Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 7/2011

01-07-2011 | Technical Report

Development of a three-dimensional detection method of cam deformities in femoroacetabular impingement

Authors: Emmanuel A. Audenaert, Nick Baelde, Wouter Huysse, Lara Vigneron, Christophe Pattyn

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 7/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The description of femoral head sphericity and related risk for femoroacetabularimpingement is currently limited to an angular estimate—the alpha angle—whose relevance and accuracy have been challenged. We developed a three-dimensional approach for both automated digital measurement of the alpha angle and the detection of camdeformities. Accuracy and diagnostic relevance of the alpha angle estimated by means of the oblique axial and multiple radial plane protocol were compared with the computed results.

Materials and methods

Using subject-specific statistical information of the femur head and mid-neck region, a method was developed to accurately compute the maximum alpha angle and to define aspherical eccentric areas at the femoral head-neck junction. The method was evaluated on 102 dry cadaver femur specimens.

Results

Average detection limit for bony prominences at the head-neck transition was 0.98 mm. Pixel size of the investigated CT data was 0.79 mm. Mean maximum computed alpha angle of the femurs with cam-type morphology as identified by the morphological method was 67.72° (range 53.04–88.02°). Mean maximum computed alpha angle of the femurs without cam deformity was 47.65° (range 38.67–59.81°). Alpha angle estimates obtained by means of the multiple radial plane protocol correlated better (R = 0.88) and showed higher diagnostic agreement (phi = 0.77) with the 3D computational analysis compared to the oblique axial protocol (R = 0.60; phi = 0.67).

Conclusions

The alpha angle seems to be a relevant screening tool when obtained by 3D computed analysis or when estimated according to the multiple radial plane protocol. Estimates obtained by means of the oblique axial protocol have insufficient diagnostic and measurement accuracy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Myers SR, Eijer H, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement after periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;363:93–9.PubMedCrossRef Myers SR, Eijer H, Ganz R. Anterior femoroacetabular impingement after periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;363:93–9.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(2):264–72.PubMedCrossRef Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, Harris WH. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(2):264–72.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(4):556–60.PubMedCrossRef Notzli HP, Wyss TF, Stoecklin CH, Schmid MR, Treiber K, Hodler J. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84(4):556–60.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Johnston TL, Schenker ML, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ. Relationship between offset angle alpha and hip chondral injury in femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(6):669–75.PubMedCrossRef Johnston TL, Schenker ML, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ. Relationship between offset angle alpha and hip chondral injury in femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2008;24(6):669–75.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Beall DP, Sweet CF, Martin HD, Lastine CL, Grayson DE, Ly JQ, et al. Imaging findings of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34(11):691–701.PubMedCrossRef Beall DP, Sweet CF, Martin HD, Lastine CL, Grayson DE, Ly JQ, et al. Imaging findings of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Skeletal Radiol. 2005;34(11):691–701.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Nouh MR, Schweitzer ME, Rybak L, Cohen J. Femoroacetabular impingement: can the alpha angle be estimated? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(5):1260–2.PubMedCrossRef Nouh MR, Schweitzer ME, Rybak L, Cohen J. Femoroacetabular impingement: can the alpha angle be estimated? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(5):1260–2.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rakhra KS, Sheikh AM, Allen D, Beaule PE. Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(3):660–5.PubMedCrossRef Rakhra KS, Sheikh AM, Allen D, Beaule PE. Comparison of MRI alpha angle measurement planes in femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(3):660–5.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pollard TC, Villar RN, Norton MR, Fern ED, Williams MR, Simpson DJ, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement and classification of the cam deformity: the reference interval in normal hips. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(1):134–41.PubMedCrossRef Pollard TC, Villar RN, Norton MR, Fern ED, Williams MR, Simpson DJ, et al. Femoroacetabular impingement and classification of the cam deformity: the reference interval in normal hips. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(1):134–41.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Zebaze RM, Jones A, Welsh F, Knackstedt M, Seeman E. Femoral neck shape and the spatial distribution of its mineral mass varies with its size: clinical and biomechanical implications. Bone. 2005;37(2):243–52.PubMedCrossRef Zebaze RM, Jones A, Welsh F, Knackstedt M, Seeman E. Femoral neck shape and the spatial distribution of its mineral mass varies with its size: clinical and biomechanical implications. Bone. 2005;37(2):243–52.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kordelle J, Millis M, Jolesz FA, Kikinis R, Richolt JA. Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal femur in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis based on computed tomography. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(2):179–82.PubMedCrossRef Kordelle J, Millis M, Jolesz FA, Kikinis R, Richolt JA. Three-dimensional analysis of the proximal femur in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis based on computed tomography. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(2):179–82.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Abel MF, Sutherland DH, Wenger DR, Mubarak SJ. Evaluation of CT scans and 3-D reformatted images for quantitative assessment of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14(1):48–53.PubMedCrossRef Abel MF, Sutherland DH, Wenger DR, Mubarak SJ. Evaluation of CT scans and 3-D reformatted images for quantitative assessment of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop. 1994;14(1):48–53.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Beaule PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi K, Copelan N, Dorey FJ. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(6):1286–92.PubMed Beaule PE, Zaragoza E, Motamedi K, Copelan N, Dorey FJ. Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(6):1286–92.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Howe WG. Two-sided tolerance limits for normal populations—some improvements. J Am Stat Assoc. 1969;64:610–20.CrossRef Howe WG. Two-sided tolerance limits for normal populations—some improvements. J Am Stat Assoc. 1969;64:610–20.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lohan DG, Seeger LL, Motamedi K, Hame S, Sayre J. Cam-type femoral-acetabular impingement: is the alpha angle the best MR arthrography has to offer? Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38(9):855–62.PubMedCrossRef Lohan DG, Seeger LL, Motamedi K, Hame S, Sayre J. Cam-type femoral-acetabular impingement: is the alpha angle the best MR arthrography has to offer? Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38(9):855–62.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Tanzer M, Noiseux N. Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: the role of hip impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:170–7.PubMedCrossRef Tanzer M, Noiseux N. Osseous abnormalities and early osteoarthritis: the role of hip impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;429:170–7.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Leunig M, Beaule PE, Ganz R. The concept of femoroacetabular impingement: current status and future perspectives. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(3):616–22.PubMedCrossRef Leunig M, Beaule PE, Ganz R. The concept of femoroacetabular impingement: current status and future perspectives. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(3):616–22.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Brunner A, Horisberger M, Herzog RF. Evaluation of a computed tomography-based navigation system prototype for hip arthroscopy in the treatment of femoroacetabular cam impingement. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(4):382–91.PubMedCrossRef Brunner A, Horisberger M, Herzog RF. Evaluation of a computed tomography-based navigation system prototype for hip arthroscopy in the treatment of femoroacetabular cam impingement. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(4):382–91.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, Fu FH. Current opinion on computer-aided surgical navigation and robotics: role in the treatment of sports-related injuries. Sports Med. 2002;32(13):809–18.PubMedCrossRef Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, Fu FH. Current opinion on computer-aided surgical navigation and robotics: role in the treatment of sports-related injuries. Sports Med. 2002;32(13):809–18.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tannast M, Kubiak-Langer M, Langlotz F, Puls M, Murphy SB, Siebenrock KA. Noninvasive three-dimensional assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2007;25(1):122–31.PubMedCrossRef Tannast M, Kubiak-Langer M, Langlotz F, Puls M, Murphy SB, Siebenrock KA. Noninvasive three-dimensional assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res. 2007;25(1):122–31.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Development of a three-dimensional detection method of cam deformities in femoroacetabular impingement
Authors
Emmanuel A. Audenaert
Nick Baelde
Wouter Huysse
Lara Vigneron
Christophe Pattyn
Publication date
01-07-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 7/2011
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-010-1021-2

Other articles of this Issue 7/2011

Skeletal Radiology 7/2011 Go to the issue