Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress 2023 EHA Congress 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Skeletal Radiology
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 10/2019

01-10-2019 | Computed Tomography | Scientific Article

Influence of the ankle position and X-ray beam angulation on the projection of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint

Authors: Amy L. Lenz, Nicola Krähenbühl, Kalebb Howell, Rich Lisonbee, Beat Hintermann, Charles L. Saltzman, Alexej Barg

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Using digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs), we determined how changes in the projection angle influenced the assessment of the subtalar joint.

Materials and methods

Weightbearing computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired in 27 healthy individuals. CT scans were segmented and processed to create DRRs of the hindfoot. DRRs were obtained to represent 25 different perspectives to simulate internal rotation of the ankle with and without caudal angulation of the X-ray beam. Subtalar joint morphology was quantified by determining the joint space curvature, subtalar inclination angle (SIA), calcaneal slope (CS), and projection of the subtalar joint line on three-dimensional (3-D) reconstructions of the calcaneus.

Results

The curvature of the projected joint space was altered substantially over the different DRR projections. Simulated caudal angulation of the X-ray beam with respect to the ankle decreased the SIA and CS significantly. Internal rotation also had a significant impact on the SIA and CS if the X-ray beam was in neutral or in 10° of caudal angulation. An antero-posterior (AP) view of the ankle showed the posterior area of the posterior facet, whereas a more anterior area was visible with internal rotation of the foot and caudal angulation of the X-ray beam.

Conclusion

Internal rotation of the foot of 20° is recommended to assess the posterior aspect of the posterior facet, whereas a combined 20° internal rotation of the foot and 40° caudal angulation of the X-ray beam is best to assess the anterior aspect of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint.
Literature
1.
2.
Cody EA, Williamson ER, Burket JC, Deland JT, Ellis SJ. Correlation of talar anatomy and subtalar joint alignment on weightbearing computed tomography with radiographic flatfoot parameters. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(8):874–81.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Wang B, Saltzman CL, Chalayon O, Barg A. Does the subtalar joint compensate for ankle malalignment in end-stage ankle arthritis? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(1):318–25.CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
Apostle KL, Coleman NW, Sangeorzan BJ. Subtalar joint axis in patients with symptomatic peritalar subluxation compared to normal controls. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(11):1153–8.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Hayashi K, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Sugimoto K, Takakura Y. Correlation of compensatory alignment of the subtalar joint to the progression of primary osteoarthritis of the ankle. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(4):400–6.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Krähenbühl N, Tschuck M, Bolliger L, Hintermann B, Knupp M. Orientation of the subtalar joint: measurement and reliability using weightbearing CT scans. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(1):109–14.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Probasco W, Haleem AM, Yu J, Sangeorzan BJ, Deland JT, Ellis SJ. Assessment of coronal plane subtalar joint alignment in peritalar subluxation via weight-bearing multiplanar imaging. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(3):302–9.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Rammelt S, Bartonicek J, Park KH. Traumatic injury to the subtalar joint. Foot Ankle Clin. 2018;23(3):353–74.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Colin F, Horn Lang T, Zwicky L, Hintermann B, Knupp M. Subtalar joint configuration on weightbearing CT scan. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35(10):1057–62.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Krähenbühl N, Siegler L, Deforth M, Zwicky L, Hintermann B, Knupp M. Subtalar joint alignment in ankle osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25(2):143–9..CrossRefPubMed
12.
Van Bergeyk AB, Younger A, Carson B. CT analysis of hindfoot alignment in chronic lateral ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23(1):37–42.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Barg A, Amendola RL, Henninger HB, Kapron AL, Saltzman CL, Anderson AE. Influence of ankle position and radiographic projection angle on measurement of supramalleolar alignment on the anteroposterior and hindfoot alignment views. Foot Ankle Int. 2015;36(11):1352–61.CrossRefPubMed
14.
15.
Kuo CC, Lu HL, Lu TW, Lin CC, Leardini A, Kuo MY, et al. Effects of positioning on radiographic measurements of ankle morphology: a computerized tomography-based simulation study. Biomed Eng Online. 2013;12:131.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
17.
Yeung TW, Chan CY, Chan WC, Yeung YN, Yuen MK. Can pre-operative axial CT imaging predict syndesmosis instability in patients sustaining ankle fractures? Seven years’ experience in a tertiary trauma center. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44(6):823–9.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Broden B. Roentgen examination of the subtaloid joint in fractures of the calcaneus. Acta Radiol. 1949;31(1):85–91.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Sarrafian SK. Biomechanics of the subtalar joint complex. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;290:17–26.
20.
Barg A, Bailey T, Richter M, de Cesar Netto C, Lintz F, Burssens A, et al. Weightbearing computed tomography of the foot and ankle: emerging technology topical review. Foot Ankle Int. 2018;39(3):376–86.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Influence of the ankle position and X-ray beam angulation on the projection of the posterior facet of the subtalar joint
Authors
Amy L. Lenz
Nicola Krähenbühl
Kalebb Howell
Rich Lisonbee
Beat Hintermann
Charles L. Saltzman
Alexej Barg
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-019-03220-1

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

Skeletal Radiology 10/2019 Go to the issue

Browser's Notes

Browser’s notes

Review Article

The diagnostic accuracy of imaging modalities to detect pseudarthrosis after spinal fusion—a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

Case Report

Myoepithelial carcinoma of tibia mimic giant cell tumor: a case report with emphasis on MR features

Case Report

A rare case of type 2 entrapment of the median nerve after posterior elbow dislocation with MRI and ultrasound correlation

Test Yourself: Question

Professional soccer player with an in-game ankle injury

Scientific Article

Detection of aseptic loosening in total knee replacements: a systematic review and meta-analysis