Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Cardiology 8/2018

01-12-2018 | Original Article

Echocardiographic Follow-Up of Congenital Aortic Valvular Stenosis II

Authors: Ayşe Güler Eroğlu, Sezen Ugan Atik, Betül Çinar, Murat Tuğberk Bakar, İrfan Levent Saltik

Published in: Pediatric Cardiology | Issue 8/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

We evaluated the natural course of congenital aortic valvular stenosis (AVS) and factors affecting AVS progression during long-term follow-up with echocardiography. Medical records of 388 patients with AVS were reviewed; patients with concomitant lesions other than aortic regurgitation (AR) were excluded. Trivial AVS was defined as a transvalvular Doppler peak systolic instantaneous gradient of < 25 mmHg; mild stenosis, 25–49 mmHg; moderate stenosis, 50–75 mmHg; and severe stenosis, > 75 mmHg. Median age of the patients was 3 years (range 0 day to 21 years), and 287 (74%) were male. A total of 355 patients were followed with medical treatment alone for a median of 4.6 years (range 1 month to 20.6 years), and the degree of AVS increased in 75 (21%) patients. The risk of AVS progression was higher when AVS was diagnosed in neonates (OR 4.29, CI 1.81–10.18, p = 0.001) and infants (OR 3.79, CI 2.21–6.49, p = 0.001). After the infancy period, bicuspid valve morphology increased AVS progression risk (OR 2.4, CI 1.2–4.6, p = 0.034). Patients with moderate AVS were more likely to have AVS progression (OR 2.59, CI 1.3–5.1, p = 0.006). Bicuspid valve morphology increased risk of AR development/progression (OR 1.77, CI 1.1–2.7, p = 0.017). The patients with mild and moderate AVS were more likely to have AR development/progression (p = 0.001). The risk of AR development/progression was higher in patients with AVS progression (OR 2.25, CI 1.33–3.81, p = 0.002). Newborn babies and infants should be followed more frequently than older patients according to disease severity. Bicuspid aortic valve morphology and moderate stenosis are risk factors for the progression of AVS and AR.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Samanek M, Voriskova M (1999) Congenital heart disease among 815,569 children born between 1980 and 1990 and their 15-year survival; a prospective Bohemia survival study. Pediatr Cardiol 20:411–417CrossRef Samanek M, Voriskova M (1999) Congenital heart disease among 815,569 children born between 1980 and 1990 and their 15-year survival; a prospective Bohemia survival study. Pediatr Cardiol 20:411–417CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Vlahos AP, Marx GR, McElhinney D et al (2008) Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography in assessing aortic stenosis severity and predicting need for intervention in children. Pediatr Cardiol 29:507–514CrossRef Vlahos AP, Marx GR, McElhinney D et al (2008) Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography in assessing aortic stenosis severity and predicting need for intervention in children. Pediatr Cardiol 29:507–514CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Nishimura RA, Pieroni DR, Bierman FZ et al (1993) Second natural history study of congenital heart defects. Aortic stenosis: echocardiography. Results of treatment of patients with aortic valvar stenosis. Circulation 87:66–72CrossRef Nishimura RA, Pieroni DR, Bierman FZ et al (1993) Second natural history study of congenital heart defects. Aortic stenosis: echocardiography. Results of treatment of patients with aortic valvar stenosis. Circulation 87:66–72CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Eroglu AG, Babaoglu K, Saltik L et al (2006) Echocardiographic follow-up of congenital aortic valvular stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol 27:713–719CrossRef Eroglu AG, Babaoglu K, Saltik L et al (2006) Echocardiographic follow-up of congenital aortic valvular stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol 27:713–719CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lopez L, Colan SD, Frommelt PC et al (2010) Recommendations for quantification methods during the performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: a report from the Pediatric Measurements Writing Group of the American Society of Echocardiography Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Council. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:465–495CrossRef Lopez L, Colan SD, Frommelt PC et al (2010) Recommendations for quantification methods during the performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: a report from the Pediatric Measurements Writing Group of the American Society of Echocardiography Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Council. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:465–495CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Cheitlin MD, Alpert JS, Armstrong WF et al (1997) ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography. Circulation 95:1686–1744CrossRef Cheitlin MD, Alpert JS, Armstrong WF et al (1997) ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Clinical Application of Echocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Clinical Application of Echocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the American Society of Echocardiography. Circulation 95:1686–1744CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Stout KK, Otto CM (2003) Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2:54–58 Stout KK, Otto CM (2003) Quantification of valvular aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2:54–58
8.
go back to reference Cantinotti M, Giordano R, Emdin M et al (2017) Echocardiographic assessment of pediatric semilunar valve disease. Echocardiography 34:1360–1370CrossRef Cantinotti M, Giordano R, Emdin M et al (2017) Echocardiographic assessment of pediatric semilunar valve disease. Echocardiography 34:1360–1370CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Karamlou T, Shen I, Alsoufia B et al (2005) The influence of valve physiology on outcome following aortic valvotomy for congenital bicuspid valve in children: 30 year results from a single institution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27:81–85CrossRef Karamlou T, Shen I, Alsoufia B et al (2005) The influence of valve physiology on outcome following aortic valvotomy for congenital bicuspid valve in children: 30 year results from a single institution. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27:81–85CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Latson LA (1998) Aortic stenosis: valvular, supravalvular, and fibromuscular subralvular. In: Garson A, Bricker JT, McNamara DG (eds) The science and practice of pediatric cardiology, 2nd edn. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 1257–1276 Latson LA (1998) Aortic stenosis: valvular, supravalvular, and fibromuscular subralvular. In: Garson A, Bricker JT, McNamara DG (eds) The science and practice of pediatric cardiology, 2nd edn. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 1257–1276
11.
go back to reference Bonow RO, Carabello B, de Leon AC Jr et al (1998) Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary; a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease. Circulation 98:1949–1984CrossRef Bonow RO, Carabello B, de Leon AC Jr et al (1998) Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: executive summary; a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease. Circulation 98:1949–1984CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E et al (2003) American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:777–802CrossRef Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E et al (2003) American Society of Echocardiography. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:777–802CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO et al (2017) 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 135:e1159–e1195CrossRef Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO et al (2017) 2017 AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 135:e1159–e1195CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ishii M, Jones M, Shiota T et al (1998) What is the validity of continuous wave Doppler grading of aortic regurgitation severity? A chronic animal model study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 11:332–337CrossRef Ishii M, Jones M, Shiota T et al (1998) What is the validity of continuous wave Doppler grading of aortic regurgitation severity? A chronic animal model study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 11:332–337CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Perry GJ, Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Byard C, Soto B (1987) Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 9:952–959CrossRef Perry GJ, Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Byard C, Soto B (1987) Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 9:952–959CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Kimball TR, Michelfelder EC (2008) Echocardiography. In: Allen HD, Driscoll DJ, Shaddy RE, Feltes TF (eds) Moss and Adams’ heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, 7th edn. Lipincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 137–138 Kimball TR, Michelfelder EC (2008) Echocardiography. In: Allen HD, Driscoll DJ, Shaddy RE, Feltes TF (eds) Moss and Adams’ heart disease in infants, children, and adolescents, 7th edn. Lipincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 137–138
17.
go back to reference Horstkqtte D, Loogen F (1988) The natural history of aortic valvular stenosis. Eur Heart J 9:57–64CrossRef Horstkqtte D, Loogen F (1988) The natural history of aortic valvular stenosis. Eur Heart J 9:57–64CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Keane JF, Driscoll DJ, Gersony WM et al (1993) Second natural history study of congenital heart defects. Results of treatment of patients with aortic valvar stenosis. Circulation 87:16–27 Keane JF, Driscoll DJ, Gersony WM et al (1993) Second natural history study of congenital heart defects. Results of treatment of patients with aortic valvar stenosis. Circulation 87:16–27
19.
go back to reference Kiraly P, Kapusta L, van Lier H et al (1997) Natural history of congenital aortic valvar stenosis: an echo and Doppler cardiographic study. Cardiol Young 7:188–193CrossRef Kiraly P, Kapusta L, van Lier H et al (1997) Natural history of congenital aortic valvar stenosis: an echo and Doppler cardiographic study. Cardiol Young 7:188–193CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Mack G, Silberbach M (2000) Aortic and pulmonary stenosis. Pediatr Rev 21:79–85CrossRef Mack G, Silberbach M (2000) Aortic and pulmonary stenosis. Pediatr Rev 21:79–85CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Ward C (2000) Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve. Heart 83:81–85CrossRef Ward C (2000) Clinical significance of the bicuspid aortic valve. Heart 83:81–85CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Bartz PJ, Driscoll DJ, Keane JF et al (2006) Management strategy for very mild aorticvalve stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol 27:259–262CrossRef Bartz PJ, Driscoll DJ, Keane JF et al (2006) Management strategy for very mild aorticvalve stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol 27:259–262CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Khalid O, Luxenberg DM, Sable C et al (2006) Aortic stenosis: the spectrum of practice. Pediatr Cardiol 27:661–669CrossRef Khalid O, Luxenberg DM, Sable C et al (2006) Aortic stenosis: the spectrum of practice. Pediatr Cardiol 27:661–669CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bengur AR, Snider AR, Meliones JN, Vermilion RP (1991) Doppler evaluation of aortic valve area in children with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 18:1499–1505CrossRef Bengur AR, Snider AR, Meliones JN, Vermilion RP (1991) Doppler evaluation of aortic valve area in children with aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 18:1499–1505CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Yamazawa H (2010) Accuracy of the Doppler-derived pressure gradient in pediatric patients with aortic valvular stenosis: is the correction for pressure recovery necessary? Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi 85:225–231PubMed Yamazawa H (2010) Accuracy of the Doppler-derived pressure gradient in pediatric patients with aortic valvular stenosis: is the correction for pressure recovery necessary? Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi 85:225–231PubMed
26.
go back to reference Barker PC, Ensing G, Ludomirsky A, Bradley DJ, Lloyd TR, Rocchini AP (2002) Comparison of simultaneous invasive and noninvasive measurements of pressure gradients in congenital aortic valve stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15:1496–1502CrossRef Barker PC, Ensing G, Ludomirsky A, Bradley DJ, Lloyd TR, Rocchini AP (2002) Comparison of simultaneous invasive and noninvasive measurements of pressure gradients in congenital aortic valve stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15:1496–1502CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Echocardiographic Follow-Up of Congenital Aortic Valvular Stenosis II
Authors
Ayşe Güler Eroğlu
Sezen Ugan Atik
Betül Çinar
Murat Tuğberk Bakar
İrfan Levent Saltik
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology / Issue 8/2018
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-018-1928-2

Other articles of this Issue 8/2018

Pediatric Cardiology 8/2018 Go to the issue