Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 4/2009

01-07-2009

Usefulness of CT volumetry for primary gastric lesions in predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer

Authors: Sang Min Lee, Se Hyung Kim, Jeong Min Lee, Seock-Ah Im, Yung-Jue Bang, Woo Ho Kim, Min A Kim, Han-Kwang Yang, Hyuk-Joon Lee, Won Jun Kang, Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 4/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

To investigate the utility of CT volumetry for primary gastric lesions in the prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Materials and methods

Thirty-three consecutive patients with resectable AGC stage ≥T2 and N1), who had been treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical gastric resection, were prospectively enrolled in this study. There were 30 men and 3 women with a mean age of 53.8 years. Contrast-enhanced CT was obtained after gastric distention with air before and after chemotherapy using a MDCT scanner. Pre- and post-chemotherapy thickness or short diameter and volume of the primary gastric tumor and largest lymph node (LN), were measured using a dedicated 3D software by two radiologists in consensus. PET/CT was also performed and the peak standardized uptake value (SUV) of primary gastric tumor and largest LN before and after chemotherapy was measured. The percentage diameter, volume, and SUV reduction rates for both the primary gastric tumor and the LN, were calculated and correlated with the histopathologic grades of regression using the Spearman correlation test. Differentiation between pathologic responders and nonresponders was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results

Among the three CT parameters which showed significant correlation with the histopathologic grades of regression, the correlation factor was highest in the percentage volume reduction rate of primary gastric tumor (ρ = 0.484, P = 0.004) followed by percentage volume reduction of the index node (ρ = 0.397, P = 0.022), and percentage diameter reduction of the index node (ρ = 0.359, P = 0.04). However, the percentage thickness decrease rate (P = 0.208) and the percentage SUV reduction rate (P = 0.619) of primary gastric tumor were not significantly correlated with the histopathologic grades of regression. When the optimal cutoff value of the percentage volume reduction rate of primary gastric tumor was determined to be 35.6%, a sensitivity of 100% (16/16) and a specificity of 58.8% (10/17) were achieved.

Conclusion

CT volumetry for primary gastric tumor may be the most accurate tool in the prediction of pathologic response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable AGC.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ekstrom AM, Hansson LE, Signorello LB et al. (2000) Decreasing incidence of both major histologic subtypes of gastric adenocarcinoma—a population-based study in Sweden. Br J Cancer 83:391–396PubMedCrossRef Ekstrom AM, Hansson LE, Signorello LB et al. (2000) Decreasing incidence of both major histologic subtypes of gastric adenocarcinoma—a population-based study in Sweden. Br J Cancer 83:391–396PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J et al. (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108PubMedCrossRef Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J et al. (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Roukos DH (2000) Current status and future perspectives in gastric cancer management. Cancer Treat Rev 26:243–255PubMedCrossRef Roukos DH (2000) Current status and future perspectives in gastric cancer management. Cancer Treat Rev 26:243–255PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gore RM (1997) Gastric cancer. Clinical and pathologic features. Radiol Clin North Am 35:295–310PubMed Gore RM (1997) Gastric cancer. Clinical and pathologic features. Radiol Clin North Am 35:295–310PubMed
7.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP et al. (2006) Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 355:11–20PubMedCrossRef Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP et al. (2006) Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med 355:11–20PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al. (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA et al. (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Therasse P, Eisenhauer EA, Verweij J (2006) RECIST revisited: a review of validation studies on tumour assessment. Eur J Cancer 42:1031–1039PubMedCrossRef Therasse P, Eisenhauer EA, Verweij J (2006) RECIST revisited: a review of validation studies on tumour assessment. Eur J Cancer 42:1031–1039PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hayes TG, Falchook GF, Varadhachary GR et al. (2006) Phase I trial of oral talactoferrin alfa in refractory solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 24:233–240PubMedCrossRef Hayes TG, Falchook GF, Varadhachary GR et al. (2006) Phase I trial of oral talactoferrin alfa in refractory solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 24:233–240PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Husband JE, Schwartz LH, Spencer J et al. (2004) Evaluation of the response to treatment of solid tumours—a consensus statement of the International Cancer Imaging Society. Br J Cancer 90:2256–2260PubMed Husband JE, Schwartz LH, Spencer J et al. (2004) Evaluation of the response to treatment of solid tumours—a consensus statement of the International Cancer Imaging Society. Br J Cancer 90:2256–2260PubMed
12.
go back to reference Beer AJ, Wieder HA, Lordick F et al. (2006) Adenocarcinomas of esophagogastric junction: multi-detector row CT to evaluate early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Radiology 239:472–480PubMedCrossRef Beer AJ, Wieder HA, Lordick F et al. (2006) Adenocarcinomas of esophagogastric junction: multi-detector row CT to evaluate early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Radiology 239:472–480PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kim SH, Lee JM, Han JK et al. (2005) Effect of adjusted positioning on gastric distention and fluid distribution during CT gastrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1180–1184PubMedCrossRef Kim SH, Lee JM, Han JK et al. (2005) Effect of adjusted positioning on gastric distention and fluid distribution during CT gastrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:1180–1184PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE et al. (1997) American Joint Committee on Cancer. Manual for staging of cancer, 5th ed., Philadelphia, Lippincott, pp 71–76 Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE et al. (1997) American Joint Committee on Cancer. Manual for staging of cancer, 5th ed., Philadelphia, Lippincott, pp 71–76
15.
go back to reference Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A (1997) Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:19–23PubMedCrossRef Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A (1997) Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis 12:19–23PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC et al. (1994) Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer 73:2680–2686PubMedCrossRef Mandard AM, Dalibard F, Mandard JC et al. (1994) Pathologic assessment of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy of esophageal carcinoma. Clinicopathologic correlations. Cancer 73:2680–2686PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kumano S, Murakami T, Kim T et al. (2005) T staging of gastric cancer: role of multi-detector row CT. Radiology 237:961–966PubMedCrossRef Kumano S, Murakami T, Kim T et al. (2005) T staging of gastric cancer: role of multi-detector row CT. Radiology 237:961–966PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kim HJ, Kim AY, Oh ST et al. (2005) Gastric cancer staging at multi-detector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology 236:879–885PubMedCrossRef Kim HJ, Kim AY, Oh ST et al. (2005) Gastric cancer staging at multi-detector row CT gastrography: comparison of transverse and volumetric CT scanning. Radiology 236:879–885PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kim AY, Kim HJ, Ha HK (2005) Gastric cancer by multidetector row CT: preoperative staging. Abdom Imaging 30:465–472PubMedCrossRef Kim AY, Kim HJ, Ha HK (2005) Gastric cancer by multidetector row CT: preoperative staging. Abdom Imaging 30:465–472PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hur J, Park MS, Lee JH et al. (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector row computed tomography in T- and N staging of gastric cancer with histopathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:372–377PubMedCrossRef Hur J, Park MS, Lee JH et al. (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of multidetector row computed tomography in T- and N staging of gastric cancer with histopathologic correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:372–377PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chen CY, Hsu JS, Wu DC et al. (2007) Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT–correlation with surgical and histopathologic results. Radiology 242:472–482PubMedCrossRef Chen CY, Hsu JS, Wu DC et al. (2007) Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT–correlation with surgical and histopathologic results. Radiology 242:472–482PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Yang DM, Kim HC, Jin W et al. (2007) 64 multidetector-row computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer: histological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:98–103PubMedCrossRef Yang DM, Kim HC, Jin W et al. (2007) 64 multidetector-row computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer: histological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:98–103PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Ott K, Fink U, Becker K et al. (2003) Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma by metabolic imaging: results of a prospective trial. J Clin Oncol 21:4604–4610PubMedCrossRef Ott K, Fink U, Becker K et al. (2003) Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma by metabolic imaging: results of a prospective trial. J Clin Oncol 21:4604–4610PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Shreve PD, Anzai Y, Wahl RL (1999) Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. Radiographics 19:61–77; quiz 150–151PubMed Shreve PD, Anzai Y, Wahl RL (1999) Pitfalls in oncologic diagnosis with FDG PET imaging: physiologic and benign variants. Radiographics 19:61–77; quiz 150–151PubMed
25.
go back to reference Stahl A, Ott K, Weber WA et al. (2003) FDG PET imaging of locally advanced gastric carcinomas: correlation with endoscopic and histopathological findings. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:288–295PubMed Stahl A, Ott K, Weber WA et al. (2003) FDG PET imaging of locally advanced gastric carcinomas: correlation with endoscopic and histopathological findings. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:288–295PubMed
Metadata
Title
Usefulness of CT volumetry for primary gastric lesions in predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer
Authors
Sang Min Lee
Se Hyung Kim
Jeong Min Lee
Seock-Ah Im
Yung-Jue Bang
Woo Ho Kim
Min A Kim
Han-Kwang Yang
Hyuk-Joon Lee
Won Jun Kang
Joon Koo Han
Byung Ihn Choi
Publication date
01-07-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 4/2009
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-008-9420-8

Other articles of this Issue 4/2009

Abdominal Radiology 4/2009 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.