Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 4/2019

01-08-2019 | Original Paper

Long-term effects of anatrophic nephrolithotomy on selective renal function

Authors: Ahmed R. EL-Nahas, Amr A. Elsawy, Ahmed Abdelhalim, Mohamed M. Elsaadany, Yasser Osman

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 4/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

To evaluate the long-term changes of selective renal function after anatrophic nephrolithotomy (ANL). A retrospective study was conducted for patients who underwent ANL between January 1995 and December 2016. Inclusion criteria were availability of preoperative and follow-up (1 year or more) radio-isotopic renal scans. Stone-free status was evaluated after 1 month with KUB and ultrasonography or NCCT. Renal isotope scans using 99mTc MAG3 were performed to measure the changes in selective function of the affected kidney (GFR%). Eligible patients were classified into two groups, group 1 patients with stable or improved function and group 2 patients with deteriorated function (> 5% decrease in GFR%). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine risk factors for deterioration of renal function. The cutoff value for any significant variable was determined using ROC curve. The study included 50 patients with mean age 43.8 + 13.9 years. Complications developed in 26 patients (52%), and stone-free status was documented in 42 patients (84%). After a median follow-up of 2.7 years (range 1–11), mean GFR% of all cases significantly decreased from preoperative value of 52.7% + SD 20 to 45.4% + SD 25% during follow-up (P < 0.001). Deterioration of GFR% was documented in 21 kidneys (42%). Cold ischemia time with a cutoff value 50 min was the independent risk factor (RR 3.986, 95% CI 1.069–14.869, P 0.039). The results of this study support limiting ANL to a selected group of patients and taking all the possible efforts to minimize cold ischemia time below 50 min.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS (2005) Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 173:1991–2000CrossRefPubMed Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS (2005) Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 173:1991–2000CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Clayman RV, Surya V, Miller RP et al (1983) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; an approach to branched and staghorn renal calculi. JAMA 250:73–75CrossRefPubMed Clayman RV, Surya V, Miller RP et al (1983) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; an approach to branched and staghorn renal calculi. JAMA 250:73–75CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mishra S, Sabnis RB, Desai M (2012) Staghorn morphometry: a new tool for clinical classification and prediction model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy. J Endourol 26:6–14CrossRefPubMed Mishra S, Sabnis RB, Desai M (2012) Staghorn morphometry: a new tool for clinical classification and prediction model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy monotherapy. J Endourol 26:6–14CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S et al (2004) Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol 18:715–722CrossRefPubMed Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S et al (2004) Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol 18:715–722CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference El-Nahas AR, Eraky I, Shokeir AA, Shoma AM et al (2012) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating staghorn stones: 10 years of experience of a tertiary-care centre. Arab J Urol 10:324–329CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral El-Nahas AR, Eraky I, Shokeir AA, Shoma AM et al (2012) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating staghorn stones: 10 years of experience of a tertiary-care centre. Arab J Urol 10:324–329CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Fayad AS, Elsheikh MG, Mosharafa A et al (2014) Effect of multiple access tracts during percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal function: evaluation of risk factors for renal function deterioration. J Endourol 28:775–779CrossRefPubMed Fayad AS, Elsheikh MG, Mosharafa A et al (2014) Effect of multiple access tracts during percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal function: evaluation of risk factors for renal function deterioration. J Endourol 28:775–779CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Simforoosh N, Aminsharifi A, Tabibi A et al (2008) Laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy for managing large staghorn calculi. BJU Int 101:1293–1296CrossRefPubMed Simforoosh N, Aminsharifi A, Tabibi A et al (2008) Laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy for managing large staghorn calculi. BJU Int 101:1293–1296CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference King SA, Klaassen Z, Madi R (2014) Robot-assisted anatrophic nephrolithotomy: description of technique and early results. J Endourol 28:325–329CrossRefPubMed King SA, Klaassen Z, Madi R (2014) Robot-assisted anatrophic nephrolithotomy: description of technique and early results. J Endourol 28:325–329CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Belis JA, Morabito RA, Kandzari SJ, Lai JC, Gabriele OF (1981) Anatrophic nephrolithotomy: preservation of renal function demonstrated by differential quantitative radionuclide renal scans. J Urol 125:761–764CrossRefPubMed Belis JA, Morabito RA, Kandzari SJ, Lai JC, Gabriele OF (1981) Anatrophic nephrolithotomy: preservation of renal function demonstrated by differential quantitative radionuclide renal scans. J Urol 125:761–764CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Thomas R, Lewis RW, Roberts JA (1981) The renal quantitative scintillation camera study for determination of renal function after anatrophic nephrolithotomy. J Urol 125:287–288CrossRefPubMed Thomas R, Lewis RW, Roberts JA (1981) The renal quantitative scintillation camera study for determination of renal function after anatrophic nephrolithotomy. J Urol 125:287–288CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ramakrishnan PA, Al-Bulushi YH, Medhat M, Nair P, Mawali SG, Sampige VP (2006) Modified anatrophic nephrolithotomy: a useful treatment option for complete complex staghorn calculi. Can J Urol 13:3261–3270PubMed Ramakrishnan PA, Al-Bulushi YH, Medhat M, Nair P, Mawali SG, Sampige VP (2006) Modified anatrophic nephrolithotomy: a useful treatment option for complete complex staghorn calculi. Can J Urol 13:3261–3270PubMed
14.
go back to reference Morey AF, Nitahara KS, McAninch JW (1999) Modified anatrophic nephrolithotomy for management of staghorn calculi: is renal function preserved? J Urol 162:670–673CrossRefPubMed Morey AF, Nitahara KS, McAninch JW (1999) Modified anatrophic nephrolithotomy for management of staghorn calculi: is renal function preserved? J Urol 162:670–673CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Melissourgos ND, Davilas EN, Fragoulis A, Kiminas E, Farmakis A (2002) Modified anatrophic nephrolithotomy for complete staghorn calculus disease -- does it still have a place? Scand J Urol Nephrol 36:426–430CrossRefPubMed Melissourgos ND, Davilas EN, Fragoulis A, Kiminas E, Farmakis A (2002) Modified anatrophic nephrolithotomy for complete staghorn calculus disease -- does it still have a place? Scand J Urol Nephrol 36:426–430CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference O’Reilly PH, Brooman PJC, Mak S et al (2003) The long-term results of Anderson–Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int 87:287–289CrossRef O’Reilly PH, Brooman PJC, Mak S et al (2003) The long-term results of Anderson–Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int 87:287–289CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kijvikai K, Leenanupunth C, Sirisriro R, Lertsithichai P (2004) Comparative study of renal function between standard and modified anatrophic nephrolithotomy by radionuclide renal scans. J Med Assoc Thai 87:704–708PubMed Kijvikai K, Leenanupunth C, Sirisriro R, Lertsithichai P (2004) Comparative study of renal function between standard and modified anatrophic nephrolithotomy by radionuclide renal scans. J Med Assoc Thai 87:704–708PubMed
18.
go back to reference Aminsharifi A, Irani D, Masoumi M, Goshtasbi B, Aminsharifi A, Mohamadian R (2016) The management of large staghorn renal stones by percutaneous versus laparoscopic versus open nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis of clinical efficacy and functional outcome. Urolithiasis 44: 551–557CrossRefPubMed Aminsharifi A, Irani D, Masoumi M, Goshtasbi B, Aminsharifi A, Mohamadian R (2016) The management of large staghorn renal stones by percutaneous versus laparoscopic versus open nephrolithotomy: a comparative analysis of clinical efficacy and functional outcome. Urolithiasis 44: 551–557CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Keshavamurthy R, Karthikeyan VS, Mallya A, Sreenivas J, Nelivigi GG, Kamath AJ (2017) Anatrophic nephrolithotomy in the management of large Staghorn Calculi—a single centre experience. J Clin Diagn Res 11:PC01-PC04PubMedPubMedCentral Keshavamurthy R, Karthikeyan VS, Mallya A, Sreenivas J, Nelivigi GG, Kamath AJ (2017) Anatrophic nephrolithotomy in the management of large Staghorn Calculi—a single centre experience. J Clin Diagn Res 11:PC01-PC04PubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Desai M, De Lisa A, Turna B et al On Behalf Of The Croes PCNL Study Group (2011). The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones. J Endourol 25:1263–1268CrossRefPubMed Desai M, De Lisa A, Turna B et al On Behalf Of The Croes PCNL Study Group (2011). The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: staghorn versus nonstaghorn stones. J Endourol 25:1263–1268CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Abreu Lde A, Camilo-Silva DG, Fiedler G et al (2015) Review on renal recovery after anatrophic nephrolithotomy: are we really healing our patients? World J Nephrol 4:105–110CrossRefPubMed Abreu Lde A, Camilo-Silva DG, Fiedler G et al (2015) Review on renal recovery after anatrophic nephrolithotomy: are we really healing our patients? World J Nephrol 4:105–110CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference El-Nahas AR, Eraky I, Shokeir AA et al (2011) Long-term results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stones. BJU Int 108:750–754PubMed El-Nahas AR, Eraky I, Shokeir AA et al (2011) Long-term results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of staghorn stones. BJU Int 108:750–754PubMed
23.
go back to reference Simmons MN, Schreiber MJ, Gill IS (2008) Surgical renal ischemia: a contemporary overview. J Urol 180:19–30CrossRefPubMed Simmons MN, Schreiber MJ, Gill IS (2008) Surgical renal ischemia: a contemporary overview. J Urol 180:19–30CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference The Canadian Transplant Study Group (1985). Examination of parameters influencing the benefit: Detriment rates of cyclosporine in renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 5:328CrossRef The Canadian Transplant Study Group (1985). Examination of parameters influencing the benefit: Detriment rates of cyclosporine in renal transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 5:328CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Al-Kohlany KM, Shokeir AA, Mosbah A et al (2005) Treatment of complete staghorn stones: a prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 173:469–473CrossRefPubMed Al-Kohlany KM, Shokeir AA, Mosbah A et al (2005) Treatment of complete staghorn stones: a prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 173:469–473CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Long-term effects of anatrophic nephrolithotomy on selective renal function
Authors
Ahmed R. EL-Nahas
Amr A. Elsawy
Ahmed Abdelhalim
Mohamed M. Elsaadany
Yasser Osman
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 4/2019
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-018-1058-6

Other articles of this Issue 4/2019

Urolithiasis 4/2019 Go to the issue