Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 2/2019

Open Access 01-02-2019 | Original Article

Parents’ received and expected information about their child’s radiation exposure during radiographic examinations

Authors: Heljä T. Oikarinen, Anne M. Perttu, Helena M. Mahajan, Leila H. Ukkola, Osmo A. Tervonen, Aino-Liisa I. Jussila, Anja O. Henner

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 2/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite regulations, insufficient information is provided to adult patients prior to their radiologic examinations. Information regarding paediatric patients has not been systematically studied.

Objective

To survey parents’ experience and wishes for information in connection with their child’s radiographic examination.

Materials and methods

We provided a questionnaire to consenting parents of children younger than 12 years old at a university hospital. The questionnaire asked parents about the information obtained from the referrer prior to the radiograph, the chance to discuss with the referrer and their wishes regarding future information. Forty-one parents responded to the survey. Twenty-five children were referred for radiography of extremities, the others for dental, body and skull examinations.

Results

Altogether 34/41 (83%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 69–91%) parents said they received adequate information on the purpose of the examination, 8/35 (23%, 95% CI 12–39%) on other options and 3/41 (7%, 95% CI 3–19%) on radiation dose. Ten of 41 parents (24%, 95% CI 12–40%) said they were aware of radiation exposure. The number of previous radiology examinations was not sufficiently discussed. The communication was scored as mean 6.5 (95% CI 5.8–7.1) on a scale from 4 (poor) to 10 (excellent). Thirty-eight of 40 (95%, 95% CI 84–99%) of parents expected information on the purpose, 35/40 (88%, 95% CI 74–95%) on radiation dose and 31/40 (78%, 95% CI 63–88%) on other options. Symbols of radiation and corresponding period of natural background radiation are preferred to convey the dose. A referrer is the preferred source of information.

Conclusion

Parents did not feel adequately informed prior to their child’s radiographic examination. Parents expect more information about the purpose, dose and alternative tests.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Malone J, Guleria R, Craven C et al (2012) Justification of diagnostic medical exposures: some practical issues. Report of an International Atomic Energy Agency consultation. Br J Radiol 85:523–538CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Malone J, Guleria R, Craven C et al (2012) Justification of diagnostic medical exposures: some practical issues. Report of an International Atomic Energy Agency consultation. Br J Radiol 85:523–538CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Ukkola L, Oikarinen H, Henner A et al (2017) Patient information regarding medical radiation exposure is inadequate: patients' experience in a university hospital. Radiography 23:e114–e119CrossRefPubMed Ukkola L, Oikarinen H, Henner A et al (2017) Patient information regarding medical radiation exposure is inadequate: patients' experience in a university hospital. Radiography 23:e114–e119CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Thornton RH, Dauer LT, Shuk E et al (2015) Patient perspectives and preferences for communication of medical imaging risks in a cancer care setting. Radiology 275:545–552CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thornton RH, Dauer LT, Shuk E et al (2015) Patient perspectives and preferences for communication of medical imaging risks in a cancer care setting. Radiology 275:545–552CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Boutis K, Thomas KE (2016) Radiation dose awareness and disclosure practice in paediatric emergency medicine: how far have we come? Br J Radiol 89:20160022CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Boutis K, Thomas KE (2016) Radiation dose awareness and disclosure practice in paediatric emergency medicine: how far have we come? Br J Radiol 89:20160022CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Hartwig H-DR, Clingenpeel J, Perkins AM et al (2013) Parental knowledge of radiation exposure in medical imaging used in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 29:705–709CrossRefPubMed Hartwig H-DR, Clingenpeel J, Perkins AM et al (2013) Parental knowledge of radiation exposure in medical imaging used in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 29:705–709CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Lam DL, Larson DB, Eisenberg JD et al (2015) Communicating potential radiation-induced cancer risks from medical imaging directly to patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:962–970CrossRefPubMed Lam DL, Larson DB, Eisenberg JD et al (2015) Communicating potential radiation-induced cancer risks from medical imaging directly to patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:962–970CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Heyer CM, Hansmann J, Peters SA et al (2010) Paediatrician awareness of radiation dose and inherent risks in chest imaging studies — a questionnaire study. Eur J Radiol 76:288–293CrossRefPubMed Heyer CM, Hansmann J, Peters SA et al (2010) Paediatrician awareness of radiation dose and inherent risks in chest imaging studies — a questionnaire study. Eur J Radiol 76:288–293CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Boutis K, Fischer J, Freedman SB et al (2014) Radiation exposure from imaging tests in pediatric emergency medicine: a survey of physician knowledge and risk disclosure practices. J Emerg Med 47:36–44 Boutis K, Fischer J, Freedman SB et al (2014) Radiation exposure from imaging tests in pediatric emergency medicine: a survey of physician knowledge and risk disclosure practices. J Emerg Med 47:36–44
15.
go back to reference Thomas KE, Parnell-Parmley JE, Haidar S et al (2006) Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians. Pediatr Radiol 36:823–832CrossRefPubMed Thomas KE, Parnell-Parmley JE, Haidar S et al (2006) Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians. Pediatr Radiol 36:823–832CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Portelli JL, McNulty JP, Bezzina P et al (2018) Benefit-risk communication in paediatric imaging: what do referring physicians, radiographers and radiologists think, say and do? Radiography 24:33–40CrossRefPubMed Portelli JL, McNulty JP, Bezzina P et al (2018) Benefit-risk communication in paediatric imaging: what do referring physicians, radiographers and radiologists think, say and do? Radiography 24:33–40CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Ukkola L, Oikarinen H, Henner A et al (2016) Information about radiation dose and risks in connection with radiological examinations: what patients would like to know. Eur Radiol 26:436–443CrossRefPubMed Ukkola L, Oikarinen H, Henner A et al (2016) Information about radiation dose and risks in connection with radiological examinations: what patients would like to know. Eur Radiol 26:436–443CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Larson DB, Rader SB, Forman HP et al (2007) Informing parents about CT radiation exposure in children: it’s OK to tell them. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:271–275CrossRefPubMed Larson DB, Rader SB, Forman HP et al (2007) Informing parents about CT radiation exposure in children: it’s OK to tell them. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:271–275CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Boutis K, Cogollo W, Fischer J et al (2013) Parental knowledge of potential cancer risks from exposure to computed tomography. Pediatrics 132:305–311CrossRefPubMed Boutis K, Cogollo W, Fischer J et al (2013) Parental knowledge of potential cancer risks from exposure to computed tomography. Pediatrics 132:305–311CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296CrossRefPubMed Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ et al (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:289–296CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Sodhi KS, Lee EY (2014) What all physicians should know about the potential radiation risk that computed tomography poses for paediatric patients. Acta Paediatr 103:807–811CrossRefPubMed Sodhi KS, Lee EY (2014) What all physicians should know about the potential radiation risk that computed tomography poses for paediatric patients. Acta Paediatr 103:807–811CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J (2003) Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care 15:261–266CrossRefPubMed Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, Sitzia J (2003) Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Health Care 15:261–266CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference International Atomic Energy Agency (2009) Report of a consultation on justification of patient exposures in medical imaging. Radiat Prot Dosim 135:137–144CrossRef International Atomic Energy Agency (2009) Report of a consultation on justification of patient exposures in medical imaging. Radiat Prot Dosim 135:137–144CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Dauer LT, Thornton RH, Hay JL et al (2011) Fears, feelings, and facts: interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:756–761CrossRefPubMed Dauer LT, Thornton RH, Hay JL et al (2011) Fears, feelings, and facts: interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:756–761CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Nievelstein RAJ, Frush DP (2012) Should we obtain informed consent for examinations that expose patients to radiation? AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:664–669CrossRefPubMed Nievelstein RAJ, Frush DP (2012) Should we obtain informed consent for examinations that expose patients to radiation? AJR Am J Roentgenol 199:664–669CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Tomà P, Cannatà V, Genovese E et al (2017) Radiation exposure in diagnostic imaging: wisdom and prudence, but still a lot to understand. Radiol Med 122:215–220CrossRefPubMed Tomà P, Cannatà V, Genovese E et al (2017) Radiation exposure in diagnostic imaging: wisdom and prudence, but still a lot to understand. Radiol Med 122:215–220CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Parents’ received and expected information about their child’s radiation exposure during radiographic examinations
Authors
Heljä T. Oikarinen
Anne M. Perttu
Helena M. Mahajan
Leila H. Ukkola
Osmo A. Tervonen
Aino-Liisa I. Jussila
Anja O. Henner
Publication date
01-02-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4300-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2019

Pediatric Radiology 2/2019 Go to the issue