Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 9/2019

Open Access 01-08-2019 | Rituximab | Original Article

Interobserver reproducibility of tumor uptake quantification with 89Zr-immuno-PET: a multicenter analysis

Authors: Yvonne W. S. Jauw, Frederike Bensch, Adrienne H. Brouwers, Otto S. Hoekstra, Josée M. Zijlstra, Simone Pieplenbosch, Carolien P. Schröder, Sonja Zweegman, Guus A. M. S. van Dongen, C. Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, Elisabeth G. E. de Vries, Henrica C. W. de Vet, Ronald Boellaard, Marc C. Huisman

Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Issue 9/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In-vivo quantification of tumor uptake of 89-zirconium (89Zr)-labelled monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with PET provides a potential tool in strategies to optimize tumor targeting and therapeutic efficacy. A specific challenge for 89Zr-immuno-PET is low tumor contrast. This is expected to result in interobserver variation in tumor delineation. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine interobserver reproducibility of tumor uptake measures by tumor delineation on 89Zr-immuno-PET scans.

Methods

Data were obtained from previously published clinical studies performed with 89Zr-rituximab, 89Zr-cetuximab and 89Zr-trastuzumab. Tumor lesions on 89Zr-immuno-PET were identified as focal uptake exceeding local background by a nuclear medicine physician. Three observers independently manually delineated volumes of interest (VOI). Maximum, peak and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax, SUVpeak and SUVmean) were used to quantify tumor uptake. Interobserver variability was expressed as the coefficient of variation (CoV). The performance of semi-automatic VOI delineation using 50% of background-corrected ACpeak was described.

Results

In total, 103 VOI were delineated (3–6 days post injection (D3-D6)). Tumor uptake (median, interquartile range) was 9.2 (5.2–12.6), 6.9 (4.0–9.6) and 5.5 (3.3–7.8) for SUVmax, SUVpeak and SUVmean. Interobserver variability was 0% (0–12), 0% (0–2) and 7% (5–14), respectively (n = 103). The success rate of the semi-automatic method was 45%. Inclusion of background was the main reason for failure of semi-automatic VOI.

Conclusions

This study shows that interobserver reproducibility of tumor uptake quantification on 89Zr-immuno-PET was excellent for SUVmax and SUVpeak using a standardized manual procedure for tumor segmentation. Semi-automatic delineation was not robust due to limited tumor contrast.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Oldham RK, Dillman RO. Monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy: 25 years of progress. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1774–7.CrossRefPubMed Oldham RK, Dillman RO. Monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy: 25 years of progress. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1774–7.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Tout M, Casasnovas O, Meignan M, et al. Rituximab exposure is influenced by baseline metabolic tumor volume and predicts outcome of DLBCL patients: a lymphoma study association report. Blood. 2017;129(19):2616–23.CrossRefPubMed Tout M, Casasnovas O, Meignan M, et al. Rituximab exposure is influenced by baseline metabolic tumor volume and predicts outcome of DLBCL patients: a lymphoma study association report. Blood. 2017;129(19):2616–23.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lamberts LE, Williams SP, Terwisscha van Scheltinga AG, et al. Antibody positron emission tomography imaging in anticancer drug development. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1491–504.CrossRefPubMed Lamberts LE, Williams SP, Terwisscha van Scheltinga AG, et al. Antibody positron emission tomography imaging in anticancer drug development. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1491–504.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Jauw YWS, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, Hoekstra OS, et al. Immuno-positron emission tomography with zirconium-89-labelled monoclonal antibodies in oncology: what can we learn from initial clinical trials? Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:131.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jauw YWS, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, Hoekstra OS, et al. Immuno-positron emission tomography with zirconium-89-labelled monoclonal antibodies in oncology: what can we learn from initial clinical trials? Front Pharmacol. 2016;7:131.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, Gootjes EC, Huisman MC, et al. 89Zr-cetuximab PET imaging in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;30:30384–93. Menke-van der Houven van Oordt CW, Gootjes EC, Huisman MC, et al. 89Zr-cetuximab PET imaging in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;30:30384–93.
6.
go back to reference Jauw YWS, Zijlstra JM, de Jong D, et al. Performance of 89Zr-labelled-rituximab-PET as an imaging biomarker to assess CD20 targeting: a pilot study in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169828.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jauw YWS, Zijlstra JM, de Jong D, et al. Performance of 89Zr-labelled-rituximab-PET as an imaging biomarker to assess CD20 targeting: a pilot study in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169828.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Makris NE, Boellaard R, Visser EP, et al. Multicenter harmonization of 89Zr PET/CT performance. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:264–7.CrossRefPubMed Makris NE, Boellaard R, Visser EP, et al. Multicenter harmonization of 89Zr PET/CT performance. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:264–7.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Boellaard R. Quantitative on cology molecular analysis suite: ACCURATE. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:1753.CrossRef Boellaard R. Quantitative on cology molecular analysis suite: ACCURATE. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:1753.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Frings V, de Langen AJ, Yaqub M, et al. Methodological considerations in quantification of 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine uptake measured with positron emission tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2014;16:136–45.CrossRefPubMed Frings V, de Langen AJ, Yaqub M, et al. Methodological considerations in quantification of 3′-deoxy-3′-[18F]fluorothymidine uptake measured with positron emission tomography in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2014;16:136–45.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1033–9.CrossRefPubMed de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1033–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Huang YE, Chen CF, Huang YJ, et al. Interobserver variability among measurements of the maximum and mean standardized uptake values on (18)F-FDG PET/CT and measurements of tumor size on diagnostic CT in patients with pulmonary tumors. Acta Radiol. 2010;51:782–8.CrossRefPubMed Huang YE, Chen CF, Huang YJ, et al. Interobserver variability among measurements of the maximum and mean standardized uptake values on (18)F-FDG PET/CT and measurements of tumor size on diagnostic CT in patients with pulmonary tumors. Acta Radiol. 2010;51:782–8.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lee JR, Madsen MT, Bushnel D, et al. A threshold method to improve standardized uptake reproducibility. Nucl Med Commun. 2000;21:685–90.CrossRefPubMed Lee JR, Madsen MT, Bushnel D, et al. A threshold method to improve standardized uptake reproducibility. Nucl Med Commun. 2000;21:685–90.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Kanoun S, Tal I, Berriolo-Riedinger A, et al. Influence of software tool and methodological aspects of total metabolic tumor volume calculation on baseline [18F]FDG PET to predict survival in Hodgkin lymphoma. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0140830.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kanoun S, Tal I, Berriolo-Riedinger A, et al. Influence of software tool and methodological aspects of total metabolic tumor volume calculation on baseline [18F]FDG PET to predict survival in Hodgkin lymphoma. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0140830.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:328–54.CrossRefPubMed Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:328–54.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Interobserver reproducibility of tumor uptake quantification with 89Zr-immuno-PET: a multicenter analysis
Authors
Yvonne W. S. Jauw
Frederike Bensch
Adrienne H. Brouwers
Otto S. Hoekstra
Josée M. Zijlstra
Simone Pieplenbosch
Carolien P. Schröder
Sonja Zweegman
Guus A. M. S. van Dongen
C. Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt
Elisabeth G. E. de Vries
Henrica C. W. de Vet
Ronald Boellaard
Marc C. Huisman
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Issue 9/2019
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Electronic ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04377-6

Other articles of this Issue 9/2019

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 9/2019 Go to the issue