Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 1/2016

01-01-2016

Optimization of non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal artery with three-dimensional balanced steady-state free-precession and time-spatial labeling inversion pulse (time-SLIP) at 3T MRI, in relation to age and blood velocity

Authors: Yasuhisa Kurata, Aki Kido, Koji Fujimoto, Kayo Kiguchi, Kyoko Takakura, Yusaku Moribata, Fuki Shitano, Yuki Himoto, Yasutaka Fushimi, Tomohisa Okada, Kaori Togashi

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the optimal inversion time (TI) value of three-dimensional (3D) balanced steady-state free-precession time-spatial labeling inversion pulse (time-SLIP) technique for visualization of the renal artery at 3T MRI, and to assess whether the optimal TI is affected by the subject’s age and blood velocity.

Materials and methods

Forty-two healthy volunteers (range 20–67 years) were enrolled in the study and subjected to non-contrast-enhanced renal MR angiography. Five different TI values (1200, 1400, 1600, 1800, and 2000 ms) were selected for evaluation. For quantitative evaluation, the relative signal intensity (SI) of the main renal artery was compared with that of the renal medulla (Vessel-to-Kidney ratio; VKR). Blood velocity of the abdominal aorta was measured using 2D phase contrast technique. For qualitative evaluation, two radiologists scored the depiction of the renal pelvis and the quality of visualization of the renal artery.

Results

VKR is the highest at TI = 1600 ms. A strong negative correlation between age and blood velocity was demonstrated. Regarding the qualitative evaluation, the overall image scores of renal arteries were the highest at a TI = 1800 ms for both readers. The optimal TI values in subjects below 50 years of age were 1600 and 1800 ms, whereas in subjects above 50 years of age, the optimal TI value was 1800 ms.

Conclusion

The optimal TI value for the visualization of renal arteries using time-SLIP technique at 3T MRI was 1800 ms. Subjects’ age affected optimal TI and this is likely due to differences in the blood velocity of the abdominal aorta.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dworkin LD, Cooper CJ (2009) Clinical practice. Renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 361:1972–1978CrossRefPubMed Dworkin LD, Cooper CJ (2009) Clinical practice. Renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 361:1972–1978CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Silverman SG, Israel GM, Herts BR, et al. (2008) Management of the incidental renal mass. Radiology 249:16–31CrossRefPubMed Silverman SG, Israel GM, Herts BR, et al. (2008) Management of the incidental renal mass. Radiology 249:16–31CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ukimura O, Nakamoto M, Gill IS (2012) Three-dimensional reconstruction of renovascular-tumor anatomy to facilitate zero-ischemia partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 61:211–217CrossRefPubMed Ukimura O, Nakamoto M, Gill IS (2012) Three-dimensional reconstruction of renovascular-tumor anatomy to facilitate zero-ischemia partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 61:211–217CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mohrs OK, Petersen SE, Schulze T, et al. (2010) High-resolution 3D unenhanced ECG-gated respiratory-navigated MR angiography of the renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:1423–1428CrossRefPubMed Mohrs OK, Petersen SE, Schulze T, et al. (2010) High-resolution 3D unenhanced ECG-gated respiratory-navigated MR angiography of the renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:1423–1428CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Braidy C, Daou I, Diop AD, et al. (2012) Unenhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: 51 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:W629–W637CrossRefPubMed Braidy C, Daou I, Diop AD, et al. (2012) Unenhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: 51 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:W629–W637CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Khoo MMY, Deeab D, Gedroyc WMW, et al. (2011) Renal artery stenosis: comparative assessment by unenhanced renal artery MRA versus contrast-enhanced MRA. Eur Radiol 21:1470–1476CrossRefPubMed Khoo MMY, Deeab D, Gedroyc WMW, et al. (2011) Renal artery stenosis: comparative assessment by unenhanced renal artery MRA versus contrast-enhanced MRA. Eur Radiol 21:1470–1476CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, et al. (2007) Steady-state free precession MRA of the renal arteries: breath-hold and navigator-gated techniques vs CE-MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:966–973CrossRefPubMed Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, et al. (2007) Steady-state free precession MRA of the renal arteries: breath-hold and navigator-gated techniques vs CE-MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:966–973CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Wyttenbach R, Braghetti A, Wyss M, et al. (2007) Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 245:186–195CrossRefPubMed Wyttenbach R, Braghetti A, Wyss M, et al. (2007) Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 245:186–195CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Glockner JF, Takahashi N, Kawashima A, et al. (2010) Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (Inhance): comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:1411–1418CrossRefPubMed Glockner JF, Takahashi N, Kawashima A, et al. (2010) Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (Inhance): comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:1411–1418CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Garcia DM, Duhamel G, Alsop DC (2005) Efficiency of inversion pulses for background suppressed arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 54:366–372CrossRefPubMed Garcia DM, Duhamel G, Alsop DC (2005) Efficiency of inversion pulses for background suppressed arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 54:366–372CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kiguchi K, Kido A, Fujimoto K, et al. (2014) Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography of uterine arteries with balanced steady-state free precession and time-space labelling inversion pulse: technical optimization and preliminary results. Clin Radiol 69:669–673CrossRefPubMed Kiguchi K, Kido A, Fujimoto K, et al. (2014) Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography of uterine arteries with balanced steady-state free precession and time-space labelling inversion pulse: technical optimization and preliminary results. Clin Radiol 69:669–673CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Takahashi J, Isono S, Miyazaki M, et al. (2009) Nonenhanced renal mra using time-SLIP with 3D balanced SSFP: Optimization of coronal acquisition: presented at the ISMRM 17th annual meeting. 17:3899 Takahashi J, Isono S, Miyazaki M, et al. (2009) Nonenhanced renal mra using time-SLIP with 3D balanced SSFP: Optimization of coronal acquisition: presented at the ISMRM 17th annual meeting. 17:3899
13.
go back to reference Utsunomiya D, Miyazaki M, Nomitsu Y, et al. (2008) Clinical role of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis. Circ J 72:1627–1630CrossRefPubMed Utsunomiya D, Miyazaki M, Nomitsu Y, et al. (2008) Clinical role of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis. Circ J 72:1627–1630CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Zhang Y, Xing Z, Liu Y, et al. (2014) Nonenhanced renal MR angiography using steady-state free precession (SSFP) and time-spatial labeling inversion pulse (time-SLIP): repeatability and comparison of different tagging location. Abdom Imaging 39:1000–1008CrossRefPubMed Zhang Y, Xing Z, Liu Y, et al. (2014) Nonenhanced renal MR angiography using steady-state free precession (SSFP) and time-spatial labeling inversion pulse (time-SLIP): repeatability and comparison of different tagging location. Abdom Imaging 39:1000–1008CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference De Bazelaire CMJ, Duhamel GD, Rofsky NM, et al. (2004) MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. Radiology 230:652–659CrossRefPubMed De Bazelaire CMJ, Duhamel GD, Rofsky NM, et al. (2004) MR imaging relaxation times of abdominal and pelvic tissues measured in vivo at 3.0 T: preliminary results. Radiology 230:652–659CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mowat DH, Haites NE, Rawles JM (1983) Aortic blood velocity measurement in healthy adults using a simple ultrasound technique. Cardiovasc Res 17:75–80CrossRefPubMed Mowat DH, Haites NE, Rawles JM (1983) Aortic blood velocity measurement in healthy adults using a simple ultrasound technique. Cardiovasc Res 17:75–80CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB, et al. (2007) Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:375–385CrossRefPubMed Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB, et al. (2007) Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:375–385CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Parienty I, Rostoker G, Jouniaux F, et al. (2011) Renal artery stenosis evaluation in chronic kidney disease patients: nonenhanced time-spatial labeling inversion-pulse three-dimensional MR angiography with regulated breathing versus DSA. Radiology 259:592–601CrossRefPubMed Parienty I, Rostoker G, Jouniaux F, et al. (2011) Renal artery stenosis evaluation in chronic kidney disease patients: nonenhanced time-spatial labeling inversion-pulse three-dimensional MR angiography with regulated breathing versus DSA. Radiology 259:592–601CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Furuta A, Isoda H, Yamashita R, et al. (2014) Non-contrast-enhanced MR portography with balanced steady-state free-precession sequence and time-spatial labeling inversion pulses: comparison of imaging with flow-in and flow-out methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 40:583–587CrossRefPubMed Furuta A, Isoda H, Yamashita R, et al. (2014) Non-contrast-enhanced MR portography with balanced steady-state free-precession sequence and time-spatial labeling inversion pulses: comparison of imaging with flow-in and flow-out methods. J Magn Reson Imaging 40:583–587CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Lee VS, Kaur M, Bokacheva L, et al. (2007) What causes diminished corticomedullary differentiation in renal insufficiency? J Magn Reson Imaging 25:790–795CrossRefPubMed Lee VS, Kaur M, Bokacheva L, et al. (2007) What causes diminished corticomedullary differentiation in renal insufficiency? J Magn Reson Imaging 25:790–795CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Optimization of non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the renal artery with three-dimensional balanced steady-state free-precession and time-spatial labeling inversion pulse (time-SLIP) at 3T MRI, in relation to age and blood velocity
Authors
Yasuhisa Kurata
Aki Kido
Koji Fujimoto
Kayo Kiguchi
Kyoko Takakura
Yusaku Moribata
Fuki Shitano
Yuki Himoto
Yasutaka Fushimi
Tomohisa Okada
Kaori Togashi
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0608-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Abdominal Radiology 1/2016 Go to the issue

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The perianal “horseshoe”