Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Skeletal Radiology
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 11/2022

28-05-2022 | Ultrasound | Review Article

Ultrasound evaluations and guided procedures of the painful joint arthroplasty

Authors: Steven B. Soliman, Jason J. Davis, Stephanie J. Muh, Saifuddin T. Vohra, Ashish Patel, Marnix T. van Holsbeeck

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 11/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to describe the use of ultrasound for the diagnosis and treatment of painful joint arthroplasty. Ultrasound plays a crucial role in the diagnosis of the painful joint arthroplasty, especially given its unique dynamic capabilities, convenience, and high resolution. Ultrasound guidance is also instrumental for procedures in both diagnosing and in select cases, treating the painful joint arthroplasty. Topics to be discussed in this article include trends in arthroplasty placement, benefits of the use of ultrasound overall, and ultrasound evaluation of periprosthetic joint infections. We will also review the sonographic findings with dissociated/displaced components and adverse reaction to metallic debris including metallosis, trunnionosis, and metal-on-metal pseudotumors. Additionally, we will discuss ultrasound evaluation of tendon pathologies with arthroplasties, including dynamic maneuvers to evaluate for tendon impingement/snapping. Finally, we will cover ultrasound-guided joint arthroplasty injection indications and precautions.

Key points

• Ultrasound is preferred over MRI in patients with joint arthroplasty and plays a crucial role in diagnosis, especially given its unique dynamic capabilities, convenience and high resolution.
• It is especially beneficial for US-guided aspiration in periprosthetic joint infections; effectively used to evaluate periprosthetic fluid collections, facilitating differentiation between abscesses and aseptic collections, and tracking sinus tracts.
• Recently, the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections has shifted focus to biomarkers in the periprosthetic fluid, specifically α‐defensin, which has a high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing infection.
• Cutibacterium acnes is a major pathogen responsible for shoulder arthroplasty infections, often presenting with normal laboratory values and since slow growing, must be kept for a minimum of 14 days.
Literature
1.
Fingar KR, Stocks C, Weiss AJ, Steiner CA. Most frequent operating room procedures performed in U.S. hospitals, 2003–2012: Statistical Brief #186. In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2006.
2.
Gademan MG, Hofstede SN, VlietVlieland TP, Nelissen RG, Marang-van de Mheen PJ. Indication criteria for total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: a state-of-the-science overview. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:463.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Quintana JM, Arostegui I, Escobar A, Azkarate J, Goenaga JI, Lafuente I. Prevalence of knee and hip osteoarthritis and the appropriateness of joint replacement in an older population. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1576–84.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Tran G, Khalil LS, Wrubel A, Klochko CL, Davis JJ, Soliman SB. Incidental findings detected on preoperative CT imaging obtained for robotic-assisted joint replacements: clinical importance and the effect on the scheduled arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol. 2021;50:1151–61.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Kayani B, Konan S, Pietrzak JRT, Haddad FS. Iatrogenic bone and soft tissue trauma in robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study and validation of a new classification system. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:2496–501.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Khalil LS, Darrith B, Franovic S, Davis JJ, Weir RM, Banka TR. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health Short Forms demonstrate responsiveness in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35:1540–4.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Mallon S, Bussis K, Beswick Z, North WT, Soliman SB. Ultrasonographic and radiographic findings of polyethylene component displacement with severe metallosis and metal-induced synovitis following total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2019;26:941–50.PubMedCrossRef
8.
North WT, Mehran N, Davis JJ, Silverton CD, Weir RM, Laker MW. Topical vs intravenous tranexamic acid in primary total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:1022–6.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Srivastava K, Bozic KJ, Silverton C, Nelson AJ, Makhni EC, Davis JJ. Reconsidering strategies for managing chronic periprosthetic joint infection in total knee arthroplasty: using decision analytics to find the optimal strategy between one-stage and two-stage total knee revision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101:14–24.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Klug A, Gramlich Y, Rudert M, et al. The projected volume of primary and revision total knee arthroplasty will place an immense burden on future heath care systems over the next 30 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29:3287–98.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL Jr. Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35:S79-85.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
12.
Arnholdt J, Kamawal Y, Holzapfel BM, Ripp A, Rudert M, Steinert AF. Evaluation of implant fit and frontal plane alignment after bi-compartmental knee arthroplasty using patient-specific instruments and implants. Arch Med Sci. 2018;14:1424–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Aujla RS, Esler CN. Total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in patients less than fifty-five years of age: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:2598-603.e1.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780–5.PubMedCrossRef
15.
16.
Lim SJ, Jang SP, Kim DW, Moon YW, Park YS. Primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty using a 32-mm ceramic head with a titanium-alloy sleeve. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:3781–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Sobieraj M, Marwin S. Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) in total joint arthroplasty. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2013;76:38–46.
18.
Delaunay CP, Putman S, Puliero B, Begin M, Migaud H, Bonnomet F. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with metasul bearings provides good results in active young patients: a concise followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474:2126–33.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
19.
Bell SW, Anthony I, Jones B, MacLean A, Rowe P, Blyth M. Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: data from a prospective, randomized controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:627–35.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Conditt MA, Roche MW. Minimally invasive robotic-arm-guided unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:63–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Nodzo SR, Chang CC, Carroll KM, et al. Intraoperative placement of total hip arthroplasty components with robotic-arm assisted technology correlates with postoperative implant position: a CT-based study. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B:1303–9.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Sousa PL, Sculco PK, Mayman DJ, Jerabek SA, Ast MP, Chalmers BP. Robots in the operating room during hip and knee arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020;13:309–17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
23.
Klauser AS, Tagliafico A, Allen GM, et al. Clinical indications for musculoskeletal ultrasound: a Delphi-based consensus paper of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:1140–8.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Lee MH, Sheehan SE, Orwin JF, Lee KS. Comprehensive shoulder US examination: a standardized approach with multimodality correlation for common shoulder disease. Radiographics. 2016;36:1606–27.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Alves TI, Girish G, Kalume Brigido M, Jacobson JA. US of the knee: scanning techniques, pitfalls, and pathologic conditions. Radiographics. 2016;36:1759–75.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Soliman SB, Spicer PJ, van Holsbeeck MT. Sonographic and radiographic findings of posterior tibial tendon dysfunction: a practical step forward. Skeletal Radiol. 2019;48:11–27.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Long SS, Surrey D, Nazarian LN. Common sonographic findings in the painful hip after hip arthroplasty. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31:301–12.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Romanò CL, Petrosillo N, Argento G, et al. The role of imaging techniques to define a peri-prosthetic hip and knee joint infection: multidisciplinary consensus statements. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2548.PubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
van Holsbeeck MT, Eyler WR, Sherman LS, et al. Detection of infection in loosened hip prostheses: efficacy of sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:381–4.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Signore A, Sconfienza LM, Borens O, et al. Consensus document for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a joint paper by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46:971–88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Battaglia M, Vannini F, Guaraldi F, Rossi G, Biondi F, Sudanese A. Validity of preoperative ultrasound-guided aspiration in the revision of hip prosthesis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:1977–83.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Eisler T, Svensson O, Engström CF, et al. Ultrasound for diagnosis of infection in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:1010–7.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Talbot BS, Weinberg EP. MR imaging with metal-suppression sequences for evaluation of total joint arthroplasty. Radiographics. 2016;36:209–25.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Heffernan EJ, Alkubaidan FO, Nielsen TO, Munk PL. The imaging appearances of metallosis. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37:59–62.PubMedCrossRef
35.
36.
Kwon YM, Dimitriou D, Liow MH, Tsai TY, Li G. Is ultrasound as useful as metal artifact reduction sequence magnetic resonance imaging in longitudinal surveillance of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients? J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:1821–7.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, et al. The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:1309-14.e2.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zeng YQ, Deng S, Zhu XY, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the synovial fluid α-defensin lateral flow test in periprosthetic joint infection: a meta-analysis. Orthop Surg. 2021;13:708–18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
40.
41.
42.
Ting NT, Della Valle CJ. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection-an algorithm-based approach. J Arthroplast. 2017;32:2047–50.CrossRef
43.
Porrino J, Wang A, Moats A, Mulcahy H, Kani K. Prosthetic joint infections: diagnosis, management, and complications of the two-stage replacement arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol. 2020;49:847–59.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Abdel Karim M, Andrawis J, Bengoa F, et al. Hip and knee section, diagnosis, algorithm: proceedings of international consensus on orthopedic infections. J Arthroplast. 2019;34:S339–50.CrossRef
45.
Chan BY, Crawford AM, Kobes PH, et al. Septic arthritis: an evidence-based review of diagnosis and image-guided aspiration. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020;215:568–81.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Kung JW, Yablon C, Huang ES, Hennessey H, Wu JS. Clinical and radiologic predictive factors of septic hip arthritis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:868–72.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Partridge DG, Winnard C, Townsend R, Cooper R, Stockley I. Joint aspiration, including culture of reaspirated saline after a ‘dry tap’, is sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of hip and knee prosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B:749–54.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Ali F, Wilkinson JM, Cooper JR, et al. Accuracy of joint aspiration for the preoperative diagnosis of infection in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:221–6.PubMedCrossRef
49.
50.
Hanna BC, Thompson NW, Wilson DS, Mollan RA. Extra-articular migration of the patellar component following total knee arthroplasty. Ulster Med J. 2002;71:57–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Helito CP, Gobbi RG, Tirico LE, Pecora JR, Camanho GL. Loosening of the patellar component and extra-articular and transcutaneous migration after TKA. Orthopedics. 2014;37:e211–3.PubMedCrossRef
52.
Singisetti K, Raju P, Langton D, Nargol A. Ultrasound is reliable in diagnosis of adverse reactions to metallic debris following metal on metal hip replacement [abstract]. Orthopaedic Proceedings. 2012;94-B:550.
53.
Sansone V, Pagani D, Melato M. The effects on bone cells of metal ions released from orthopaedic implants. A review Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2013;10:34–40.PubMed
54.
Romesburg JW, Wasserman PL, Schoppe CH. Metallosis and metal-induced synovitis following total knee arthroplasty: review of radiographic and CT findings. J Radiol Case Rep. 2010;4:7–17.PubMedPubMedCentral
55.
Rajgopal A, Panda I, Tyagi VC. Early failure with massive metallosis and posteromedial wear following atraumatic anterior cruciate ligament rupture after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today. 2017;4:15–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
56.
Craig R, Vlychou M, McCarthy CL, Gibbons CLMH, Athanasou NA. Metal wear-induced pseudotumour following an endoprosthetic knee replacement for Ewing sarcoma. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46:967–74.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
57.
Matharu GS, Mansour R, Dada O, Ostlere S, Pandit HG, Murray DW. Which imaging modality is most effective for identifying pseudotumours in metal-on-metal hip resurfacings requiring revision: ultrasound or MARS-MRI or both. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B:40–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
Weissman BN, Scott RD, Brick GW, Corson JM. Radiographic detection of metal-induced synovitis as a complication of arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:1002–7.PubMedCrossRef
59.
Case CP, Langkamer VG, James C, et al. Widespread dissemination of metal debris from implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:701–12.PubMedCrossRef
60.
61.
Awan O, Chen L, Resnik CS. Imaging evaluation of complications of hip arthroplasty: review of current concepts and imaging findings. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2013;64:306–13.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Lainiala O, Elo P, Reito A, Pajamäki J, Puolakka T, Eskelinen A. Good sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound for detecting pseudotumors in 83 failed metal-on-metal hip replacements. Acta Orthop. 2015;86:339–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
63.
Piechota M, Maczuch J, Skupiński J, Kukawska-Sysio K, Wawrzynek W. Internal snapping hip syndrome in dynamic ultrasonography. J Ultrason. 2016;16:296–303.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
64.
Cardinal E, Buckwalter KA, Capello WN, Duval N. US of the snapping iliopsoas tendon. Radiology. 1996;198:521–2.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Ives EP, Nazarian LN, Parker L, Garrigues GE, Williams GR. Subscapularis tendon tears: a common sonographic finding in symptomatic postarthroplasty shoulders. J Clin Ultrasound. 2013;41:129–33.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Sofka CM, Adler RS. Original report. Sonographic evaluation of shoulder arthroplasty. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1117–20.PubMedCrossRef
67.
Odak S, Ivory J. Management of abductor mechanism deficiency following total hip replacement. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B:343–7.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Bremer AK, Kalberer F, Pfirrmann CW, Dora C. Soft-tissue changes in hip abductor muscles and tendons after total hip replacement: comparison between the direct anterior and the transgluteal approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93:886–9.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Creteur V, De Angelis R, Absil J, Kyriakidis T, Madani A. Sonographic and radiographic evaluation of the extensor tendons in early postoperative period after total knee arthroplasty. Skeletal Radiol. 2021;50:485–94.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Cyteval C. Imaging of knee implants and related complications. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2016;97:809–21.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Mills ES, Elman MB, Foran JRH. The risk of acute infection following intra-articular corticosteroid injection into a pre-existing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:216–9.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Klement MR, Luzzi AJ, Siddiqi A, Valichka K, Sharkey PF. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection following total knee arthroplasty: is it effective? J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:303–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Ultrasound evaluations and guided procedures of the painful joint arthroplasty
Authors
Steven B. Soliman
Jason J. Davis
Stephanie J. Muh
Saifuddin T. Vohra
Ashish Patel
Marnix T. van Holsbeeck
Publication date
28-05-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 11/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04080-y

Other articles of this Issue 11/2022

Skeletal Radiology 11/2022 Go to the issue

Test Yourself: Answer

Test yourself answer to question: a 69-year-old male presented with a 20-year history of left calf swelling that began following a fall from a tree

Test Yourself: Answer

Elbow pain and clicking

Scientific Article

Complications associated with improper palpation-guided iliac bone marrow biopsy tracts identified on follow-up imaging

Test Yourself: Question

Test Yourself Question: A 69-year-old male presented with a 20-year history of left calf swelling that began following a fall from a tree

Review Article

Complications in image-guided musculoskeletal injections

Technical Report

Prospective pre-operative 3-T MR neurography peripheral nerve mapping of upper extremity amputations implanted with FAST-LIFE electrode interfaces of robotic hands: technical report