Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 4/2016

01-04-2016 | Scientific Article

The neck shaft angle: CT reference values of 800 adult hips

Authors: Christoph Kolja Boese, Janine Jostmeier, Johannes Oppermann, Jens Dargel, De-Hua Chang, Peer Eysel, Philipp Lechler

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 4/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

A precise understanding of the radiological anatomy and biomechanics as well as reliable reference values of the hip are essential. The primary goal of this study was to provide reference values of the neck-shaft angle (NSA) for adult patients based on the analysis of rotation corrected computed tomography (CT) scans of 800 hips. The secondary aim was to compare these measurements with simulated anteroposterior roentgenograms of the pelvis.

Materials and methods

Pelvic CT scans of 400 patients (54.3 years, range 18–100 years; 200 female) were reconstructed in the derotated coronal plane of the proximal femur and as CT-based simulated anteroposterior roentgenograms of the pelvis in the anterior pelvic plane. Femora were categorized as coxa vara (<120°), physiologic (≥120° to <135°), and coxa valga (≥135°). Intra- and inter-rater reliability were analyzed.

Results

Primary research question: Mean NSA for male adults was 129.6° (range 113.2°–148.2°; SD 5.9°) and 131.9° (range 107.1°–151.9°; SD 6.8°) for females in derotated coronal reconstructions. Age (p < 0.001 in both views) and sex influenced the NSA significantly (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001); no significant differences were found between sides (p = 0.722 and p = 0.955). Overall, an excellent reliability of repeated measurements of one or two observers was found (ICC 0.891–0.995).
Secondary research question: NSA values measured in the simulated anteroposterior roentgenogram and the rotation corrected coronal reconstruction differed significantly (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

While anteroposterior pelvis radiographs are susceptible to rotational errors, the coronal reconstruction of the proximal femur in the femoral neck plane allows the correct measurement of the NSA.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Boese CK, Dargel J, Oppermann J, Eysel P, Scheyerer MJ, et al. The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review. Skelet Radiol. 2015;45:19–28.CrossRef Boese CK, Dargel J, Oppermann J, Eysel P, Scheyerer MJ, et al. The femoral neck-shaft angle on plain radiographs: a systematic review. Skelet Radiol. 2015;45:19–28.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Mast NH, Impellizzeri F, Keller S, Leunig M. Reliability and agreement of measures used in radiographic evaluation of the adult hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:188–99.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Mast NH, Impellizzeri F, Keller S, Leunig M. Reliability and agreement of measures used in radiographic evaluation of the adult hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:188–99.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Lechler P, Frink M, Gulati A, Murray D, Renkawitz T, et al. The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:389–95.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Lechler P, Frink M, Gulati A, Murray D, Renkawitz T, et al. The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:389–95.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Buecking B, Boese CK, Bergmeister VA, Frink M, Ruchholtz S, et al. Functional implications of femoral offset following hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture. Int Orthop. 2015. Buecking B, Boese CK, Bergmeister VA, Frink M, Ruchholtz S, et al. Functional implications of femoral offset following hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture. Int Orthop. 2015.
5.
go back to reference Haspl M, Bilic R. Assessment of femoral neck-shaft and antetorsion angles. Int Orthop. 1996;20:363–6.CrossRefPubMed Haspl M, Bilic R. Assessment of femoral neck-shaft and antetorsion angles. Int Orthop. 1996;20:363–6.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jozwiak M, Rychlik M, Musielak B, Chen BP, Idzior M, et al. An accurate method of radiological assessment of acetabular volume and orientation in computed tomography spatial reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:42.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jozwiak M, Rychlik M, Musielak B, Chen BP, Idzior M, et al. An accurate method of radiological assessment of acetabular volume and orientation in computed tomography spatial reconstruction. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:42.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Waldt S, K. W. Measurements and classifications in musculoskeletal radiology. Harrogate, UK: Thieme; 2014. Waldt S, K. W. Measurements and classifications in musculoskeletal radiology. Harrogate, UK: Thieme; 2014.
8.
go back to reference Tönnis D, Legal H. Die angeborene Hüftdysplasie und Hüftluxation im Kindes- und Erwachsenenalter: Grundlagen, Diagnostik, konservative und operative Behandlung. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 1984. Tönnis D, Legal H. Die angeborene Hüftdysplasie und Hüftluxation im Kindes- und Erwachsenenalter: Grundlagen, Diagnostik, konservative und operative Behandlung. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 1984.
9.
go back to reference Argenson JN, Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM. Anatomy of the dysplastic hip and consequences for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:40–5.PubMed Argenson JN, Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM. Anatomy of the dysplastic hip and consequences for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:40–5.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Anastopoulos G, Chissas D, Dourountakis J, Ntagiopoulos PG, Magnisalis E, et al. Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing. Injury. 2010;41:300–5.CrossRefPubMed Anastopoulos G, Chissas D, Dourountakis J, Ntagiopoulos PG, Magnisalis E, et al. Computer-assisted three-dimensional correlation between the femoral neck-shaft angle and the optimal entry point for antegrade nailing. Injury. 2010;41:300–5.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Andruszkow H, Frink M, Fromke C, Matityahu A, Zeckey C, et al. Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. 2012;36:2347–54.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Andruszkow H, Frink M, Fromke C, Matityahu A, Zeckey C, et al. Tip apex distance, hip screw placement, and neck shaft angle as potential risk factors for cut-out failure of hip screws after surgical treatment of intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. 2012;36:2347–54.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Reikeras O, Hoiseth A, Reigstad A, Fonstelien E. Femoral neck angles: a specimen study with special regard to bilateral differences. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53:775–9.CrossRefPubMed Reikeras O, Hoiseth A, Reigstad A, Fonstelien E. Femoral neck angles: a specimen study with special regard to bilateral differences. Acta Orthop Scand. 1982;53:775–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gnudi S, Sitta E, Pignotti E. Prediction of incident hip fracture by femoral neck bone mineral density and neck-shaft angle: a 5 years longitudinal study in post-menopausal females. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:e467–73.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Gnudi S, Sitta E, Pignotti E. Prediction of incident hip fracture by femoral neck bone mineral density and neck-shaft angle: a 5 years longitudinal study in post-menopausal females. Br J Radiol. 2012;85:e467–73.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Elbuken F, Baykara M, Ozturk C. Standardisation of the neck-shaft angle and measurement of age-, gender- and BMI-related changes in the femoral neck using DXA. Singap Med J. 2012;53:587–90. Elbuken F, Baykara M, Ozturk C. Standardisation of the neck-shaft angle and measurement of age-, gender- and BMI-related changes in the femoral neck using DXA. Singap Med J. 2012;53:587–90.
15.
go back to reference Weber M, Lechler P, von Kunow F, Vollner F, Keshmiri A, et al. The validity of a novel radiological method for measuring femoral stem version on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B:306–11.CrossRefPubMed Weber M, Lechler P, von Kunow F, Vollner F, Keshmiri A, et al. The validity of a novel radiological method for measuring femoral stem version on anteroposterior radiographs of the hip after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B:306–11.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Boddu K, Siebachmeyer M, Lakkol S, Rajayogeswaran B, Kavarthapu V, et al. Predicting the underestimation of the femoral offset in anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis using ‘lesser trochanter index’: a 3D CT derived simulated radiographic analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1278–84.CrossRefPubMed Boddu K, Siebachmeyer M, Lakkol S, Rajayogeswaran B, Kavarthapu V, et al. Predicting the underestimation of the femoral offset in anteroposterior radiographs of the pelvis using ‘lesser trochanter index’: a 3D CT derived simulated radiographic analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1278–84.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Nelitz M, Guenther KP, Gunkel S, Puhl W. Reliability of radiological measurements in the assessment of hip dysplasia in adults. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:331–4.CrossRefPubMed Nelitz M, Guenther KP, Gunkel S, Puhl W. Reliability of radiological measurements in the assessment of hip dysplasia in adults. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:331–4.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The neck shaft angle: CT reference values of 800 adult hips
Authors
Christoph Kolja Boese
Janine Jostmeier
Johannes Oppermann
Jens Dargel
De-Hua Chang
Peer Eysel
Philipp Lechler
Publication date
01-04-2016
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-015-2314-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2016

Skeletal Radiology 4/2016 Go to the issue

Test Yourself: Answer

Low back pain and fevers

Browser's Notes

Browser's Notes