Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 12/2008

01-12-2008 | Review

Soft-copy display and reading: what the radiologist should know in the digital era

Author: Erich Sorantin

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 12/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The basic scheme of modern medical imaging consists of the following steps: (1) data acquisition, (2) data (image) processing, (3) further data processing by the computer graphic system, (4) image display, and finally (5) visual perception and interpretation. Medical monitors represent a forgotten part of the whole chain. The purpose of this review is to present the key facts about the display technologies used today, as well as their characterization and quality assurance.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sorantin E, Coradello H, Wiltgen M (1992) Computer-assisted mechanical ventilation of newborn infants. Anaesthesist 41:342–345PubMed Sorantin E, Coradello H, Wiltgen M (1992) Computer-assisted mechanical ventilation of newborn infants. Anaesthesist 41:342–345PubMed
3.
go back to reference Samei E (2005) AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: technological and psychophysical considerations for digital mammographic displays. Radiographics 25:491–501PubMedCrossRef Samei E (2005) AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: technological and psychophysical considerations for digital mammographic displays. Radiographics 25:491–501PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Groth DS, Bernatz SN, Fetterly KA et al (2001) Cathode ray tube quality control and acceptance testing program: initial results for clinical PACS displays. Radiographics 21:719–732PubMed Groth DS, Bernatz SN, Fetterly KA et al (2001) Cathode ray tube quality control and acceptance testing program: initial results for clinical PACS displays. Radiographics 21:719–732PubMed
7.
go back to reference Huppelsberg J, Walter K (2005) Kurzlehrbuch physiologie, 2nd edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 255–256 Huppelsberg J, Walter K (2005) Kurzlehrbuch physiologie, 2nd edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 255–256
13.
go back to reference Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D et al (2005) Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. Med Phys 32:1205–1225PubMedCrossRef Samei E, Badano A, Chakraborty D et al (2005) Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. Med Phys 32:1205–1225PubMedCrossRef
16.
19.
go back to reference Braunschweig R, Klose HJ, Neugebauer E et al (1997) Digital radiography. Results of a survey (part A) and a consensus conference (part B). Eur Radiol 7:94–101PubMedCrossRef Braunschweig R, Klose HJ, Neugebauer E et al (1997) Digital radiography. Results of a survey (part A) and a consensus conference (part B). Eur Radiol 7:94–101PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Balassy C, Prokop M, Weber M et al (2005) Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study. AJR 184:752–756PubMed Balassy C, Prokop M, Weber M et al (2005) Flat-panel display (LCD) versus high-resolution gray-scale display (CRT) for chest radiography: an observer preference study. AJR 184:752–756PubMed
22.
go back to reference Fukushima H, Ikeda M, Ishigaki T et al (2007) Influence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for detection of diffuse pulmonary disease on chest radiographs. Radiat Med 25:211–217PubMedCrossRef Fukushima H, Ikeda M, Ishigaki T et al (2007) Influence of liquid crystal display monitors on observer performance for detection of diffuse pulmonary disease on chest radiographs. Radiat Med 25:211–217PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Oschatz E, Prokop M, Scharitzer M et al (2005) Comparison of liquid crystal versus cathode ray tube display for the detection of simulated chest lesions. Eur Radiol 15:1472–1476PubMedCrossRef Oschatz E, Prokop M, Scharitzer M et al (2005) Comparison of liquid crystal versus cathode ray tube display for the detection of simulated chest lesions. Eur Radiol 15:1472–1476PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Park CM, Lee HJ, Goo JM et al (2008) Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors. Eur J Radiol 66:13–18PubMedCrossRef Park CM, Lee HJ, Goo JM et al (2008) Comparison of observer performance on soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs: high resolution liquid-crystal display monitors versus cathode-ray tube monitors. Eur J Radiol 66:13–18PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Scharitzer M, Prokop M, Weber M et al (2005) Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode ray tube monitors. Radiology 234:611–616PubMedCrossRef Scharitzer M, Prokop M, Weber M et al (2005) Detectability of catheters on bedside chest radiographs: comparison between liquid crystal display and high-resolution cathode ray tube monitors. Radiology 234:611–616PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Usami H, Ikeda M, Ishigaki T et al (2006) The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs. Eur Radiol 16:726–732PubMedCrossRef Usami H, Ikeda M, Ishigaki T et al (2006) The influence of liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors on observer performance for the detection of nodular lesions on chest radiographs. Eur Radiol 16:726–732PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Soft-copy display and reading: what the radiologist should know in the digital era
Author
Erich Sorantin
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0898-6

Other articles of this Issue 12/2008

Pediatric Radiology 12/2008 Go to the issue