Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 3/2014

01-10-2014 | Image Gently ALARA CT summit: How to Use New CT Technologies for Children

Should risk from medical imaging be assessed in the absence of benefit and vice versa?

Author: Louis K. Wagner

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Special Issue 3/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Diagnostic radiology has an image problem. In its effort to develop a better understanding of benefit–risk in medical radiology, data on potential risks associated with medical imaging have been welcomed into the medical community. As such, risk perspectives and mantras from the occupational health profession have been adopted and applied to patients. These perspectives often focus on risk with only casual, incidental, or no reference to the benefits experienced by patients. These occupational health viewpoints have accumulated over decades, have overshadowed a very limited perspective about the benefits of medical X-rays, and have become an integrated part of our profession. This review argues that the medical profession should abandon perspectives on risk that are adopted from occupational health professions and focus on perspectives that realistically focus on the medical benefit–risk for patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Redberg RF, Smith-Bindman R (2014) We are giving ourselves cancer. New York Times, 30 Jan 2014 Redberg RF, Smith-Bindman R (2014) We are giving ourselves cancer. New York Times, 30 Jan 2014
3.
go back to reference Mettler FA Jr, Thomadsen BR, Bhargavan M et al (2008) Medical radiation exposure in the U.S. in 2006: preliminary results. Health Phys 95:461–686CrossRef Mettler FA Jr, Thomadsen BR, Bhargavan M et al (2008) Medical radiation exposure in the U.S. in 2006: preliminary results. Health Phys 95:461–686CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ et al (2011) Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology 258:889–905PubMedCrossRef Hricak H, Brenner DJ, Adelstein SJ et al (2011) Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge. Radiology 258:889–905PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kendall GM, Little MP, Wakeford R et al (2013) A record-based case–control study of natural background radiation and the incidence of childhood leukaemia and other cancers in Great Britain during 1980–2006. Leukemia 27:3–9PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Kendall GM, Little MP, Wakeford R et al (2013) A record-based case–control study of natural background radiation and the incidence of childhood leukaemia and other cancers in Great Britain during 1980–2006. Leukemia 27:3–9PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP et al (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 380:499–505PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. Br Med J 346:1–18CrossRef Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z et al (2013) Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. Br Med J 346:1–18CrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Kelley KM, Madden DA, Arcarese JS et al (1975) The utilization and efficacy of pelvimetry. AJR Am J Roentgenol 125:66–74CrossRef Kelley KM, Madden DA, Arcarese JS et al (1975) The utilization and efficacy of pelvimetry. AJR Am J Roentgenol 125:66–74CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gray JE, Hoffman AD, Peterson HA (1983) Reduction of radiation exposure during radiography for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:5–12PubMed Gray JE, Hoffman AD, Peterson HA (1983) Reduction of radiation exposure during radiography for scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:5–12PubMed
13.
go back to reference Ardran GM, Coates R, Dickson RA et al (1980) Assessment of scoliosis in children: low dose radiographic technique. Br J Radiol 53:146–147PubMedCrossRef Ardran GM, Coates R, Dickson RA et al (1980) Assessment of scoliosis in children: low dose radiographic technique. Br J Radiol 53:146–147PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kuppermann N, Holmes J, Dayan P et al (2009) Identification of children at very low risk of clinically important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 374:1160–1170PubMedCrossRef Kuppermann N, Holmes J, Dayan P et al (2009) Identification of children at very low risk of clinically important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study. Lancet 374:1160–1170PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Should risk from medical imaging be assessed in the absence of benefit and vice versa?
Author
Louis K. Wagner
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue Special Issue 3/2014
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3018-9

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2014

Pediatric Radiology 3/2014 Go to the issue

Image Gently ALARA CT summit: How to Use New CT Technologies for Children

Development of pediatric CT protocols for specific scanners: why bother?

Image Gently ALARA CT summit: How to Use New CT Technologies for Children

Management of auto exposure control during pediatric computed tomography

Image Gently ALARA CT summit: how to use new CT technologies for children

If it is published in the peer-reviewed literature, it must be true?

Image Gently ALARA CT summit: How to Use New CT Technologies for Children

Boots on the ground: how to influence your local radiology departments to use appropriate CT dose