Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 12/2017

01-11-2017 | Original Article

Assessment of a modified technique for air delivery during fluoroscopic-monitored pneumatic intussusception reduction

Authors: Gaurav Jindal, Brendon L. Graeber, Lawrence H. Staib, Cicero T. Silva

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Intussusception is one of the most common causes of acute abdominal emergency in children. Image-monitored pressure reduction is the first line of treatment.

Objective

We report on a modified technique of air delivery during fluoroscopic-monitored pneumatic intussusception reductions, and compare it with an established technique.

Materials and methods

We modified the Shiels intussusception reduction device so that the air used for intussusception reduction is delivered not by the device’s insufflator bulb, but rather by the hospital medical air supply system, eliminating the need for continuous pumping of the insufflator bulb during the procedure. Subsequently, we retrospectively compared sequential fluoroscopy-monitored pneumatic intussusception reduction procedures performed in patients younger than 18 years using either the standard or modified devices, evaluating technical procedure parameters (i.e. median procedure time length, fluoroscopy time length and radiation dose) and patient outcomes (i.e. number of complete intussusception reductions, number of incomplete intussusception reductions, number of intussusception recurrences within 3 days of the procedure, number of procedures followed by surgery).

Results

We found no statistically significant differences between procedures performed with the standard and modified techniques.

Conclusion

The device modification allows for increased operator comfort. Evaluated procedure parameters and patient outcomes appear similar to those of the standard technique.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Stein-Wexler R, O'Connor R, Daldrup-Link H et al (2015) Current methods for reducing intussusception: survey results. Pediatr Radiol 45:667–674CrossRefPubMed Stein-Wexler R, O'Connor R, Daldrup-Link H et al (2015) Current methods for reducing intussusception: survey results. Pediatr Radiol 45:667–674CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Guo JZ, Ma XY, Zhou QH et al (1986) Results of air pressure enema reduction of intussusception: 6,396 cases in 13 years. J Pediatr Surg 21:1201–1203CrossRefPubMed Guo JZ, Ma XY, Zhou QH et al (1986) Results of air pressure enema reduction of intussusception: 6,396 cases in 13 years. J Pediatr Surg 21:1201–1203CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Crystal P, Hertzanu Y, Farber B et al (2002) Sonographically guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in children. J Clin Ultrasound 30:343–348CrossRefPubMed Crystal P, Hertzanu Y, Farber B et al (2002) Sonographically guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in children. J Clin Ultrasound 30:343–348CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gu L, Zhu H, Wang S et al (2000) Sonographic guidance of air enema for intussusception reduction in children. Pediatr Radiol 30:339–342CrossRefPubMed Gu L, Zhu H, Wang S et al (2000) Sonographic guidance of air enema for intussusception reduction in children. Pediatr Radiol 30:339–342CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Shiels WE 2nd, Bisset GS 3rd, Kirks DR et al (1990) Simple device for air reduction of intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 20:472–474CrossRefPubMed Shiels WE 2nd, Bisset GS 3rd, Kirks DR et al (1990) Simple device for air reduction of intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 20:472–474CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Paterson CA, Langer JC, Somers S et al (1994) Pneumatic reduction of intussusception using carbon dioxide. Pediatr Radiol 24:296–297CrossRefPubMed Paterson CA, Langer JC, Somers S et al (1994) Pneumatic reduction of intussusception using carbon dioxide. Pediatr Radiol 24:296–297CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Assessment of a modified technique for air delivery during fluoroscopic-monitored pneumatic intussusception reduction
Authors
Gaurav Jindal
Brendon L. Graeber
Lawrence H. Staib
Cicero T. Silva
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3920-z

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

Pediatric Radiology 12/2017 Go to the issue