Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Cardiology 5/2019

01-06-2019 | Supraventricular Tachycardia | Original Article

Ambulatory Arrhythmia Detection with ZIO® XT Patch in Pediatric Patients: A Comparison of Devices

Authors: Sarah Pradhan, Jeffrey A. Robinson, Jill K. Shivapour, Christopher S. Snyder

Published in: Pediatric Cardiology | Issue 5/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring devices can be used for 24–72 h to detect arrhythmias. A new device, the ZIO® XT Patch has cardiac monitoring capabilities that can be utilized for up to 14 days. The purpose of this study is to describe duration of ZIO use by age, and to compare its time to arrhythmia detection with the Holter monitor in a pediatric population. A single-center, retrospective review of patients < 18 years of age who underwent clinical investigation with ZIO from October 2014 to February 2016 was performed. An age-matched cohort was utilized to compare ZIO to Holter monitor results. Demographic and diagnostic data, time to first arrhythmia, and arrhythmia burden were analyzed. A total of 406 ZIO were prescribed; median age 12.7 years and 50% male subjects. Median duration of ZIO monitoring significantly increased with age (p < 0.001). 499 Holter monitors were prescribed on a statistically different age group. Arrhythmia detection rates were similar between groups, 10% (n = 42) by ZIO and 9% (n = 45) by Holter (p = NS). The majority of arrhythmias (57%) detected by ZIO were after 24 h (p < 0.0001). All arrhythmias detected by Holter monitor occurred within 24 h (p < 0.0001), mean duration of wear was 24.1 h, range 0.5–48 h. The ZIO® XT Patch may be considered as an ambulatory ECG monitor to diagnose arrhythmia in pediatric patients of all ages. Increasing patient age resulted in increasing duration of ZIO monitoring. Majority of arrhythmias detected with ZIO were identified after 24 h, which would have been missed by other short-term monitors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Locati ET, Vecchi AM, Vargiu S, Cattafi G et al (2013) Role of extended external loop recorders for the diagnosis of unexplained syncope, pre-syncope, and sustained palpitations. Europace 16(6):914–922CrossRefPubMed Locati ET, Vecchi AM, Vargiu S, Cattafi G et al (2013) Role of extended external loop recorders for the diagnosis of unexplained syncope, pre-syncope, and sustained palpitations. Europace 16(6):914–922CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sreeram N, Gass M, Apitz C et al (2007) The diagnostic yield from implantable loop recorders in children and young adults. Clin Res Cardiol 97(5):327–333CrossRefPubMed Sreeram N, Gass M, Apitz C et al (2007) The diagnostic yield from implantable loop recorders in children and young adults. Clin Res Cardiol 97(5):327–333CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Zimetbaum P, Goldman A (2010) Ambulatory arrhythmia monitoring: choosing the right device. Circulation 122(16):1629–1636CrossRefPubMed Zimetbaum P, Goldman A (2010) Ambulatory arrhythmia monitoring: choosing the right device. Circulation 122(16):1629–1636CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Rees AH, Solinger R, Elbl F (1985) Holter monitoring in the management of cardiac arrhythmias in children. Compr Ther 11(3):11–16PubMed Rees AH, Solinger R, Elbl F (1985) Holter monitoring in the management of cardiac arrhythmias in children. Compr Ther 11(3):11–16PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hegazy RA, Lotfy WN (2007) The value of Holter monitoring in the assessment of Pediatric patients. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 7(4):204–214PubMedPubMedCentral Hegazy RA, Lotfy WN (2007) The value of Holter monitoring in the assessment of Pediatric patients. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 7(4):204–214PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Begic Z, Begic E, Mesihovic-Dinarevic S, Masic I et al (2016) The use of continuous electrocardiographic Holter monitoring in pediatric cardiology. Acta Inform Med 24(4):253–256CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Begic Z, Begic E, Mesihovic-Dinarevic S, Masic I et al (2016) The use of continuous electrocardiographic Holter monitoring in pediatric cardiology. Acta Inform Med 24(4):253–256CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Turakhia MP, Hoang DD, Zimetbaum P, Miller JD et al (2013) Diagnostic utility of a novel leadless arrhythmia monitoring device. Am J Cardiology 112(4):520–524CrossRef Turakhia MP, Hoang DD, Zimetbaum P, Miller JD et al (2013) Diagnostic utility of a novel leadless arrhythmia monitoring device. Am J Cardiology 112(4):520–524CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Schreiber D, Sattar A, Drigalla D, Higgins S (2014) Ambulatory cardiac monitoring for discharged emergency department patients with possible cardiac arrhythmias. West J Emerg Med 15(2):194–198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schreiber D, Sattar A, Drigalla D, Higgins S (2014) Ambulatory cardiac monitoring for discharged emergency department patients with possible cardiac arrhythmias. West J Emerg Med 15(2):194–198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Cheung CC, Kerr CR, Krahn AD (2014) Comparing 14-day adhesive patch with 24-h Holter monitoring. Future Cardiol 10(3):319–322CrossRefPubMed Cheung CC, Kerr CR, Krahn AD (2014) Comparing 14-day adhesive patch with 24-h Holter monitoring. Future Cardiol 10(3):319–322CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Barrett PM, Komatireddy R, Haaser S, Topol S (2014) Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring. Am J Med 127(1):95.e11–95.e17CrossRef Barrett PM, Komatireddy R, Haaser S, Topol S (2014) Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring. Am J Med 127(1):95.e11–95.e17CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Bolourchi M, Batra AS (2015) Diagnostic yield of patch ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring in children (from a national registry). Am J Cardiol 115(5):630–634CrossRefPubMed Bolourchi M, Batra AS (2015) Diagnostic yield of patch ambulatory electrocardiogram monitoring in children (from a national registry). Am J Cardiol 115(5):630–634CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Ambulatory Arrhythmia Detection with ZIO® XT Patch in Pediatric Patients: A Comparison of Devices
Authors
Sarah Pradhan
Jeffrey A. Robinson
Jill K. Shivapour
Christopher S. Snyder
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology / Issue 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02089-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2019

Pediatric Cardiology 5/2019 Go to the issue