Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 3/2013

01-03-2013 | Scientific Article

3DMR osseous reconstructions of the shoulder using a gradient-echo based two-point Dixon reconstruction: a feasibility study

Authors: Soterios Gyftopoulos, Avner Yemin, Thomas Mulholland, Michael Bloom, Pippa Storey, Christian Geppert, Michael P. Recht

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 3/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To create 3DMR osseous models of the shoulder similar to 3DCT models using a gradient-echo-based two-point/Dixon sequence.

Materials and methods

CT and 3TMR examinations of 7 cadaveric shoulders were obtained. Glenoid defects were created in 4 of the cadaveric shoulders. Each MR study included an axial Dixon 3D-dual-echo-time T1W-FLASH (acquisition time of 3 min/30 s). The water-only image data from the Dixon sequence and CT data were post-processed using 3D software. The following measurements were obtained on the shoulders: surface area (SA), height/width of the glenoid and humeral head, and width of the biceps groove. The glenoid defects were measured on imaging and compared with measurements made on en face digital photographs of the glenoid fossae (reference standard). Paired t tests/ANOVA were used to assess the differences between the imaging modalities.

Results

The differences between the glenoid and humeral measurements were not statistically significant (cm): glenoid SA 0.12 ± 0.04 (p = 0.45) and glenoid width 0.13 ± 0.06 (p = 0.06) with no difference in glenoid height measurement; humeral head SA 0.07 ± 0.12 (p = 0.42), humeral head height 0.03 ± 0.06 (p = 0.42), humeral head width 0.07 ± 0.06(p = 0.18), and biceps groove width 0.02 ± 0.01 (p = 0.07). The mean/standard deviation difference between the reference standard and 3DMR measurements was 0.25 ± 0.96 %/0.30 ± 0.14 mm; 3DCT 0.25 ± 0.96 /0.75 ± 0.39 mm. There was no statistical difference between the measurements obtained on 3DMR and 3DCT (percentage, p = 0.45; mm, p = 0.20).

Conclusion

Accurate 3D osseous models of the shoulder can be produced using a 3D two-point/Dixon sequence and can be added to MR examinations with a minor increase in imaging time, used to quantify glenoid loss, and may eliminate the need for pre-surgical CT examinations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Abel MF, Sutherland DH, Wenger DR, Mubarak SJ. Evaluation of CT scans and 3-D reformatted images for quantitative assessment of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14:48–53.PubMedCrossRef Abel MF, Sutherland DH, Wenger DR, Mubarak SJ. Evaluation of CT scans and 3-D reformatted images for quantitative assessment of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14:48–53.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Beaule PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi KD, Copelan N, Dorey FJ. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1286–92.PubMedCrossRef Beaule PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi KD, Copelan N, Dorey FJ. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2005;23:1286–92.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Audenaert EA, Baelde N, Huysse W, Vigneror L, Pattyn C. Development of a three-dimensional detection method of cam deformities in femoroacetabular impingement. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:921–7.PubMedCrossRef Audenaert EA, Baelde N, Huysse W, Vigneror L, Pattyn C. Development of a three-dimensional detection method of cam deformities in femoroacetabular impingement. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:921–7.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bedi A, Dolan M, Magennis E, Lipman J, Buly R, Kelly BT. Computer-assisted modeling of osseous impingement and resection in femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2012;28:204–10.PubMedCrossRef Bedi A, Dolan M, Magennis E, Lipman J, Buly R, Kelly BT. Computer-assisted modeling of osseous impingement and resection in femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2012;28:204–10.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Dohi M, Kon Y, Tsuchiya A. Glenoid rim morphology in recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:878–84.PubMed Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Dohi M, Kon Y, Tsuchiya A. Glenoid rim morphology in recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:878–84.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Chuang TY, Adams CR, Burkhardt SS. Use of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:376–82.PubMedCrossRef Chuang TY, Adams CR, Burkhardt SS. Use of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy. 2008;24:376–82.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Nofsinger C, Browning B, Burkhardt SS, Pedowitz RA. Objective preoperative measurement of anterior glenoid bone loss: a pilot study of a computer-based method using unilateral 3-dimensional computed tomography. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:322–9.PubMedCrossRef Nofsinger C, Browning B, Burkhardt SS, Pedowitz RA. Objective preoperative measurement of anterior glenoid bone loss: a pilot study of a computer-based method using unilateral 3-dimensional computed tomography. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:322–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Itoi E, Lee SB, Berglund LJ, Berge LL, An KN. The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior stability of the shoulder after bankart repair: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:35–46.PubMed Itoi E, Lee SB, Berglund LJ, Berge LL, An KN. The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior stability of the shoulder after bankart repair: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:35–46.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Lo IK, Perten PM, Burkhart SS. The inverted pear glenoid: an indicator of significant glenoid bone loss. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:169–74.PubMedCrossRef Lo IK, Perten PM, Burkhart SS. The inverted pear glenoid: an indicator of significant glenoid bone loss. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:169–74.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Greis PE, Scuderi MG, Mohr A, Bachus KN, Burks RT. Glenohumeral articular contact areas and pressures following labral and osseous injury to the anteroinferior quadrant of the glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:442–51.PubMedCrossRef Greis PE, Scuderi MG, Mohr A, Bachus KN, Burks RT. Glenohumeral articular contact areas and pressures following labral and osseous injury to the anteroinferior quadrant of the glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:442–51.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Burkhart SS, Debeer JF, Tehrany AM, Parten PM. Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:488–91.PubMedCrossRef Burkhart SS, Debeer JF, Tehrany AM, Parten PM. Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:488–91.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Steiner RM, Mitchell DG, Rao VM, Murphy S, Rifkin MD, Burk DL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow: diagnostic value in diffuse hematologic disorders. Magn Reson Q. 1990;6:17–34.PubMed Steiner RM, Mitchell DG, Rao VM, Murphy S, Rifkin MD, Burk DL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of bone marrow: diagnostic value in diffuse hematologic disorders. Magn Reson Q. 1990;6:17–34.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Johnson LA, Hoppel BE, Gerard EL, Miller SP, Doppelt SH, Zirzow GC, et al. Quantitative chemical shift imaging of vertebral bone marrow in patients with Gaucher disease. Radiology. 1992;182:451–2.PubMed Johnson LA, Hoppel BE, Gerard EL, Miller SP, Doppelt SH, Zirzow GC, et al. Quantitative chemical shift imaging of vertebral bone marrow in patients with Gaucher disease. Radiology. 1992;182:451–2.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Gerard EL, Ferry JA, Amrein PC, Harmon DC, McKinstry RC, Hoppel BE, et al. Compositional changes in vertebral bone marrow during treatment for acute leukemia: assessment with quantitative chemical shift imaging. Radiology. 1992;183:39–46.PubMed Gerard EL, Ferry JA, Amrein PC, Harmon DC, McKinstry RC, Hoppel BE, et al. Compositional changes in vertebral bone marrow during treatment for acute leukemia: assessment with quantitative chemical shift imaging. Radiology. 1992;183:39–46.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Ballon D, Jakubowski AA, Tulipano PK, Graham MC, Schneider E, Aghazadeh B, et al. Quantitative assessment of bone marrow hematopoiesis using parametric magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1998;39:789–800.PubMedCrossRef Ballon D, Jakubowski AA, Tulipano PK, Graham MC, Schneider E, Aghazadeh B, et al. Quantitative assessment of bone marrow hematopoiesis using parametric magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1998;39:789–800.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Maas M, Dijkstra PF, Akkerman EM. Uniform fat suppression in hands and feet through the use of two-point Dixon chemical shift MR imaging. Radiology. 1999;210:189–93.PubMed Maas M, Dijkstra PF, Akkerman EM. Uniform fat suppression in hands and feet through the use of two-point Dixon chemical shift MR imaging. Radiology. 1999;210:189–93.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Maas M, Hollak CE, Akkerman EM, Aerts JM, Stoker J, Den Heeten GJ. Quantification of skeletal involvement in adults with type I Gaucher’s disease: fat fraction measured by Dixon quantitative chemical shift imaging as a valid parameter. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:961–5.PubMed Maas M, Hollak CE, Akkerman EM, Aerts JM, Stoker J, Den Heeten GJ. Quantification of skeletal involvement in adults with type I Gaucher’s disease: fat fraction measured by Dixon quantitative chemical shift imaging as a valid parameter. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:961–5.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Rathnayaka K, Konstantin IM, Noser H, Volp A, Schuetz MA, Sahama T, et al. Quantification of the accuracy of MRI generated 3D models of long bones compared to CT generated 3D models. Med Eng Phys. 2012;34:357–63.PubMedCrossRef Rathnayaka K, Konstantin IM, Noser H, Volp A, Schuetz MA, Sahama T, et al. Quantification of the accuracy of MRI generated 3D models of long bones compared to CT generated 3D models. Med Eng Phys. 2012;34:357–63.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Abebe ES, Moorman CT, Dziedzic TS, Spritzer CE, Cothran RL, Taylor DC, et al. Femoral tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo imaging analysis comparing transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel independent techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1904–11.PubMedCrossRef Abebe ES, Moorman CT, Dziedzic TS, Spritzer CE, Cothran RL, Taylor DC, et al. Femoral tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo imaging analysis comparing transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel independent techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2009;37:1904–11.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Moro-oka T-a, Hamai S, Miura H, Shimoto T, Higaki H, Fregly BJ. Can magnetic resonance imaging-derived bone models be used for accurate motion measurement with single-plane three-dimensional shape registration? J Orthop Res. 2007;25:867–72.PubMedCrossRef Moro-oka T-a, Hamai S, Miura H, Shimoto T, Higaki H, Fregly BJ. Can magnetic resonance imaging-derived bone models be used for accurate motion measurement with single-plane three-dimensional shape registration? J Orthop Res. 2007;25:867–72.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Laura Z, Erik RW, Michael DS, Susan MS. Image fusion of computed tomographic and magnetic resonance images for the development of a three-dimensional musculoskeletal model of the equine forelimb. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2006;47:553–62.CrossRef Laura Z, Erik RW, Michael DS, Susan MS. Image fusion of computed tomographic and magnetic resonance images for the development of a three-dimensional musculoskeletal model of the equine forelimb. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2006;47:553–62.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
3DMR osseous reconstructions of the shoulder using a gradient-echo based two-point Dixon reconstruction: a feasibility study
Authors
Soterios Gyftopoulos
Avner Yemin
Thomas Mulholland
Michael Bloom
Pippa Storey
Christian Geppert
Michael P. Recht
Publication date
01-03-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 3/2013
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-012-1489-z

Other articles of this Issue 3/2013

Skeletal Radiology 3/2013 Go to the issue

Test Yourself: Question

Parachordoma/myoepithelioma