Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2020

01-09-2020 | Prostate Cancer | Short Communication

Prognostic biomarkers in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving [177Lu]-PSMA-617

Authors: Justin Ferdinandus, John Violet, Shahneen Sandhu, Rodney J. Hicks, Aravind S. Ravi Kumar, Amir Iravani, Grace Kong, Tim Akhurst, Sue Ping Thang, Declan G. Murphy, Scott Williams, Michael S. Hofman

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 10/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

We analysed quantitative biomarkers derived from both baseline whole-body imaging and blood serum to identify prognostic markers in patients treated within the lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen (LuPSMA) phase 2 trial.

Methods

PET image analysis was carried out using whole-body segmentation quantifying molecular tumour volume (SUV > 3 threshold for PSMA, SUV > liver+2sd for fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) including SUVmax and SUVmean. For baseline bone scans, EXINI bone scan index (BSI) was used to calculate the percentage of involved bone. Baseline alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), prostate specific antigen (PSA) and PSA doubling time were also used in this analysis. We used univariate cox regression analysis and log-rank comparison with optimised cut-offs to find suitable biomarkers prognostic of overall survival from time of enrolment.

Results

This analysis identified FDG-positive tumour volume (FDGvol; HR 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4–4.8), mean intensity of PSMA-avid tumour uptake (PSMAmean; HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.8–0.98), bone scan index (BSI; HR 2.3; 95% CI, 1.2–4.4), ALP (HR 1.1; 95% CI, 1–1.2) and LDH (HR 1.2; 95% CI, 1–1.5) as biomarkers prognostic of overall survival.

Conclusions

In addition to established biomarkers, both FDG and PSMA PET/CT parameters have prognostic significance for survival in men undergoing LuPSMA therapy.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Violet J, Sandhu S, Iravani A, Ferdinandus J, Thang SP, Kong G, et al. Long term follow-up and outcomes of re-treatment in an expanded 50 patient single-center phase II prospective trial of Lutetium-177 ((177)Lu) PSMA-617 theranostics in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.119.236414. Violet J, Sandhu S, Iravani A, Ferdinandus J, Thang SP, Kong G, et al. Long term follow-up and outcomes of re-treatment in an expanded 50 patient single-center phase II prospective trial of Lutetium-177 ((177)Lu) PSMA-617 theranostics in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2019. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2967/​jnumed.​119.​236414.
11.
go back to reference Hofman MS, Emmett L, Violet J, Zhang A Y, Lawrence NJ, Stockler M, et al. TheraP: a randomized phase 2 trial of (177) Lu-PSMA-617 theranostic treatment vs cabazitaxel in progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (Clinical Trial Protocol ANZUP 1603). BJU Int. 2019;124(Suppl 1):5–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14876.CrossRefPubMed Hofman MS, Emmett L, Violet J, Zhang A Y, Lawrence NJ, Stockler M, et al. TheraP: a randomized phase 2 trial of (177) Lu-PSMA-617 theranostic treatment vs cabazitaxel in progressive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (Clinical Trial Protocol ANZUP 1603). BJU Int. 2019;124(Suppl 1):5–13. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1111/​bju.​14876.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Prognostic biomarkers in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving [177Lu]-PSMA-617
Authors
Justin Ferdinandus
John Violet
Shahneen Sandhu
Rodney J. Hicks
Aravind S. Ravi Kumar
Amir Iravani
Grace Kong
Tim Akhurst
Sue Ping Thang
Declan G. Murphy
Scott Williams
Michael S. Hofman
Publication date
01-09-2020
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 10/2020
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-020-04723-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2020

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 10/2020 Go to the issue