Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 6/2010

01-12-2010

Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of resected and immunohistochemically proven hepatic angiomyolipomas

Authors: Rui Li, Xiaohang Zhang, Xing Hua, Ping Cai, Hua Zhong, Yanli Guo, Shiyi Ding, XiaoChu Yan

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with hepatic angiomyolipomas with respect to contrast-enhancing kinetics and enhancement patterns.

Materials and methods

Nonlinear, low mechanical index (mechanical index less than 0.2), real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was performed in 18 patients with 19 tumors after 2.4 mL bolus injection of contrast agent SonoVue. All the 19 tumors were surgically resected and immunohistochemically proven sporadic hepatic angiomyolipomas.

Results

Inhomogeneous hyperenhancing pattern was detected 16 tumors (84.2%) and homogeneous hyperenhancing pattern in 1 tumor (0.5%) in arterial phase and portal phase, 16 lesions remained hyperenhancement but one lesion became isoenhancement in late phase. Two lesions (10.5%) were detected inhomogeneously hypoenhancement compared to liver parenchyma during arterial, portal, and late phases, with only punctiform internal enhancement. The margin of all the lesions were smooth and well defined on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, whereas no peripheral nodular arterial enhancement, centripetal filling, or spoke-wheel like enhancement pattern were depicted. Early strong enhancement in arterial phase, rapid washout of contrast agent, and appear hypoechoic to surrounding liver tissue during portal or late phase was not at all observed.

Conclusion

Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can demonstrate typical imaging characteristics of hepatic angiomyolipomas in most cases, that is, inhomogeneous hyperenhancing pattern in arterial phase, prolonged hyperenhancement during portal and late phase with smooth and well-defined margin. This real-time dynamic imaging technique may therefore improve noninvasive characterization and differentiation of this rare, benign, hepatic mesenchymal neoplasm.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Petrolla Amber A, Xin W (2008) Hepatic angiomyolipoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132:1679–1682PubMed Petrolla Amber A, Xin W (2008) Hepatic angiomyolipoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 132:1679–1682PubMed
2.
go back to reference Zhou YM, Li B, Xu F, et al. (2008) Clinical features of hepatic angiomyolipoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 7(3):284–287PubMed Zhou YM, Li B, Xu F, et al. (2008) Clinical features of hepatic angiomyolipoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 7(3):284–287PubMed
3.
go back to reference Yoshimura H, Murakami T, Kim T, et al. (2002) Angiomyolipoma of the liver with least amount of fat component: imaging features of CT, MR, and angiography. Abdom Imaging 27:184–187CrossRefPubMed Yoshimura H, Murakami T, Kim T, et al. (2002) Angiomyolipoma of the liver with least amount of fat component: imaging features of CT, MR, and angiography. Abdom Imaging 27:184–187CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Högemann D, Flemming P, Kreipe H, Galanski M (2001) Correlation of MRI and CT findings with histopathology in hepatic angiomyolipoma. Eur Radiol 11(8):1389–1395CrossRefPubMed Högemann D, Flemming P, Kreipe H, Galanski M (2001) Correlation of MRI and CT findings with histopathology in hepatic angiomyolipoma. Eur Radiol 11(8):1389–1395CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Li R, Guo Y, Hua X, et al. (2007) Characterization of focal liver lesions: comparison of pulse-inversion harmonic contrast-enhanced sonography with contrast-enhanced CT. J Clinical Ultrasound 35(3):109–117CrossRef Li R, Guo Y, Hua X, et al. (2007) Characterization of focal liver lesions: comparison of pulse-inversion harmonic contrast-enhanced sonography with contrast-enhanced CT. J Clinical Ultrasound 35(3):109–117CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Celli N, Gaiani S, Piscaglia F, et al. (2007) Characterization of focal liver lesions by real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:3–14CrossRefPubMed Celli N, Gaiani S, Piscaglia F, et al. (2007) Characterization of focal liver lesions by real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19:3–14CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Takayama Y, Moriura S, Nagata J, et al. (2002) Hepatic angiomyolipoma: radiologic and histopathologic correlation. Abdom Imaging 27:180–183CrossRefPubMed Takayama Y, Moriura S, Nagata J, et al. (2002) Hepatic angiomyolipoma: radiologic and histopathologic correlation. Abdom Imaging 27:180–183CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Yan F, Zeng M, Zhou K, et al. (2002) Hepatic angiomyolipoma: various appearances on two-phase contrast scanning of spiral CT. Eur J Radiol 41:12–18CrossRefPubMed Yan F, Zeng M, Zhou K, et al. (2002) Hepatic angiomyolipoma: various appearances on two-phase contrast scanning of spiral CT. Eur J Radiol 41:12–18CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Prasad SR, Wang H, Rosas H, et al. (2005) Fat-containing lesions of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 25:321–331CrossRefPubMed Prasad SR, Wang H, Rosas H, et al. (2005) Fat-containing lesions of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 25:321–331CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Xiao W, Zhou M, Lou H, Wang Z, Zhang M (2009) Hemodynamic characterization of hepatic angiomyolipoma with least amount of fat evaluated by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Abdom Imaging [Epub ahead of print] Xiao W, Zhou M, Lou H, Wang Z, Zhang M (2009) Hemodynamic characterization of hepatic angiomyolipoma with least amount of fat evaluated by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Abdom Imaging [Epub ahead of print]
11.
go back to reference Yoshikawa J, Matsui O, Takashima T, et al. (1988) Fatty metamorphosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: radiologic features in 10 cases. AJR 151:717–720PubMed Yoshikawa J, Matsui O, Takashima T, et al. (1988) Fatty metamorphosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: radiologic features in 10 cases. AJR 151:717–720PubMed
13.
go back to reference Tsui WM, Colombari R, Portmann BC, et al. (1999) Hepatic angiomyolipoma: a clinicopathologic study of 30 cases and delineation of unusual morphologic variants. Am J Surg Pathol 23:34–48CrossRefPubMed Tsui WM, Colombari R, Portmann BC, et al. (1999) Hepatic angiomyolipoma: a clinicopathologic study of 30 cases and delineation of unusual morphologic variants. Am J Surg Pathol 23:34–48CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Jiang TA, Zhao QY, Chen MY, Wang LJ, Ao JY (2005) Diagnostic analysis of hepatic angiomyolipoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 4:152–155PubMed Jiang TA, Zhao QY, Chen MY, Wang LJ, Ao JY (2005) Diagnostic analysis of hepatic angiomyolipoma. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 4:152–155PubMed
15.
go back to reference Ascenti G, Gaeta M, Zimbaro G, et al. (2000) US power Doppler of hepatic angiomyolipoma with low fat content. Eur Radiol 10:935–937CrossRefPubMed Ascenti G, Gaeta M, Zimbaro G, et al. (2000) US power Doppler of hepatic angiomyolipoma with low fat content. Eur Radiol 10:935–937CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Nicolau C, Vilana R, Catalá V, et al. (2006) Importance of evaluating all vascular phases on contrast-enhanced sonography in the differentiation of benign from malignant focal liver lesions. Am J Roentgenol 186:158–167CrossRef Nicolau C, Vilana R, Catalá V, et al. (2006) Importance of evaluating all vascular phases on contrast-enhanced sonography in the differentiation of benign from malignant focal liver lesions. Am J Roentgenol 186:158–167CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dietrich CF, Schuessler G, Trojan J, Fellbaum C, Ignee A (2005) Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Br J Radiol 78:704–707CrossRefPubMed Dietrich CF, Schuessler G, Trojan J, Fellbaum C, Ignee A (2005) Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound. Br J Radiol 78:704–707CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ricci P, Laghi A, Cantisani V, et al. (2005) Contrast-enhanced sonography with SonoVue: enhancement patterns of benign focal liver lesions and correlation with dynamic gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI. Am J Roentgenol 184:821–827 Ricci P, Laghi A, Cantisani V, et al. (2005) Contrast-enhanced sonography with SonoVue: enhancement patterns of benign focal liver lesions and correlation with dynamic gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI. Am J Roentgenol 184:821–827
19.
go back to reference Leen E, Ceccotti P, Kalogeropoulou C, et al. (2006) Prospective multicenter trial evaluating a novel method of characterizing focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography. Am J Roentgenol 186:1551–1559CrossRef Leen E, Ceccotti P, Kalogeropoulou C, et al. (2006) Prospective multicenter trial evaluating a novel method of characterizing focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography. Am J Roentgenol 186:1551–1559CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Martin K, Fabian K, Marco E, et al. (2004) Low mechanical index contrast enhanced ultrasound better reflects high arterial perfusion oh liver metastases than arterial phase computed tomography. Invest Radiol 39:222–261 Martin K, Fabian K, Marco E, et al. (2004) Low mechanical index contrast enhanced ultrasound better reflects high arterial perfusion oh liver metastases than arterial phase computed tomography. Invest Radiol 39:222–261
21.
go back to reference Burns P, Wilson S (2007) Focal liver masses: enhancement patterns on contrast enhanced images-concordance of US scans with CT scans and MR images. Radiology 242:162–174CrossRefPubMed Burns P, Wilson S (2007) Focal liver masses: enhancement patterns on contrast enhanced images-concordance of US scans with CT scans and MR images. Radiology 242:162–174CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Catalá V, Nicolau C, Vilana R, et al. (2007) Characterization of focal liver lesions: comparative study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol 17:1066–1073CrossRefPubMed Catalá V, Nicolau C, Vilana R, et al. (2007) Characterization of focal liver lesions: comparative study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus spiral computed tomography. Eur Radiol 17:1066–1073CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Von Herbay A, Vogt C, Willers R, Häussinger D (2004) Real-time imaging with the sonographic contrast agent SonoVue: differentiation between benign and malignant hepatic lesions. J Ultrasound Med 23:1557–1568 Von Herbay A, Vogt C, Willers R, Häussinger D (2004) Real-time imaging with the sonographic contrast agent SonoVue: differentiation between benign and malignant hepatic lesions. J Ultrasound Med 23:1557–1568
24.
go back to reference Wilson SR, Burns PN (2006) An algorithm for the diagnosis of focal liver masses using microbubble contrast enhanced pulse inversion sonography. Am J Roentgenol 186:1401–1412CrossRef Wilson SR, Burns PN (2006) An algorithm for the diagnosis of focal liver masses using microbubble contrast enhanced pulse inversion sonography. Am J Roentgenol 186:1401–1412CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Nanomura A, Mizukami Y, Kadoya M (1994) Angiomyolipoma of the liver: a collective review. J Gastroenterol 29:95–105CrossRef Nanomura A, Mizukami Y, Kadoya M (1994) Angiomyolipoma of the liver: a collective review. J Gastroenterol 29:95–105CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Xu AM, Zhang SH, Zheng JM, Zheng WQ, Wu MC (2006) Pathological and molecular analysis of sporadic hepatic angiomyolipoma. Hum Pathol 37(6):735–741CrossRefPubMed Xu AM, Zhang SH, Zheng JM, Zheng WQ, Wu MC (2006) Pathological and molecular analysis of sporadic hepatic angiomyolipoma. Hum Pathol 37(6):735–741CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of resected and immunohistochemically proven hepatic angiomyolipomas
Authors
Rui Li
Xiaohang Zhang
Xing Hua
Ping Cai
Hua Zhong
Yanli Guo
Shiyi Ding
XiaoChu Yan
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9592-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Abdominal Radiology 6/2010 Go to the issue