Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Cardiology 5/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Article

Quantification of Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis in Pediatric Patients: Comparison Between Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography

Authors: Selma Sirin, Kai Nassenstein, Ulrich Neudorf, Christoph J. Jensen, Christian Mikat, Thomas Schlosser

Published in: Pediatric Cardiology | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Previous studies showed the reliability of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) in the quantification of aortic valve stenosis in adults. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the ability of cMRI in the quantification of congenital aortic valve stenosis (CAS) in children. Nineteen patients (mean age 14.0 ± 3.2 years, 15 boys and 4 girls) with CAS were imaged by cMRI and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). cMRI was performed on a 1.5-Tesla MR scanner (Magnetom Avanto; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using cine steady-state free precession sequences for the assessment of the aortic valve area (AVA) by MR planimetry and left-ventricular function. Phase-contrast measurement was used in cMRI to assess peak flow velocity above the aortic valve. A positive correlation was found between maximum systolic pressure gradient (MPG) as assessed by cMRI and TTE (28.9 ± 21.2 vs. 41.3 ± 22.7 mmHg, r = 0.84, p = 0.001) with a mean underestimation of 12.4 mmHg by cMRI. Only a weak correlation could be observed between AVA by cMRI and MPG at the aortic valve by TTE (r = −0.50, p = 0.029) and cMRI (r = −0.27, p = 0.40). Furthermore, a positive correlation between myocardial mass (cMRI) and MPG (TTE, r = 0.57, p = 0.01), but not between myocardial mass (cMRI) and AVA (cMRI, r = 0.07, p = 0.77), was found. The assessment of MPG by cMRI in patients with CAS is feasible with a trend toward underestimatation compared with TTE. Moreover, MPG seems to be a more accurate parameter than AVA regarding the prediction of myocardial hypertrophy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alfakih K, Bloomer T, Bainbridge S, Bainbridge G, Ridgway J, Williams G et al (2004) A comparison of left ventricular mass between two-dimensional echocardiography, using fundamental and tissue harmonic imaging, and cardiac MRI in patients with hypertension. Eur J Radiol 52:103–109CrossRefPubMed Alfakih K, Bloomer T, Bainbridge S, Bainbridge G, Ridgway J, Williams G et al (2004) A comparison of left ventricular mass between two-dimensional echocardiography, using fundamental and tissue harmonic imaging, and cardiac MRI in patients with hypertension. Eur J Radiol 52:103–109CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Baltes C, Hansen MS, Tsao J, Kozerke S, Rezavi R, Pedersen EM et al (2008) Determination of peak velocity in stenotic areas: echocardiography versus k-t SENSE accelerated MR Fourier velocity encoding. Radiology 246:249–257CrossRefPubMed Baltes C, Hansen MS, Tsao J, Kozerke S, Rezavi R, Pedersen EM et al (2008) Determination of peak velocity in stenotic areas: echocardiography versus k-t SENSE accelerated MR Fourier velocity encoding. Radiology 246:249–257CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Burwash IG, Dickinson A, Teskey RJ, Tam JW, Chan KL (2000) Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. Can J Cardiol 16:985–992PubMed Burwash IG, Dickinson A, Teskey RJ, Tam JW, Chan KL (2000) Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. Can J Cardiol 16:985–992PubMed
4.
go back to reference Eleid MF, Nishimura RA, Sorajja P, Borlaug BA (2013) Systemic hypertension in low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 128:1349–1353CrossRefPubMed Eleid MF, Nishimura RA, Sorajja P, Borlaug BA (2013) Systemic hypertension in low-gradient severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 128:1349–1353CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Fratz S, Gildein HP, Balling G, Sebening W, Genz T, Eicken A et al (2008) Aortic valvuloplasty in pediatric patients substantially postpones the need for aortic valve surgery: a single-center experience of 188 patients after up to 17.5 years of follow-up. Circulation 117:1201–1206CrossRefPubMed Fratz S, Gildein HP, Balling G, Sebening W, Genz T, Eicken A et al (2008) Aortic valvuloplasty in pediatric patients substantially postpones the need for aortic valve surgery: a single-center experience of 188 patients after up to 17.5 years of follow-up. Circulation 117:1201–1206CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Garcia J, Kadem L, Larose E, Clavel MA, Pibarot P (2011) Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:25PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Garcia J, Kadem L, Larose E, Clavel MA, Pibarot P (2011) Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:25PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Haghi D, Suselbeck T, Fluechter S, Kalmar G, Schroder M, Kaden JJ et al (2006) A hybrid approach for quantification of aortic valve stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography: comparison to right heart catheterization and standard echocardiography. Clin Res Cardiol 95:162–167CrossRefPubMed Haghi D, Suselbeck T, Fluechter S, Kalmar G, Schroder M, Kaden JJ et al (2006) A hybrid approach for quantification of aortic valve stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography: comparison to right heart catheterization and standard echocardiography. Clin Res Cardiol 95:162–167CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference John AS, Dill T, Brandt RR, Rau M, Ricken W, Bachmann G et al (2003) Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? J Am Coll Cardiol 42:519–526CrossRefPubMed John AS, Dill T, Brandt RR, Rau M, Ricken W, Bachmann G et al (2003) Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: how does it compare to current diagnostic standards? J Am Coll Cardiol 42:519–526CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kristen AV, Meyer FJ, Perz JB et al (2005) Risk stratification in cardiac amyloidosis: novel approaches. Transplantation 80:S151–S155CrossRefPubMed Kristen AV, Meyer FJ, Perz JB et al (2005) Risk stratification in cardiac amyloidosis: novel approaches. Transplantation 80:S151–S155CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kronik G, Slany J, Mosslacher H (1979) Comparative value of eight M-mode echocardiographic formulas for determining left ventricular stroke volume. A correlative study with thermodilution and left ventricular single-plane cineangiography. Circulation 60:1308–1316CrossRefPubMed Kronik G, Slany J, Mosslacher H (1979) Comparative value of eight M-mode echocardiographic formulas for determining left ventricular stroke volume. A correlative study with thermodilution and left ventricular single-plane cineangiography. Circulation 60:1308–1316CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Martin WA, Sigwart U (2002) Who and how to treat with non-surgical myocardial reduction therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: long-term outcomes. Heart Fail Monit 3:15–27PubMed Martin WA, Sigwart U (2002) Who and how to treat with non-surgical myocardial reduction therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: long-term outcomes. Heart Fail Monit 3:15–27PubMed
12.
go back to reference Mascherbauer J, Fuchs C, Stoiber M, Schima H, Pernicka E, Maurer G et al (2008) Systemic pressure does not directly affect pressure gradient and valve area estimates in aortic stenosis in vitro. Eur Heart J 29:2049–2057CrossRefPubMed Mascherbauer J, Fuchs C, Stoiber M, Schima H, Pernicka E, Maurer G et al (2008) Systemic pressure does not directly affect pressure gradient and valve area estimates in aortic stenosis in vitro. Eur Heart J 29:2049–2057CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference McBride KL, Marengo L, Canfield M, Langlois P, Fixler D, Belmont JW (2005) Epidemiology of noncomplex left ventricular outflow tract obstruction malformations (aortic valve stenosis, coarctation of the aorta, hypoplastic left heart syndrome) in Texas, 1999–2001. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 73:555–561PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed McBride KL, Marengo L, Canfield M, Langlois P, Fixler D, Belmont JW (2005) Epidemiology of noncomplex left ventricular outflow tract obstruction malformations (aortic valve stenosis, coarctation of the aorta, hypoplastic left heart syndrome) in Texas, 1999–2001. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 73:555–561PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference O’Brien KR, Gabriel RS, Greiser A, Cowan BR, Young AA, Kerr AJ (2009) Aortic valve stenotic area calculation from phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance: the importance of short echo time. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 11:49PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed O’Brien KR, Gabriel RS, Greiser A, Cowan BR, Young AA, Kerr AJ (2009) Aortic valve stenotic area calculation from phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance: the importance of short echo time. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 11:49PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Omran H, Schmidt H, Hackenbroch M et al (2003) Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study. Lancet 361:1241–1246CrossRefPubMed Omran H, Schmidt H, Hackenbroch M et al (2003) Silent and apparent cerebral embolism after retrograde catheterisation of the aortic valve in valvular stenosis: a prospective, randomised study. Lancet 361:1241–1246CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Oswal N, Sullivan I, Khambadkone S, Taylor AM, Hughes ML (2012) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging predicts cardiac catheter findings for great artery stenosis in children with congenital cardiac disease. Cardiol Young 22:178–183CrossRefPubMed Oswal N, Sullivan I, Khambadkone S, Taylor AM, Hughes ML (2012) Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging predicts cardiac catheter findings for great artery stenosis in children with congenital cardiac disease. Cardiol Young 22:178–183CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Pasquali SK, Cohen MS, Shera D, Wernovsky G, Spray TL, Marino BS (2007) The relationship between neo-aortic root dilation, insufficiency, and reintervention following the Ross procedure in infants, children, and young adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:1806–1812CrossRefPubMed Pasquali SK, Cohen MS, Shera D, Wernovsky G, Spray TL, Marino BS (2007) The relationship between neo-aortic root dilation, insufficiency, and reintervention following the Ross procedure in infants, children, and young adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:1806–1812CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Poutanen T, Ikonen A, Jokinen E, Vainio P, Tikanoja T (2001) Transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography is as good as magnetic resonance imaging in measuring dynamic changes in left ventricular volume during the heart cycle in children. Eur J Echocardiogr 2:31–39CrossRefPubMed Poutanen T, Ikonen A, Jokinen E, Vainio P, Tikanoja T (2001) Transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography is as good as magnetic resonance imaging in measuring dynamic changes in left ventricular volume during the heart cycle in children. Eur J Echocardiogr 2:31–39CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Rajappan K, Bellenger NG, Melina G, Di Terlizzi M, Yacoub MH, Sheridan DJ et al (2003) Assessment of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement—cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus M-mode echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 24:59–65CrossRefPubMed Rajappan K, Bellenger NG, Melina G, Di Terlizzi M, Yacoub MH, Sheridan DJ et al (2003) Assessment of left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement—cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus M-mode echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 24:59–65CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Reant P, Lederlin M, Lafitte S, Serri K, Montaudon M, Corneloup O et al (2006) Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation. Eur J Radiol 59:276–283CrossRefPubMed Reant P, Lederlin M, Lafitte S, Serri K, Montaudon M, Corneloup O et al (2006) Absolute assessment of aortic valve stenosis by planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterisation. Eur J Radiol 59:276–283CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Schlosser T, Malyar N, Jochims M, Breuckmann F, Hunold P, Bruder O et al (2007) Quantification of aortic valve stenosis in MRI-comparison of steady-state free precession and fast low-angle shot sequences. Eur Radiol 17:1284–1290CrossRefPubMed Schlosser T, Malyar N, Jochims M, Breuckmann F, Hunold P, Bruder O et al (2007) Quantification of aortic valve stenosis in MRI-comparison of steady-state free precession and fast low-angle shot sequences. Eur Radiol 17:1284–1290CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Secchi F, Di Leo G, Papini GD, Nardella VG, Negura D, Carminati M et al (2011) Cardiac magnetic resonance: impact on diagnosis and management of patients with congenital cardiovascular disease. Clin Radiol 66:720–725CrossRefPubMed Secchi F, Di Leo G, Papini GD, Nardella VG, Negura D, Carminati M et al (2011) Cardiac magnetic resonance: impact on diagnosis and management of patients with congenital cardiovascular disease. Clin Radiol 66:720–725CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Tanaka K, Makaryus AN, Wolff SD (2007) Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 9:799–805CrossRefPubMed Tanaka K, Makaryus AN, Wolff SD (2007) Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 9:799–805CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, Gorlin R (1976) Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol 37:7–11CrossRefPubMed Teichholz LE, Kreulen T, Herman MV, Gorlin R (1976) Problems in echocardiographic volume determinations: echocardiographic-angiographic correlations in the presence of absence of asynergy. Am J Cardiol 37:7–11CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference van der Hulst AE, Roest AA, Delgado V, Kroft LJ, Holman ER, Blom NA et al (2011) Corrected tetralogy of Fallot: comparison of tissue doppler imaging and velocity-encoded MR for assessment of performance and temporal activation of right ventricle. Radiology 260:88–97CrossRefPubMed van der Hulst AE, Roest AA, Delgado V, Kroft LJ, Holman ER, Blom NA et al (2011) Corrected tetralogy of Fallot: comparison of tissue doppler imaging and velocity-encoded MR for assessment of performance and temporal activation of right ventricle. Radiology 260:88–97CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Quantification of Congenital Aortic Valve Stenosis in Pediatric Patients: Comparison Between Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography
Authors
Selma Sirin
Kai Nassenstein
Ulrich Neudorf
Christoph J. Jensen
Christian Mikat
Thomas Schlosser
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Pediatric Cardiology / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0172-0643
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1971
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-013-0851-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Pediatric Cardiology 5/2014 Go to the issue