Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 11/2010

01-11-2010 | Original Article

Comparison of Haller index values calculated with chest radiographs versus CT for pectus excavatum evaluation

Authors: Geetika Khanna, Alok Jaju, Steven Don, Tim Keys, Charles F. Hildebolt

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 11/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Pectus excavatum is a common chest wall anomaly in children. Pre-operative imaging for pectus excavatum is performed with CT, which is used to calculate the Haller index to determine the severity of pectus excavatum.

Objective

To determine the correlation between Haller index values calculated with two-view chest radiographs and those calculated with CT and to determine, with CT as the reference standard, the diagnostic performance of radiographic Haller index for identifying cases that meet imaging criteria for surgical correction of pectus excavatum.

Materials and methods

For the period 2001–2009, our radiology information system was searched to identify all children who had undergone CT for Haller index calculation. Children who had also undergone two-view chest radiography (CXR) within 6 months of the CT were included in this retrospective study. Two radiologists independently calculated CT Haller index and radiographic Haller index. Data distributions were tested for normality with the Shapiro-Wilk W test. The associations between CT Haller index and radiographic Haller index were determined with the Spearman coefficient of rank correlation. Differences between CT Haller index and radiographic Haller index were tested with the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Haller index values were dichotomized into positive (>3.2) and negative (≤3.2) cases. Using CT as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of radiographic Haller index in identifying children who meet imaging criteria for surgery were calculated.

Results

CT and CXR for evaluation of pectus excavatum were available for 32 children (25 male; median age 14.5 years). With CT, the median Haller indices for observers 1 and 2 were 3.4 and 3.5 and with CXR 3.5 and 3.5. There were statistically significant correlations between the radiographic Haller index and CT Haller index estimated by the two observers [Spearman correlation coefficient (95% confidence interval) for observer 1 = 0.71 (0.48–0.85, P < 0.01) and for observer 2 = 0.77 (0.52–0.88, P < 0.01)]. A statistically significant correlation was found between the radiographic Haller index calculated by the two observers [Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.98 (0.95–0.99, P < 0.01)]. Using CT Haller index as the reference standard, radiographic Haller index had a sensitivity of 0.95 (0.75–0.99), specificity of 0.75 (0.43–0.94), and accuracy of 0.88 (0.72–0.95) for observer 1, and a sensitivity of 0.95 (0.75–0.99), specificity of 0.67 (0.35–0.90), and accuracy of 0.84 (0.68–0.93) for observer 2.

Conclusion

Radiographic Haller index correlates strongly with CT Haller index, has good interobserver correlation, and has a high diagnostic accuracy for pre-operative evaluation of pectus excavatum. We suggest that a CT of the chest is not required for pre-operative evaluation of pectus excavatum, and a two-view chest radiograph is sufficient for preoperative imaging of pectus excavatum.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Nuss D (2008) Minimally invasive surgical repair of pectus excavatum. Semin Pediatr Surg 17:209–217CrossRefPubMed Nuss D (2008) Minimally invasive surgical repair of pectus excavatum. Semin Pediatr Surg 17:209–217CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Haller JA Jr, Kramer SS, Lietman SA (1987) Use of CT scans in selection of patients for pectus excavatum surgery: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 22:904–906CrossRefPubMed Haller JA Jr, Kramer SS, Lietman SA (1987) Use of CT scans in selection of patients for pectus excavatum surgery: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 22:904–906CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Shrimpton PC, Jones DG (1993) Normalised organ doses for x-ray computed tomography calculated using Monte Carlo techniques and a mathematical anthropomorphic phantom. Radiat Prot Dosim 49:241–243 Shrimpton PC, Jones DG (1993) Normalised organ doses for x-ray computed tomography calculated using Monte Carlo techniques and a mathematical anthropomorphic phantom. Radiat Prot Dosim 49:241–243
6.
go back to reference Khursheed A, Hillier MC, Shrimpton PC et al (2002) Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations. Br J Radiol 75:819–830PubMed Khursheed A, Hillier MC, Shrimpton PC et al (2002) Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations. Br J Radiol 75:819–830PubMed
7.
go back to reference Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF (1996) Normalized organ doses for paediatric x-ray examinations calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. NRBP-SR279. National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF (1996) Normalized organ doses for paediatric x-ray examinations calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. NRBP-SR279. National Radiological Protection Board, Chilton
8.
go back to reference ICRP (1990) 1990 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Annals of the ICRP, publication 60. Elsevier, Philadelphia ICRP (1990) 1990 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Annals of the ICRP, publication 60. Elsevier, Philadelphia
9.
go back to reference ICRP (2008) ICRP publication 103. Recommendations of the ICRP. Annals of the ICRP. Elsevier, Philadelphia ICRP (2008) ICRP publication 103. Recommendations of the ICRP. Annals of the ICRP. Elsevier, Philadelphia
10.
go back to reference Nuss D, Croitoru DP, Kelly RE Jr et al (2002) Review and discussion of the complications of minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg 12:230–234CrossRefPubMed Nuss D, Croitoru DP, Kelly RE Jr et al (2002) Review and discussion of the complications of minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair. Eur J Pediatr Surg 12:230–234CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Aronson DC, Bosgraaf RP, Merz EM et al (2007) Lung function after the minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair (Nuss procedure). World J Surg 31:1518–1522CrossRefPubMed Aronson DC, Bosgraaf RP, Merz EM et al (2007) Lung function after the minimally invasive pectus excavatum repair (Nuss procedure). World J Surg 31:1518–1522CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Welch KJ (1958) Satisfactory surgical correction of pectus excavatum deformity in childhood: a limited opportunity. J Thorac Surg 36:697–713PubMed Welch KJ (1958) Satisfactory surgical correction of pectus excavatum deformity in childhood: a limited opportunity. J Thorac Surg 36:697–713PubMed
13.
go back to reference Derveaux L, Clarysse I, Ivanoff I et al (1989) Preoperative and postoperative abnormalities in chest x-ray indices and in lung function in pectus deformities. Chest 95:850–856CrossRefPubMed Derveaux L, Clarysse I, Ivanoff I et al (1989) Preoperative and postoperative abnormalities in chest x-ray indices and in lung function in pectus deformities. Chest 95:850–856CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rebeis EB, Campos JR, Fernandez A et al (2007) Anthropometric index for pectus excavatum. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 62:599–606 Rebeis EB, Campos JR, Fernandez A et al (2007) Anthropometric index for pectus excavatum. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 62:599–606
15.
go back to reference Chang PY, Chang CH, Lai JY et al (2009) A method for the non-invasive assessment of chest wall growth in pectus excavatum patients. Eur J Pediatr Surg Nov 6 [Epub ahead of print] Chang PY, Chang CH, Lai JY et al (2009) A method for the non-invasive assessment of chest wall growth in pectus excavatum patients. Eur J Pediatr Surg Nov 6 [Epub ahead of print]
16.
go back to reference Daunt SW, Cohen JH, Miller SF (2004) Age-related normal ranges for the Haller index in children. Pediatr Radiol 34:326–330CrossRefPubMed Daunt SW, Cohen JH, Miller SF (2004) Age-related normal ranges for the Haller index in children. Pediatr Radiol 34:326–330CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mueller C, Saint-Vil D, Bouchard S (2008) Chest x-ray as a primary modality for preoperative imaging of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 43:71–73CrossRefPubMed Mueller C, Saint-Vil D, Bouchard S (2008) Chest x-ray as a primary modality for preoperative imaging of pectus excavatum. J Pediatr Surg 43:71–73CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rattan AS, Laor T, Ryckman FC et al (2010) Pectus excavatum imaging: enough but not too much. Pediatr Radiol 40:168–172CrossRefPubMed Rattan AS, Laor T, Ryckman FC et al (2010) Pectus excavatum imaging: enough but not too much. Pediatr Radiol 40:168–172CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kuenzler KA, Stolar CJ (2009) Surgical correction of pectus excavatum. Paediatr Respir Rev 10:7–11CrossRefPubMed Kuenzler KA, Stolar CJ (2009) Surgical correction of pectus excavatum. Paediatr Respir Rev 10:7–11CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Haller JA Jr (2000) Complications of surgery for pectus excavatum. Chest Surg Clin N Am 10:415–426, ixPubMed Haller JA Jr (2000) Complications of surgery for pectus excavatum. Chest Surg Clin N Am 10:415–426, ixPubMed
21.
go back to reference Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K et al (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950–2007. Radiology 253:520–531CrossRefPubMed Mettler FA Jr, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K et al (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources—1950–2007. Radiology 253:520–531CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Haller index values calculated with chest radiographs versus CT for pectus excavatum evaluation
Authors
Geetika Khanna
Alok Jaju
Steven Don
Tim Keys
Charles F. Hildebolt
Publication date
01-11-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 11/2010
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1681-z

Other articles of this Issue 11/2010

Pediatric Radiology 11/2010 Go to the issue