Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Cardiology 7/2022

24-03-2022 | Echocardiography | Original Article

Mid-Term Outcome of Left Ventricle Reverse Remodeling After Atrial Septal Defect Closure: A Comparison Between Surgical and Device Groups

Authors: Muflih Albalawi, Salim Ahmad, Mohamed Al Nasef, Abdulmajeed Alotay, Najlaa Al Rajaa, Atif Alsahari, Irfan Saleem, Jassim Mohamed Abudlhamed

Published in: Pediatric Cardiology | Issue 7/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Right ventricular (RV) volume overload occurs in patients with significant atrial septal defect (ASD II) shunts, which can impair left ventricle (LV) filling, thus decreasing LV indices. However, after ASD II closure, the left ventricle regains near normal dimensions. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of LV reverse remodeling between device and surgical closure. We retrospectively reviewed the echocardiographic data of 222 patients with isolated ASD II who underwent surgical (95 patients) or device closure (127 patients) between January 2012 and December 2017. The ASD II was significantly larger in the surgical closure group (p < 0.001.) leading to a higher degree of paradoxical interventricular septal (IVS) movement. In contrast, the LV volume was larger in the device closure group (p < 0.001). After a median follow-up period of 19.5 months, the maximum LV systolic and diastolic volumes were reached at 1 year in the device closure group and 2 years in the surgical closure group. IVS motion normalized in 91% of the device closure group compared to 57% of the surgical closure group (p =  < 0.001). There was significant improvement in left ventricular indices and IVS motion after ASD II closure in both groups but more favorable in patients after device closure.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference van der Linde D, Konings EEM, Slager MA et al (2011) Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(21):2241–2247CrossRef van der Linde D, Konings EEM, Slager MA et al (2011) Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(21):2241–2247CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Alabdulgader AA (2006) Congenital heart disease in Saudi Arabia: current epidemiology and future projections. East Mediterr Health J 12(Suppl 2):S157–S167 (PMID: 17361687)PubMed Alabdulgader AA (2006) Congenital heart disease in Saudi Arabia: current epidemiology and future projections. East Mediterr Health J 12(Suppl 2):S157–S167 (PMID: 17361687)PubMed
10.
go back to reference Moore J, Hegde S, El-Said H et al (2013) Transcatheter Device Closure of Atrial Septal Defects. JACC Cardiovasc Intervent 6(5):433–442CrossRef Moore J, Hegde S, El-Said H et al (2013) Transcatheter Device Closure of Atrial Septal Defects. JACC Cardiovasc Intervent 6(5):433–442CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fraisse A, Latchman M, Sharma S-R et al (2018) Atrial septal defect closure: indications and contra-indications. J Thorac Dis 10(S24):S2874–S2881CrossRef Fraisse A, Latchman M, Sharma S-R et al (2018) Atrial septal defect closure: indications and contra-indications. J Thorac Dis 10(S24):S2874–S2881CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lopez L, Colan SD, Frommelt PC et al (2010) Recommendations for quantification methods during the performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: A report from the pediatric measurements writing group of the American society of echocardiography pediatric and congenital heart disease council. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:465–95CrossRef Lopez L, Colan SD, Frommelt PC et al (2010) Recommendations for quantification methods during the performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: A report from the pediatric measurements writing group of the American society of echocardiography pediatric and congenital heart disease council. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:465–95CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Du Z-D, Cao Q-L, Rhodes J, Heitschmidt M, Hijazi ZM (2002) Choice of device size and results of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect using the Amplatzer septal occluder. J Intervent Cardiol 15(4):287–292CrossRef Du Z-D, Cao Q-L, Rhodes J, Heitschmidt M, Hijazi ZM (2002) Choice of device size and results of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect using the Amplatzer septal occluder. J Intervent Cardiol 15(4):287–292CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Maatouk F, Farhat B, Betbout F, Gamra H, Ben Hamda K, Jarrar M, Hammami S, Added F, Ben Gadha N, Dridi Z (2001) Right ventricular dilatation and intraventricular septal motion after surgical closure of atrial septal defect. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 94(3):204–10PubMed Maatouk F, Farhat B, Betbout F, Gamra H, Ben Hamda K, Jarrar M, Hammami S, Added F, Ben Gadha N, Dridi Z (2001) Right ventricular dilatation and intraventricular septal motion after surgical closure of atrial septal defect. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 94(3):204–10PubMed
27.
go back to reference Kuijpers JM, Mulder BJM, Bouma BJ (2015) Secundum atrial septal defect in adults a practical review and recent developments. Neth Heart J 23(4):205–211CrossRef Kuijpers JM, Mulder BJM, Bouma BJ (2015) Secundum atrial septal defect in adults a practical review and recent developments. Neth Heart J 23(4):205–211CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Mid-Term Outcome of Left Ventricle Reverse Remodeling After Atrial Septal Defect Closure: A Comparison Between Surgical and Device Groups
Authors
Muflih Albalawi
Salim Ahmad
Mohamed Al Nasef
Abdulmajeed Alotay
Najlaa Al Rajaa
Atif Alsahari
Irfan Saleem
Jassim Mohamed Abudlhamed
Publication date
24-03-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology / Issue 7/2022
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-02879-z

Other articles of this Issue 7/2022

Pediatric Cardiology 7/2022 Go to the issue