Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 3/2014

01-10-2014 | Image Gently ALARA CT summit: How to Use New CT Technologies for Children

Pediatric CT quality management and improvement program

Authors: David B. Larson, Lior Z. Molvin, Jia Wang, Frandics P. Chan, Beverley Newman, Dominik Fleischmann

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Special Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Modern CT is a powerful yet increasingly complex technology that continues to rapidly evolve; optimal clinical implementation as well as appropriate quality management and improvement in CT are challenging but attainable. This article outlines the organizational structure on which a CT quality management and improvement program can be built, followed by a discussion of common as well as pediatric-specific challenges. Organizational elements of a CT quality management and improvement program include the formulation of clear objectives; definition of the roles and responsibilities of key personnel; implementation of a technologist training, coaching and feedback program; and use of an efficient and accurate monitoring system. Key personnel and roles include a radiologist as the CT director, a qualified CT medical physicist, as well as technologists with specific responsibilities and adequate time dedicated to operation management, CT protocol management and CT technologist education. Common challenges in managing a clinical CT operation are related to the complexity of newly introduced technology, of training and communication and of performance monitoring. Challenges specific to pediatric patients include the importance of including patient size in protocol and dose considerations, a lower tolerance for error in these patients, and a smaller sample size from which to learn and improve.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Flohr TG, Schaller S, Stierstorfer K et al (2005) Multi-detector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques. Radiology 235:756–773PubMedCrossRef Flohr TG, Schaller S, Stierstorfer K et al (2005) Multi-detector row CT systems and image-reconstruction techniques. Radiology 235:756–773PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim K-P et al (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169:2071–2077PubMedCrossRef Berrington de González A, Mahesh M, Kim K-P et al (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169:2071–2077PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Frush DP, Morin R, Rehani MM (2013) Monitoring of medical radiation exposure for individuals. In: Lau L, Kwan-Hoong N (eds) Radiology safety and quality. Springer, New York, pp 69–84 Frush DP, Morin R, Rehani MM (2013) Monitoring of medical radiation exposure for individuals. In: Lau L, Kwan-Hoong N (eds) Radiology safety and quality. Springer, New York, pp 69–84
4.
go back to reference Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628PubMedCrossRef Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Cody DD, Fisher TS, Gress DA et al (2013) AAPM medical physics practice guideline 1.a: CT protocol management and review practice guideline. J Appl Clin Med Phys 14:3–12PubMed Cody DD, Fisher TS, Gress DA et al (2013) AAPM medical physics practice guideline 1.a: CT protocol management and review practice guideline. J Appl Clin Med Phys 14:3–12PubMed
6.
go back to reference Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM et al (2011) Rising use of CT in child visits to the emergency department in the United States, 1995–2008. Radiology 259:793–801PubMedCrossRef Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM et al (2011) Rising use of CT in child visits to the emergency department in the United States, 1995–2008. Radiology 259:793–801PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference (1991) Standards for protection against radiation — Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Final rule. Fed Regist 56:23360–23474 (1991) Standards for protection against radiation — Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Final rule. Fed Regist 56:23360–23474
8.
go back to reference National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2012) Reference levels and achievable doses in medical and dental imaging: recommendations for the United States. NCRPM report 172. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2012) Reference levels and achievable doses in medical and dental imaging: recommendations for the United States. NCRPM report 172. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, MD
9.
go back to reference Larson DB, Wang LL, Podberesky DJ et al (2013) System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. Part I: optimization model. Radiology 269:167–176 Larson DB, Wang LL, Podberesky DJ et al (2013) System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. Part I: optimization model. Radiology 269:167–176
10.
go back to reference Larson DB, Malarik RJ, Hall SM et al (2013) System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. Part II: process control system. Radiology 269:177–185 Larson DB, Malarik RJ, Hall SM et al (2013) System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. Part II: process control system. Radiology 269:177–185
11.
go back to reference Fleischmann D (2009) Contrast medium administration in computed tomographic angiography. In: Rubin GD, Rofsky NM (eds) CT and MR angiography. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 129–154 Fleischmann D (2009) Contrast medium administration in computed tomographic angiography. In: Rubin GD, Rofsky NM (eds) CT and MR angiography. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 129–154
12.
go back to reference Fleischmann D, Kamaya A (2009) Optimal vascular and parenchymal contrast enhancement: the current state of the art. Radiol Clin North Am 47:13–26PubMedCrossRef Fleischmann D, Kamaya A (2009) Optimal vascular and parenchymal contrast enhancement: the current state of the art. Radiol Clin North Am 47:13–26PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Goldman LW (2007) Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality. J Nucl Med Technol 35:213–225PubMedCrossRef Goldman LW (2007) Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality. J Nucl Med Technol 35:213–225PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Renne J, Falck CV, Ringe KI et al. (2013) CT angiography for pulmonary embolism detection: the effect of breathing on pulmonary artery enhancement using a 64-row detector system. Acta Radiol [Epub ahead of print] Renne J, Falck CV, Ringe KI et al. (2013) CT angiography for pulmonary embolism detection: the effect of breathing on pulmonary artery enhancement using a 64-row detector system. Acta Radiol [Epub ahead of print]
15.
go back to reference Talati RK, Dunkin J, Parikh S et al (2013) Current methods of monitoring radiation exposure from CT. J Am Coll Radiol 10:702–707PubMedCrossRef Talati RK, Dunkin J, Parikh S et al (2013) Current methods of monitoring radiation exposure from CT. J Am Coll Radiol 10:702–707PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Wang J, Duan X, Christner JA et al (2012) Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part I. Development and validation of methods using the CT image. Med Phys 39:6764–6771PubMedCrossRef Wang J, Duan X, Christner JA et al (2012) Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part I. Development and validation of methods using the CT image. Med Phys 39:6764–6771PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Wang J, Christner JA, Duan X et al (2012) Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part II. Implementation on abdomen and thorax phantoms using cross sectional CT images and scanned projection radiograph images. Med Phys 39:6772–6778PubMedCrossRef Wang J, Christner JA, Duan X et al (2012) Attenuation-based estimation of patient size for the purpose of size specific dose estimation in CT. Part II. Implementation on abdomen and thorax phantoms using cross sectional CT images and scanned projection radiograph images. Med Phys 39:6772–6778PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kleinman PL, Strauss KJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1611–1619PubMedCrossRef Kleinman PL, Strauss KJ, Zurakowski D et al (2010) Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children’s hospital. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1611–1619PubMedCrossRef
19.
20.
go back to reference Menke J (2005) Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. Radiology 236:565–571PubMedCrossRef Menke J (2005) Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. Radiology 236:565–571PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pediatric CT quality management and improvement program
Authors
David B. Larson
Lior Z. Molvin
Jia Wang
Frandics P. Chan
Beverley Newman
Dominik Fleischmann
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue Special Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3039-4

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2014

Pediatric Radiology 3/2014 Go to the issue

Image Gently ALARA CT summit: How to Use New CT Technologies for Children

Should risk from medical imaging be assessed in the absence of benefit and vice versa?

Image Gently ALARA CT summit: How to Use New CT Technologies for Children

Management of auto exposure control during pediatric computed tomography

Image Gently ALARA CT summit: how to use new CT technologies for children

If it is published in the peer-reviewed literature, it must be true?

Image Gently ALARA CT summit: How to Use New CT Technologies for Children

Clinical decision-making tools for exam selection, reporting and dose tracking

Image Gently ALARA CT summit: How to Use New CT Technologies for Children

Dose indices: everybody wants a number