Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 4/2010

01-08-2010 | SYMPOSIUM PAPER

Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi

Authors: Joshua D. Wiesenthal, Daniela Ghiculete, R. John D’A Honey, Kenneth T. Pace

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is considered the first line treatment for the majority of patients with renal and ureteric calculi, with success rates from contemporary series varying from 60 to 90%. Success is dependent on many patient and stone-related factors. We conducted a retrospective analysis of mean stone CT density (MSD) and skin-to-stone distance (SSD) to determine their influence on the success of SWL of renal and ureteric calculi. Data from all patients treated at the St. Michael’s Hospital Lithotripsy Unit from May 2004 to June 2009 were reviewed. Analysis was restricted to those patients with a pre-treatment non-contrast CT scan conducted at our center demonstrating a solitary renal or ureteric calculus ≤20 mm in maximal diameter. Successful treatment of renal stones was defined as those patients who were stone free or had asymptomatic, clinically insignificant residual fragments ≤4 mm in diameter, as measured by KUB X-ray, 3 months after a single SWL treatment. Successful treatment of ureteric stones was defined as being stone free on KUB X-ray, 2-weeks post-SWL. Demographic, stone, patient, treatment and follow-up data were collected from a prospective database and review of CT and KUB imaging by two independent urologists and one radiologist. Data were analyzed with logistic regression, Chi square analysis and ANOVA where appropriate. 422 patients (69.7% male) with a mean age of 51.4 years (SD 12.9) and mean BMI 27.0 kg/m2 (SD 4.9) were analyzed. Mean stone size was 78.9 mm2 (SD 77.3) for ureteral stones and 66.1 mm2 (SD 63.2) for renal stones, with 95 (43.6%) of the renal stones located in the lower pole. The single-treatment success rates for ureteral and renal stones were 62.3% and 68.8%, respectively. On univariate analysis, predictors of SWL success, regardless of stone location, were age (p = 0.01), BMI (p = 0.01), stone size (p < 0.01), MSD (p < 0.01) and SSD (p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, MSD >900 HU (OR = 0.49, CI: 0.32–0.75) and SSD >110 mm (OR = 0.49, CI: 0.31–0.78) were both significant predictors of outcome. We have identified in a large series of renal and ureteric calculi that both MSD and SSD can reliably predict SWL outcomes. This data can be used in combination with other patient and stone-related factors to facilitate optimal treatment-based decisions and provide patients with more accurate single-treatment success rates for SWL.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dalla PL, Pozzi-Mucelli R, Stacul F (2001) Present-day imaging of patients with renal colic. Eur Radiol 11:4CrossRef Dalla PL, Pozzi-Mucelli R, Stacul F (2001) Present-day imaging of patients with renal colic. Eur Radiol 11:4CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Anderson KR, Bove P, Covey AM, Rosenfield AT et al (1998) The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol 159:735CrossRefPubMed Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Anderson KR, Bove P, Covey AM, Rosenfield AT et al (1998) The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol 159:735CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Williams JC Jr, Kim SC, Zarse CA, McAteer JA, Lingeman JE (2004) Progress in the use of helical CT for imaging urinary calculi. J Endourol 18:937CrossRefPubMed Williams JC Jr, Kim SC, Zarse CA, McAteer JA, Lingeman JE (2004) Progress in the use of helical CT for imaging urinary calculi. J Endourol 18:937CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck AC, Gallucci M et al (2007) Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol 52:1610CrossRefPubMed Preminger GM, Tiselius HG, Assimos DG, Alken P, Buck AC, Gallucci M et al (2007) Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol 52:1610CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Johnson DB, Lowry PS, Schluckebier JA, Kryger JV, Nakada SY (2003) University of Wisconsin experience using the Doli S lithotriptor. Urology 62:410CrossRefPubMed Johnson DB, Lowry PS, Schluckebier JA, Kryger JV, Nakada SY (2003) University of Wisconsin experience using the Doli S lithotriptor. Urology 62:410CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Park H, Park M, Park T (1998) Two-year experience with ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy v ureteroscopic manipulation. J Endourol 12:501CrossRefPubMed Park H, Park M, Park T (1998) Two-year experience with ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy v ureteroscopic manipulation. J Endourol 12:501CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Coz F, Orvieto M, Bustos M, Lyng R, Stein C, Hinrichs A et al (2000) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of 2000 urinary calculi with the modulith SL-20: success and failure according to size and location of stones. J Endourol 14:239CrossRefPubMed Coz F, Orvieto M, Bustos M, Lyng R, Stein C, Hinrichs A et al (2000) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of 2000 urinary calculi with the modulith SL-20: success and failure according to size and location of stones. J Endourol 14:239CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, Denstedt JD, Grasso M, Gutierrez-Aceves J et al (2001) Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol 166:2072CrossRefPubMed Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, Denstedt JD, Grasso M, Gutierrez-Aceves J et al (2001) Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol 166:2072CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Pace KT, Ghiculete D, Harju M, Honey RJ (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Urol 174:595CrossRefPubMed Pace KT, Ghiculete D, Harju M, Honey RJ (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Urol 174:595CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Abe T, Akakura K, Kawaguchi M, Ueda T, Ichikawa T, Ito H et al (2005) Outcomes of shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary-tract stones: a large-scale study at a single institution. J Endourol 19:768CrossRefPubMed Abe T, Akakura K, Kawaguchi M, Ueda T, Ichikawa T, Ito H et al (2005) Outcomes of shockwave lithotripsy for upper urinary-tract stones: a large-scale study at a single institution. J Endourol 19:768CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference White W, Klein F (2006) Five-year clinical experience with the Dornier Delta lithotriptor. Urology 68:28CrossRefPubMed White W, Klein F (2006) Five-year clinical experience with the Dornier Delta lithotriptor. Urology 68:28CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kanao K, Nakashima J, Nakagawa K, Asakura H, Miyajima A, Oya M et al (2006) Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 176:1453CrossRefPubMed Kanao K, Nakashima J, Nakagawa K, Asakura H, Miyajima A, Oya M et al (2006) Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 176:1453CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Nakada SY, Hoff DG, Attai S, Heisey D, Blankenbaker D, Pozniak M (2000) Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting. Urology 55:816CrossRefPubMed Nakada SY, Hoff DG, Attai S, Heisey D, Blankenbaker D, Pozniak M (2000) Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting. Urology 55:816CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wang LJ, Wong YC, Chuang CK, Chu SH, Chen CS, See LC et al (2005) Predictions of outcomes of renal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from stone characteristics determined by unenhanced helical computed tomography: a multivariate analysis. Eur Radiol 15:2238CrossRefPubMed Wang LJ, Wong YC, Chuang CK, Chu SH, Chen CS, See LC et al (2005) Predictions of outcomes of renal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from stone characteristics determined by unenhanced helical computed tomography: a multivariate analysis. Eur Radiol 15:2238CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Magnuson WJ, Tomera KM, Lance RS (2005) Hounsfield unit density accurately predicts ESWL success. Alaska Med 47:6PubMed Magnuson WJ, Tomera KM, Lance RS (2005) Hounsfield unit density accurately predicts ESWL success. Alaska Med 47:6PubMed
16.
go back to reference Pareek G, Hedican SP, Lee FT Jr, Nakada SY (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography. Urology 66:941CrossRefPubMed Pareek G, Hedican SP, Lee FT Jr, Nakada SY (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography. Urology 66:941CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Rush E, Plank L, Chandu V, Laulu M, Simmons D, Swinburn B et al (2004) Body size, body composition, and fat distribution: a comparison of young New Zealand men of European, Pacific Island, and Asian Indian ethnicities. N Z Med J 117:U1203PubMed Rush E, Plank L, Chandu V, Laulu M, Simmons D, Swinburn B et al (2004) Body size, body composition, and fat distribution: a comparison of young New Zealand men of European, Pacific Island, and Asian Indian ethnicities. N Z Med J 117:U1203PubMed
18.
go back to reference El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, Mansour O, Sheir KZ (2007) A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol 51:1688CrossRefPubMed El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, Mansour O, Sheir KZ (2007) A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol 51:1688CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Ng CF, Siu DY, Wong A, Goggins W, Chan ES, Wong KT (2009) Development of a scoring system from noncontrast computerized tomography measurements to improve the selection of upper ureteral stone for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 181:1151CrossRefPubMed Ng CF, Siu DY, Wong A, Goggins W, Chan ES, Wong KT (2009) Development of a scoring system from noncontrast computerized tomography measurements to improve the selection of upper ureteral stone for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 181:1151CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Perks AE, Schuler TD, Lee J, Ghiculete D, Chung DG, D’A Honey RJ et al (2008) Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 72:765CrossRefPubMed Perks AE, Schuler TD, Lee J, Ghiculete D, Chung DG, D’A Honey RJ et al (2008) Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 72:765CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Saw KC, McAteer JA, Fineberg NS, Monga AG, Chua GT, Lingeman JE et al (2000) Calcium stone fragility is predicted by helical CT attenuation values. J Endourol 14:471CrossRefPubMed Saw KC, McAteer JA, Fineberg NS, Monga AG, Chua GT, Lingeman JE et al (2000) Calcium stone fragility is predicted by helical CT attenuation values. J Endourol 14:471CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Joseph P, Mandal AK, Singh SK, Mandal P, Sankhwar SN, Sharma SK (2002) Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A preliminary study. J Urol 167:1968CrossRefPubMed Joseph P, Mandal AK, Singh SK, Mandal P, Sankhwar SN, Sharma SK (2002) Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A preliminary study. J Urol 167:1968CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Gupta NP, Ansari MS, Kesarvani P, Kapoor A, Mukhopadhyay S (2005) Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi. BJU Int 95:1285CrossRefPubMed Gupta NP, Ansari MS, Kesarvani P, Kapoor A, Mukhopadhyay S (2005) Role of computed tomography with no contrast medium enhancement in predicting the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for urinary calculi. BJU Int 95:1285CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Yoshida S, Hayashi T, Ikeda J, Yoshinaga A, Ohno R, Ishii N et al (2006) Role of volume and attenuation value histogram of urinary stone on noncontrast helical computed tomography as predictor of fragility by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 68:33CrossRefPubMed Yoshida S, Hayashi T, Ikeda J, Yoshinaga A, Ohno R, Ishii N et al (2006) Role of volume and attenuation value histogram of urinary stone on noncontrast helical computed tomography as predictor of fragility by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 68:33CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Perks AE, Gotto G, Teichman JM (2007) Shock wave lithotripsy correlates with stone density on preoperative computerized tomography. J Urol 178:912CrossRefPubMed Perks AE, Gotto G, Teichman JM (2007) Shock wave lithotripsy correlates with stone density on preoperative computerized tomography. J Urol 178:912CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Weld KJ, Montiglio C, Morris MS, Bush AC, Cespedes RD (2007) Shock wave lithotripsy success for renal stones based on patient and stone computed tomography characteristics. Urology 70:1043CrossRefPubMed Weld KJ, Montiglio C, Morris MS, Bush AC, Cespedes RD (2007) Shock wave lithotripsy success for renal stones based on patient and stone computed tomography characteristics. Urology 70:1043CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Kacker R, Zhao L, Macejko A, Thaxton CS, Stern J, Liu JJ et al (2008) Radiographic parameters on noncontrast computerized tomography predictive of shock wave lithotripsy success. J Urol 179:1866CrossRefPubMed Kacker R, Zhao L, Macejko A, Thaxton CS, Stern J, Liu JJ et al (2008) Radiographic parameters on noncontrast computerized tomography predictive of shock wave lithotripsy success. J Urol 179:1866CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Jacobs BL, Smaldone MC, Smaldone AM, Ricchiuti DJ, Averch TD (2008) Effect of skin-to-stone distance on shockwave lithotripsy success. J Endourol 22:1623CrossRefPubMed Jacobs BL, Smaldone MC, Smaldone AM, Ricchiuti DJ, Averch TD (2008) Effect of skin-to-stone distance on shockwave lithotripsy success. J Endourol 22:1623CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Bandi G, Meiners RJ, Pickhardt PJ, Nakada SY (2009) Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. BJU Int 103:524CrossRefPubMed Bandi G, Meiners RJ, Pickhardt PJ, Nakada SY (2009) Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. BJU Int 103:524CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Patel T, Kozakowski K, Hruby G, Gupta M (2009) Skin to stone distance is an independent predictor of stone-free status following shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 23:1383CrossRefPubMed Patel T, Kozakowski K, Hruby G, Gupta M (2009) Skin to stone distance is an independent predictor of stone-free status following shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 23:1383CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Williams JC Jr, Zarse CA, Jackson ME, Lingeman JE, McAteer JA (2007) Using helical CT to predict stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). In: Renal Stone Disease, 1st Annual International Urolithiasis Research Symposium. AIP Conf Proc 900:326 Williams JC Jr, Zarse CA, Jackson ME, Lingeman JE, McAteer JA (2007) Using helical CT to predict stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). In: Renal Stone Disease, 1st Annual International Urolithiasis Research Symposium. AIP Conf Proc 900:326
Metadata
Title
Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi
Authors
Joshua D. Wiesenthal
Daniela Ghiculete
R. John D’A Honey
Kenneth T. Pace
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0295-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Urolithiasis 4/2010 Go to the issue