Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 4/2008

01-07-2008

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: MRI/MRCP in staging and treatment planning

Authors: Gabriele Masselli, Gianfranco Gualdi

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 4/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The role of MR imaging in hilar cholangiocarcinoma is to confirm/reach a diagnosis and to assess resectability. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma shows the same signal intensity pattern of peripheral tumors both on T1- and T2-weighted images. On magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) images, hilar cholangiocarcinoma appears as a moderately irregular thickening of the bile duct wall (5 mm) with symmetric upstream dilation of the intrahepatic bile ducts. The aim of preoperative investigation in Klatskin tumors typically requires the evaluation of the level of biliary obstruction, the intrahepatic tumor spread, and the vascular involvement; it also needs to show any atrophy–hypertrophy complex. Because of its intrinsic high tissue contrast and multiplanar capability, MR imaging and MRCP are able to detect and preoperatively assess patients with cholangiocarcinoma, investigating all involved structures such as bile ducts, vessels and hepatic parenchyma. The main reason for surgical/imaging discrepancy is represented by the microscopic diffusion along the mucosa and in the perineural space.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Klatskin G (1965) Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic ducts at its bifurcation with the porta hepatis: an unusual tumor with distinctive clinical and pathological features. Am J Med 38:241–245PubMedCrossRef Klatskin G (1965) Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic ducts at its bifurcation with the porta hepatis: an unusual tumor with distinctive clinical and pathological features. Am J Med 38:241–245PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Alexander F, Rossi RL, O’Bryan M, et al. (1994) Biliary carcinoma: a review of 109 cases. Am J Surg 147:503–509CrossRef Alexander F, Rossi RL, O’Bryan M, et al. (1994) Biliary carcinoma: a review of 109 cases. Am J Surg 147:503–509CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Launois B, Wemyss-Holden S, Maddern GJ (2002) Current and future trends in management and treatment of Klatskin tumour. Int J Clin Oncol 7:91–102PubMed Launois B, Wemyss-Holden S, Maddern GJ (2002) Current and future trends in management and treatment of Klatskin tumour. Int J Clin Oncol 7:91–102PubMed
4.
go back to reference Gibson RN, Yeung E, Thompson JN, et al. (1986) Bile duct obstruction: radiologic evaluation of level, cause, and tumor resectability. Radiology 160:43–47PubMed Gibson RN, Yeung E, Thompson JN, et al. (1986) Bile duct obstruction: radiologic evaluation of level, cause, and tumor resectability. Radiology 160:43–47PubMed
5.
go back to reference Guthrie JA, Ward J, Robinson PJ (1996) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: T2-weighted spin-echo and gadolinium enhanced FLASH MR imaging. Radiology 201:347–351PubMed Guthrie JA, Ward J, Robinson PJ (1996) Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: T2-weighted spin-echo and gadolinium enhanced FLASH MR imaging. Radiology 201:347–351PubMed
6.
go back to reference Fulcher AS, Turner MA (1997) HASTE MR cholangiography in the evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1501–1505PubMed Fulcher AS, Turner MA (1997) HASTE MR cholangiography in the evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1501–1505PubMed
7.
go back to reference Reinhold C, Bret P, Atri M, et al. (1996) MR cholangiopancreatography:potential clinical application. Radiographics 16:309–320 Reinhold C, Bret P, Atri M, et al. (1996) MR cholangiopancreatography:potential clinical application. Radiographics 16:309–320
8.
9.
go back to reference Vogl TJ, Schwarz WO, Heller M, et al. (2006) Staging of Klatskin tumours (hilar cholangiocarcinomas): comparison of MR cholangiography, MR imaging, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Eur Radiol 16(10):2317–25PubMedCrossRef Vogl TJ, Schwarz WO, Heller M, et al. (2006) Staging of Klatskin tumours (hilar cholangiocarcinomas): comparison of MR cholangiography, MR imaging, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Eur Radiol 16(10):2317–25PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference American Joint Committee on Cancer (2005) AJCC cancer staging. New York: Springer, pp 1–150 American Joint Committee on Cancer (2005) AJCC cancer staging. New York: Springer, pp 1–150
11.
go back to reference Slattery JM, Sahani DV (2006) What is the current state of the art imaging for detection and staging of cholangiocarcinoma? Oncologist 11:913–922PubMedCrossRef Slattery JM, Sahani DV (2006) What is the current state of the art imaging for detection and staging of cholangiocarcinoma? Oncologist 11:913–922PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nakanuma Y, Minato H, Kida T, et al. (1994) Pathology of cholangiocarcinoma. In Primary liver Cancer in Japan. Tokyo, Japan: Springer, pp 39–50 Nakanuma Y, Minato H, Kida T, et al. (1994) Pathology of cholangiocarcinoma. In Primary liver Cancer in Japan. Tokyo, Japan: Springer, pp 39–50
13.
go back to reference Bhuiya MR, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, et al. (1992) Clinicopathologic studies on perineural invasion of bile duct carcinoma. Ann Surg 215:344–349PubMedCrossRef Bhuiya MR, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, et al. (1992) Clinicopathologic studies on perineural invasion of bile duct carcinoma. Ann Surg 215:344–349PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lim JH, Park CK (2004) Pathology of cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 29:540–547PubMed Lim JH, Park CK (2004) Pathology of cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 29:540–547PubMed
15.
go back to reference Lim JH (2003) Cholangiocarcinoma: morphologic classification according to growth pattern and imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:819–827PubMed Lim JH (2003) Cholangiocarcinoma: morphologic classification according to growth pattern and imaging findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:819–827PubMed
16.
go back to reference Malhi H, Gores GJ (2006) Review article: the modern diagnosis and therapy of cholangiocarcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23:1287–1296PubMedCrossRef Malhi H, Gores GJ (2006) Review article: the modern diagnosis and therapy of cholangiocarcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23:1287–1296PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Choi BI, Lee JM, Han JK (2004) Imaging of intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinoma 29:548–557 Choi BI, Lee JM, Han JK (2004) Imaging of intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinoma 29:548–557
18.
go back to reference Looser C, Stain SC, Baer HU, Triller J, Blungart LH (1992) Staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma by ultrasound and duplex sonography: a comparison with angiography and operative findings. Br J Radiol 65:871–877PubMedCrossRef Looser C, Stain SC, Baer HU, Triller J, Blungart LH (1992) Staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma by ultrasound and duplex sonography: a comparison with angiography and operative findings. Br J Radiol 65:871–877PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tillich M, Mischinger HJ, Preisegger KH, Rabl H, Szolar DH (1998) Multiphasic Helical CT in Diagnosis and Staging of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:651–658PubMed Tillich M, Mischinger HJ, Preisegger KH, Rabl H, Szolar DH (1998) Multiphasic Helical CT in Diagnosis and Staging of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:651–658PubMed
20.
go back to reference Wilkinson M (1996) The art of diagnostic imaging: the biliary tree. J Hepatol 25:5–19PubMed Wilkinson M (1996) The art of diagnostic imaging: the biliary tree. J Hepatol 25:5–19PubMed
21.
go back to reference Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, et al. (1976) Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a study of 10.000 cases. Gastroenterology 70:314–320PubMed Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, et al. (1976) Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a study of 10.000 cases. Gastroenterology 70:314–320PubMed
22.
go back to reference Zech JC, Schoenberg SO, Reiser M, Helmeberger (2004) Cross-sectional imaging of biliary tumors:current clinical status and future developments. Eur Radiol 14:1174–1187 Zech JC, Schoenberg SO, Reiser M, Helmeberger (2004) Cross-sectional imaging of biliary tumors:current clinical status and future developments. Eur Radiol 14:1174–1187
23.
go back to reference Manfredi R, Barbaro B, Masselli G, Vecchioli A, Marano P (2004) Magnetic Resonance imaging of cholangiocarcinoma. Seminar Liv Dis 24:155–164CrossRef Manfredi R, Barbaro B, Masselli G, Vecchioli A, Marano P (2004) Magnetic Resonance imaging of cholangiocarcinoma. Seminar Liv Dis 24:155–164CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Manfredi R, Masselli G, Maresca G, et al. (2003) MR imaging and MRCP of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 28:319–325PubMedCrossRef Manfredi R, Masselli G, Maresca G, et al. (2003) MR imaging and MRCP of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Abdom Imaging 28:319–325PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bismuth H, Corlette MB (1975) Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 140:170–178PubMed Bismuth H, Corlette MB (1975) Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 140:170–178PubMed
26.
go back to reference Lopera JE, Soto JA, Munera F (2001) Malignant hilar and perihilar biliary obstruction: use of MR cholangiography to define the extent of biliary ductal involvement and plan percutaneous interventions. Radiology 220:90–96PubMed Lopera JE, Soto JA, Munera F (2001) Malignant hilar and perihilar biliary obstruction: use of MR cholangiography to define the extent of biliary ductal involvement and plan percutaneous interventions. Radiology 220:90–96PubMed
27.
go back to reference Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen L, Rondeua Y, Pelletier G (2000) Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the staging of malignant hilar strictures. Gut 46:103–106PubMedCrossRef Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen L, Rondeua Y, Pelletier G (2000) Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the staging of malignant hilar strictures. Gut 46:103–106PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Manfredi R, Brizi MG, Masselli G, et al. (2001) Malignant Biliary hilar stenosis. MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiol Med 102:48–54PubMed Manfredi R, Brizi MG, Masselli G, et al. (2001) Malignant Biliary hilar stenosis. MR cholangiopancreatography compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Radiol Med 102:48–54PubMed
29.
go back to reference Otto G, Romaneehsen B, Bittinger F, et al. (2004) Preoperative imaging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma:surgical evaluation of standard practices. Z Gastroenterol. 42(1):9–14PubMedCrossRef Otto G, Romaneehsen B, Bittinger F, et al. (2004) Preoperative imaging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma:surgical evaluation of standard practices. Z Gastroenterol. 42(1):9–14PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Lee HY, Kim SH, Lee JM, et al. (2006) Preoperative assessment of respectability of hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma:combined CT and cholangiography with revised criteria. Radiology 239:113–121PubMedCrossRef Lee HY, Kim SH, Lee JM, et al. (2006) Preoperative assessment of respectability of hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma:combined CT and cholangiography with revised criteria. Radiology 239:113–121PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E, et al. (2006) MR imaging and MRCP in the preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings[Abstract]. Radiol Suppl RSNA 2006:273 Masselli G, Casciani E, Polettini E, et al. (2006) MR imaging and MRCP in the preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings[Abstract]. Radiol Suppl RSNA 2006:273
32.
go back to reference Mcfarland EG, Kaufman JA, Saini S, et al. (1996) Preoperative staging of cancer of the pancreas: value of MR angiography versus conventional angiography in detecting portal venous invasion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:37–43PubMed Mcfarland EG, Kaufman JA, Saini S, et al. (1996) Preoperative staging of cancer of the pancreas: value of MR angiography versus conventional angiography in detecting portal venous invasion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:37–43PubMed
33.
go back to reference Lee GM, Park KB, Shin YM, et al. (2003) Preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with contrast enhanced 3D Fast Imaging with steady-state precession magnetic resonance angiography: comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. World J Surg 7:278–283CrossRef Lee GM, Park KB, Shin YM, et al. (2003) Preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with contrast enhanced 3D Fast Imaging with steady-state precession magnetic resonance angiography: comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. World J Surg 7:278–283CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lygidakis NJ, Van der Henden MN, Houthoff HJ (1988) Surgical approaches to the management of primary biliary cholangiocarcinoma of the porta hepatis. The decision making dilemma. Hepatogastroenterology 35:261–267PubMed Lygidakis NJ, Van der Henden MN, Houthoff HJ (1988) Surgical approaches to the management of primary biliary cholangiocarcinoma of the porta hepatis. The decision making dilemma. Hepatogastroenterology 35:261–267PubMed
35.
go back to reference Baer HU, Stain SC, Dennison MD, et al. (1992) Improvement in survival by aggressive resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 217:20–27CrossRef Baer HU, Stain SC, Dennison MD, et al. (1992) Improvement in survival by aggressive resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 217:20–27CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Rosai J (1996) Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology, 8th edn. St. Louis: Mosby 914–915, 960 Rosai J (1996) Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology, 8th edn. St. Louis: Mosby 914–915, 960
37.
go back to reference Lygidakis NJ, Sgourakis GJ, Dedemadi GV, Vlachos L, Safioleas M (2001) Long term results following resectional surgery for Klatskin tumors: a twenty-year personal experience. Hepatogastroenterology 48:95–101PubMed Lygidakis NJ, Sgourakis GJ, Dedemadi GV, Vlachos L, Safioleas M (2001) Long term results following resectional surgery for Klatskin tumors: a twenty-year personal experience. Hepatogastroenterology 48:95–101PubMed
Metadata
Title
Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: MRI/MRCP in staging and treatment planning
Authors
Gabriele Masselli
Gianfranco Gualdi
Publication date
01-07-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 4/2008
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9281-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2008

Abdominal Radiology 4/2008 Go to the issue
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discuss last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.