Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2010

01-04-2010

MR-guided abdominal biopsy using a 1.5-Tesla closed system: a feasibility study

Authors: Chandan Jyoti Das, Ajit Harishkumar Goenka, Deep Narayan Srivastava

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

MR-guided biopsy may aid to obtain samples in cases which are not feasible with conventional US or CT guidance.

Purpose

To evaluate safety and efficacy of MRI-guided abdominal biopsy at 1.5-T closed MR system.

Methods and materials

MRI guided abdominal biopsy was performed using Siemens Avanto 1.5-T closed MR system. Eighteen samples were obtained in 10 patients under local anesthesia using a novel technique to define skin entry site. None of the cases included in the study were amenable to biopsy using the conventional ultrasound (US) or computed tomography (CT) guidance. MR compatible 18G needle (US Biopsy) was used to obtain biopsy samples. Intravenous gadolinium was used in two patients for better delineation during biopsy. Patients were followed up for 3–5 h and were discharged on the same day.

Results

Technical success was achieved in all patients. Average number of biopsy passes were two (range 1–4). All biopsy samples were adequate for histopathological examination. Average size of the core biopsy specimen was 9 mm.

Conclusion

1.5-T closed MR system allows adequate biopsy sampling from various abdominal organs. This technique may help to sample lesions which are not otherwise amenable for biopsy under conventional CT or US guidance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schulz T, Puccini S, Schneider JP, Kahn T (2004) Interventional and intraoperative MR: review and update of techniques and clinical experience. Eur Radiol 14(12):2212–27.CrossRefPubMed Schulz T, Puccini S, Schneider JP, Kahn T (2004) Interventional and intraoperative MR: review and update of techniques and clinical experience. Eur Radiol 14(12):2212–27.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Orel SG, Schnall MD, Newman RW, Powell CM, Torosian MH, Rosato EF (1994) MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast lesions: initial experience. Radiology193(1):97–102.PubMed Orel SG, Schnall MD, Newman RW, Powell CM, Torosian MH, Rosato EF (1994) MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast lesions: initial experience. Radiology193(1):97102.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Elevelt A, Leutner CC, Gieseke J, Pakos E, Schild HH (1997) Interventional breast MR imaging: clinical use of a stereotactic localization and biopsy device. Radiology 204(3):667–75.PubMed Kuhl CK, Elevelt A, Leutner CC, Gieseke J, Pakos E, Schild HH (1997) Interventional breast MR imaging: clinical use of a stereotactic localization and biopsy device. Radiology 204(3):667–75.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Schulz T, Schneider JP, Bootz F, Keiner S, Scheffler B, Weidenbach H, Dietrich J, Schirmer T, Schmidt F, Kahn T (2001) Transnasal and transsphenoidal MRI-guided biopsies of petroclival tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(1):3–11.CrossRefPubMed Schulz T, Schneider JP, Bootz F, Keiner S, Scheffler B, Weidenbach H, Dietrich J, Schirmer T, Schmidt F, Kahn T (2001) Transnasal and transsphenoidal MRI-guided biopsies of petroclival tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(1):3–11.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kacl GM, Carls FR, Moll C, Debatin JF (1999) Interactive MR-guided biopsies of maxillary and skull-base lesions in an open-MR system: first clinical results. Eur Radiol 9(3):487–92.CrossRefPubMed Kacl GM, Carls FR, Moll C, Debatin JF (1999) Interactive MR-guided biopsies of maxillary and skull-base lesions in an open-MR system: first clinical results. Eur Radiol 9(3):487–92.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Parkkola RK, Mattila KT, Heikkilä JT, Ekfors TO, Kallajoki MA, Komu ME, Vaara TJ, Aro HT (2001) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR-guided bone biopsy on a 0.23 T open imager. Skeletal Radiol 30(11):620–4.CrossRefPubMed Parkkola RK, Mattila KT, Heikkilä JT, Ekfors TO, Kallajoki MA, Komu ME, Vaara TJ, Aro HT (2001) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and MR-guided bone biopsy on a 0.23 T open imager. Skeletal Radiol 30(11):6204.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Langen HJ, Kugel H, Landwehr P (2002) MR-guided core biopsies using a closed 1.0 T imager. First clinical results. Eur J Radiol 41(1):19–25.CrossRefPubMed Langen HJ, Kugel H, Landwehr P (2002) MR-guided core biopsies using a closed 1.0 T imager. First clinical results. Eur J Radiol 41(1):1925.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Stattaus J, Maderwald S, Forsting M, Barkhausen J, Ladd ME (2008) MR-guided core biopsy with MR fluoroscopy using a short, wide-bore 1.5-Tesla scanner: feasibility and initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging 27(5):1181–7.CrossRefPubMed Stattaus J, Maderwald S, Forsting M, Barkhausen J, Ladd ME (2008) MR-guided core biopsy with MR fluoroscopy using a short, wide-bore 1.5-Tesla scanner: feasibility and initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging 27(5):11817.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Schmidt AJ, Kee ST, Sze DY, Daniel BL, Razavi MK, Semba CP, Dake MD (1999) Diagnostic yield of MR-guided liver biopsies compared with CT- and US-guided liver biopsies. J Vasc Interv Radiol;10(10):1323–9.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt AJ, Kee ST, Sze DY, Daniel BL, Razavi MK, Semba CP, Dake MD (1999) Diagnostic yield of MR-guided liver biopsies compared with CT- and US-guided liver biopsies. J Vasc Interv Radiol;10(10):13239.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lewin JS, Petersilge CA, Hatem SF, Duerk JL, Lenz G, Clampitt ME, Williams ML, Kaczynski KR, Lanzieri CF, Wise AL, Haaga JR 1998) Interactive MR imaging-guided biopsy and aspiration with a modified clinical C-arm system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170(6):1593–601.PubMed Lewin JS, Petersilge CA, Hatem SF, Duerk JL, Lenz G, Clampitt ME, Williams ML, Kaczynski KR, Lanzieri CF, Wise AL, Haaga JR 1998) Interactive MR imaging-guided biopsy and aspiration with a modified clinical C-arm system. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170(6):1593–601.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Khamene A, Wacker F, Vogt S, Azar F, Wendt M, Sauer F, Lewin J (2003). An Augmented Reality system for MRI-guided needle biopsies. Stud Health Technol Inform 94:151–7.PubMed Khamene A, Wacker F, Vogt S, Azar F, Wendt M, Sauer F, Lewin J (2003). An Augmented Reality system for MRI-guided needle biopsies. Stud Health Technol Inform 94:151–7.PubMed
13.
go back to reference König CW, Trübenbach J, Fritz J, Lauer UM, Claussen CD, Pereira PL (2004) Contrast enhanced MR-guided biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 29(1):71–6.CrossRefPubMed König CW, Trübenbach J, Fritz J, Lauer UM, Claussen CD, Pereira PL (2004) Contrast enhanced MR-guided biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Imaging 29(1):71–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lu DS, Lee H, Farahani K, Sinha S, Lufkin R (1997)Biopsy of hepatic dome lesions: semi-real-time coronal MR guidance technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168(3):737–9.PubMed Lu DS, Lee H, Farahani K, Sinha S, Lufkin R (1997)Biopsy of hepatic dome lesions: semi-real-time coronal MR guidance technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168(3):7379.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Nour SG, Lewin JS (2005) Percutaneous biopsy from blinded to MR guided: an update on current techniques and applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13(3):441–64.CrossRefPubMed Nour SG, Lewin JS (2005) Percutaneous biopsy from blinded to MR guided: an update on current techniques and applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 13(3):441–64.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
MR-guided abdominal biopsy using a 1.5-Tesla closed system: a feasibility study
Authors
Chandan Jyoti Das
Ajit Harishkumar Goenka
Deep Narayan Srivastava
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-009-9504-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Abdominal Radiology 2/2010 Go to the issue

EditorialNotes

Introduction

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.