Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 5/2018

01-10-2018 | Case Report

A case of important weight loss after a prepectoral breast reconstruction

Authors: Marzia Salgarello, Liliana Barone Adesi, Maria Lucia Mangialardi

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

The submuscular implant-based breast reconstruction is the most common reconstructive technique following mastectomy. Recently, subcutaneous implant positioning, together with acellular dermal matrix, has become a promising technique in selected patients. We present the case of a 42-year-old woman who underwent left nipple-sparing mastectomy with prepectoral acellular dermal matrix (ADM) assisted direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction and contralateral mastopexy. The implant was completely wrapped around by Braxon®, a preshaped porcine ADM. A few months after surgery, she experienced a severe weight loss resulting in the aesthetic deterioration of both breasts. The patient showed a migration of the left implant inferiorly and laterally, and deflation of the contralateral breast. In order to improve the left breast, a lateral capsulectomy was performed to reduce the prepectoral pocket size and lift the implant. Subsequently, a modified donut mastopexy was performed to obtain an upward migration of the nipple-areolar complex. One of the limiting factors of prosthetic reconstruction, as compared to autologous reconstruction, is the aesthetic deterioration determined by any weight change. Differently from submuscular implant reconstruction, the prepectoral implant reconstruction follows body changes after weight changes and ageing. In fact, Braxon’s integration determines the formation of a capsule adhering to the mastectomy flap which makes the implant more sensible to dermatochalasis. The greater thickness of the mastectomy flap due to the larger representation of the subcutaneous tissue makes the reconstruction more sensitive to weight changes. A tailored partial capsulectomy combined with a donut mastopexy can be a solution in these patients after an important weight loss.
Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic study.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Sigalove S, Maxwell GP, Sigalove N, Storm-Dickerson TL, Pope N, Rice J, Gabriel A (2017) Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: rationale, indications, and preliminary results. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(2):287–294CrossRef Sigalove S, Maxwell GP, Sigalove N, Storm-Dickerson TL, Pope N, Rice J, Gabriel A (2017) Prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction: rationale, indications, and preliminary results. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(2):287–294CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Snyderman RK, Guthrie RH (1971) Reconstruction of the female breast following radical mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 47:565–567CrossRef Snyderman RK, Guthrie RH (1971) Reconstruction of the female breast following radical mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 47:565–567CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Gruber RP, Kahn RA, Lash H, Maser MR, Apfelberg DB, Laub DR (1981) Breast reconstruction following mastectomy: a comparison of submuscular and subcutaneous techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 67:312–317CrossRef Gruber RP, Kahn RA, Lash H, Maser MR, Apfelberg DB, Laub DR (1981) Breast reconstruction following mastectomy: a comparison of submuscular and subcutaneous techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 67:312–317CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Spear SL, Schwartz J, Dayan JH, Clemens MW (2009) Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33:44–48CrossRef Spear SL, Schwartz J, Dayan JH, Clemens MW (2009) Outcome assessment of breast distortion following submuscular breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33:44–48CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Haynes DF, Kreithen JC (2014) Vicryl mesh in expander/implant breast reconstruction: long-term follow-up in 38 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:892–899CrossRef Haynes DF, Kreithen JC (2014) Vicryl mesh in expander/implant breast reconstruction: long-term follow-up in 38 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:892–899CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Martin JB, Moore R, Paydar KZ, Wirth GA (2014) Use of fenestrations in acellular dermal allograft in two-stage tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:901–904CrossRef Martin JB, Moore R, Paydar KZ, Wirth GA (2014) Use of fenestrations in acellular dermal allograft in two-stage tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:901–904CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dieterich M, Angres J, Stubert J, Stachs A, Reimer T, Gerber B (2015) Patient-reported outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction alone or in combination with a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh - a detailed analysis of the BREAST-Q and overview of the literature. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 75:692–701CrossRef Dieterich M, Angres J, Stubert J, Stachs A, Reimer T, Gerber B (2015) Patient-reported outcomes in implant-based breast reconstruction alone or in combination with a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh - a detailed analysis of the BREAST-Q and overview of the literature. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 75:692–701CrossRef
9.
go back to reference McCarthy CM, Lee CN, Halvorson EG, Riedel E, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ et al (2012) The use of acellular dermal matrices in two-stage expander/implant reconstruction: a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):57S–66SCrossRef McCarthy CM, Lee CN, Halvorson EG, Riedel E, Pusic AL, Mehrara BJ et al (2012) The use of acellular dermal matrices in two-stage expander/implant reconstruction: a multicenter, blinded, randomized controlled trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(5 Suppl 2):57S–66SCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bernini M, Calabrese C, Cecconi L, Santi C, Gjondedaj U, Roselli J, Nori J, Fausto A, Orzalesi L, Casella D (2015) Subcutaneous direct-to- implant breast reconstruction: surgical, functional, and aesthetic results after long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e574CrossRef Bernini M, Calabrese C, Cecconi L, Santi C, Gjondedaj U, Roselli J, Nori J, Fausto A, Orzalesi L, Casella D (2015) Subcutaneous direct-to- implant breast reconstruction: surgical, functional, and aesthetic results after long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e574CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Salibian AA, Frey JD, Choi M, Karp NS (2016) Subcutaneous implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix/mesh: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(11):e1139CrossRef Salibian AA, Frey JD, Choi M, Karp NS (2016) Subcutaneous implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix/mesh: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 4(11):e1139CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zhu L, Mohan A, Abdelsattar JM, Wang Z, Vijayasekaran A, Michelle Hwang NV, Tran MD et al (2016) Comparison of subcutaneous versus submuscular expander placement in the first stage of immediate breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(4):e77–e86CrossRef Zhu L, Mohan A, Abdelsattar JM, Wang Z, Vijayasekaran A, Michelle Hwang NV, Tran MD et al (2016) Comparison of subcutaneous versus submuscular expander placement in the first stage of immediate breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(4):e77–e86CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Casella D, Calabrese C, Bianchi S, eattini I, Bernini M (2015) Subcutaneous tissue expander placement with synthetic titanium-coated mesh in breast reconstruction: long-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e577CrossRef Casella D, Calabrese C, Bianchi S, eattini I, Bernini M (2015) Subcutaneous tissue expander placement with synthetic titanium-coated mesh in breast reconstruction: long-term results. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e577CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Berna G, Cawthorn SJ, Papaccio G, Balestrieri N (2014) Evaluation of a novel breast reconstruction technique using the Braxon® acellular dermal matrix: a new muscle-sparing breast reconstruction. ANZ J Surg 87:493–498CrossRef Berna G, Cawthorn SJ, Papaccio G, Balestrieri N (2014) Evaluation of a novel breast reconstruction technique using the Braxon® acellular dermal matrix: a new muscle-sparing breast reconstruction. ANZ J Surg 87:493–498CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Woods JE (1983) Subcutaneous mastectomy: current state of the art. Ann Plast Surg 11:541–550CrossRef Woods JE (1983) Subcutaneous mastectomy: current state of the art. Ann Plast Surg 11:541–550CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Goodnight JE Jr, Quagliana JM, Morton DL (1984) Failure of subcutaneous mastectomy to prevent the development of breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 26:198–201CrossRef Goodnight JE Jr, Quagliana JM, Morton DL (1984) Failure of subcutaneous mastectomy to prevent the development of breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 26:198–201CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Reitsamer R, Peintinger F (2015) Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68:162–167CrossRef Reitsamer R, Peintinger F (2015) Prepectoral implant placement and complete coverage with porcine acellular dermal matrix: a new technique for direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 68:162–167CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wallace MS, Wallace AM, Lee J (1996) Pain after breast surgery: a survey of 282 women. Pain 66:195–205CrossRef Wallace MS, Wallace AM, Lee J (1996) Pain after breast surgery: a survey of 282 women. Pain 66:195–205CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tomita K, Yano K, Nishibayashi A, Hosokawa K (2015) Effects of subcutaneous versus submuscular tissue expander placement on breast capsule formation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3(6):e432CrossRef Tomita K, Yano K, Nishibayashi A, Hosokawa K (2015) Effects of subcutaneous versus submuscular tissue expander placement on breast capsule formation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3(6):e432CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Becker H, Lind JG 2nd, Hopkins EG (2015) Immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction using a vertical incision. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e412CrossRef Becker H, Lind JG 2nd, Hopkins EG (2015) Immediate implant-based prepectoral breast reconstruction using a vertical incision. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 3:e412CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Arquero PS, Zanata FC, Ferreira LM, Nahas FX (2015) Capsular weakness around breast implant: a non-recognized complication. World J Plast Surg 4:168–74.PubMedPubMedCentral Arquero PS, Zanata FC, Ferreira LM, Nahas FX (2015) Capsular weakness around breast implant: a non-recognized complication. World J Plast Surg 4:168–74.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
A case of important weight loss after a prepectoral breast reconstruction
Authors
Marzia Salgarello
Liliana Barone Adesi
Maria Lucia Mangialardi
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-018-1413-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 5/2018 Go to the issue