Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 6/2019

01-05-2019 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | Original Article

Clinical experience with two-point mDixon turbo spin echo as an alternative to conventional turbo spin echo for magnetic resonance imaging of the pediatric knee

Authors: Bamidele F. Kammen, Eric M. Padua, S. Pinar Karakas, R. Ward Hagar, Dave M. Hitt, Nirav K. Pandya, Taylor Chung

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Two-point modified Dixon (mDixon) turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence provides an efficient, robust method of fat suppression. In one mDixon acquisition, four image types can be generated: water-only, fat-only, in-phase and opposed-phase images.

Objective

To determine whether PD mDixon TSE water-only and, by proxy, PD in-phase images generated by one acquisition can replace two conventional PD TSE sequences with and without fat suppression in routine clinical MR examination of the knee.

Materials and methods

This is a retrospective study of 50 consecutive pediatric knee MR examinations. PD mDixon TSE water-only and PD fat-saturated TSE sequences (acquired in the sagittal plane with identical spatial resolution) were reviewed independently by two pediatric radiologists for homogeneity of fat suppression and detection of intra-articular pathology. Thirteen of the 50 patients underwent arthroscopy, and we used the arthroscopic results as a reference standard for the proton-density fat-saturated and proton-density mDixon results. We used the Kruskal-Wallis rank test to assess difference in fat suppression between the proton-density mDixon and proton-density fat-saturated techniques. We used kappa statistics to compare the agreement of detection of intra-articular pathology between readers and techniques. We also calculated sensitivity, specificity and accuracy between arthroscopy and MR interpretations.

Results

Proton-density mDixon water-only imaging showed significant improvement with the fat suppression compared with proton-density fat-saturated sequence (P=0.02). Each observer demonstrated near-perfect agreement between both techniques for detecting meniscal and ligamentous pathology and fair to substantial agreement for bone contusions, and chondral and osteochondral lesions.

Conclusion

Two-point mDixon water-only imaging can replace conventional proton-density fat-saturated sequence. When same-plane proton-density fat-saturated and non-fat-saturated sequences are required, proton-density water-only and proton-density in-phase image types acquired in the same acquisition shorten the overall examination time while maintaining excellent intra-articular lesion conspicuity.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Del Grande F, Santini F, Herzka DA et al (2014) Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiographics 34:217–233CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Del Grande F, Santini F, Herzka DA et al (2014) Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiographics 34:217–233CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Glover GH, Schneider E (1991) Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med 18:371–383CrossRefPubMed Glover GH, Schneider E (1991) Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with B0 inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Med 18:371–383CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rybicki FJ, Mulkern RV, Robertson RL et al (2001) Fast three-point Dixon MR imaging of the retrobulbar space with low-resolution images for phase correction: comparison with fast spin-echo inversion recovery imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:1798–1802PubMed Rybicki FJ, Mulkern RV, Robertson RL et al (2001) Fast three-point Dixon MR imaging of the retrobulbar space with low-resolution images for phase correction: comparison with fast spin-echo inversion recovery imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:1798–1802PubMed
5.
go back to reference Rybicki FJ, Chung T, Reid J et al (2001) Fast three-point Dixon MR imaging using low-resolution images for phase correction: a comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppression for pediatric musculoskeletal imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1019–1023CrossRefPubMed Rybicki FJ, Chung T, Reid J et al (2001) Fast three-point Dixon MR imaging using low-resolution images for phase correction: a comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppression for pediatric musculoskeletal imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:1019–1023CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ma J, Singh SK, Kumar AJ et al (2004) T2-weighted spine imaging with a fast three-point Dixon technique: comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppression. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:1025–1029CrossRefPubMed Ma J, Singh SK, Kumar AJ et al (2004) T2-weighted spine imaging with a fast three-point Dixon technique: comparison with chemical shift selective fat suppression. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:1025–1029CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ma J (2004) Breath-hold water and fat imaging using a dual-echo two-point Dixon technique with an efficient and robust phase-correction algorithm. Magn Reson Med 52:415–419CrossRefPubMed Ma J (2004) Breath-hold water and fat imaging using a dual-echo two-point Dixon technique with an efficient and robust phase-correction algorithm. Magn Reson Med 52:415–419CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Xiang QS (2006) Two-point water-fat imaging with partially-opposed-phase (POP) acquisition: an asymmetric Dixon method. Magn Reson Med 56:572–584CrossRefPubMed Xiang QS (2006) Two-point water-fat imaging with partially-opposed-phase (POP) acquisition: an asymmetric Dixon method. Magn Reson Med 56:572–584CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Eggers H, Brendel B, Duijndam A et al (2011) Dual-echo Dixon imaging with flexible choice of echo times. Magn Reson Med 65:96–107CrossRefPubMed Eggers H, Brendel B, Duijndam A et al (2011) Dual-echo Dixon imaging with flexible choice of echo times. Magn Reson Med 65:96–107CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Glantz SA (2005) Primer of biostatistics. McGraw-Hill, New York Glantz SA (2005) Primer of biostatistics. McGraw-Hill, New York
11.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bley TA, Wieben O, François CJ et al (2010) Fat and water magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:4–18CrossRefPubMed Bley TA, Wieben O, François CJ et al (2010) Fat and water magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 31:4–18CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference de Kerviler E, Leroy-Willig A, Clement O et al (1998) Fat suppression techniques in MRI: an update. Biomed Pharmacother 52:69–75CrossRefPubMed de Kerviler E, Leroy-Willig A, Clement O et al (1998) Fat suppression techniques in MRI: an update. Biomed Pharmacother 52:69–75CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Bydder GM, Pennock JM, Steiner RE et al (1985) The short TI inversion recovery sequence--an approach to MR imaging of the abdomen. Magn Reson Imaging 3:251–254CrossRefPubMed Bydder GM, Pennock JM, Steiner RE et al (1985) The short TI inversion recovery sequence--an approach to MR imaging of the abdomen. Magn Reson Imaging 3:251–254CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Pokharel SS, Macura KJ, Kamel IR et al (2013) Current MR imaging lipid detection techniques for diagnosis of lesions in the abdomen and pelvis. Radiographics 33:681–702CrossRefPubMed Pokharel SS, Macura KJ, Kamel IR et al (2013) Current MR imaging lipid detection techniques for diagnosis of lesions in the abdomen and pelvis. Radiographics 33:681–702CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Krinsky G, Rofsky NM, Weinreb JC (1996) Nonspecificity of short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) as a technique of fat suppression: pitfalls in image interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:523–526CrossRefPubMed Krinsky G, Rofsky NM, Weinreb JC (1996) Nonspecificity of short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) as a technique of fat suppression: pitfalls in image interpretation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:523–526CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Delfaut EM, Beltran J, Johnson G et al (1999) Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls. Radiographics 19:373–382CrossRefPubMed Delfaut EM, Beltran J, Johnson G et al (1999) Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls. Radiographics 19:373–382CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
20.
go back to reference Kohl S, Meier S, Ahmad SS et al (2015) Accuracy of cartilage-specific 3-tesla 3D-DESS magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of chondral lesions: comparison with knee arthroscopy. J Orthop Surg Res 10:191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kohl S, Meier S, Ahmad SS et al (2015) Accuracy of cartilage-specific 3-tesla 3D-DESS magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of chondral lesions: comparison with knee arthroscopy. J Orthop Surg Res 10:191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Rossbach BP, Paulus AC, Niethammer TR et al (2016) Discrepancy between morphological findings in juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (OCD): a comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:1259–1264CrossRefPubMed Rossbach BP, Paulus AC, Niethammer TR et al (2016) Discrepancy between morphological findings in juvenile osteochondritis dissecans (OCD): a comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:1259–1264CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Reed ME, Villacis DC, Hatch GF 3rd et al (2013) 3.0-tesla MRI and arthroscopy for assessment of knee articular cartilage lesions. Orthopedics 36:e1060–e1064CrossRefPubMed Reed ME, Villacis DC, Hatch GF 3rd et al (2013) 3.0-tesla MRI and arthroscopy for assessment of knee articular cartilage lesions. Orthopedics 36:e1060–e1064CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Park HJ, Lee SY, Rho MH et al (2016) Usefulness of the fast spin-echo three-point Dixon (mDixon) image of the knee joint on 3.0-T MRI: comparison with conventional fast spin-echo T2 weighted image. Br J Radiol 89:20151074CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Park HJ, Lee SY, Rho MH et al (2016) Usefulness of the fast spin-echo three-point Dixon (mDixon) image of the knee joint on 3.0-T MRI: comparison with conventional fast spin-echo T2 weighted image. Br J Radiol 89:20151074CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB et al (2007) Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:375–385CrossRefPubMed Dietrich O, Raya JG, Reeder SB et al (2007) Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:375–385CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical experience with two-point mDixon turbo spin echo as an alternative to conventional turbo spin echo for magnetic resonance imaging of the pediatric knee
Authors
Bamidele F. Kammen
Eric M. Padua
S. Pinar Karakas
R. Ward Hagar
Dave M. Hitt
Nirav K. Pandya
Taylor Chung
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04349-w

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Pediatric Radiology 6/2019 Go to the issue