Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 3/2021

01-03-2021 | Commentary

Appropriate use criteria and computerized decision support for the pediatric population: background, Pediatric Rapid Response Committee and future direction

Authors: Marta Hernanz-Schulman, Donald P. Frush, Michael A. Bettmann

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Excerpt

Medical imaging contributes to the diagnosis and management of patients of all ages, yet it is increasingly complex — a complexity that has far outpaced the medical school resources devoted to training for its use. Further, this evolution in the complexity and role of medical imaging is so rapid that it renders static educational models obsolete. Yet the potential for appropriately chosen imaging to decrease morbidity and improve outcomes of care delivery is vast, from replacement of routine exploratory laparotomies, to the rapid, accurate and noninvasive diagnosis of treatable conditions such as pyloric stenosis. Similarly, inappropriate imaging can be detrimental, incurring avoidable risks such as unnecessary radiation exposure, complications from contrast media, and detection of confounding and potentially unimportant incidental findings, which sometimes results in increased cost of health care without reciprocal benefit to the health of the individual or the population. This concern is not insignificant. According to a report to the U.S. Congress by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission in 2011, the volume of physician services per fee-for-service beneficiary rose by 100% between the years 2000 and 2009, with imaging and other tests leading the rise [1]. In a similar report dated 2018, total health care spending as a percentage of gross domestic product was less than 10% in 1975, rising to nearly 18% in 2017; moreover, decisions by health care providers accounted for approximately 80% of these health care expenditures. Unfortunately, these decisions and increased expenditures were found to be largely unaccompanied by improvements in overall quality of health care and outcomes [2]. Clearly, the incorporation of evidence-based and methodologically sound appropriate use criteria to help guide such everyday decision-making is indeed appropriate, and is a directive whose time has come. …
Literature
3.
go back to reference Lee DW, Rawson JV, Wade SW et al (2011) Radiology benefit managers: cost saving or cost shifting? J Am Coll Radiol 8:393–401CrossRef Lee DW, Rawson JV, Wade SW et al (2011) Radiology benefit managers: cost saving or cost shifting? J Am Coll Radiol 8:393–401CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Huber TC, Krishnaraj A, Patrie J et al (2018) Impact of a commercially available clinical decision support program on provider ordering habits. J Am Coll Radiol 15:951–957CrossRef Huber TC, Krishnaraj A, Patrie J et al (2018) Impact of a commercially available clinical decision support program on provider ordering habits. J Am Coll Radiol 15:951–957CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Larson DB, Molvin LZ, Wang J et al (2014) Pediatric CT quality management and improvement program. Pediatr Radiol 44:519–524CrossRef Larson DB, Molvin LZ, Wang J et al (2014) Pediatric CT quality management and improvement program. Pediatr Radiol 44:519–524CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fitch K, Bernstein S, Aguilar MD et al (2001) The Rand/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. Rand Corp., Santa Monica Fitch K, Bernstein S, Aguilar MD et al (2001) The Rand/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. Rand Corp., Santa Monica
15.
go back to reference Bettmann MA (2006) The ACR Appropriateness Criteria: view from the committee chair. J Am Coll Radiol 3:510–512CrossRef Bettmann MA (2006) The ACR Appropriateness Criteria: view from the committee chair. J Am Coll Radiol 3:510–512CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Appropriate use criteria and computerized decision support for the pediatric population: background, Pediatric Rapid Response Committee and future direction
Authors
Marta Hernanz-Schulman
Donald P. Frush
Michael A. Bettmann
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04898-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Pediatric Radiology 3/2021 Go to the issue