Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 2/2010

01-02-2010 | Scientific Article

Single photon emission computed tomography/spiral computed tomography fusion imaging for the diagnosis of bone metastasis in patients with known cancer

Authors: Zhen Zhao, Lin Li, Fanglan Li, Lixia Zhao

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/spiral computed tomography (CT) fusion imaging for the diagnosis of bone metastasis in patients with known cancer and to compare the diagnostic efficacy of SPECT/CT fusion imaging with that of SPECT alone and with SPECT + CT.

Materials and methods

One hundred forty-one bone lesions of 125 cancer patients (with nonspecific bone findings on bone scintigraphy) were investigated in the study. SPECT, CT, and SPECT/CT fusion images were acquired simultaneously. All images were interpreted independently by two experienced nuclear medicine physicians. In cases of discrepancy, consensus was obtained by a joint reading. The final diagnosis was based on biopsy proof and radiologic follow-up over at least 1 year.

Results

The final diagnosis revealed 63 malignant bone lesions and 78 benign lesions. The diagnostic sensitivity of SPECT, SPECT + CT, and SPECT/CT fusion imaging for malignant lesions was 82.5%, 93.7%, and 98.4%, respectively. Specificity was 66.7%, 80.8%, and 93.6%, respectively. Accuracy was 73.8%, 86.5%, and 95.7%, respectively. The specificity and accuracy of SPECT/CT fusion imaging for the diagnosis malignant bone lesions were significantly higher than those of SPECT alone and of SPECT + CT (P < 0.05). Among 37 equivocal lesions revealed with SPECT, the diagnostic accuracy of bone lesions was 45.9% for SPECT + CT and 81.1% for SPECT/CT fusion imaging (χ2 = 9.855, P = 0.002). The numbers of equivocal lesions were 37, 18, and 5 for SPECT, SPECT + CT, and SPECT/CT fusion imaging, respectively, and 29.7% (11/37), 27.8% (5/18), and 20.0% (1/5) of lesions were confirmed to be malignant by radiologic follow-up over at least 1 year.

Conclusions

SPECT/spiral CT is particularly valuable for the diagnosis of bone metastasis in patients with known cancer by providing precise anatomic localization and detailed morphologic characteristics.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chowdhury FU, Scarsbrook AF. The role of hybrid SPECT-CT in oncology: current and emerging clinical applications. Clin Radiol. 2008;6:241–51.CrossRef Chowdhury FU, Scarsbrook AF. The role of hybrid SPECT-CT in oncology: current and emerging clinical applications. Clin Radiol. 2008;6:241–51.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rybak LD, Rosenthal DI. Radiological imaging for the diagnosis of bone metastases. Q J Nucl Med. 2001;45:53–64.PubMed Rybak LD, Rosenthal DI. Radiological imaging for the diagnosis of bone metastases. Q J Nucl Med. 2001;45:53–64.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Even-Sapir E. Imaging of malignant bone involvement by morphologic, scintigraphic and hybrid modalities. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1356–67.PubMed Even-Sapir E. Imaging of malignant bone involvement by morphologic, scintigraphic and hybrid modalities. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1356–67.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Love C, Din AS, Tomas MB, Kalapparambath TP, Palestro CJ. Radionuclide bone imaging: an illustrative review. Radiographics. 2003;23:341–58.CrossRef Love C, Din AS, Tomas MB, Kalapparambath TP, Palestro CJ. Radionuclide bone imaging: an illustrative review. Radiographics. 2003;23:341–58.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bushnell DL, Kahn D, Huston B, Bevering CG. Utility of SPECT imaging for determination of vertebral metastases in patients with known primary tumors. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24:13–6.CrossRef Bushnell DL, Kahn D, Huston B, Bevering CG. Utility of SPECT imaging for determination of vertebral metastases in patients with known primary tumors. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24:13–6.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Reinartz P, Schaffeldt J, Sabri O, et al. Benign versus malignant osseous lesions in the lumbar vertebrae: differentiation by means of bone SPET. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:721–6.CrossRef Reinartz P, Schaffeldt J, Sabri O, et al. Benign versus malignant osseous lesions in the lumbar vertebrae: differentiation by means of bone SPET. Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27:721–6.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Townsend DW. Dual-modality imaging: combining anatomy and function. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:938–55.CrossRef Townsend DW. Dual-modality imaging: combining anatomy and function. J Nucl Med. 2008;49:938–55.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Schillaci O, Danieli R, Manni C, Simonetti G. Is SPECT/CT with a hybrid camera useful to improve scintigraphic imaging interpretation? Nucl Med Commun. 2004;5:705–10.CrossRef Schillaci O, Danieli R, Manni C, Simonetti G. Is SPECT/CT with a hybrid camera useful to improve scintigraphic imaging interpretation? Nucl Med Commun. 2004;5:705–10.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Horger M, Eschmann SM, Pfannenberg C, et al. Evaluation of combined transmission and emission tomography for classification of skeletal lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:655–61.CrossRef Horger M, Eschmann SM, Pfannenberg C, et al. Evaluation of combined transmission and emission tomography for classification of skeletal lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:655–61.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Horger M, Bares R. The role of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in benign and malignant bone disease. Semin Nucl Med. 2006;36:275–85.CrossRef Horger M, Bares R. The role of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in benign and malignant bone disease. Semin Nucl Med. 2006;36:275–85.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Delbeke D, Edward RC, Guiberteau MJ, et al. Procedure guideline for SPECT/CT imaging 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1227–34.PubMed Delbeke D, Edward RC, Guiberteau MJ, et al. Procedure guideline for SPECT/CT imaging 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1227–34.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Daisuke U, Shinya S, Masanori I, et al. Added value of SPECT/CT fusion in assessing suspected bone metastasis: comparison with scintigraphy alone and nonfused scintigraphy and CT. Radiology. 2006;238:264–71.CrossRef Daisuke U, Shinya S, Masanori I, et al. Added value of SPECT/CT fusion in assessing suspected bone metastasis: comparison with scintigraphy alone and nonfused scintigraphy and CT. Radiology. 2006;238:264–71.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Roarke MC, Nguyen BD, Pockaj BA. Applications of SPECT/CT in nuclear radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:W135–50.CrossRef Roarke MC, Nguyen BD, Pockaj BA. Applications of SPECT/CT in nuclear radiology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:W135–50.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Strobel K, Burger C, Seifert B, et al. Characterization of focal bone lesions in the axial skeleton: performance of planar bone scintigraphy compared with SPECT and SPECT fused with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:W467–74.CrossRef Strobel K, Burger C, Seifert B, et al. Characterization of focal bone lesions in the axial skeleton: performance of planar bone scintigraphy compared with SPECT and SPECT fused with CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:W467–74.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Roach PJ, Schembri GP, Ho Shon IA, et al. SPECT/CT imaging using a spiral CT scanner for anatomical localization: impact on diagnostic accuracy and reporter confidence in clinical practice. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:977–87.CrossRef Roach PJ, Schembri GP, Ho Shon IA, et al. SPECT/CT imaging using a spiral CT scanner for anatomical localization: impact on diagnostic accuracy and reporter confidence in clinical practice. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:977–87.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Romer W, Nomayr A, Uder M, et al. SPECT-guided CT for evaluating foci of increased bone metabolism classified as indeterminate on SPECT in cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1102–6.PubMed Romer W, Nomayr A, Uder M, et al. SPECT-guided CT for evaluating foci of increased bone metabolism classified as indeterminate on SPECT in cancer patients. J Nucl Med. 2006;47:1102–6.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Keidar Z, Israel O, Krausz Y. SPECT/CT in tumor imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications. Semin Nucl Med. 2003;33:205–18.CrossRef Keidar Z, Israel O, Krausz Y. SPECT/CT in tumor imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications. Semin Nucl Med. 2003;33:205–18.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Ruf J, Lehmkuhl L, Bertram H, et al. Impact of SPECT and integrated low-dose CT after radioiodine therapy on the management of patients with thyroid carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun. 2004;25:1177–82.CrossRef Ruf J, Lehmkuhl L, Bertram H, et al. Impact of SPECT and integrated low-dose CT after radioiodine therapy on the management of patients with thyroid carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun. 2004;25:1177–82.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Schillaci O. Hybrid SPECT/CT: a new era for SPECT imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:521–4.CrossRef Schillaci O. Hybrid SPECT/CT: a new era for SPECT imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:521–4.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Romer W, Beckmann MW, Forst R, Bautz W, Kuwert T. SPECT/spiral-CT hybrid imaging in unclear foci of increased bone metabolism: a case report. Rontgenpraxis. 2005;55:234–7.PubMed Romer W, Beckmann MW, Forst R, Bautz W, Kuwert T. SPECT/spiral-CT hybrid imaging in unclear foci of increased bone metabolism: a case report. Rontgenpraxis. 2005;55:234–7.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Pomeranz SJ, Pretorius HT, Ramsingh PS. Bone scintigraphy and multimodality imaging in bone neoplasia: strategies for imaging in the new health care climate. Semin Nucl Med. 1994;24:188–207.CrossRef Pomeranz SJ, Pretorius HT, Ramsingh PS. Bone scintigraphy and multimodality imaging in bone neoplasia: strategies for imaging in the new health care climate. Semin Nucl Med. 1994;24:188–207.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Ghanem N, Uhl M, Brink I, et al. Diagnostic value of MRI in comparison to scintigraphy, PET, MS-CT and PET/CT for the detection of metastases of bone. Eur J Radiol. 2005;55:41–55.CrossRef Ghanem N, Uhl M, Brink I, et al. Diagnostic value of MRI in comparison to scintigraphy, PET, MS-CT and PET/CT for the detection of metastases of bone. Eur J Radiol. 2005;55:41–55.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schmidt GP, Reiser MF, Baur-Melnyk AB. Whole-body imaging of the musculoskeletal system: the value of MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36:1109–19.CrossRef Schmidt GP, Reiser MF, Baur-Melnyk AB. Whole-body imaging of the musculoskeletal system: the value of MR imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 2007;36:1109–19.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Tian R, Su M, Tian Y, et al. Dual-time point PET/CT with F-18 FDG for the differentiation of malignant and benign bone lesions. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:451–8.CrossRef Tian R, Su M, Tian Y, et al. Dual-time point PET/CT with F-18 FDG for the differentiation of malignant and benign bone lesions. Skeletal Radiol. 2009;38:451–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Single photon emission computed tomography/spiral computed tomography fusion imaging for the diagnosis of bone metastasis in patients with known cancer
Authors
Zhen Zhao
Lin Li
Fanglan Li
Lixia Zhao
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0764-0

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Skeletal Radiology 2/2010 Go to the issue