Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 8/2021

01-07-2021 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Original Article

Feasibility and safety of quantitative adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric heart transplant patients with and without coronary allograft vasculopathy

Authors: Silvestre R. Duran, Tyler Huffaker, Bryant Dixon, Vasu Gooty, Riad Abou Zahr, Yousef Arar, Joshua S. Greer, Ryan J. Butts, Mohammad T. Hussain

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 8/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pediatric heart transplant patients require cardiac catheterization to monitor for coronary allograft vasculopathy. Cardiac catheterization has no safe and consistent method for measuring microvascular disease. Stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessing microvascular disease has been performed in adults.

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and safety of performing cardiac MRI with quantitative adenosine stress perfusion testing in pediatric heart transplant patients with and without coronary allograft vasculopathy.

Materials and methods

All pediatric heart transplant patients with coronary vasculopathy at our institution were asked to participate. Age- and gender-matched pediatric heart transplant patients without vasculopathy were recruited for comparison. Patients underwent cardiac MRI with adenosine stress perfusion testing.

Results

Sixteen pediatric heart transplant patients, ages 6–22 years, underwent testing. Nine patients had vasculopathy by angiography. No heart block or other complications occurred during the study. The myocardial perfusion reserve for patients with vasculopathy showed no significant difference with comparison patients (median: 1.43 vs. 1.48; P=0.49). Values for both groups were lower than expected values based on previous adult studies. The patients were also analyzed for time after transplant and the number of rejection episodes. Patients within 6 years of transplantation had a nonsignificant trend toward a higher myocardial perfusion reserve (median: 1.57) versus patients with older transplants (median: 1.47; P=0.46). Intra- and interobserver reproducibility were 97% and 92%, respectively.

Conclusion

Myocardial perfusion reserve is a safe and feasible method for estimating myocardial perfusion in pediatric heart transplant patients. There is no reliable way to monitor microvascular disease in pediatric patients. This method shows potential and deserves investigation in a larger cohort.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Khush KK, Cherikh WS, Chambers DC et al (2018) The international thoracic organ transplant registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirty-fifth adult heart transplantation report-2018; focus theme: multiorgan transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 37:1155–1168CrossRef Khush KK, Cherikh WS, Chambers DC et al (2018) The international thoracic organ transplant registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirty-fifth adult heart transplantation report-2018; focus theme: multiorgan transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 37:1155–1168CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Rossano JW, Cherikh WS, Chambers DC et al (2018) The international thoracic organ transplant registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-first pediatric heart transplantation report-2018; focus theme: multiorgan transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 37:1184–1195CrossRef Rossano JW, Cherikh WS, Chambers DC et al (2018) The international thoracic organ transplant registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-first pediatric heart transplantation report-2018; focus theme: multiorgan transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 37:1184–1195CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Mehra MR, Crespo-Leiro MG, Dipchand A et al (2010) International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation working formulation of a standardized nomenclature for cardiac allograft vasculopathy-2010. J Heart Lung Transplant 29:717–727CrossRef Mehra MR, Crespo-Leiro MG, Dipchand A et al (2010) International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation working formulation of a standardized nomenclature for cardiac allograft vasculopathy-2010. J Heart Lung Transplant 29:717–727CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dedieu N, Greil G, Wong J et al (2014) Diagnosis and management of coronary allograft vasculopathy in children and adolescents. World J Transplant 4:276–293CrossRef Dedieu N, Greil G, Wong J et al (2014) Diagnosis and management of coronary allograft vasculopathy in children and adolescents. World J Transplant 4:276–293CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Pollack A, Nazif T, Mancini D, Weisz G (2013) Detection and imaging of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:613–623CrossRef Pollack A, Nazif T, Mancini D, Weisz G (2013) Detection and imaging of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 6:613–623CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lee MS, Tadwalkar RV, Fearon WF et al (2018) Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 92:E527–E536CrossRef Lee MS, Tadwalkar RV, Fearon WF et al (2018) Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a review. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 92:E527–E536CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Barthelemy O, Toledano D, Varnous S et al (2012) Multislice computed tomography to rule out coronary allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 31:1262–1268CrossRef Barthelemy O, Toledano D, Varnous S et al (2012) Multislice computed tomography to rule out coronary allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 31:1262–1268CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hussain T, Fenton M, Peel SA et al (2013) Detection and grading of coronary allograft vasculopathy in children with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary vessel wall. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6:91–98CrossRef Hussain T, Fenton M, Peel SA et al (2013) Detection and grading of coronary allograft vasculopathy in children with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the coronary vessel wall. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 6:91–98CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Chirakarnjanakorn S, Starling RC, Popovic ZB et al (2015) Dobutamine stress echocardiography during follow-up surveillance in heart transplant patients: diagnostic accuracy and predictors of outcomes. J Heart Lung Transplant 34:710–717CrossRef Chirakarnjanakorn S, Starling RC, Popovic ZB et al (2015) Dobutamine stress echocardiography during follow-up surveillance in heart transplant patients: diagnostic accuracy and predictors of outcomes. J Heart Lung Transplant 34:710–717CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Miller CA, Sarma J, Naish JH et al (2014) Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:799–808CrossRef Miller CA, Sarma J, Naish JH et al (2014) Multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 63:799–808CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chih S, Ross HJ, Alba AC et al (2016) Perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as a rule-out test for cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Am J Transplant 16:3007–3015CrossRef Chih S, Ross HJ, Alba AC et al (2016) Perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging as a rule-out test for cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Am J Transplant 16:3007–3015CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Erbel C, Mukhammadaminova N, Gleissner CA et al (2016) Myocardial perfusion reserve and strain-encoded CMR for evaluation of cardiac allograft microvasculopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:255–266 Erbel C, Mukhammadaminova N, Gleissner CA et al (2016) Myocardial perfusion reserve and strain-encoded CMR for evaluation of cardiac allograft microvasculopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 9:255–266
14.
go back to reference Ishida M, Schuster A, Morton G et al (2011) Development of a universal dual-bolus injection scheme for the quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:28CrossRef Ishida M, Schuster A, Morton G et al (2011) Development of a universal dual-bolus injection scheme for the quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:28CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hussain ST, Paul M, Plein S et al (2012) Design and rationale of the MR-INFORM study: stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to guide the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:65CrossRef Hussain ST, Paul M, Plein S et al (2012) Design and rationale of the MR-INFORM study: stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging to guide the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 14:65CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Manisty C, Ripley DP, Herrey AS et al (2015) Splenic switch-off: a tool to assess stress adequacy in adenosine perfusion cardiac MR imaging. Radiology 276:732–740CrossRef Manisty C, Ripley DP, Herrey AS et al (2015) Splenic switch-off: a tool to assess stress adequacy in adenosine perfusion cardiac MR imaging. Radiology 276:732–740CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Narang A, Blair JE, Patel MB et al (2018) Myocardial perfusion reserve and global longitudinal strain as potential markers of coronary allograft vasculopathy in late-stage orthotopic heart transplantation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 34:1607–1617CrossRef Narang A, Blair JE, Patel MB et al (2018) Myocardial perfusion reserve and global longitudinal strain as potential markers of coronary allograft vasculopathy in late-stage orthotopic heart transplantation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 34:1607–1617CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Toft J, Mortensen J, Hesse B (1998) Risk of atrioventricular block during adenosine pharmacologic stress testing in heart transplant recipients. Am J Cardiol 82:A699 Toft J, Mortensen J, Hesse B (1998) Risk of atrioventricular block during adenosine pharmacologic stress testing in heart transplant recipients. Am J Cardiol 82:A699
19.
go back to reference Cerqueira MD, Verani MS, Schwaiger M et al (1994) Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter trial registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 23:384–389CrossRef Cerqueira MD, Verani MS, Schwaiger M et al (1994) Safety profile of adenosine stress perfusion imaging: results from the Adenoscan Multicenter trial registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 23:384–389CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Karamitsos TD, Arnold JR, Pegg TJ et al (2009) Tolerance and safety of adenosine stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:277–283CrossRef Karamitsos TD, Arnold JR, Pegg TJ et al (2009) Tolerance and safety of adenosine stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:277–283CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Al-Mallah MH, Arida M, Garcia-Sayan E et al (2011) Safety of adenosine pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging in orthotopic cardiac transplant recipients: a single center experience of 102 transplant patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1105–1111CrossRef Al-Mallah MH, Arida M, Garcia-Sayan E et al (2011) Safety of adenosine pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging in orthotopic cardiac transplant recipients: a single center experience of 102 transplant patients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 27:1105–1111CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Flyer JN, Zuckerman WA, Richmond ME et al (2017) Prospective study of adenosine on atrioventricular nodal conduction in pediatric and young adult patients after heart transplantation. Circulation 135:2485–2493CrossRef Flyer JN, Zuckerman WA, Richmond ME et al (2017) Prospective study of adenosine on atrioventricular nodal conduction in pediatric and young adult patients after heart transplantation. Circulation 135:2485–2493CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Feasibility and safety of quantitative adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric heart transplant patients with and without coronary allograft vasculopathy
Authors
Silvestre R. Duran
Tyler Huffaker
Bryant Dixon
Vasu Gooty
Riad Abou Zahr
Yousef Arar
Joshua S. Greer
Ryan J. Butts
Mohammad T. Hussain
Publication date
01-07-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 8/2021
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-04977-1

Other articles of this Issue 8/2021

Pediatric Radiology 8/2021 Go to the issue