Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Cardiology 5/2015

01-06-2015 | Letter To The Editor

Standard Error or Standard Deviation?

Author: Julien I. E. Hoffman

Published in: Pediatric Cardiology | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Excerpt

There is ambiguity in the way medical publications indicate variation in bar graphs. Some of them present a short vertical line that depicts the magnitude of the standard error of the mean to facilitate visual assessment of the significance between two (or more) mean values. These error bars may be misleading because they indicate only the 67 % confidence limits [1] and because they are difficult to interpret without allowing for sample sizes [3]. In addition, they may give a false sense of individual variation [8]. Other publications display the standard deviation as a longer vertical line; this does indicate individual variability, and a standard deviation similar in magnitude to the mean suggests rightward skewing. Some figures even display confidence limits. At times, more than one of these displays occurs in different figures in the same publication, and often the metric chosen is not described [4, 7]. Many journals now require standard deviation to be used [2, 5, 6]. …
Literature
2.
go back to reference Bartko JJ (1985) Rationale for reporting standard deviations rather than standard errors of the mean. Am J Psychiatry 142:1060CrossRefPubMed Bartko JJ (1985) Rationale for reporting standard deviations rather than standard errors of the mean. Am J Psychiatry 142:1060CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Browne RH (1979) On visual assessment of the significance of a mean difference. Biometrics 35:657–665CrossRef Browne RH (1979) On visual assessment of the significance of a mean difference. Biometrics 35:657–665CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bunce H III, Hokanson JA, Weiss GB (1980) Avoiding ambiguity when reporting variability in biomedical data. Am J Med 69:8–9CrossRefPubMed Bunce H III, Hokanson JA, Weiss GB (1980) Avoiding ambiguity when reporting variability in biomedical data. Am J Med 69:8–9CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Curran-Everett D, Benos DJ (2004) Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 287:E189–E191CrossRefPubMed Curran-Everett D, Benos DJ (2004) Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 287:E189–E191CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Curran-Everett D, Benos DJ (2007) Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society: the sequel. Adv Physiol Educ 31:295–298CrossRefPubMed Curran-Everett D, Benos DJ (2007) Guidelines for reporting statistics in journals published by the American Physiological Society: the sequel. Adv Physiol Educ 31:295–298CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Morton JP (2009) Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know? Adv Physiol Educ 33:7–9CrossRefPubMed Morton JP (2009) Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know? Adv Physiol Educ 33:7–9CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Standard Error or Standard Deviation?
Author
Julien I. E. Hoffman
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-015-1166-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Pediatric Cardiology 5/2015 Go to the issue