Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 5/2005

01-12-2005 | Original Paper

Immediate or delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy: what do women really want

Authors: K. Belouli, P. Wyss, S. Vetter, V. E. Meyer, G. M. Beer

Published in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Issue 5/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Breast reconstruction, especially immediate reconstruction after mastectomy has increased over the last decades, at present being regularly offered in many centres worldwide. Despite obvious benefits and the evident oncological safety of primary breast reconstruction, the majority of women still receive a delayed procedure or even no reconstructive surgery. The objective of the present study was to determine the preference of women for breast reconstruction—immediate or delayed—and in the case of rejection of treatment to find out the reasons for this reluctance. In a prospective study a sample of 200 women—divided into two groups—were evaluated by an oral interview on the subject. The two-formed groups of participants consisted of randomly chosen women (n=100) and non-surgical nurses (n=100). The questionnaire surveyed personal data including marital status and educational level, as well as information about the preferred timing, the method of and the reasons for or against breast reconstruction. The evaluation of all data showed that 66% of the participants voted for additional surgery after mastectomy. Young age and high education level were significantly correlated (age r=0.56, P<0.01; education r=0.25, P<0.01) to the wish for reconstruction. The mean age of all participants was 39 years (range 20–69), with a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.01), the group of nurses being younger (mean age 35, range 20–62) and the other women being older (mean age 43, range 20–69). Concerning the timing of reconstruction, 21% of women elected to have an immediate and 27% a delayed operation. Yet, 52% could not come to a decision as to whether they should prefer a primary or secondary procedure. For the surgical procedure—autologous versus non-autologous tissue—about 23% of the participants could not decide spontaneously, while 40% preferred autologous tissue, 14% implants and 23% would choose a combination of both. The main reason in favour of reconstruction was that it would enhance the physical appearance (96%), whereas an important reason for general rejection was the fear of additional surgical risk (19%). For primary reconstruction, a high percentage of women also were highly concerned that reconstruction could mask cancer recurrence (62%). Although the majority of women—unaffected with breast cancer—are interested in breast reconstruction, more than half of them cannot decide spontaneously about the timing and mode of surgery, including the medical women. The collected data emphasize the urgent necessity to systematically inform women and the whole population about the options of breast reconstruction. Equally important is for the involved surgeons to know the individual wishes and fears of women unexpectedly confronted with the diagnosis of breast cancer in order to provide comprehensive preoperative counselling with respect to cancer therapy including breast reconstruction.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alderman AK, Wilkins AG, Lowery JC, Kim M, Davis JA (2000) Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(4):769–776CrossRefPubMed Alderman AK, Wilkins AG, Lowery JC, Kim M, Davis JA (2000) Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(4):769–776CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Baker C, Johnson N, Nelson J, Homer L, Walts D, Waldorf K, Boardman K (2002) Perspective on reconstruction after mastectomy. Am J Surg 183:562–565CrossRefPubMed Baker C, Johnson N, Nelson J, Homer L, Walts D, Waldorf K, Boardman K (2002) Perspective on reconstruction after mastectomy. Am J Surg 183:562–565CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Bronz G, Bronz L (2002) Mammary reconstruction with skin-expander and silicone protheses: 15 years experience. Aesth Plast Surg 26:215–218CrossRef Bronz G, Bronz L (2002) Mammary reconstruction with skin-expander and silicone protheses: 15 years experience. Aesth Plast Surg 26:215–218CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Bruant-Rodier C, Mathelin C, Rodier JF, Kjartansdottir T, Meyer N (2004) Immediate breast reconstruction: who is more satisfied, the surgeon or the patient? Eur J Plast Surg 27:4–7CrossRef Bruant-Rodier C, Mathelin C, Rodier JF, Kjartansdottir T, Meyer N (2004) Immediate breast reconstruction: who is more satisfied, the surgeon or the patient? Eur J Plast Surg 27:4–7CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chawla AK, Kachnic LA, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, Zapton DT, Powell SN (2002) Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: Complications and cosmesis with TRAM versus tissue expander/implant. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 54(2):520–526CrossRef Chawla AK, Kachnic LA, Taghian AG, Niemierko A, Zapton DT, Powell SN (2002) Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: Complications and cosmesis with TRAM versus tissue expander/implant. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 54(2):520–526CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Clough KB, O’Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, Nos C, Falcou M-C (2001) Prospective Evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 107(7):1702–1709CrossRef Clough KB, O’Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, Nos C, Falcou M-C (2001) Prospective Evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: I. Implant reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 107(7):1702–1709CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Danforth DN (2000) Comments on skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a critical analysis of local recurrence. Cancer J 6(5):285–286PubMed Danforth DN (2000) Comments on skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a critical analysis of local recurrence. Cancer J 6(5):285–286PubMed
8.
go back to reference Finlayson CA, MacDermott TA, Arya J (2001) Can specific preoperative counselling increase the likelihood a woman will choose postmastectomy breast reconstruction? Am J Surg 182:649–653CrossRefPubMed Finlayson CA, MacDermott TA, Arya J (2001) Can specific preoperative counselling increase the likelihood a woman will choose postmastectomy breast reconstruction? Am J Surg 182:649–653CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Harcourt DM, Rumsey NJ, Ambler NR, Cawthorn SJ, Reid CD, Maddox PR, Kenealy JM, Rainsbury RM, Umpleby HC (2003) The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: a prospective, multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1060–1068CrossRefPubMed Harcourt DM, Rumsey NJ, Ambler NR, Cawthorn SJ, Reid CD, Maddox PR, Kenealy JM, Rainsbury RM, Umpleby HC (2003) The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: a prospective, multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1060–1068CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hidalgo DA (1998) Aesthetic refinement in breast reconstruction: complete skin-sparing mastectomy with autogenous tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(1):63–70PubMed Hidalgo DA (1998) Aesthetic refinement in breast reconstruction: complete skin-sparing mastectomy with autogenous tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(1):63–70PubMed
11.
go back to reference Hudson DA, Skoll PJ (2001) Single-stage, autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(5):1163–1173CrossRefPubMed Hudson DA, Skoll PJ (2001) Single-stage, autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(5):1163–1173CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Keith DJW, Walker MB, Walker LG, Heys SD, Sarkar TK, Hutcheon AW, Eremin O (2003) Women who wish breast reconstruction: characteristics, fears and hopes. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(3):1051–1059CrossRefPubMed Keith DJW, Walker MB, Walker LG, Heys SD, Sarkar TK, Hutcheon AW, Eremin O (2003) Women who wish breast reconstruction: characteristics, fears and hopes. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(3):1051–1059CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Khoo A, Kroll SS, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GRD, Robb GL, Baldwin BJ, Wang G, Schustermann MA (1998) A comparison of resource costs of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 101(4):64–970PubMed Khoo A, Kroll SS, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Evans GRD, Robb GL, Baldwin BJ, Wang G, Schustermann MA (1998) A comparison of resource costs of immediate and delayed breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 101(4):64–970PubMed
14.
go back to reference Kroll SS, Baldwin B (1992) A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 90(3):455–462PubMed Kroll SS, Baldwin B (1992) A comparison of outcomes using three different methods of breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 90(3):455–462PubMed
15.
go back to reference Malata CM, McIntosh SA, Purushotham AD (2000) Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 87:1455–1472CrossRefPubMed Malata CM, McIntosh SA, Purushotham AD (2000) Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Br J Surg 87:1455–1472CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Robbins TH (1979) Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction. Aust N Z J Surg 49(5):527–530PubMed Robbins TH (1979) Rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap for breast reconstruction. Aust N Z J Surg 49(5):527–530PubMed
17.
go back to reference Rowland JH, Dioso J, Holland JC (1995) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: who seeks it, who refuses it? Plast Reconstr Surg 95:812–822PubMed Rowland JH, Dioso J, Holland JC (1995) Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: who seeks it, who refuses it? Plast Reconstr Surg 95:812–822PubMed
18.
go back to reference Sakorafas GH (2001) Breast cancer surgery. Historical evolution, current status and future perspectives. Acta Oncologica 40:5–13CrossRefPubMed Sakorafas GH (2001) Breast cancer surgery. Historical evolution, current status and future perspectives. Acta Oncologica 40:5–13CrossRefPubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Slavin SA, Schnitt SJ, Duda RB, Houlihan MJ, Koufman CN, Morris DJ, Troyan SL, Goldwyn RM (1998) Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: Oncological risks and aesthetic results in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(1):49–62PubMed Slavin SA, Schnitt SJ, Duda RB, Houlihan MJ, Koufman CN, Morris DJ, Troyan SL, Goldwyn RM (1998) Skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction: Oncological risks and aesthetic results in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(1):49–62PubMed
21.
go back to reference Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, Davis JA, Kim HM, Roth RS, Goldfarb S, Izenberg PH, Houin HP, Shaheen KW (2000) Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(5):1014–1025CrossRefPubMed Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, Davis JA, Kim HM, Roth RS, Goldfarb S, Izenberg PH, Houin HP, Shaheen KW (2000) Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(5):1014–1025CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Immediate or delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy: what do women really want
Authors
K. Belouli
P. Wyss
S. Vetter
V. E. Meyer
G. M. Beer
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Issue 5/2005
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-005-0778-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2005

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 5/2005 Go to the issue