Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 4/2019

01-04-2019 | Pediatric Radiology | Minisymposium: Quality and safety

Clinical decision support: the role of ACR Appropriateness Criteria

Authors: Sherwin S. Chan, Michael L. Francavilla, Ramesh S. Iyer, Cynthia K. Rigsby, David Kurth, Boaz K. Karmazyn

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Clinical decision support is a way to decrease inappropriate imaging exams and promote judicious use of imaging resources. The adoption of clinical decision support will be incentivized by requiring the use of approved mechanisms to qualify for Medicare reimbursement starting in January 2020. Insurance providers base their reimbursement policies on Medicare, so clinical decision support could soon become relevant to pediatric imaging. We present the process behind the American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria (a set of appropriate use criteria developed by the ACR) that will form the basis for software that can be used to fulfill the criteria for clinical decision support. For most organizations, this software is expected to be the easiest way to implement clinical decision support. Clinical decision support will affect how providers order imaging exams. This article should help readers understand how clinical decision support is expected to change the practice of the ordering providers, how the ACR Appropriateness Criteria are related to clinical decision support and how the ACR Appropriateness Criteria are developed. This will help the interpreting radiologist better communicate with the referring clinician, including informing the latter about how the clinical decision support software is making decisions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jaspers MW, Smeulers M, Vermeulen H et al (2011) Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings. J Am Med Inform Assoc 18:327–334CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jaspers MW, Smeulers M, Vermeulen H et al (2011) Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings. J Am Med Inform Assoc 18:327–334CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Larson EB (2008) Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. Health Aff 27:1491–1502CrossRef Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Larson EB (2008) Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system. Health Aff 27:1491–1502CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Taylor GA (2007) Quo vadis? Trends in demographics and pediatric care and their impact on the specialty of pediatric radiology. Pediatr Radiol 37:870–875CrossRefPubMed Taylor GA (2007) Quo vadis? Trends in demographics and pediatric care and their impact on the specialty of pediatric radiology. Pediatr Radiol 37:870–875CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Iglehart JK (2009) Health insurers and medical-imaging policy — a work in progress. N Engl J Med 360:1030–1037CrossRefPubMed Iglehart JK (2009) Health insurers and medical-imaging policy — a work in progress. N Engl J Med 360:1030–1037CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ip IK, Schneider LI, Hanson R et al (2012) Adoption and meaningful use of computerized physician order entry with an integrated clinical decision support system for radiology: ten-year analysis in an urban teaching hospital. J Am Coll Radiol 9:129–136CrossRefPubMed Ip IK, Schneider LI, Hanson R et al (2012) Adoption and meaningful use of computerized physician order entry with an integrated clinical decision support system for radiology: ten-year analysis in an urban teaching hospital. J Am Coll Radiol 9:129–136CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Rao VM, Levin DC (2012) The overuse of diagnostic imaging and the Choosing Wisely initiative. Ann Intern Med 157:574–576CrossRefPubMed Rao VM, Levin DC (2012) The overuse of diagnostic imaging and the Choosing Wisely initiative. Ann Intern Med 157:574–576CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pfeifer CM (2018) Declining interest in pediatric radiology prompts a call to action. J Am Coll Radiol 15:490–492CrossRefPubMed Pfeifer CM (2018) Declining interest in pediatric radiology prompts a call to action. J Am Coll Radiol 15:490–492CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD et al (2001) The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. RAND, Santa Monica Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD et al (2001) The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user’s manual. RAND, Santa Monica
15.
go back to reference Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A et al (1986) A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2:53–63CrossRefPubMed Brook RH, Chassin MR, Fink A et al (1986) A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2:53–63CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Sardanelli F, Hunink MG, Gilbert FJ et al (2009) Evidence-based radiology: why and how? Eur Radiol 20:1–15CrossRef Sardanelli F, Hunink MG, Gilbert FJ et al (2009) Evidence-based radiology: why and how? Eur Radiol 20:1–15CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lee CI, Forman HP (2011) Radiology health services research: from imperative to legislative mandate. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:1111–1114CrossRefPubMed Lee CI, Forman HP (2011) Radiology health services research: from imperative to legislative mandate. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:1111–1114CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical decision support: the role of ACR Appropriateness Criteria
Authors
Sherwin S. Chan
Michael L. Francavilla
Ramesh S. Iyer
Cynthia K. Rigsby
David Kurth
Boaz K. Karmazyn
Publication date
01-04-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4298-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Pediatric Radiology 4/2019 Go to the issue

Minisymposium: Quality and safety

Quality and safety in pediatric radiology