Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Cardiology 6/2022

26-02-2022 | Ultrasound | Original Article

Utility of Screening Fetal Echocardiogram Following Normal Anatomy Ultrasound for In Vitro Fertilization Pregnancies

Authors: Rebecca R. Spurr, Jeffrey A. Conwell, Luciana T. Young, Mark B. Lewin, Lindsay A. Edwards, Bhawna Arya

Published in: Pediatric Cardiology | Issue 6/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

In vitro fertilization (IVF) is associated with a higher incidence of congenital heart disease, resulting in universal screening fetal echocardiograms (F-echo) even when cardiac structures on obstetric scan (OB-scan) are normal. Recent studies suggest that when OB-scan is normal, F-echo may add little benefit and increases cost and anxiety. We aim to determine the utility of screening F-echo in IVF pregnancies with normal cardiac anatomy on prior OB-scan. We conducted a retrospective chart review of IVF pregnancies referred for F-echo at the Seattle Children’s Hospital between 2014 and 2020. OB-scan results and subspecialty of interpreting physician (Obstetrics = OB; Maternal Fetal Medicine = MFM; Radiology = Rads), F-echoes, and postnatal outcomes were reviewed. Cardiac anatomy on OB-scans was classified as complete if 4-chamber and outflow-tract views were obtained. Supplemental views (three-vessel and sagittal aortic arch views) on OB-scan were also documented. Of 525 IVF referrals, OB-scan reports were available for review in 411. Normal anatomy was demonstrated in 304 (74%) interpreted by OB (128; 42%), MFM (80; 26%), and Rads (96; 32%). F-echo was normal in 278 (91%). Of the 26 abnormal F-echo, none required intervention (17 muscular and 5 perimembranous ventricular septal defects, and 4 minor valve abnormalities). There was no difference in OB-scan accuracy for identifying normal cardiac anatomy when comparing 4-chamber and outflow-tract views vs. addition of supplemental views (91% vs 92% normal F-echo; p > 0.1). Evaluation of OB-scan accuracy by interpreting physician subspecialty demonstrated normal F-echo in 95%, 85%, and 92% (p = 0.95) as read by OB, MFM, and Rads, respectively. A majority of IVF referrals with normal cardiac anatomy visualized on OB-scan using 4-chamber and outflow-tract views resulted in normal F-echo, regardless of interpreting physician subspecialty or addition of supplemental views. Of the minority with abnormal F-echo, none required intervention. Consideration should be given to the cost/benefit of screening F-echo for the indication of IVF if normal cardiac anatomy is demonstrated on OB-scan.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Holland BJ, Myers JA, Woods CR (2015) Prenatal diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease reduces risk of death from cardiovascular compromise prior to planned neonatal cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 45:631–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.14882CrossRef Holland BJ, Myers JA, Woods CR (2015) Prenatal diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease reduces risk of death from cardiovascular compromise prior to planned neonatal cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Off J Int Soc Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 45:631–638. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​uog.​14882CrossRef
18.
Metadata
Title
Utility of Screening Fetal Echocardiogram Following Normal Anatomy Ultrasound for In Vitro Fertilization Pregnancies
Authors
Rebecca R. Spurr
Jeffrey A. Conwell
Luciana T. Young
Mark B. Lewin
Lindsay A. Edwards
Bhawna Arya
Publication date
26-02-2022
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology / Issue 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-02857-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2022

Pediatric Cardiology 6/2022 Go to the issue