RCA2 Improving Root Cause Analyses and Actions to Prevent Harm, Version 2. 2016. The National Patient Safety Foundation. www.​npsf.​oreg. Accessed January 22, 2016
Metadata
Title
Quality assurance methodology and applications to abdominal imaging PQI
Authors
David M. Paushter
Stephen Thomas
Publication date
01-03-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0678-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Abdominal Radiology 3/2016 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The “winking owl” sign

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.