Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 5/2018

01-10-2018 | Review

Preoperative double-J stent placement can improve the stone-free rate for patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Yubo Yang, Yin Tang, Yunjin Bai, Xiaoming Wang, Dechao Feng, Ping Han

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

To evaluate the efficiency and safety of preoperative double-J stent placement for patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Eligible studies were identified from electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews). All analyses were performed by the Review Manager 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Stone-free rate (SFR) was regarded as primary outcome. Second outcomes, including operation time, complication rates as well as major complication rates were also assessed. A total of 11,239 patients (2605 with and 8634 without preoperative stent) from nine retrospective studies were included. Our pooled analysis showed that SFR was significantly higher in patients with a preoperative stent than those without a stent (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.19–2.15, p = 0.002). Operation time was not significantly different between stented and non-stented groups (OR − 0.89, 95% CI − 5.79–4.01, p = 0.72). No significant differences of complication rates were observed between stented and non-stented groups (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.67–1.33, p = 0.73). Furthermore, major complication rates were not significantly different between two groups, either (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.43–2.70, p = 0.88). Generally, preoperative double-J stent placement significantly improved SFR of patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Operation time, complication rates, as well as major complication rates, were similar between stented and non-stented groups. However, the effect of preoperative double-J stent placement for different locations and burden of stones is unclear, more high-quality studies should be anticipated.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vashishtha S, Sureka SK, Agarwal S et al (2014) Urethral stricture and stone: their coexistence and management. Urol J 11:1204–1210PubMed Vashishtha S, Sureka SK, Agarwal S et al (2014) Urethral stricture and stone: their coexistence and management. Urol J 11:1204–1210PubMed
2.
go back to reference Jones BJ, Ryan PC, Lyons O et al (1990) Use of the double pigtail stent in stone retrieval following unsuccessful ureteroscopy. Br J Urol 66:254–256CrossRefPubMed Jones BJ, Ryan PC, Lyons O et al (1990) Use of the double pigtail stent in stone retrieval following unsuccessful ureteroscopy. Br J Urol 66:254–256CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Rubenstein RA, Zhao LC, Loeb S et al (2007) Prestenting improves ureteroscopic stone-free rates. J Endourol 21:1277–1280CrossRefPubMed Rubenstein RA, Zhao LC, Loeb S et al (2007) Prestenting improves ureteroscopic stone-free rates. J Endourol 21:1277–1280CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Lumma PP, Schneider P, Strauss A et al (2013) Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications. World J Urol 31:855–859CrossRefPubMed Lumma PP, Schneider P, Strauss A et al (2013) Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications. World J Urol 31:855–859CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Netsch C, Knipper S, Bach T et al (2012) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients. Urology 80:1214–1219CrossRefPubMed Netsch C, Knipper S, Bach T et al (2012) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on stone-free rates of ureteroscopy for nephroureterolithiasis: a matched-paired analysis of 286 patients. Urology 80:1214–1219CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Assimos D, Crisci A, Culkin D et al (2016) Preoperative JJ stent placement in ureteral and renal stone treatment: results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society (CROES) ureteroscopy (URS) Global Study. BJU Int 117:648–654CrossRefPubMed Assimos D, Crisci A, Culkin D et al (2016) Preoperative JJ stent placement in ureteral and renal stone treatment: results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society (CROES) ureteroscopy (URS) Global Study. BJU Int 117:648–654CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cheung MC, Yip SK, Lee FC et al (2000) Outpatient ureteroscopic lithotripsy: selective internal stenting and factors enhancing success. J Endourol 14:559–564CrossRefPubMed Cheung MC, Yip SK, Lee FC et al (2000) Outpatient ureteroscopic lithotripsy: selective internal stenting and factors enhancing success. J Endourol 14:559–564CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Chu L, Sternberg KM, Averch TD (2011) Preoperative stenting decreases operative time and reoperative rates of ureteroscopy. J Endourol 25:751–754CrossRefPubMed Chu L, Sternberg KM, Averch TD (2011) Preoperative stenting decreases operative time and reoperative rates of ureteroscopy. J Endourol 25:751–754CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H et al (2012) Preoperative stenting for ureteroscopic lithotripsy for a large renal stone. Int J Urol 19:881–885CrossRefPubMed Kawahara T, Ito H, Terao H et al (2012) Preoperative stenting for ureteroscopic lithotripsy for a large renal stone. Int J Urol 19:881–885CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Shields JM, Bird VG, Graves R (2009) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis. J Urol 182:2768–2774CrossRefPubMed Shields JM, Bird VG, Graves R (2009) Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis. J Urol 182:2768–2774CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Zhang J, Xu C, He D et al (2016) Flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone without preoperative ureteral stenting shows good prognosis. Peer J 4:e2728 (eCollection 2016) CrossRefPubMed Zhang J, Xu C, He D et al (2016) Flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone without preoperative ureteral stenting shows good prognosis. Peer J 4:e2728 (eCollection 2016) CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Hartling L, Milne A, Hamm MP et al (2013) Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers. J Clin Epidemiol 66:982–993CrossRefPubMed Hartling L, Milne A, Hamm MP et al (2013) Testing the Newcastle Ottawa Scale showed low reliability between individual reviewers. J Clin Epidemiol 66:982–993CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Aboumarzouk OM, Kata SG, Keeley FX et al (2012) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteral calculi. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:CD006029 Aboumarzouk OM, Kata SG, Keeley FX et al (2012) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteral calculi. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5:CD006029
14.
go back to reference Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F et al (2012) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 109:1384–1389CrossRefPubMed Akman T, Binbay M, Ozgor F et al (2012) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int 109:1384–1389CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Chu L, Farris CA, Corcoran AT et al (2011) Preoperative stent placement decreases cost of ureteroscopy. Urology 78:309–313CrossRefPubMed Chu L, Farris CA, Corcoran AT et al (2011) Preoperative stent placement decreases cost of ureteroscopy. Urology 78:309–313CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Preoperative double-J stent placement can improve the stone-free rate for patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Yubo Yang
Yin Tang
Yunjin Bai
Xiaoming Wang
Dechao Feng
Ping Han
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-1012-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Urolithiasis 5/2018 Go to the issue