Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 6/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Original Paper

New software and breast boundary landmarks to calculate breast volumes from 3D surface images

Authors: T. S. Wesselius, R. D. Vreeken, A. C. Verhulst, T. Xi, T. J. J. Maal, D. J. O. Ulrich

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 6/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A method to accurately calculate breast volumes helps achieving a better breast surgery outcome. 3D surface imaging potentially allows these calculations in a harmless, quick, and practicable way. The calculated volume from a 3D surface image is dependent on the determined breast boundary and the method of chest wall simulation by software. Currently, there is no consensus on a robust set of breast boundary landmarks and validation studies on breast volume calculation software are scarce. The purposes of this study were to determine the robustness of newly introduced breast boundary landmarks and introduce and validate a new method to simulate a chest wall.

Methods

Sixteen subjects who underwent a unilateral simple mastectomy were included. In addition to the natural skin fold of the breast, the sternomanubrial joint, the transition of the pectoral muscle curve into the breast curvature, and the midaxillary line were used as landmarks to indicate the breast boundary. The intra- and interrater variability of these landmarks was tested. Furthermore, new chest wall simulation software was validated on the breastless chest side of the subjects.

Results

The intra- and interrater variability of the three breast boundary markers was small (mean 3.5–6.7 mm), and no significant difference was found between the intra- and interrater variability (p = 0.08, p = 0.06, and p = 0.10). The mean volume error of the most accurately simulated chest wall was 4.6 ± 37 ml.

Conclusion

The newly introduced landmarks showed to be robust and our new chest wall simulation algorithm showed accurate results.
Level of Evidence: Level IV, diagnostic study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hudson D (2004) Factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 52(1):15–21CrossRef Hudson D (2004) Factors determining shape and symmetry in immediate breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 52(1):15–21CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tezel E, Numanoğlu A (2000) Practical do-it-yourself device for accurate volume measurement of breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(3):1019–1023CrossRef Tezel E, Numanoğlu A (2000) Practical do-it-yourself device for accurate volume measurement of breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(3):1019–1023CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wilkie T, Ship AG (1976) Volumetric breast measurement during surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1(1):301–305CrossRef Wilkie T, Ship AG (1976) Volumetric breast measurement during surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1(1):301–305CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tegtmeier R (1978) Volumetric breast measurement during surgery. Ann Plast Surg 1(6):625–626CrossRef Tegtmeier R (1978) Volumetric breast measurement during surgery. Ann Plast Surg 1(6):625–626CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Campaigne BNN, Katch VLL, Freedson P, Sady S, Katch FI (1979) Measurement of breast volume in females: description of a reliable method. Ann Hum Biol 6(4):363–367CrossRef Campaigne BNN, Katch VLL, Freedson P, Sady S, Katch FI (1979) Measurement of breast volume in females: description of a reliable method. Ann Hum Biol 6(4):363–367CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M, Jurell G (1996) Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 30(2):129–132CrossRef Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M, Jurell G (1996) Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 30(2):129–132CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Grossman AJ, Roudner LA (1980) A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. Plast Reconstr Surg 66(6):851–852CrossRef Grossman AJ, Roudner LA (1980) A simple means for accurate breast volume determination. Plast Reconstr Surg 66(6):851–852CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kalbhen CL, McGill JJ, Fendley PM, Corrigan KW, Angelats J (1999) Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods. Am J Roentgenol 173(6):1643–1649CrossRef Kalbhen CL, McGill JJ, Fendley PM, Corrigan KW, Angelats J (1999) Mammographic determination of breast volume: comparing different methods. Am J Roentgenol 173(6):1643–1649CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Caruso MK, Guillot TS, Nguyen T, Greenway FL (2006) The cost effectiveness of three different measures of breast volume. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30(1):16–20CrossRef Caruso MK, Guillot TS, Nguyen T, Greenway FL (2006) The cost effectiveness of three different measures of breast volume. Aesthetic Plast Surg 30(1):16–20CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Yip JM, Mouratova N, Jeffery RM, Veitch DE, Woodman RJ, Dean NR (2012) Accurate assessment of breast volume. Ann Plast Surg 68(2):135–141CrossRef Yip JM, Mouratova N, Jeffery RM, Veitch DE, Woodman RJ, Dean NR (2012) Accurate assessment of breast volume. Ann Plast Surg 68(2):135–141CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mailey B, Freel A, Wong R, Pointer DT, Khoobehi K (2013) Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of portrait 3D surgical simulation platform in breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 33(1):84–92CrossRef Mailey B, Freel A, Wong R, Pointer DT, Khoobehi K (2013) Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of portrait 3D surgical simulation platform in breast augmentation. Aesthet Surg J 33(1):84–92CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA, Carlson GW (2005) Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54(5):471–476CrossRef Losken A, Seify H, Denson DD, Paredes AA, Carlson GW (2005) Validating three-dimensional imaging of the breast. Ann Plast Surg 54(5):471–476CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hoeffelin H, Jacquemin D, Defaweux V, Nizet JL (2014) A methodological evaluation of volumetric measurement techniques including three-dimensional imaging in breast surgery. Biomed Res Int 2014(57324):1–10CrossRef Hoeffelin H, Jacquemin D, Defaweux V, Nizet JL (2014) A methodological evaluation of volumetric measurement techniques including three-dimensional imaging in breast surgery. Biomed Res Int 2014(57324):1–10CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M, Schneider A, Udosic K, Schwenzer-Zimmerer K, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E (2006) New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg 57(6):602–610CrossRef Kovacs L, Eder M, Hollweck R, Zimmermann A, Settles M, Schneider A, Udosic K, Schwenzer-Zimmerer K, Papadopulos NA, Biemer E (2006) New aspects of breast volume measurement using 3-dimensional surface imaging. Ann Plast Surg 57(6):602–610CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Eder M, Waldenfels FV, Swobodnik A, Klöppel M, Pape A-K, Schuster T et al (2012) Objective breast symmetry evaluation using 3-D surface imaging. Breast 21(2):152–158CrossRef Eder M, Waldenfels FV, Swobodnik A, Klöppel M, Pape A-K, Schuster T et al (2012) Objective breast symmetry evaluation using 3-D surface imaging. Breast 21(2):152–158CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Eder M, Grabhorn A, Waldenfels FV, Schuster T, Papadopulos NA, Machens H-G et al (2013) Prediction of breast resection weight in reduction Mammaplasty based on 3-dimensional surface imaging. Surg Innov 20(4):356–364CrossRef Eder M, Grabhorn A, Waldenfels FV, Schuster T, Papadopulos NA, Machens H-G et al (2013) Prediction of breast resection weight in reduction Mammaplasty based on 3-dimensional surface imaging. Surg Innov 20(4):356–364CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Liu C, Luan J, Ji K, Sun J (2012) Measuring volumetric change after augmentation mammaplasty using a three-dimensional scanning technique: an innovative method. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(5):1134–1139CrossRef Liu C, Luan J, Ji K, Sun J (2012) Measuring volumetric change after augmentation mammaplasty using a three-dimensional scanning technique: an innovative method. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(5):1134–1139CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Henseler H, Smith J, Bowman A, Khambay BS, Ju X, Ayoub A et al (2012) Investigation into variation and errors of a three-dimensional breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(12):332–337CrossRef Henseler H, Smith J, Bowman A, Khambay BS, Ju X, Ayoub A et al (2012) Investigation into variation and errors of a three-dimensional breast imaging system using multiple stereo cameras. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(12):332–337CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Mioton LM, Jordan SW, Kim JYS (2015) A prospective analysis of dynamic loss of breast projection in tissue expander-implant reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 42(3):309–315CrossRef Mioton LM, Jordan SW, Kim JYS (2015) A prospective analysis of dynamic loss of breast projection in tissue expander-implant reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 42(3):309–315CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Reece GP, Merchant F, Andon J, Khatam H, Ravi-Chandar K, Weston J, Fingeret MC, Lane C, Duncan K, Markey MK (2015) 3D surface imaging of the human female torso in upright to supine positions. Med Eng Phys 37(4):375–383CrossRef Reece GP, Merchant F, Andon J, Khatam H, Ravi-Chandar K, Weston J, Fingeret MC, Lane C, Duncan K, Markey MK (2015) 3D surface imaging of the human female torso in upright to supine positions. Med Eng Phys 37(4):375–383CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Georgii J, Eder M, Burger K, Klotz S, Ferstl F, Kovacs L, Westermann R (2014) A computational tool for preoperative breast augmentation planning in aesthetic plastic surgery. IEEE J Biomed Health Informat 18(3):907–919CrossRef Georgii J, Eder M, Burger K, Klotz S, Ferstl F, Kovacs L, Westermann R (2014) A computational tool for preoperative breast augmentation planning in aesthetic plastic surgery. IEEE J Biomed Health Informat 18(3):907–919CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Tomita K, Yano K, Hata Y, Nishibayashi A, Hosokawa K (2015) DIEP flap breast reconstruction using 3-dimensional surface imaging and a printed mold. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3(3):316CrossRef Tomita K, Yano K, Hata Y, Nishibayashi A, Hosokawa K (2015) DIEP flap breast reconstruction using 3-dimensional surface imaging and a printed mold. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3(3):316CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Eriksen C, Lindgren EN, Olivecrona H, Frisell J, Stark B (2011) Evaluation of volume and shape of breasts: comparison between traditional and three-dimensional techniques. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 45(1):14–22CrossRef Eriksen C, Lindgren EN, Olivecrona H, Frisell J, Stark B (2011) Evaluation of volume and shape of breasts: comparison between traditional and three-dimensional techniques. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 45(1):14–22CrossRef
Metadata
Title
New software and breast boundary landmarks to calculate breast volumes from 3D surface images
Authors
T. S. Wesselius
R. D. Vreeken
A. C. Verhulst
T. Xi
T. J. J. Maal
D. J. O. Ulrich
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 6/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-018-1431-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2018

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 6/2018 Go to the issue