Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 4/2018

01-04-2018 | Scientific Article

Radiographic markers for measuring tibial rotation based on CT-reconstructed radiographs: an accuracy and feasibility study

Authors: David Hakimian, Amal Khoury, Rami Mosheiff, Meir Liebergall, Yoram A. Weil

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

Malreduction in the axial plane (malrotation) following tibial fracture surgery is often undiagnosed. A few clinical and radiographic methods have been proposed for measuring tibial rotation intraoperatively, yet have failed to match the accuracy of computed tomography (CT). The aim of this study was to develop radiographic tools for future intraoperative assessment of the tibial shaft rotation profile.

Methods

The setting was a laboratory computerized analysis. Twenty lower limb CT scans were used to construct a three-dimensional (3D) model using AMIRA© software. A virtual 3D cylinder was implanted in the posterior condylar line and in the transmalleolar axis. The 3D models were used to simulate four standard knee and ankle plain radiographs. On each radiograph, four landmarks were depicted by two observers and their relation with the cylinder was measured and analyzed for accuracy and reproducibility. A cadaveric lower leg was implanted with two Kirschner wires. A CT scan was performed in addition to 2D fluoroscopy. The simulated radiographs and the fluoroscopy were compared for accuracy.

Results

Measurement of the landmarks showed reliability in most of the knee anteroposterior and ankle mortise radiographs (coefficients of variation < 0.01 and = 0.01) respectively. Cadaveric measurement of the landmarks using real fluoroscopy and simulated radiographs were similar.

Conclusions

To date, no reliable and common methods have been reported for the evaluation of tibial axial rotation. We propose a model in which simple radiographic landmarks can be used to calculate a 3D coordinate system that accurately assesses the axial rotation angle of the tibial shaft.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Güven M, Akman B, Ünay K. A new radiographic measurement method for evaluation of tibial torsion: a pilot study in adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(7):1807–12.CrossRefPubMed Güven M, Akman B, Ünay K. A new radiographic measurement method for evaluation of tibial torsion: a pilot study in adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(7):1807–12.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Turner MS, Smillie IS. The effect of tibial torsion of the pathology of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63-B(3):396–8.CrossRefPubMed Turner MS, Smillie IS. The effect of tibial torsion of the pathology of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;63-B(3):396–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lee SH, Chung CY, Park MS, Choi IH, Cho TJ. Tibial torsion in cerebral palsy: validity and reliability of measurement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(8):2098–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee SH, Chung CY, Park MS, Choi IH, Cho TJ. Tibial torsion in cerebral palsy: validity and reliability of measurement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(8):2098–104.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Puloski S, Romano C, Buckley R, Powell J. Rotational malalignment of the tibia following reamed intramedullary nail fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(7):397–402.CrossRefPubMed Puloski S, Romano C, Buckley R, Powell J. Rotational malalignment of the tibia following reamed intramedullary nail fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(7):397–402.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Eckhoff DG. Effect of limb malrotation on malalignment and osteoarthritis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994;25(3):405–14.PubMed Eckhoff DG. Effect of limb malrotation on malalignment and osteoarthritis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1994;25(3):405–14.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Tscherne H. Nonreamed interlocking nailing of closed tibial fractures with severe soft tissue injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;315:34–47. Krettek C, Schandelmaier P, Tscherne H. Nonreamed interlocking nailing of closed tibial fractures with severe soft tissue injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;315:34–47.
7.
go back to reference Shin SY, Yoon CH, Lee ES, Oh MK, Kim AR, Park JM, et al. The availability of radiological measurement of tibial torsion: three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35(5):673–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shin SY, Yoon CH, Lee ES, Oh MK, Kim AR, Park JM, et al. The availability of radiological measurement of tibial torsion: three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35(5):673–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Clementz BG, Magnusson A. Fluoroscopic measurement of tibial torsion in adults. A comparison of three methods. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1989;108(3):150–3.CrossRefPubMed Clementz BG, Magnusson A. Fluoroscopic measurement of tibial torsion in adults. A comparison of three methods. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1989;108(3):150–3.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jakob RP, Haertel M, Stüssi E. Tibial torsion calculated by computerised tomography and compared to other methods of measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980;62-B(2):238–42.CrossRefPubMed Jakob RP, Haertel M, Stüssi E. Tibial torsion calculated by computerised tomography and compared to other methods of measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980;62-B(2):238–42.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Mosheiff R, Weil Y, Peleg E, Liebergall M. Computerised navigation for closed reduction during femoral intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2005;36:866–70.CrossRefPubMed Mosheiff R, Weil Y, Peleg E, Liebergall M. Computerised navigation for closed reduction during femoral intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2005;36:866–70.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ballinger PW. Merrill’s atlas of radiographic positions and radiologic procedures. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1991. p. 220–50. Ballinger PW. Merrill’s atlas of radiographic positions and radiologic procedures. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1991. p. 220–50.
13.
go back to reference Deza MM, Deza E. Encyclopedia of distances. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. p. 94.CrossRef Deza MM, Deza E. Encyclopedia of distances. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2009. p. 94.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lipschutz S, Lipson M. Linear algebra (Schaum’s Outlines) 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2009. p. 4. Lipschutz S, Lipson M. Linear algebra (Schaum’s Outlines) 4th ed. New York: McGraw Hill; 2009. p. 4.
15.
go back to reference Le Damany P. La torsion du tibia, normale, pathologique expérimentale (abstr). J Anat Physiol. 1909;45:598–615. Le Damany P. La torsion du tibia, normale, pathologique expérimentale (abstr). J Anat Physiol. 1909;45:598–615.
16.
go back to reference Prasad CV, Khalid M, McCarthy P, OSullivan ME. CT assessment of torsion following locked intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures. Injury. 1999;30(7):467–70.CrossRefPubMed Prasad CV, Khalid M, McCarthy P, OSullivan ME. CT assessment of torsion following locked intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures. Injury. 1999;30(7):467–70.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Staheli LT, Engel GM. Tibial torsion: a method of assessment and a survey of normal children. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;86:183–6.CrossRefPubMed Staheli LT, Engel GM. Tibial torsion: a method of assessment and a survey of normal children. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;86:183–6.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hazlewood ME, Simmons AN, Johnson WT, Richardson AM, van der Linden ML, Hillman SJ, et al. The footprint method to assess transmalleolar axis. Gait Posture. 2007;25(4):597–603.CrossRefPubMed Hazlewood ME, Simmons AN, Johnson WT, Richardson AM, van der Linden ML, Hillman SJ, et al. The footprint method to assess transmalleolar axis. Gait Posture. 2007;25(4):597–603.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Jend HH, Heller M, Dallek M, Schoettle H. Measurement of tibial torsion by computer tomography. Acta Radiol Diagn. 1981;22(3A):271–6.CrossRef Jend HH, Heller M, Dallek M, Schoettle H. Measurement of tibial torsion by computer tomography. Acta Radiol Diagn. 1981;22(3A):271–6.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wang G, Zheng G, Gruetzner PA, Mueller-Alsbach U, von Recum J, Staubli A, Nolte LP. A fluoroscopy-based surgical navigation system for high tibial osteotomy. Tech Health Care. 2005;13(6):469–83.CrossRef Wang G, Zheng G, Gruetzner PA, Mueller-Alsbach U, von Recum J, Staubli A, Nolte LP. A fluoroscopy-based surgical navigation system for high tibial osteotomy. Tech Health Care. 2005;13(6):469–83.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Weil YA, Gardner MJ, Helfet DL, Pearle A. Computer navigation allows for accurate reduction of femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;460:185–91.PubMed Weil YA, Gardner MJ, Helfet DL, Pearle A. Computer navigation allows for accurate reduction of femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;460:185–91.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Radiographic markers for measuring tibial rotation based on CT-reconstructed radiographs: an accuracy and feasibility study
Authors
David Hakimian
Amal Khoury
Rami Mosheiff
Meir Liebergall
Yoram A. Weil
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-017-2810-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Skeletal Radiology 4/2018 Go to the issue