Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 12/2017

01-11-2017 | Review

Pediatric renal transplant biopsy with ultrasound guidance: the ‘core’ essentials

Authors: Aris Oates, Saveen Ahuja, Marsha M. Lee, Andrew S. Phelps, John D. Mackenzie, Jesse L. Courtier

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 12/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

This review provides a comprehensive and practical approach to pediatric percutaneous renal transplant biopsies, highlighting techniques and strategies to optimize adequate sample yield and ensure patient safety. In children with end-stage renal disease, transplantation is the preferred choice of therapy, providing for overall lower long-term morbidity and mortality compared with dialysis. In the ongoing management of renal transplant patients, core tissue sampling via a percutaneous renal biopsy remains the gold standard when transplant dysfunction is suspected. Indications for renal transplant biopsy and techniques/tools for adequate sample yield are discussed. Strategies for common challenges such as poor visualization and renal transplant mobility are addressed. We discuss the clinical signs, techniques and imaging findings for common complications including hematomas, arteriovenous fistulas and pseudoaneurysms. Although the percutaneous renal transplant biopsy procedure is generally safe with rare complications, care must be taken to ensure major complications are promptly recognized and treated. Adequate tissue samples obtained via renal biopsy are imperative to promptly identify transplant rejection to provide valuable information for patient diagnosis, treatment and outcomes. Radiologist and nephrologist attention to proper ultrasound techniques and optimal biopsy tools are critical to ensure tissue adequacy and minimize complications.
Literature
1.
go back to reference National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (2012) U.S. renal data system. USRDS 2012 annual data report: Atlas of chronic kidney disease & end-stage renal disease in the United States National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (2012) U.S. renal data system. USRDS 2012 annual data report: Atlas of chronic kidney disease & end-stage renal disease in the United States
2.
go back to reference National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (2015) U.S. renal data system. 2015 USRDS annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (2015) U.S. renal data system. 2015 USRDS annual data report: Epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States
3.
go back to reference Seikaly MG, Ho PL, Emmett L et al (2003) Chronic renal insufficiency in children: the 2001 annual report of the NAPRTCS. Pediatr Nephrol 18:796–804CrossRefPubMed Seikaly MG, Ho PL, Emmett L et al (2003) Chronic renal insufficiency in children: the 2001 annual report of the NAPRTCS. Pediatr Nephrol 18:796–804CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Baumgarten M, Gehr T (2011) Chronic kidney disease: detection and evaluation. Am Fam Physician 84:1138–1148PubMed Baumgarten M, Gehr T (2011) Chronic kidney disease: detection and evaluation. Am Fam Physician 84:1138–1148PubMed
5.
go back to reference McDonald SP, Craig JC, Australian and New Zealand Paediatric Nephrology Association (2004) Long-term survival of children with end-stage renal disease. N Engl J Med 350:2654–2662 McDonald SP, Craig JC, Australian and New Zealand Paediatric Nephrology Association (2004) Long-term survival of children with end-stage renal disease. N Engl J Med 350:2654–2662
6.
go back to reference Lai WM (2009) Quality of life in children with end-stage renal disease: does treatment modality matter? Perit Dial Int 29(Suppl 2):S190–S191 Lai WM (2009) Quality of life in children with end-stage renal disease: does treatment modality matter? Perit Dial Int 29(Suppl 2):S190–S191
7.
go back to reference Saini T, Murtagh FE, Dupont PJ et al (2006) Comparative pilot study of symptoms and quality of life in cancer patients and patients with end stage renal disease. Palliat Med 20:631–636CrossRefPubMed Saini T, Murtagh FE, Dupont PJ et al (2006) Comparative pilot study of symptoms and quality of life in cancer patients and patients with end stage renal disease. Palliat Med 20:631–636CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Liem YS, Bosch JL, Arends LR et al (2007) Quality of life assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey of patients on renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Value Health 10:390–397CrossRefPubMed Liem YS, Bosch JL, Arends LR et al (2007) Quality of life assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey of patients on renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Value Health 10:390–397CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Liem YS, Weimar W (2009) Early living-donor kidney transplantation: a review of the associated survival benefit. Transplantation 87:317–318CrossRefPubMed Liem YS, Weimar W (2009) Early living-donor kidney transplantation: a review of the associated survival benefit. Transplantation 87:317–318CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
go back to reference Ferris ME, Gipson DS, Kimmel PL, Eggers PW (2006) Trends in treatment and outcomes of survival of adolescents initiating end-stage renal disease care in the United States of America. Pediatr Nephrol 21:1020–1026CrossRefPubMed Ferris ME, Gipson DS, Kimmel PL, Eggers PW (2006) Trends in treatment and outcomes of survival of adolescents initiating end-stage renal disease care in the United States of America. Pediatr Nephrol 21:1020–1026CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Matas AJ, Smith JM, Skeans MA et al (2015) OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: kidney. Am J Transplant 15(Suppl 2):1–34CrossRefPubMed Matas AJ, Smith JM, Skeans MA et al (2015) OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: kidney. Am J Transplant 15(Suppl 2):1–34CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Casey MJ, Meier-Kriesche HU (2011) Calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplantation: friend or foe? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 20:610–615CrossRefPubMed Casey MJ, Meier-Kriesche HU (2011) Calcineurin inhibitors in kidney transplantation: friend or foe? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 20:610–615CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Offermann G (2004) Immunosuppression for long-term maintenance of renal allograft function. Drugs 64:1325–1338CrossRefPubMed Offermann G (2004) Immunosuppression for long-term maintenance of renal allograft function. Drugs 64:1325–1338CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Al-Awwa IA, Hariharan S, First MR (1998) Importance of allograft biopsy in renal transplant recipients: correlation between clinical and histological diagnosis. Am J Kidney Dis 31:S15–S18CrossRefPubMed Al-Awwa IA, Hariharan S, First MR (1998) Importance of allograft biopsy in renal transplant recipients: correlation between clinical and histological diagnosis. Am J Kidney Dis 31:S15–S18CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Silva DM, Garcia JP, Ribeiro AR et al (2007) Utility of biopsy in kidney transplants with delayed graft function and acute dysfunction. Transplant Proc 39:376–377CrossRefPubMed Silva DM, Garcia JP, Ribeiro AR et al (2007) Utility of biopsy in kidney transplants with delayed graft function and acute dysfunction. Transplant Proc 39:376–377CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Broecker V, Mengel M (2015) The significance of histological diagnosis in renal allograft biopsies in 2014. Transpl Int 28:136–143CrossRefPubMed Broecker V, Mengel M (2015) The significance of histological diagnosis in renal allograft biopsies in 2014. Transpl Int 28:136–143CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Schwarz A, Mengel M, Gwinner W et al (2002) Protocol biopsy program after renal transplantation: structure and first results. Transplant Proc 34:2238–2239CrossRefPubMed Schwarz A, Mengel M, Gwinner W et al (2002) Protocol biopsy program after renal transplantation: structure and first results. Transplant Proc 34:2238–2239CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Birk PE (2012) Surveillance biopsies in children post-kidney transplant. Pediatr Nephrol 27:753–760CrossRefPubMed Birk PE (2012) Surveillance biopsies in children post-kidney transplant. Pediatr Nephrol 27:753–760CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Matas AJ, Sibley R, Mauer M et al (1983) The value of needle renal allograft biopsy. I. A retrospective study of biopsies performed during putative rejection episodes. Ann Surg 197:226–237CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Matas AJ, Sibley R, Mauer M et al (1983) The value of needle renal allograft biopsy. I. A retrospective study of biopsies performed during putative rejection episodes. Ann Surg 197:226–237CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Solez K, Axelsen RA, Benediktsson H et al (1993) International standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection: the Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Kidney Int 44:411–422CrossRefPubMed Solez K, Axelsen RA, Benediktsson H et al (1993) International standardization of criteria for the histologic diagnosis of renal allograft rejection: the Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Kidney Int 44:411–422CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bates WD, Davies DR, Welsh K et al (1999) An evaluation of the Banff classification of early renal allograft biopsies and correlation with outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14:2364–2369CrossRefPubMed Bates WD, Davies DR, Welsh K et al (1999) An evaluation of the Banff classification of early renal allograft biopsies and correlation with outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14:2364–2369CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tanaka T, Kyo M, Kokado Y et al (2004) Correlation between the Banff 97 classification of renal allograft biopsies and clinical outcome. Transpl Int 17:59–64CrossRefPubMed Tanaka T, Kyo M, Kokado Y et al (2004) Correlation between the Banff 97 classification of renal allograft biopsies and clinical outcome. Transpl Int 17:59–64CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Ahmad I (2004) Biopsy of the transplanted kidney. Semin Interv Radiol 21:275–281CrossRef Ahmad I (2004) Biopsy of the transplanted kidney. Semin Interv Radiol 21:275–281CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kim D, Kim H, Shin G et al (1998) A randomized, prospective, comparative study of manual and automated renal biopsies. Am J Kidney Dis 32:426–431CrossRefPubMed Kim D, Kim H, Shin G et al (1998) A randomized, prospective, comparative study of manual and automated renal biopsies. Am J Kidney Dis 32:426–431CrossRefPubMed
28.
29.
go back to reference Maya ID, Maddela P, Barker J, Allon M (2007) Percutaneous renal biopsy: comparison of blind and real-time ultrasound-guided technique. Semin Dial 20:355–358CrossRefPubMed Maya ID, Maddela P, Barker J, Allon M (2007) Percutaneous renal biopsy: comparison of blind and real-time ultrasound-guided technique. Semin Dial 20:355–358CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Patel MD, Phillips CJ, Young SW et al (2010) US-guided renal transplant biopsy: efficacy of a cortical tangential approach. Radiology 256:290–296CrossRefPubMed Patel MD, Phillips CJ, Young SW et al (2010) US-guided renal transplant biopsy: efficacy of a cortical tangential approach. Radiology 256:290–296CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Kudryk BT, Martinez CR, Gunasekeran S, Ramirez G (1995) CT-guided renal biopsy using a coaxial technique and an automated biopsy gun. South Med J 88:543–546CrossRefPubMed Kudryk BT, Martinez CR, Gunasekeran S, Ramirez G (1995) CT-guided renal biopsy using a coaxial technique and an automated biopsy gun. South Med J 88:543–546CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Donati-Bourne J, Roberts HW, Coleman RA (2014) Donor-recipient size mismatch in paediatric renal transplantation. J Transp Secur 2014:317574 Donati-Bourne J, Roberts HW, Coleman RA (2014) Donor-recipient size mismatch in paediatric renal transplantation. J Transp Secur 2014:317574
33.
go back to reference Nicholson ML, Wheatley TJ, Doughman TM et al (2000) A prospective randomized trial of three different sizes of core-cutting needle for renal transplant biopsy. Kidney Int 58:390–395CrossRefPubMed Nicholson ML, Wheatley TJ, Doughman TM et al (2000) A prospective randomized trial of three different sizes of core-cutting needle for renal transplant biopsy. Kidney Int 58:390–395CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Gupta RK, Balogun RA (2005) Native renal biopsies: complications and glomerular yield between radiologists and nephrologists. J Nephrol 18:553–558PubMed Gupta RK, Balogun RA (2005) Native renal biopsies: complications and glomerular yield between radiologists and nephrologists. J Nephrol 18:553–558PubMed
35.
go back to reference Chung S, Koh ES, Kim SJ et al (2014) Safety and tissue yield for percutaneous native kidney biopsy according to practitioner and ultrasound technique. BMC Nephrol 15:96CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chung S, Koh ES, Kim SJ et al (2014) Safety and tissue yield for percutaneous native kidney biopsy according to practitioner and ultrasound technique. BMC Nephrol 15:96CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Yesudas SS, Georgy NK, Manickam S et al (2010) Percutaneous real-time ultrasound-guided renal biopsy performed solely by nephrologists: A case series. Indian J Nephrol 20:137–141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Yesudas SS, Georgy NK, Manickam S et al (2010) Percutaneous real-time ultrasound-guided renal biopsy performed solely by nephrologists: A case series. Indian J Nephrol 20:137–141CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Durkan AM, Beattie TJ, Howatson A et al (2006) Renal transplant biopsy specimen adequacy in a paediatric population. Pediatr Nephrol 21:265–269CrossRefPubMed Durkan AM, Beattie TJ, Howatson A et al (2006) Renal transplant biopsy specimen adequacy in a paediatric population. Pediatr Nephrol 21:265–269CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Hussain F, Mallik M, Marks SD et al (2010) Renal biopsies in children: current practice and audit of outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 25:485–489CrossRefPubMed Hussain F, Mallik M, Marks SD et al (2010) Renal biopsies in children: current practice and audit of outcomes. Nephrol Dial Transplant 25:485–489CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Tøndel C, Vikse BE, Bostad L, Svarstad E (2012) Safety and complications of percutaneous kidney biopsies in 715 children and 8573 adults in Norway 1988-2010. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7:1591–1597CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tøndel C, Vikse BE, Bostad L, Svarstad E (2012) Safety and complications of percutaneous kidney biopsies in 715 children and 8573 adults in Norway 1988-2010. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7:1591–1597CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
go back to reference Colvin RB, Cohen AH, Saiontz C et al (1997) Evaluation of pathologic criteria for acute renal allograft rejection: reproducibility, sensitivity, and clinical correlation. J Am Soc Nephrol 8:1930–1941PubMed Colvin RB, Cohen AH, Saiontz C et al (1997) Evaluation of pathologic criteria for acute renal allograft rejection: reproducibility, sensitivity, and clinical correlation. J Am Soc Nephrol 8:1930–1941PubMed
41.
go back to reference Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al (1999) The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int 55:713–723CrossRefPubMed Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB et al (1999) The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int 55:713–723CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Riehl J, Maigatter S, Kierdorf H et al (1994) Percutaneous renal biopsy: comparison of manual and automated puncture techniques with native and transplanted kidneys. Nephrol Dial Transplant 9:1568–1574PubMed Riehl J, Maigatter S, Kierdorf H et al (1994) Percutaneous renal biopsy: comparison of manual and automated puncture techniques with native and transplanted kidneys. Nephrol Dial Transplant 9:1568–1574PubMed
43.
go back to reference Morgan TA, Chandran S, Burger IM et al (2016) Complications of ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsies. Am J Transplant 16:1298–1305CrossRefPubMed Morgan TA, Chandran S, Burger IM et al (2016) Complications of ultrasound-guided renal transplant biopsies. Am J Transplant 16:1298–1305CrossRefPubMed
44.
go back to reference Marwah DS, Korbet SM (1996) Timing of complications in percutaneous renal biopsy: what is the optimal period of observation? Am J Kidney Dis 28:47–52CrossRefPubMed Marwah DS, Korbet SM (1996) Timing of complications in percutaneous renal biopsy: what is the optimal period of observation? Am J Kidney Dis 28:47–52CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Whittier WL, Korbet SM (2004) Timing of complications in percutaneous renal biopsy. J Am Soc Nephrol 15:142–147CrossRefPubMed Whittier WL, Korbet SM (2004) Timing of complications in percutaneous renal biopsy. J Am Soc Nephrol 15:142–147CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Redfield RR, McCune KR, Rao A et al (2016) Nature, timing, and severity of complications from ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal transplant biopsy. Transpl Int 29:167–172CrossRefPubMed Redfield RR, McCune KR, Rao A et al (2016) Nature, timing, and severity of complications from ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal transplant biopsy. Transpl Int 29:167–172CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Korbet SM (2012) Nephrology and the percutaneous renal biopsy: a procedure in jeopardy of being lost along the way. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7:1545–1547CrossRefPubMed Korbet SM (2012) Nephrology and the percutaneous renal biopsy: a procedure in jeopardy of being lost along the way. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7:1545–1547CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Schwarz A, Hiss M, Gwinner W et al (2008) Course and relevance of arteriovenous fistulas after renal transplant biopsies. Am J Transplant 8:826–831CrossRefPubMed Schwarz A, Hiss M, Gwinner W et al (2008) Course and relevance of arteriovenous fistulas after renal transplant biopsies. Am J Transplant 8:826–831CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Schwarz A, Gwinner W, Hiss M et al (2005) Safety and adequacy of renal transplant protocol biopsies. Am J Transplant 5:1992–1996CrossRefPubMed Schwarz A, Gwinner W, Hiss M et al (2005) Safety and adequacy of renal transplant protocol biopsies. Am J Transplant 5:1992–1996CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Güneyli S, Gök M, Bozkaya H et al (2015) Endovascular management of iatrogenic renal arterial lesions and clinical outcomes. Diagn Interv Radiol 21:229–234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Güneyli S, Gök M, Bozkaya H et al (2015) Endovascular management of iatrogenic renal arterial lesions and clinical outcomes. Diagn Interv Radiol 21:229–234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
go back to reference Sharma AK, Sunil S, Rowlands P, Bakran A (2002) Pseudoaneurysm with severe haematuria in renal allograft after renal biopsy treated by percutaneous embolization. Nephrol Dial Transplant 17:934–935CrossRefPubMed Sharma AK, Sunil S, Rowlands P, Bakran A (2002) Pseudoaneurysm with severe haematuria in renal allograft after renal biopsy treated by percutaneous embolization. Nephrol Dial Transplant 17:934–935CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Simckes AM, Blowey DL, Gyves KM, Alon US (2000) Success and safety of same-day kidney biopsy in children and adolescents. Pediatr Nephrol 14:946–952CrossRefPubMed Simckes AM, Blowey DL, Gyves KM, Alon US (2000) Success and safety of same-day kidney biopsy in children and adolescents. Pediatr Nephrol 14:946–952CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B et al (2012) Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:727–736CrossRefPubMed Patel IJ, Davidson JC, Nikolic B et al (2012) Consensus guidelines for periprocedural management of coagulation status and hemostasis risk in percutaneous image-guided interventions. J Vasc Interv Radiol 23:727–736CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Sethi I, Brier M, Dwyer A (2013) Predicting post renal biopsy complications. Semin Dial 26:633–635CrossRefPubMed Sethi I, Brier M, Dwyer A (2013) Predicting post renal biopsy complications. Semin Dial 26:633–635CrossRefPubMed
56.
go back to reference Cavuoto KM, Rodriguez LI, Tutiven J, Chang TC (2014) General anesthesia in the pediatric population. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 25:411–416CrossRefPubMed Cavuoto KM, Rodriguez LI, Tutiven J, Chang TC (2014) General anesthesia in the pediatric population. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 25:411–416CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Pediatric renal transplant biopsy with ultrasound guidance: the ‘core’ essentials
Authors
Aris Oates
Saveen Ahuja
Marsha M. Lee
Andrew S. Phelps
John D. Mackenzie
Jesse L. Courtier
Publication date
01-11-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 12/2017
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-017-3905-y

Other articles of this Issue 12/2017

Pediatric Radiology 12/2017 Go to the issue