Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 3/2015

01-03-2015

Differentiation of lipid poor angiomyolipoma from hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging

Authors: Rihyeon Kim, Jeong Min Lee, Ijin Joo, Dong Ho Lee, Sungmin Woo, Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate magnetic resonance (MR) findings of angiomyolipoma (AML) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging, and to identify features that differentiate AML from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with a low risk of HCC development.

Methods

This retrospective study was institutional review board approved, and the requirement for informed consent was waived. Twelve patients with hepatic AML who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with no risk factors for HCC development were recruited. Twenty-seven patients with HCC under the same inclusion criteria were recruited as control. Two radiologists analyzed the images in consensus for morphologic features, enhancement patterns, and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) findings. All results were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney test, two-tailed Fisher exact test, and chi-square test.

Results

Patients with AML were younger than those with HCC (48.8 ± 15 years for AML vs. 62.7 ± 14.2 years for HCC, p = 0.008) with female predominance, while most HCC patients were male (75% (9/12) vs. 15% (4/27), p < 0.001). The most prevalent enhancement pattern was arterial enhancement followed by hypointensity at portal or transitional phases for both AMLs (58% (7/12)) and HCCs (74% (20/27)) (p = 0.455). However, during the HBP, AMLs frequently showed more homogeneous hypointensity than HCCs (83% (10/12) vs. 41% (11/27), p = 0.018). When compared with the signal intensity of the spleen, the mean relative signal intensity of the AML was 91.2 ± 15.4%, while in HCCs, it was 128.7 ± 40% (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Although AMLs showed similar enhancement patterns to HCCs during the dynamic phases of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, using characteristic MR features of AML during the HBP and demographic differences, one can better differentiate AML from HCC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Li T, Wang L, Yu HH, et al. (2008) Hepatic angiomyolipoma: a retrospective study of 25 cases. Surg Today 38:529–535CrossRefPubMed Li T, Wang L, Yu HH, et al. (2008) Hepatic angiomyolipoma: a retrospective study of 25 cases. Surg Today 38:529–535CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Xu PJ, Shan Y, Yan FH, et al. (2009) Epithelioid angiomyolipoma of the liver: cross-sectional imaging findings of 10 immunohistochemically-verified cases. World J Gastroenterol 15:4576–4581CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Xu PJ, Shan Y, Yan FH, et al. (2009) Epithelioid angiomyolipoma of the liver: cross-sectional imaging findings of 10 immunohistochemically-verified cases. World J Gastroenterol 15:4576–4581CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
3.
go back to reference Basaran C, Karcaaltincaba M, Akata D, et al. (2005) Fat-containing lesions of the liver: cross-sectional imaging findings with emphasis on MRI. Am J Roentgenol 184:1103–1110CrossRef Basaran C, Karcaaltincaba M, Akata D, et al. (2005) Fat-containing lesions of the liver: cross-sectional imaging findings with emphasis on MRI. Am J Roentgenol 184:1103–1110CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Chang Z, Zhang JM, Ying JQ, Ge YP (2011) Characteristics and treatment strategy of hepatic angiomyolipoma: a series of 94 patients collected from four institutions. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 20:65–69 Chang Z, Zhang JM, Ying JQ, Ge YP (2011) Characteristics and treatment strategy of hepatic angiomyolipoma: a series of 94 patients collected from four institutions. J Gastrointest Liver Dis 20:65–69
5.
go back to reference Jeon TY, Kim SH, Lim HK, Lee WJ (2010) Assessment of triple-phase CT findings for the differentiation of fat-deficient hepatic angiomyolipoma from hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver. Eur J Radiol 73:601–606CrossRefPubMed Jeon TY, Kim SH, Lim HK, Lee WJ (2010) Assessment of triple-phase CT findings for the differentiation of fat-deficient hepatic angiomyolipoma from hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver. Eur J Radiol 73:601–606CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Yoshimura H, Murakami T, Kim T, et al. (2002) Angiomyolipoma of the liver with least amount of fat component: imaging features of CT, MR, and angiography. Abdom Imaging 27:184–187CrossRefPubMed Yoshimura H, Murakami T, Kim T, et al. (2002) Angiomyolipoma of the liver with least amount of fat component: imaging features of CT, MR, and angiography. Abdom Imaging 27:184–187CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Montoriol P, Joubert-Zakeyh J, Buc E, Garcier J, Da Ines D (2013) Fat-deficient hepatic angiomyolipoma: a radiological challenge. Diagn Interv Imaging 94:909–911CrossRefPubMed Montoriol P, Joubert-Zakeyh J, Buc E, Garcier J, Da Ines D (2013) Fat-deficient hepatic angiomyolipoma: a radiological challenge. Diagn Interv Imaging 94:909–911CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Yeh CN, Chen MF, Hung CF, Chen TC, Chao TC (2001) Angiomyolipoma of the liver. J Surg Oncol 77:195–200CrossRefPubMed Yeh CN, Chen MF, Hung CF, Chen TC, Chao TC (2001) Angiomyolipoma of the liver. J Surg Oncol 77:195–200CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chung AYF, Ng S-B, Thng C-H, Ooi LPJ, Chow PKH (2002) Hepatic angiomyolipoma mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma. Asian J Surg 25:251–254CrossRefPubMed Chung AYF, Ng S-B, Thng C-H, Ooi LPJ, Chow PKH (2002) Hepatic angiomyolipoma mimicking hepatocellular carcinoma. Asian J Surg 25:251–254CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Trevisani F, Frigerio M, Santi V, Grignaschi A, Bernardi M (2010) Hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver: a reappraisal. Dig Liver Dis 42:341–347CrossRefPubMed Trevisani F, Frigerio M, Santi V, Grignaschi A, Bernardi M (2010) Hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic liver: a reappraisal. Dig Liver Dis 42:341–347CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Nonomura A, Mizukami Y, Kadoya M (1994) Angiomyolipoma of the liver: a collective review. J Gastroenterol 29:95–105CrossRefPubMed Nonomura A, Mizukami Y, Kadoya M (1994) Angiomyolipoma of the liver: a collective review. J Gastroenterol 29:95–105CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wang SY, Kuai XP, Meng XX, Jia NY, Dong H (2014) Comparison of MRI features for the differentiation of hepatic angiomyolipoma from fat-containing hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 39:323–333CrossRefPubMed Wang SY, Kuai XP, Meng XX, Jia NY, Dong H (2014) Comparison of MRI features for the differentiation of hepatic angiomyolipoma from fat-containing hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 39:323–333CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Zhao Y, Ouyang H, Wang X, Ye F, Liang J (2014) MRI manifestations of liver epithelioid and nonepithelioid angiomyolipoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 39:1502–1508CrossRefPubMed Zhao Y, Ouyang H, Wang X, Ye F, Liang J (2014) MRI manifestations of liver epithelioid and nonepithelioid angiomyolipoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 39:1502–1508CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Cai PQ, Wu YP, Xie CM, et al. (2013) Hepatic angiomyolipoma: CT and MR imaging findings with clinical-pathologic comparison. Abdom Imaging 38:482–489CrossRefPubMed Cai PQ, Wu YP, Xie CM, et al. (2013) Hepatic angiomyolipoma: CT and MR imaging findings with clinical-pathologic comparison. Abdom Imaging 38:482–489CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Hu WG, Lai EC, Liu H, et al. (2011) Diagnostic difficulties and treatment strategy of hepatic angiomyolipoma. Asian J Surg 34:158–162CrossRefPubMed Hu WG, Lai EC, Liu H, et al. (2011) Diagnostic difficulties and treatment strategy of hepatic angiomyolipoma. Asian J Surg 34:158–162CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Lee J, Lee JM, Yoon JH, et al. (2012) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation with multiple electrodes for medium-sized hepatocellular carcinomas. Korean J Radiol 13:34–43 Lee J, Lee JM, Yoon JH, et al. (2012) Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation with multiple electrodes for medium-sized hepatocellular carcinomas. Korean J Radiol 13:34–43
18.
go back to reference Lee JM, Zech CJ, Bolondi L, et al. (2011) Consensus report of the 4th international forum for gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid magnetic resonance imaging. Korean J Radiol 12:403–415CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Lee JM, Zech CJ, Bolondi L, et al. (2011) Consensus report of the 4th international forum for gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid magnetic resonance imaging. Korean J Radiol 12:403–415CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
19.
go back to reference Sun HY, Lee JM, Shin CI, et al. (2010) Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating small hepatocellular carcinomas (<or = 2 cm in diameter) from arterial enhancing pseudolesions: special emphasis on hepatobiliary phase imaging. Investig Radiol 45:96–103CrossRef Sun HY, Lee JM, Shin CI, et al. (2010) Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for differentiating small hepatocellular carcinomas (<or = 2 cm in diameter) from arterial enhancing pseudolesions: special emphasis on hepatobiliary phase imaging. Investig Radiol 45:96–103CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lee KH, Lee JM, Park JH, et al. (2013) MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver-specific contrast agent gadoxetic acid. Korean J Radiol 14:894–904 Lee KH, Lee JM, Park JH, et al. (2013) MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver-specific contrast agent gadoxetic acid. Korean J Radiol 14:894–904
21.
go back to reference Anysz-Grodzicka A, Pacho R, Grodzicki M, et al. (2013) Angiomyolipoma of the liver: analysis of typical features and pitfalls based on own experience and literature. Clin Imaging 37:320–326CrossRefPubMed Anysz-Grodzicka A, Pacho R, Grodzicki M, et al. (2013) Angiomyolipoma of the liver: analysis of typical features and pitfalls based on own experience and literature. Clin Imaging 37:320–326CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Boraschi P, Donati F, Gherarducci G (2012) Imaging findings in myomatous angiomyolipoma of the liver. Diagn Interv Radiol 18:387–390PubMed Boraschi P, Donati F, Gherarducci G (2012) Imaging findings in myomatous angiomyolipoma of the liver. Diagn Interv Radiol 18:387–390PubMed
23.
go back to reference Merkle EM, Nelson RC (2006) Dual gradient-echo in-phase and opposed-phase hepatic MR imaging: a useful tool for evaluating more than fatty infiltration or fatty sparing. Radiographics 26:1409–1418CrossRefPubMed Merkle EM, Nelson RC (2006) Dual gradient-echo in-phase and opposed-phase hepatic MR imaging: a useful tool for evaluating more than fatty infiltration or fatty sparing. Radiographics 26:1409–1418CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kelekis NL, Semelka RC, Worawattanakul S, et al. (1998) Hepatocellular carcinoma in North America: a multiinstitutional study of appearance on T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and serial gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo images. Am J Roentgenol 170:1005–1013CrossRef Kelekis NL, Semelka RC, Worawattanakul S, et al. (1998) Hepatocellular carcinoma in North America: a multiinstitutional study of appearance on T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and serial gadolinium-enhanced gradient-echo images. Am J Roentgenol 170:1005–1013CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hussain SM, Zondervan PE, IJzermans JN, et al. (2002) Benign versus malignant hepatic nodules: MR imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 22:1023–1036CrossRefPubMed Hussain SM, Zondervan PE, IJzermans JN, et al. (2002) Benign versus malignant hepatic nodules: MR imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 22:1023–1036CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Elsayes KM, Narra VR, Yin Y, et al. (2005) Focal hepatic lesions: diagnostic value of enhancement pattern approach with contrast-enhanced 3D gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiographics 25:1299–1320CrossRefPubMed Elsayes KM, Narra VR, Yin Y, et al. (2005) Focal hepatic lesions: diagnostic value of enhancement pattern approach with contrast-enhanced 3D gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiographics 25:1299–1320CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Tublin ME, Dodd GD, Baron RI (1997) Benign and malignant portal vein thrombosis: differentiation by CT characteristics. Am J Roentgenol 168:719–723CrossRef Tublin ME, Dodd GD, Baron RI (1997) Benign and malignant portal vein thrombosis: differentiation by CT characteristics. Am J Roentgenol 168:719–723CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Marrero JA, Hussain HK, Nghiem HV, et al. (2005) Improving the prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with an arterially-enhancing liver mass. Liver Transpl 11:281–289CrossRefPubMed Marrero JA, Hussain HK, Nghiem HV, et al. (2005) Improving the prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with an arterially-enhancing liver mass. Liver Transpl 11:281–289CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Rimola J, Forner A, Reig M, et al. (2009) Cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis: absence of contrast washout in delayed phases by magnetic resonance imaging avoids misdiagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 50:791–798CrossRefPubMed Rimola J, Forner A, Reig M, et al. (2009) Cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhosis: absence of contrast washout in delayed phases by magnetic resonance imaging avoids misdiagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 50:791–798CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Ni Y, Chen F, Wang H, et al. (2010) Proper definitions of MRI contrast enhancement in liver tumors. J Gastroenterol 45:349–350CrossRefPubMed Ni Y, Chen F, Wang H, et al. (2010) Proper definitions of MRI contrast enhancement in liver tumors. J Gastroenterol 45:349–350CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Zizka J, Klzo L, Ferda J, Mrklovsky M, Bukac J (2007) Dynamic and delayed contrast enhancement in upper abdominal MRI studies: comparison of gadoxetic acid and gadobutrol. Eur J Radiol 62:186–191CrossRefPubMed Zizka J, Klzo L, Ferda J, Mrklovsky M, Bukac J (2007) Dynamic and delayed contrast enhancement in upper abdominal MRI studies: comparison of gadoxetic acid and gadobutrol. Eur J Radiol 62:186–191CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sou H, et al. (2009) Liver parenchymal enhancement of hepatocyte-phase images in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: which biological markers of the liver function affect the enhancement? J Magn Reson Imaging 30:1042–1046CrossRefPubMed Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sou H, et al. (2009) Liver parenchymal enhancement of hepatocyte-phase images in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging: which biological markers of the liver function affect the enhancement? J Magn Reson Imaging 30:1042–1046CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Kobayashi S, Matsui O, Gabata T, et al. (2012) Intranodular signal intensity analysis of hypovascular high-risk borderline lesions of HCC that illustrate multi-step hepatocarcinogenesis within the nodule on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Eur J Radiol 81:3839–3845CrossRefPubMed Kobayashi S, Matsui O, Gabata T, et al. (2012) Intranodular signal intensity analysis of hypovascular high-risk borderline lesions of HCC that illustrate multi-step hepatocarcinogenesis within the nodule on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Eur J Radiol 81:3839–3845CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Kitao A, Matsui O, Yoneda N, et al. (2011) The uptake transporter OATP8 expression decreases during multistep hepatocarcinogenesis: correlation with gadoxetic acid enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiology 21:2056–2066CrossRef Kitao A, Matsui O, Yoneda N, et al. (2011) The uptake transporter OATP8 expression decreases during multistep hepatocarcinogenesis: correlation with gadoxetic acid enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiology 21:2056–2066CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Kitao A, Zen Y, Matsui O, et al. (2010) Hepatocellular carcinoma: signal intensity at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR Imaging-correlation with molecular transporters and histopathologic features. Radiology 256:817–826CrossRefPubMed Kitao A, Zen Y, Matsui O, et al. (2010) Hepatocellular carcinoma: signal intensity at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR Imaging-correlation with molecular transporters and histopathologic features. Radiology 256:817–826CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Hogemann D, Flemming P, Kreipe H, Galanski M (2001) Correlation of MRI and CT findings with histopathology in hepatic angiomyolipoma. Eur Radiology 11:1389–1395CrossRef Hogemann D, Flemming P, Kreipe H, Galanski M (2001) Correlation of MRI and CT findings with histopathology in hepatic angiomyolipoma. Eur Radiology 11:1389–1395CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Ahmadi T, Itai Y, Takahashi M, et al. (1998) Angiomyolipoma of the liver: significance of CT and MR dynamic study. Abdom Imaging 23:520–526CrossRefPubMed Ahmadi T, Itai Y, Takahashi M, et al. (1998) Angiomyolipoma of the liver: significance of CT and MR dynamic study. Abdom Imaging 23:520–526CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Reimer P, Schneider G, Schima W (2004) Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications. Eur Radiology 14:559–578CrossRef Reimer P, Schneider G, Schima W (2004) Hepatobiliary contrast agents for contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver: properties, clinical development and applications. Eur Radiology 14:559–578CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Husarik DB, Gupta RT, Ringe KI, Boll DT, Merkle EM (2011) Contrast enhanced liver MRI in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: inverse appearance of focal confluent fibrosis on delayed phase MR images with hepatocyte specific versus extracellular gadolinium based contrast agents. Acad Radiology 18:1549–1554CrossRef Husarik DB, Gupta RT, Ringe KI, Boll DT, Merkle EM (2011) Contrast enhanced liver MRI in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis: inverse appearance of focal confluent fibrosis on delayed phase MR images with hepatocyte specific versus extracellular gadolinium based contrast agents. Acad Radiology 18:1549–1554CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Jeong HT, Kim MJ, Chung YE, et al. (2013) Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas: imaging-histologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 201:W603–W611CrossRef Jeong HT, Kim MJ, Chung YE, et al. (2013) Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas: imaging-histologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 201:W603–W611CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Ding GH, Liu Y, Mc Wu, et al. (2011) Diagnosis and treatment of hepatic angiomyolipoma. J Surg Oncol 103:807–812CrossRefPubMed Ding GH, Liu Y, Mc Wu, et al. (2011) Diagnosis and treatment of hepatic angiomyolipoma. J Surg Oncol 103:807–812CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Israel GM, Hindman N, Hecht E, Krinsky G (2005) The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas. Am J Roentgenol 184:1868–1872CrossRef Israel GM, Hindman N, Hecht E, Krinsky G (2005) The use of opposed-phase chemical shift MRI in the diagnosis of renal angiomyolipomas. Am J Roentgenol 184:1868–1872CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Earls JP, Krinsky GA (1997) Abdominal and pelvic applications of opposed-phase MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 169:1071–1077CrossRef Earls JP, Krinsky GA (1997) Abdominal and pelvic applications of opposed-phase MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 169:1071–1077CrossRef
44.
go back to reference Hindman N, Ngo L, Genega EM, et al. (2012) Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: can it be differentiated from clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using standard MR techniques? Radiology 265:468–477CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Hindman N, Ngo L, Genega EM, et al. (2012) Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: can it be differentiated from clear cell renal cell carcinoma by using standard MR techniques? Radiology 265:468–477CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
45.
go back to reference Hassan M, El-Hefnawy AS, Elshal AM, et al. (2014) Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma: a rare variant with unusual behavior. Int Urol Nephrol 46:314–322 Hassan M, El-Hefnawy AS, Elshal AM, et al. (2014) Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma: a rare variant with unusual behavior. Int Urol Nephrol 46:314–322
Metadata
Title
Differentiation of lipid poor angiomyolipoma from hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver MR imaging
Authors
Rihyeon Kim
Jeong Min Lee
Ijin Joo
Dong Ho Lee
Sungmin Woo
Joon Koo Han
Byung Ihn Choi
Publication date
01-03-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0244-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Abdominal Radiology 3/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.