Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 6/2019

01-05-2019 | Pediatric Radiology | Original Article

What’s missing? An analysis of pediatric radiology fellowship website utility and recruitment potential

Authors: Jack H. Ruddell, Adam E. M. Eltorai, Andrew S. Mark, Sasha Raman, Cassandra M. Sams

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 6/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pediatric radiology fellowship web pages convey practical information and provide an opportunity to impress upon visitors the mission and principles that are core to the program.

Objective

The goal of the study was to assess pediatric radiology fellowship program websites and identify potential areas for improvement because applications and enrollment have been steadily declining since 2013.

Materials and methods

We evaluated 41 websites of pediatric radiology fellowship programs for 17 criteria. We classified programs by region, size and separate web page status. We compared the met criteria using the Kruskal-Wallis and two-sided t-test, accounting for any unequal variances and distributions.

Results

Of the websites evaluated, the average content score was 42.3%, meeting only 7.2±2.9 of the 17 criteria. Programs in the Northeast were associated with higher online comprehensiveness (P=0.034), as were programs with a separate website for pediatric radiology (P<0.001). We also noted a higher number of positions offered per year than there were fellows enrolled (2.73±2.3 versus 1.39±2.3; P<0.001).

Conclusion

The future of diverse pediatric radiology fellowship training opportunities is increasingly influenced by the availability and transparency of fellowship program and training attributes online. With an average content score of 42.3% across the examined fellowship websites, it is evident that there is room for improvement in the information provided by the pediatric radiology fellowship programs, particularly with respect to providing alumni information and job dispositions, listing current fellows whom applicants may contact regarding the program, and including realistic call and other work expectations of fellows.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Arnold RW, Goske MJ, Bulas DI et al (2009) Factors influencing subspecialty choice among radiology residents: a case study of pediatric radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 6:635–642CrossRefPubMed Arnold RW, Goske MJ, Bulas DI et al (2009) Factors influencing subspecialty choice among radiology residents: a case study of pediatric radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 6:635–642CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Luk L, Maher MD, Desperito E et al (2018) Evaluating factors and resources affecting ranking of diagnostic radiology residency programs by medical students in 2016–2017. Acad Radiol 25:1344–1352CrossRefPubMed Luk L, Maher MD, Desperito E et al (2018) Evaluating factors and resources affecting ranking of diagnostic radiology residency programs by medical students in 2016–2017. Acad Radiol 25:1344–1352CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Glover M, Patel TY (2016) The radiology fellowship arms race cannot be won. J Am Coll Radiol 13:461–464CrossRefPubMed Glover M, Patel TY (2016) The radiology fellowship arms race cannot be won. J Am Coll Radiol 13:461–464CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Pfeifer CM (2018) Declining interest in pediatric radiology prompts a call to action. J Am Coll Radiol 15:490–492CrossRefPubMed Pfeifer CM (2018) Declining interest in pediatric radiology prompts a call to action. J Am Coll Radiol 15:490–492CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference DePietro DM, Kiefer RM, Redmond JW et al (2018) The 2017 integrated IR residency match: results of a national survey of applicants and program directors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 29:114–124CrossRefPubMed DePietro DM, Kiefer RM, Redmond JW et al (2018) The 2017 integrated IR residency match: results of a national survey of applicants and program directors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 29:114–124CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Gaeta TJ, Birkhahn RH, Lamont D et al (2005) Aspects of residency programs' web sites important to student applicants. Acad Emerg Med 12:89–92CrossRefPubMed Gaeta TJ, Birkhahn RH, Lamont D et al (2005) Aspects of residency programs' web sites important to student applicants. Acad Emerg Med 12:89–92CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hansberry DR, Bornstein J, Agarwal N et al (2018) An assessment of radiology residency program websites. J Am Coll Radiol 15:663–666CrossRefPubMed Hansberry DR, Bornstein J, Agarwal N et al (2018) An assessment of radiology residency program websites. J Am Coll Radiol 15:663–666CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Silvestre J, Tomlinson-Hansen S et al (2014) Plastic surgery residency websites: a critical analysis of accessibility and content. Ann Plast Surg 72:265–269PubMed Silvestre J, Tomlinson-Hansen S et al (2014) Plastic surgery residency websites: a critical analysis of accessibility and content. Ann Plast Surg 72:265–269PubMed
10.
go back to reference Oladeji LO, Yu JC, Oladeji AK, Ponce BA (2015) How useful are orthopedic surgery residency web pages? J Surg Educ 72:1185–1189CrossRefPubMed Oladeji LO, Yu JC, Oladeji AK, Ponce BA (2015) How useful are orthopedic surgery residency web pages? J Surg Educ 72:1185–1189CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Skovrlj B, Silvestre J, Ibeh C et al (2015) Neurosurgery residency websites: a critical evaluation. World Neurosurg 84:727–733CrossRefPubMed Skovrlj B, Silvestre J, Ibeh C et al (2015) Neurosurgery residency websites: a critical evaluation. World Neurosurg 84:727–733CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Svider PF, Gupta A, Johnson AP et al (2014) Evaluation of otolaryngology residency program websites. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:956–960CrossRefPubMed Svider PF, Gupta A, Johnson AP et al (2014) Evaluation of otolaryngology residency program websites. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140:956–960CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
What’s missing? An analysis of pediatric radiology fellowship website utility and recruitment potential
Authors
Jack H. Ruddell
Adam E. M. Eltorai
Andrew S. Mark
Sasha Raman
Cassandra M. Sams
Publication date
01-05-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 6/2019
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-019-04381-w

Other articles of this Issue 6/2019

Pediatric Radiology 6/2019 Go to the issue