Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 3/2019

01-06-2019 | Original Paper

The role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal stones (LPSs) after the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)

Authors: Junhong Fan, Tao Zhang, Wei Zhu, Alberto Gurioli, Irene Raphael Ketegwe, Guohua Zeng

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

To assess the safety and efficacy of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal stones (LPSs) after the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), we retrospectively evaluated 44 patients with symptomatic LPSs with previously failed SWL or RIRS and consequently underwent SMP from October 2014 to March 2016. The percutaneous renal access was performed 12–14F with C-arm fluoroscopy or ultrasonographic guidance. Stone disintegration was performed using either Holmium laser or pneumatic lithotripter. Perioperative parameters along with operations were assessed in detail. A total of 44 patients (mean age 49.1 ± 13.7 years) were included in the study. Stone size was 18.4 ± 6.0 mm (range 9–29), operative time was 63.9 ± 32.7 min (range 14–145) and hospital stay was 2.8 ± 1.2 days (range 1–5). The hemoglobin drop was 12.4 ± 8.8 g/L (range 0–31), and no patients required blood transfusion. Complete stone-free status was achieved in 40 (90.9%) patients. Clinically insignificant residual fragments were observed in three (6.8%) patients and only one (2.3%) patient had a 6 mm residual calculus. A total of three minor complications (urinary tract infection, hemorrhage resolved by hemostatics and renal colic requiring analgesics) were observed postoperatively. For symptomatic LPSs after the failure of SWL or RIRS, SMP is a safe and efficient auxiliary option and even might be an alternative to SWL or RIRS, while further considering the stone-free rates and stone-related events.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R et al (2005) Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 173(6):2005–2009CrossRefPubMed Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R et al (2005) Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 173(6):2005–2009CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV et al (2001) Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol 166(6):2072–2080CrossRefPubMed Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV et al (2001) Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol 166(6):2072–2080CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Grasso M (2000) Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of ureteral and intrarenal calculi. Urol Clin N Am 27(4):623–631CrossRef Grasso M (2000) Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of ureteral and intrarenal calculi. Urol Clin N Am 27(4):623–631CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Preminger GM (2006) Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy. Urol Res 34(2):108–111CrossRefPubMed Preminger GM (2006) Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy. Urol Res 34(2):108–111CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Zeng G, Wan S, Zhao Z et al (2016) Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation. BJU Int 117(4):655–661CrossRefPubMed Zeng G, Wan S, Zhao Z et al (2016) Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP): a new concept in technique and instrumentation. BJU Int 117(4):655–661CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP et al (2012) on behalf of the CROES PCNL Study Group. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 62(2):246–255CrossRefPubMed de la Rosette JJ, Opondo D, Daels FP et al (2012) on behalf of the CROES PCNL Study Group. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 62(2):246–255CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bozkurt OF, Resorlu B, Yildiz Y et al (2011) Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of 15 to 20 mm. J Endourol 25(7):1131–1135CrossRefPubMed Bozkurt OF, Resorlu B, Yildiz Y et al (2011) Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of 15 to 20 mm. J Endourol 25(7):1131–1135CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482CrossRefPubMed Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K et al (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Raman JD, Pearle MS (2008) Management options for lower pole renal calculi. Curr Opin Urol 18(2):214 – 219CrossRefPubMed Raman JD, Pearle MS (2008) Management options for lower pole renal calculi. Curr Opin Urol 18(2):214 – 219CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Al-Ansari A, As-Sadiq K, Al-Said S et al (2006) Prognostic factors of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of renal stones. Int Urol Nephrol 38(1):63–67CrossRefPubMed Al-Ansari A, As-Sadiq K, Al-Said S et al (2006) Prognostic factors of success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of renal stones. Int Urol Nephrol 38(1):63–67CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Fong YK, Peh SO, Ho SH et al (2004) Lower pole ratio: a new and accurate predictor of lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy? Int J Urol 11(9):700–703CrossRefPubMed Fong YK, Peh SO, Ho SH et al (2004) Lower pole ratio: a new and accurate predictor of lower pole stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy? Int J Urol 11(9):700–703CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Talas H, Kilic O, Tangal S et al (2007) Does lower-pole caliceal anatomy predict stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for primary lower-pole nephrolithiasis? Urol Int 79(2):129–132CrossRefPubMed Talas H, Kilic O, Tangal S et al (2007) Does lower-pole caliceal anatomy predict stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy for primary lower-pole nephrolithiasis? Urol Int 79(2):129–132CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ et al (2002) Ureteroscopic treatment of lower pole calculi: Comparison of lithotripsy in situ and after displacement. J Urol 168(1):43–45CrossRefPubMed Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ et al (2002) Ureteroscopic treatment of lower pole calculi: Comparison of lithotripsy in situ and after displacement. J Urol 168(1):43–45CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kuo RL, Lingeman JE, Leveillee RJ et al (2003) Lower pole II: initial results from a comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureteroscopy (URS), and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PNL) for lower pole nephrolithiasis. J Urol 169(Suppl):486 (abstract in American Urological Association 98th Annual Meeting, 26 April to 1 May 2003, Chicago, IL) Kuo RL, Lingeman JE, Leveillee RJ et al (2003) Lower pole II: initial results from a comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureteroscopy (URS), and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PNL) for lower pole nephrolithiasis. J Urol 169(Suppl):486 (abstract in American Urological Association 98th Annual Meeting, 26 April to 1 May 2003, Chicago, IL)
17.
go back to reference Bilen CY, Kocak B, Kitirci G et al (2007) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: lessons learned in 5 years at a single institution. J Urol 177(5):1867–1871CrossRefPubMed Bilen CY, Kocak B, Kitirci G et al (2007) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: lessons learned in 5 years at a single institution. J Urol 177(5):1867–1871CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Chiong E, Hwee ST, Kay LM et al (2005) Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 65(6):1070–1074CrossRefPubMed Chiong E, Hwee ST, Kay LM et al (2005) Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 65(6):1070–1074CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hein S, Miernik A, Wilhelm K et al (2016) Endoscopically determined stone clearance predicts disease recurrence within 5 years after retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Endourol 30(6):644–649CrossRefPubMed Hein S, Miernik A, Wilhelm K et al (2016) Endoscopically determined stone clearance predicts disease recurrence within 5 years after retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Endourol 30(6):644–649CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kang M, Son H, Jeong H et al (2016) Clearance rates of residual stone fragments and dusts after endoscopic lithotripsy procedures using a holmium laser: 2-year follow-up results. World J Urol 34(11):1591–1597CrossRefPubMed Kang M, Son H, Jeong H et al (2016) Clearance rates of residual stone fragments and dusts after endoscopic lithotripsy procedures using a holmium laser: 2-year follow-up results. World J Urol 34(11):1591–1597CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The role of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) in the treatment of symptomatic lower pole renal stones (LPSs) after the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS)
Authors
Junhong Fan
Tao Zhang
Wei Zhu
Alberto Gurioli
Irene Raphael Ketegwe
Guohua Zeng
Publication date
01-06-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-018-1068-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Urolithiasis 3/2019 Go to the issue