Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 8/2015

01-10-2015

Does focal incidental 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake in the prostate have significance?

Authors: Anna M. Brown, Maria L. Lindenberg, Sandeep Sankineni, Joanna H. Shih, Linda M. Johnson, Suneha Pruthy, Karen A. Kurdziel, Maria J. Merino, Bradford J. Wood, Peter A. Pinto, Peter L. Choyke, Baris Turkbey

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 8/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

18F-FDG PET/CT is used to characterize many malignancies, but is not recommended for localized prostate cancer. This study explores the value of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) in characterizing incidental prostate 18F-FDG uptake.

Methods

Thirty-one patients who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for reasons unrelated to prostate cancer and prostate mpMRI were eligible for this retrospective study. The mpMRI included T2-weighted (T2W), dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and MR spectroscopy (MRS) sequences. Fourteen patients were excluded (n = 8 insufficient histopathology, n = 6 radical prostatectomy before PET), and final analysis included 17 patients. A nuclear medicine physician, blinded to clinicopathologic findings, identified suspicious areas and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) on 18F-FDG PET/CT. Sector-based imaging findings were correlated with annotated histopathology from whole-mount or MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy samples. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were estimated using generalized estimating equations with logit link. Results were evaluated with Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s multiple comparisons tests.

Results

The PPV of 18F-FDG PET alone in detecting prostate cancer was 0.65. Combining 18F-FDG PET as a base parameter with mpMRI (T2W, DCE, ADC, and MRS) increased the PPV to 0.82, 0.83, 0.83, and 0.94, respectively. All benign lesions had SUVmax < 6. Malignant lesions had higher SUVmax values that correlated with Gleason scores. There was a significant difference in SUVmax per prostate between the Gleason ≥ 4 + 5 and benign categories (p = 0.03).

Conclusions

Focal incidental prostate 18F-FDG uptake has low clinical utility alone, but regions of uptake may harbor high-grade prostate cancer, especially if SUVmax > 6. Using mpMRI to further evaluate incidental 18F-FDG uptake aids the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Hwang I, Chong A, Jung SI, et al. (2013) Is further evaluation needed for incidental focal uptake in the prostate in 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography images ? Ann Nucl Med 27:140–145CrossRefPubMed Hwang I, Chong A, Jung SI, et al. (2013) Is further evaluation needed for incidental focal uptake in the prostate in 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography images ? Ann Nucl Med 27:140–145CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Cho SK, Choi JY, Yoo J, et al. (2011) Incidental focal (18)F-FDG uptake in the prostate: clinical significance and differential diagnostic criteria. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45:192–196PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Cho SK, Choi JY, Yoo J, et al. (2011) Incidental focal (18)F-FDG uptake in the prostate: clinical significance and differential diagnostic criteria. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45:192–196PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Han EJ, Ho J, Choi WH, et al. (2010) Significance of incidental focal uptake in prostate on 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT images. Br J Radiol 83:915–920PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Han EJ, Ho J, Choi WH, et al. (2010) Significance of incidental focal uptake in prostate on 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography CT images. Br J Radiol 83:915–920PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Jadvar H, Desai B, Ji L, et al. (2013) Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters as imaging biomarkers of overall survival in castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. J Nucl Med 54:1195–1201PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jadvar H, Desai B, Ji L, et al. (2013) Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters as imaging biomarkers of overall survival in castrate-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. J Nucl Med 54:1195–1201PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bartoletti R, Meliani E, Bongini A, et al. (2014) Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography may aid the diagnosis of aggressive primary prostate cancer: a case series study. Oncol Lett 7:381–386PubMedCentralPubMed Bartoletti R, Meliani E, Bongini A, et al. (2014) Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography may aid the diagnosis of aggressive primary prostate cancer: a case series study. Oncol Lett 7:381–386PubMedCentralPubMed
9.
go back to reference Mena E, Lindenberg ML, Turkbey BI, et al. (2014) A pilot study of the value of 18 F-fluoro-deoxy-thymidine PET/CT in predicting viable lymphoma in residual F-FDG avid masses after completion of therapy. Clin Nucl Med 39:874–881CrossRefPubMed Mena E, Lindenberg ML, Turkbey BI, et al. (2014) A pilot study of the value of 18 F-fluoro-deoxy-thymidine PET/CT in predicting viable lymphoma in residual F-FDG avid masses after completion of therapy. Clin Nucl Med 39:874–881CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pinto PA, Chung PH, Rastinehad AR, et al. (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 186:1281–1285PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Pinto PA, Chung PH, Rastinehad AR, et al. (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy improves cancer detection following transrectal ultrasound biopsy and correlates with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. J Urol 186:1281–1285PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Shakir NA, George AK, Siddiqui MM, et al. (2014) Identification of threshold prostate-specific antigen levels to optimize the detection of clinically-significant prostate cancer by MRI/US fusion guided biopsy. J Urol 192(6):1642–1648CrossRefPubMed Shakir NA, George AK, Siddiqui MM, et al. (2014) Identification of threshold prostate-specific antigen levels to optimize the detection of clinically-significant prostate cancer by MRI/US fusion guided biopsy. J Urol 192(6):1642–1648CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Shah V, Pohida T, Turkbey B (2009) A method for correlating in vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology using individualized magnetic resonance-based molds. Rev Sci Instrum 80:1–6CrossRef Shah V, Pohida T, Turkbey B (2009) A method for correlating in vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology using individualized magnetic resonance-based molds. Rev Sci Instrum 80:1–6CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Minamimoto R, Uemura H, Sano F, et al. (2011) The potential of FDG-PET/CT for detecting prostate cancer in patients with an elevated serum PSA level. Ann Nucl Med 25:21–27CrossRefPubMed Minamimoto R, Uemura H, Sano F, et al. (2011) The potential of FDG-PET/CT for detecting prostate cancer in patients with an elevated serum PSA level. Ann Nucl Med 25:21–27CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Seino H, Ono S, Miura H, et al. (2014) Incidental prostate 18F-FDG uptake without calcification indicates the possibility of prostate cancer. Oncol Rep 31:1517–1522PubMedCentralPubMed Seino H, Ono S, Miura H, et al. (2014) Incidental prostate 18F-FDG uptake without calcification indicates the possibility of prostate cancer. Oncol Rep 31:1517–1522PubMedCentralPubMed
Metadata
Title
Does focal incidental 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake in the prostate have significance?
Authors
Anna M. Brown
Maria L. Lindenberg
Sandeep Sankineni
Joanna H. Shih
Linda M. Johnson
Suneha Pruthy
Karen A. Kurdziel
Maria J. Merino
Bradford J. Wood
Peter A. Pinto
Peter L. Choyke
Baris Turkbey
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 8/2015
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-015-0520-y

Other articles of this Issue 8/2015

Abdominal Radiology 8/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.