Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neuroradiology 3/2018

01-03-2018 | Diagnostic Neuroradiology

Combining monoenergetic extrapolations from dual-energy CT with iterative reconstructions: reduction of coil and clip artifacts from intracranial aneurysm therapy

Authors: Sebastian Winklhofer, Ricarda Hinzpeter, Daniel Stocker, Gerasimos Baltsavias, Lars Michels, Jan-Karl Burkhardt, Luca Regli, Antonios Valavanis, Hatem Alkadhi

Published in: Neuroradiology | Issue 3/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare and to combine iterative metal artifact reduction (MAR) and virtual monoenergetic extrapolations (VMEs) from dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for reducing metal artifacts from intracranial clips and coils.

Methods

Fourteen clips and six coils were scanned in a phantom model with DECT at 100 and 150SnkVp. Four datasets were reconstructed: non-corrected images (filtered-back projection), iterative MAR, VME from DECT at 120 keV, and combined iterative MAR + VME images. Artifact severity scores and visibility of simulated, contrast-filled, adjacent vessels were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively by two independent, blinded readers.

Results

Iterative MAR, VME, and combined iterative MAR + VME resulted in a significant reduction of qualitative (p < 0.001) and quantitative clip artifacts (p < 0.005) and improved the visibility of adjacent vessels (p < 0.05) compared to non-corrected images, with lowest artifact scores found in combined iterative MAR + VME images. Titanium clips demonstrated less artifacts than Phynox clips (p < 0.05), and artifact scores increased with clip size. Coil artifacts increased with coil size but were reducible when applying iterative MAR + VME compared to non-corrected images. However, no technique improved the severe artifacts from large, densely packed coils.

Conclusions

Combining iterative MAR with VME allows for an improved metal artifact reduction from clips and smaller, loosely packed coils. Limited value was found for large and densely packed coils.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Psychogios MN, Scholz B, Rohkohl C, Kyriakou Y, Mohr A, Schramm P, Wachter D, Wasser K, Knauth M (2013) Impact of a new metal artefact reduction algorithm in the noninvasive follow-up of intracranial clips, coils, and stents with flat-panel angiographic CTA: initial results. Neuroradiology 55(7):813–818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-013-1165-6 CrossRefPubMed Psychogios MN, Scholz B, Rohkohl C, Kyriakou Y, Mohr A, Schramm P, Wachter D, Wasser K, Knauth M (2013) Impact of a new metal artefact reduction algorithm in the noninvasive follow-up of intracranial clips, coils, and stents with flat-panel angiographic CTA: initial results. Neuroradiology 55(7):813–818. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00234-013-1165-6 CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference van der Schaaf I, van Leeuwen M, Vlassenbroek A, Velthuis B (2006) Minimizing clip artifacts in multi CT angiography of clipped patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(1):60–66PubMed van der Schaaf I, van Leeuwen M, Vlassenbroek A, Velthuis B (2006) Minimizing clip artifacts in multi CT angiography of clipped patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(1):60–66PubMed
11.
go back to reference De Crop A, Casselman J, Van Hoof T, Dierens M, Vereecke E, Bossu N, Pamplona J, D'Herde K, Thierens H, Bacher K (2015) Analysis of metal artifact reduction tools for dental hardware in CT scans of the oral cavity: kVp, iterative reconstruction, dual-energy CT, metal artifact reduction software: does it make a difference? Neuroradiology 57(8):841–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1537-1 CrossRefPubMed De Crop A, Casselman J, Van Hoof T, Dierens M, Vereecke E, Bossu N, Pamplona J, D'Herde K, Thierens H, Bacher K (2015) Analysis of metal artifact reduction tools for dental hardware in CT scans of the oral cavity: kVp, iterative reconstruction, dual-energy CT, metal artifact reduction software: does it make a difference? Neuroradiology 57(8):841–849. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00234-015-1537-1 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Winklhofer S, Benninger E, Spross C, Morsbach F, Rahm S, Ross S, Jost B, Thali MJ, Stolzmann P, Alkadhi H, Guggenberger R (2014) CT metal artefact reduction for internal fixation of the proximal humerus: value of mono-energetic extrapolation from dual-energy and iterative reconstructions. Clin Radiol 69(5):e199–e206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.12.011 CrossRefPubMed Winklhofer S, Benninger E, Spross C, Morsbach F, Rahm S, Ross S, Jost B, Thali MJ, Stolzmann P, Alkadhi H, Guggenberger R (2014) CT metal artefact reduction for internal fixation of the proximal humerus: value of mono-energetic extrapolation from dual-energy and iterative reconstructions. Clin Radiol 69(5):e199–e206. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​crad.​2013.​12.​011 CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Higashigaito K, Angst F, Runge VM, Alkadhi H, Donati OF (2015) Metal artifact reduction in pelvic computed tomography with hip prostheses: comparison of virtual monoenergetic extrapolations from dual-energy computed tomography and an iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm in a phantom study. Investig Radiol 50(12):828–834. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000191 CrossRef Higashigaito K, Angst F, Runge VM, Alkadhi H, Donati OF (2015) Metal artifact reduction in pelvic computed tomography with hip prostheses: comparison of virtual monoenergetic extrapolations from dual-energy computed tomography and an iterative metal artifact reduction algorithm in a phantom study. Investig Radiol 50(12):828–834. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1097/​RLI.​0000000000000191​ CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Guggenberger R, Winklhofer S, Osterhoff G, Wanner GA, Fortunati M, Andreisek G, Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P (2012) Metallic artefact reduction with monoenergetic dual-energy CT: systematic ex vivo evaluation of posterior spinal fusion implants from various vendors and different spine levels. Eur Radiol 22(11):2357–2364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2501-7 CrossRefPubMed Guggenberger R, Winklhofer S, Osterhoff G, Wanner GA, Fortunati M, Andreisek G, Alkadhi H, Stolzmann P (2012) Metallic artefact reduction with monoenergetic dual-energy CT: systematic ex vivo evaluation of posterior spinal fusion implants from various vendors and different spine levels. Eur Radiol 22(11):2357–2364. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00330-012-2501-7 CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC, Kirkwood BR (2003) Essential medical statistics, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Malden Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC, Kirkwood BR (2003) Essential medical statistics, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science, Malden
31.
go back to reference Hegde A, Chan LL, Tan L, Illyyas M, Lim WE (2009) Dual energy CT and its use in neuroangiography. Ann Acad Med Singap 38(9):817–820PubMed Hegde A, Chan LL, Tan L, Illyyas M, Lim WE (2009) Dual energy CT and its use in neuroangiography. Ann Acad Med Singap 38(9):817–820PubMed
35.
go back to reference Pechlivanis I, Harders A, Tuttenberg J, Barth M, Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Schmieder K (2009) Computed tomographic angiography: diagnostic procedure of choice in the management of subarachnoid hemorrhage in the elderly patient? Cerebrovasc Dis 28(5):481–489. https://doi.org/10.1159/000236526 CrossRefPubMed Pechlivanis I, Harders A, Tuttenberg J, Barth M, Schulte-Altedorneburg G, Schmieder K (2009) Computed tomographic angiography: diagnostic procedure of choice in the management of subarachnoid hemorrhage in the elderly patient? Cerebrovasc Dis 28(5):481–489. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​000236526 CrossRefPubMed
36.
Metadata
Title
Combining monoenergetic extrapolations from dual-energy CT with iterative reconstructions: reduction of coil and clip artifacts from intracranial aneurysm therapy
Authors
Sebastian Winklhofer
Ricarda Hinzpeter
Daniel Stocker
Gerasimos Baltsavias
Lars Michels
Jan-Karl Burkhardt
Luca Regli
Antonios Valavanis
Hatem Alkadhi
Publication date
01-03-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Neuroradiology / Issue 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0028-3940
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1920
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-018-1981-9

Other articles of this Issue 3/2018

Neuroradiology 3/2018 Go to the issue