Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 11/2022

18-03-2022 | Computed Tomography | Case Report

Fracture through tracking pin sites following a robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

Authors: Aliya G. Feroe, Amit K. Chakraborty, Daniel I. Rosenthal, F. Joseph Simeone

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 11/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

The use of computer-navigated, robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is expanding as the result of widespread efforts to improve the precision of implant placement and to restore mechanical, anatomic, and kinematic alignment. The procedure requires placement of femoral and tibial pins to mount the robotic tracking system. Fractures through tracking pin sites following robotic-assisted TKA are rare; only 30 cases have been reported to our knowledge. It is probable that this complication will become more frequent as the use of robotic-assisted TKAs continues to grow. We report the case of a 67-year-old female who suffered a fracture of the femur through two pin sites 3 months after a robotic-assisted TKA. We believe that this report is the first case in the radiologic literature. Our case demonstrates some of the difficulties of recognizing this complication and raises questions about appropriate post-operative imaging.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bendich I, Kapadia M, Alpaugh K, Diane A, Vigdorchik J, Westrich G. Trends of utilization and 90-day complication rates for computer-assisted navigation and robotic assistance for total knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2010 to 2018. Arthroplast Today. 2021;11:134–9.CrossRef Bendich I, Kapadia M, Alpaugh K, Diane A, Vigdorchik J, Westrich G. Trends of utilization and 90-day complication rates for computer-assisted navigation and robotic assistance for total knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2010 to 2018. Arthroplast Today. 2021;11:134–9.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference de Steiger RN, Liu YL, Graves SE. Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:635–42.CrossRef de Steiger RN, Liu YL, Graves SE. Computer navigation for total knee arthroplasty reduces revision rate for patients less than sixty-five years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:635–42.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Chin BZ, Tan SSH, Chua KCX, Budiono GR, Syn NL, O’Neill GK. Robot-Assisted versus conventional total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of radiological and functional outcomes. J Knee Surg. 2021;34:1064–75.CrossRef Chin BZ, Tan SSH, Chua KCX, Budiono GR, Syn NL, O’Neill GK. Robot-Assisted versus conventional total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of radiological and functional outcomes. J Knee Surg. 2021;34:1064–75.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK. Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:1177–82.CrossRef Hetaimish BM, Khan MM, Simunovic N, Al-Harbi HH, Bhandari M, Zalzal PK. Meta-analysis of navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:1177–82.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kim YH, Yoon SH, Park JW. Does robotic-assisted TKA result in better outcome scores or long-term survivorship than conventional TKA? A randomized, controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478:266–75.CrossRef Kim YH, Yoon SH, Park JW. Does robotic-assisted TKA result in better outcome scores or long-term survivorship than conventional TKA? A randomized, controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020;478:266–75.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:236–243. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:236–243.
7.
go back to reference Yang HY, Seon JK, Shin YJ, Lim HA, Song EK. Robotic total knee arthroplasty with a cruciate-retaining implant: a 10-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Surg. 2017;9:169–76.CrossRef Yang HY, Seon JK, Shin YJ, Lim HA, Song EK. Robotic total knee arthroplasty with a cruciate-retaining implant: a 10-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Surg. 2017;9:169–76.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kamara E, Robinson J, Bas MA, Rodriguez JA, Hepinstall MS. Adoption of Robotic vs fluoroscopic guidance in total hip arthroplasty: is acetabular positioning improved in the learning curve? J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:125–30.CrossRef Kamara E, Robinson J, Bas MA, Rodriguez JA, Hepinstall MS. Adoption of Robotic vs fluoroscopic guidance in total hip arthroplasty: is acetabular positioning improved in the learning curve? J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:125–30.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Marchand KB, Ehiorobo J, Mathew KK, Marchand RC, Mont MA. Learning Curve of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty for a high-volume surgeon. J Knee Surg. 2020. Marchand KB, Ehiorobo J, Mathew KK, Marchand RC, Mont MA. Learning Curve of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty for a high-volume surgeon. J Knee Surg. 2020.
10.
go back to reference Skibicki HE, Ponzio DY, Brustein JA, Post ZD, Ong AC, Orozco FR. A cautionary case: osteoporotic femur fracture after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Osteoporos Int. 2021;32:2125–9.CrossRef Skibicki HE, Ponzio DY, Brustein JA, Post ZD, Ong AC, Orozco FR. A cautionary case: osteoporotic femur fracture after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Osteoporos Int. 2021;32:2125–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Smith TJ, Siddiqi A, Forte SA, Judice A, Sculco PK, Vigdorchik JM, Schwarzkopf R, Springer BD. Periprosthetic fractures through tracking pin sites following computer navigated and robotic total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. JBJS Rev. 2021;9:e20.00091. Smith TJ, Siddiqi A, Forte SA, Judice A, Sculco PK, Vigdorchik JM, Schwarzkopf R, Springer BD. Periprosthetic fractures through tracking pin sites following computer navigated and robotic total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. JBJS Rev. 2021;9:e20.00091.
12.
go back to reference Yun AG, Qutami M, Pasko KBD. Do bicortical diaphyseal array pins create the risk of periprosthetic fracture in robotic-assisted knee arthroplasties? Arthroplasty. 2021;3:25.CrossRef Yun AG, Qutami M, Pasko KBD. Do bicortical diaphyseal array pins create the risk of periprosthetic fracture in robotic-assisted knee arthroplasties? Arthroplasty. 2021;3:25.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gregory P, Pevny T, Teague D. Early complications with external fixation of pediatric femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:191–8.CrossRef Gregory P, Pevny T, Teague D. Early complications with external fixation of pediatric femoral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10:191–8.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Owens RF Jr, Swank ML. Low incidence of postoperative complications due to pin placement in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:1096–8.CrossRef Owens RF Jr, Swank ML. Low incidence of postoperative complications due to pin placement in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:1096–8.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Blue M, Douthit C, Dennison J, Caroom C, Jenkins M. Periprosthetic fracture through a unicortical tracking pin site after computer navigated total knee replacement. Case Rep Orthop. 2018;2018:2381406.PubMedPubMedCentral Blue M, Douthit C, Dennison J, Caroom C, Jenkins M. Periprosthetic fracture through a unicortical tracking pin site after computer navigated total knee replacement. Case Rep Orthop. 2018;2018:2381406.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Marshall RA, Mandell JC, Weaver MJ, Ferrone M, Sodickson A, Khurana B. Imaging features and management of stress, atypical, and pathologic fractures. Radiographics. 2018;38:2173–92.CrossRef Marshall RA, Mandell JC, Weaver MJ, Ferrone M, Sodickson A, Khurana B. Imaging features and management of stress, atypical, and pathologic fractures. Radiographics. 2018;38:2173–92.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Ardran GM. Bone destruction not demonstrable by radiography. Br J Radiol. 1951;24:107–9.CrossRef Ardran GM. Bone destruction not demonstrable by radiography. Br J Radiol. 1951;24:107–9.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Urish KL, Qin Y, Li BY, Borza T, Sessine M, Kirk P, Hollenbeck BK, Helm JE, Lavieri MS, Skolarus TA, Jacobs BL. Predictors and cost of readmission in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:2759–63.CrossRef Urish KL, Qin Y, Li BY, Borza T, Sessine M, Kirk P, Hollenbeck BK, Helm JE, Lavieri MS, Skolarus TA, Jacobs BL. Predictors and cost of readmission in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:2759–63.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Fracture through tracking pin sites following a robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty
Authors
Aliya G. Feroe
Amit K. Chakraborty
Daniel I. Rosenthal
F. Joseph Simeone
Publication date
18-03-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 11/2022
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-022-04034-4

Other articles of this Issue 11/2022

Skeletal Radiology 11/2022 Go to the issue

Test Yourself: Question

Elbow pain and clicking

Test Yourself: Answer

Elbow pain and clicking